Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Thirty years since J. Davidovits introduced geopolymers considered now as hypo-crystalline materials within the mers-framework and the effect of oxygen binding: a review

  • Published:
Journal of Thermal Analysis and Calorimetry Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The development of new materials called geopolymers is described, which at the turn of the nineties brought a new state of the art in material design through the so-called wet process resulting in a specific amorphous state. The classical configuration of glasses prepared by quenching is used for a joint appraisal and judgment. We can use the comparison and description of the known form of organic polymers with the so-called mers-structure. The formation involves a sol–gel polycondensation chemical reaction also known in the case of organic polymers. The formation is described using aluminosilicate oxide in IV-fold coordination with alkaline polysilicates to form polymeric Si–O–Al chains through amorphous to semi- and hypo-crystalline three-dimensional silico-aluminate structures. The revision of structural units and their interconnection is evaluated, and it turns out that the common factor of the multiparty description is the existence of bridging and non-bridging oxygen. The review provides a detailed overview of opinion while reminding that the historical origin of the field falls within the purview of the JTAC journal.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig.1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Davidovits J. Geopolymers. J Therm Anal. 1991;37(8):1633–56.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Koga N, Strnad Z, Sestak J, Strnad J. Thermodynamics of non-bridging oxygen in silica bio-compatible glass-ceramics—mimetic material for the bone tissue substitution. J Therm Anal Calorim. 2003;71(3):927–37.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Davidovits J, Davidovics M. Geopolymer: room-temperature ceramic matrix for composites. In: Proceedings of the 12th annual conference on composites and advanced ceramic materials: ceramic engineering and science proceedings. 1988, pp 835–41

  4. Davidovits J. Geopolymers and geopolymeric materials. J Therm Anal. 1989;35(2):429–41.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Barrer RM. Some researched on silicates: mineral synthesis and metamorphosis. Trans Br Ceram Soc. 1957;56:155–61.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Gluchovskij VD. Gruntosilikaty. Kiev: Gosstrojizdat; 1959.

    Google Scholar 

  7. Knight CTG, Balec RJ, Kinrade SD. The structure of silicate anions in aqueous alkaline solutions. Angew Chem Int Ed. 2007;46(43):8148–52.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Toop GW, Somis CS. Some new ionic concepts of silicate slags. Can Metall Q. 1962;1(2):129–52.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Masson CR. Anionic constitution of glass-forming melts. J Non-Cryst Solids. 1977;25(1):1–41.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Těmkin M. Mixtures of fused salts as ionic solutions. Acta Physicoch URSS. 1945;20:4511–9.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Davidovits J. Geopolymers: ceramic-like inorganic polymers. J Ceram Sci Technol. 2017;8(3):335–50.

    Google Scholar 

  12. Kriven WM, Bell JL, Gordon M. Microstructure and microchemistry of fully-reacted geopolymers and geopolymer matrix composites. In: International symposium on recent advances in ceramic matrix composites. Nashville, 2003, pp 227–50.

  13. Rahier H, VanMele B, Biesemans M, Wastiels J, Wu X. Low-temperature synthesized aluminosilicate glasses. 1. Low-temperature reaction stoichiometry and structure of a model compound. J Mater Sci. 1996;31(1):71–9.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Rowles MR, O’Connor BH. Chemical and structural microanalysis of aluminosilicate geopolymers synthesized by sodium silicate activation of metakaolinite. J Am Ceram Soc. 2009;92(10):2354–61.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Kriven WM. Inorganic polysialates or “geopolymers.” Am Ceram Soc Bull. 2010;89(4):31–4.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Šestak J, Foller B. Some aspects of composite inorganic polysialates. J Therm Anal Calorim. 2012;108(2):511–7.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Provis JL, Palomo A, Shi CJ. Advances in understanding alkali-activated materials. Cem Concr Res. 2015;78:110–25.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Mysen BO, Shang J. Evidence from olivine/melt element partitioning that nonbridging oxygen in silicate melts are not equivalent. Geochim Cosmochim Acta. 2005;69(11):2861–75.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Machacek J, Gedeon O, Liska M. Group connectivity in binary silicate glasses. J Non-Cryst Solids. 2006;352(21–22):2173–9.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Greaves GN, Sen S. Inorganic glasses, glass-forming liquids and amorphizing solids. Adv Phys. 2007;56(1):1–166.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Šestak J, Strnad Z, Strnad J, Holecek M, Koga N. Biomedical thermodynamics and implantology aspects of biocompatible glass-ceramics and otherwise modified inorganic materials and surfaces. In: 9th Conference of the European-society-of-glass-science-and-technology/annual meeting of the international-commission-on-glass. Trencin, SLOVAKIA; 2008, pp 329.

