Skip to main content
Log in

Differences in coating mechanism of structurally different aluminosilicates observed through the thermal analysis

  • Published:
Journal of Thermal Analysis and Calorimetry Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Systematic modification of three structurally different minerals (zeolite, mica, and vermiculite) was carried out with the aim of determining the modification mechanism and exposing the hydrophobic surface that can be used as a sorbent for many organic compounds. Mechanism of modification with cationic surfactant depends strongly on the mineral type. In order to identify the influence of aluminosilicates structural differences on the modification process, adsorption experiments with organic matter and water vapor, supplemented with the DTA/TG analysis, were performed. The cation exchange capacity (CEC) value was 1454 > 560 > 28 meq kg−1 for zeolite (clinoptilolite), vermiculite, and mica (muscovite), respectively. Despite its CEC value, vermiculite adsorbed three times the amount of organic matter than did clinoptilolite due to the porous structure of zeolite, which acted to limit the adsorption only on the external exchangeable cations. If the loading amount is equal to the CEC or the external cation exchange capacity for clinoptilolite (ECEC ≈ 10% CEC), the monolayer will form while mineral surface will have hydrophobic character. Only one active center exists at the surface of the clinoptilolite that was identified by DTA curves with a sharp and defined peak around 300 °C and by the mass loss at the TG diagrams. Two significant and equal active centers were observed in vermiculite, one for the exchange of the surface cations and the other for the interlayer cations and H2O molecules. Muscovite CEC is negligible, and due to the absence of any other functional groups, the modification of this mineral was impossible.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Wan Ngah WS, Isa IM. Comparison study of copper ion adsorption on chitosan, Dowex A-1, and Zerolit 225. J Appl Polym Sci. 1998;67:1067–70.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Crini G. Recent developments in polysaccharide-based materials used as adsorbents in wastewater treatment. Prog Polym Sci. 2005;30:38–70.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Ajmal M, Rao R, Ahmad J. Adsorption studies on Citrus reticulata (fruit peel of orange): removal and recovery of Ni(II) from electroplating wastewater. J Hazard Mater. 2000;79:117–31.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Amana T, Kazi AA, Sabri MU, Banoa Q. Potato peels as solid waste for the removal of heavy metal copper (II) from waste water/industrial effluent. Colloids Surf B: Biointerfaces. 2008;63:116–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Kurniawan TA, Chan GYS, Lo W, Babel S. Comparisons of low-cost adsorbents for treating wastewaters laden with heavy metals. Sci Total Environ. 2006;366:409–26.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Ahluwalia SS, Goyal D. Biosorption of Cu(II) from aqueous solution by Fucus serratus: surface characterization and sorption mechanisms. Bioresour Technol. 2008;99:6150–5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Šćiban M, Radetić B, Kevrešanin Ž, Klašnja M. Adsorption of heavy metals from electroplating wastewater by wood sawdust. Bioresour Technol. 2007;98:402–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Carmody O, Frost R, Xi Y, Kokot S. Adsorption of hydrocarbons on organo-clays—implications for oil spill remediation. J Colloid Interface Sci. 2007;305:17–24.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Wang D, Liu Q, Cheng H, Zhang S, Zuo X. Effect of reaction temperature on intercalation of octyltrimethylammonium chloride into kaolinite. J Therm Anal Calorim. 2017;128(3):1555–64.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Chun Y, Sheng GY, Boyd SA. Sorptive characteristics of tetraalkylammonium-exchanged smectite