  22. Závěta K, Šesták J. Structure, bridging oxygen and magnetic properties of Fe-rich oxide glasses. In: 21st International congress on glass. Prague: Dům techniky ČVTS; 1977, pp 399.

  23. Šesták J. Nonbridging oxygen in silica biocompatible glass ceramics and magnetic properties of Fe2O3 added borate glasses. In: Šesták J, Holeček M, Málek J, editors. Some thermodynamic, structural and behavioral aspects of glassy and amorphous materials. Plzeň: OPS-ZČU Plzeň; 2009. p. 128–51.

    Google Scholar 

  24. Komnitsas K, Zaharaki D. Geopolymerisation: a review and prospects for the minerals industry. Min Eng. 2007;20(14):1261–77.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Khale D, Chaudhary R. Mechanism of geopolymerization and factors influencing its development: a review. J Mater Sci. 2007;42(3):729–46.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Duxson P, Fernández-Jiménez A, Provis JL, Lukey GC, Palomo A, van Deventer JSJ. Geopolymer technology: the current state of the art. J Mater Sci. 2007;42(9):2917–33.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Li C, Sun HH, Li LT. A review: the comparison between alkali-activated slag (Si plus Ca) and metakaolin (Si plus Al) cements. Cem Concr Res. 2010;40(9):1341–9.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Lopes AC, Martins P, Lanceros-Mendez S. Aluminosilicate and aluminosilicate based polymer composites: present status, applications and future trends. Prog Surf Sci. 2014;89(3–4):239–77.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Palomo A, Krivenko P, Garcia-Lodeiro I, Kavalerova E, Maltseva O, Fernandez-Jimeneza A. A review on alkaline activation: new analytical perspectives. Mater Constr. 2014;64(315):e022.

    Google Scholar 

  30. Nikolov A, Nugteren H, Rostovsky I. Optimization of geopolymers based on natural zeolite clinoptilolite by calcination and use of aluminate activators. Constr Build Mater. 2020;243:118257.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Cong PL, Cheng YQ. Advances in geopolymer materials: a comprehensive review. J Traffic Transp Eng Engl Ed. 2021;8(3):283–314.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Castillo H, Collado H, Droguett T, Vesely M, Garrido P, Palma S. State of the art of geopolymers: a review. E-Polymers. 2022;22(1):108–24.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Zribi M, Baklouti S. Phosphate-based geopolymers: a critical review. Polym Bull. 2022;79(9):6827–55.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Longhi MA, Rodriguez ED, Walkley B, Eckhard D, Zhang ZH, Provis JL, et al. Metakaolin-based geopolymers: efflorescence and its effect on microstructure and mechanical properties. Ceram Int. 2022;48(2):2212–29.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Marvila MT, Azevedo ARG, Vieira CMF. Reaction mechanisms of alkali-activated materials, a review. Rev IBRACON Estrut Mater. 2021;14(3):e14309.

    Google Scholar 

  36. Šesták J, Koga N, Šimon P, Foller B, Roubíček P, Wu N-LN. Amorphous inorganic polysialates: geopolymeric composites and the bioactivity of hydroxyl groups. In: Šesták J, Šimon P, editors. Thermal analysis of micro, nano- and non-crystalline materials: transformation, crystallization, kinetics and thermodynamics. Dordrecht: Springer; 2013. p. 441–60.

    Google Scholar 

  37. Šestak J. Non-bridging oxygen in silica biocompatible glasses, ceramics, polysialates and geopolymers. In: Sestak J, editor. Thermal analysis and thermodynamic properties of solids. 2nd ed. Amsterdam: Elsevier; 2021. p. 437–58.

    Google Scholar 

  38. Šestak J. Miracle of reinforced states of matter. Glasses: ancient and innovative materials for the third millennium. J Therm Anal Calorim. 2000;61(1):305–23.

    Google Scholar 

  39. Collins LE. Overview of rapid solidification technology. Can Metallu Q. 1986;25(1):59–72.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Kramer MJ, Mecco H, Dennis KW, Vargonova E, McCallum RW, Napolitano RE. Rapid solidification and metallic glass formation—experimental and theoretical limits. J Non-Cryst Solids. 2007;353(32–40):3633–9.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Šesták J. The art and horizont of non-equilibriated and disordered states and the new glassy phase rapid formation techniques. Glass Sci Technol. 1997;70(1):153–63.

    Google Scholar 

  42. Kawazoe Y, Carow-Watamura U, Louzguine DV. A brief introduction to bulk metallic glasses: datasheet from condensed matter. In: Carow-Watamura U, editor. Phase diagrams and physical properties of nonequilibrium alloys, vol. 37C3. Berlin: Springer; 2013. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-57920-6_1.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  43. Illeková E, Šesták J. Crystallization of metallic micro-, nano-, and non-crystalline alloys. In: Šesták J, Šimon P, editors. Thermal analysis of micro, nano- and non-crystalline materials: transformation, crystallization, kinetics and thermodynamics. Dordrecht: Springer; 2013. p. 257–89.

    Google Scholar 

  44. Prasad N. Introduction to metallic glasses. Metallic glass–based nanocomposites. Boca Raton: CRC Press; 2019.

    Google Scholar 

  45. Queiroz CA, Šestak J. Aspects of the non-crystalline state. Phys Chem Glass Eur J Glass Sci Technol Part B. 2010;51(3):165–72.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  46. Kozmidis-Petrovic A, Šestak J. Forty years of the Hruby glass-forming coefficient via DTA when comparing other criteria in relation to the glass stability and vitrification ability. J Therm Anal Calorim. 2012;110(2):997–1004.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  47. Šestak J, Šestakova V, Třiska A, Zavěta K. Glass-formation, phase-relations and magnetic-properties of the splat-quenched system of laser-melted (FE, MN)2O3-(BI, B)2O3. J Therm Anal Calorim. 1988;33(3):789–95.

    Google Scholar 

  48. Iordanova R, Dimitriev Y, Dimitrov V, Kassabov S, Klissurski D. Glass formation and structure in the system MoO3–Bi2O3–Fe2O3. J Non-Cryst Solids. 1998;231(3):227–33.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  49. Šestak J. Use of phenomenological kinetics and the enthalpy versus temperature diagram (and its derivative—DTA) for a better understanding of transition processes in glasses. Thermochim Acta. 1996;280:175–90.

    Google Scholar 

  50. Schumacher O, Marvel CJ, Kelly MN, Cantwell PR, Vinci RP, Rickman JM, et al. Complexion time-temperature-transformation (TTT) diagrams: opportunities and challenges. Curr Opin Solid State Mater Sci. 2016;20(5):316–23.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  51. Šesták J. Thermal analysis and thermodynamic properties of solids. 2nd ed. Amsterdam: Elsevier; 2021.

    Google Scholar 

  52. Machaček J, Gedeon O. Q-species in alkali-disilicate glasses. Ceram Silik. 2003;47(2):45–9.

    Google Scholar 

  53. Liška M, Klement R, Machaček J, Gedeon O. Inverse thermodynamic modelling of glass from Raman spectroscopical and molecular dynamics results. Phys Chem Glasses. 2005;46(2):108–11.

    Google Scholar 

  54. Liška M, Macháček J, Gedeon O. Molecular dynamics of the Na2O–MgO–SiO2 system. Glass Sci Technol. 2004;77(1):267.

    Google Scholar 

  55. Zaharaki D, Komnitsas K, Perdikatsis V. Use of analytical techniques for identification of inorganic polymer gel composition. J Mater Sci. 2010;45(10):2715–24.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  56. Gasca-Tirado JR, Manzano-Ramírez A, Rivera Muñoz EM, Velázquez-Castillo R, Apátiga-Castro M, Nava R, et al. Ion exchange in geopolymers. In: Selcan K, editor., et al., New trends in ion exchange studies. Rijeka: IntechOpen; 2018.

    Google Scholar 

  57. Virgo D, Mysen BO, Kushiro I. Anionic constitution of 1-atmosphere silicate melts—implications for the structure of igneous melts. Science. 1980;208(4450):1371–3.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. Mysen B, Richet P. Silicate glasses and melts. 2nd ed. Amsterdam: Elsevier; 2019.

    Google Scholar 

  59. Steevels IM. Neue erkenntnisse uber die struktur des glases. Philips Tech Rundschau. 1960;9–10:337.

    Google Scholar 

  60. Hench LL. Bioactive ceramics. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 1988;523(1):54–71.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  61. Masson CR. Ionic equilibria in liquid silicates. J Am Ceram Soc. 1968;51(3):134–0.

    Google Scholar 

  62. Hench LL. Glasses and genes: a forecast for the future. Glass Sci Technol. 1997;70:439–48.

    Google Scholar 

  63. Hench LL. Life and death: The ultimate phase transformation. Thermochim Acta. 1996;280:1–13.

    Google Scholar 

  64. Šestak J, Liška M, Hubik P. 12—Oxide glass structure, bridging oxygen and feasible magnetic and structural properties due to the addition of Fe/Mn oxides. In: Sestak J, Mares JJ, Hubik P, editors. Glassy, amorphous and nano-crystalline materials: thermal physics, analysis, structure and properties. Dordrecht: Springer; 2011.

    Google Scholar 

  65. Provis JL, Van Deventer JSJ. Geopolymers: structures, processing, properties and industrial applicatiosn. Sawston: Woodhead Publishing; 2009.

    Google Scholar 

  66. Mazen A, Han-Yong J. Geopolymers and other geosynthetics. Rijeka: Intechopen; 2020.

    Google Scholar 

  67. Davidovits J. Geopolymer chemistry and applications. 5th ed. Saint-Quentin: Geopolymer Institute; 2020.

    Google Scholar 

  68. Kóth J, Sinkó K. Geopolymer composites-in environmentally friendly aspects. Gels. 2023;9:196. https://doi.org/10.3390/gels9030196.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  69. Šestak J, Černy R. Thermotics as an alternative nonequilibrium thermodynamic approach suitable for real thermoanalytical measurements: a short review. J Non-Equilib Thermodyn. 2022;47:233–40.

    Google Scholar 

  70. Plasencia G, Jaramillo D. Thermochemistry in materials processing. Berlin: Springer; 2017.

    Google Scholar 

  71. Delhaes P. Materials and thermodynamics (materials science). Hoboken: Wiley; 2017.

    Google Scholar 

  72. Klimm D. Thermal analysis and thermodynamics in materials science. Berlin: De Gruyter; 2022.

    Google Scholar 

  73. Ebeid EZ, Zakaria M. Thermal analysis: from introductory fundamentals to advanced applications. Amsterdam: Elsevier; 2021.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research has been supported by the Technology Agency of the Czech Republic under project No. FW01010229 and by the specific research project of the University of West Bohemia in Pilsen, NaturTech4 SGS-2022-921.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Materials Engineering and Chemistry, Faculty of Civil Engineering, Czech Technical University in Prague, Thákurova 7, 166 29, Prague 6, Czech Republic

    Jaroslav Šesták, Václav Kočí & Robert Černý

  2. Institute of New Technologies - Research Centre of the Westbohemian Region, University of West Bohemia, Universitní 8, 30114, Pilsen, Czech Republic

    Jaroslav Šesták & Tomáš Kovařík

Authors
  1. Jaroslav Šesták
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Václav Kočí
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Robert Černý
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Tomáš Kovařík
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jaroslav Šesták.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Šesták, J., Kočí, V., Černý, R. et al. Thirty years since J. Davidovits introduced geopolymers considered now as hypo-crystalline materials within the mers-framework and the effect of oxygen binding: a review. J Therm Anal Calorim 148, 10455–10463 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10973-023-12312-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10973-023-12312-z

Keywords

Search

Navigation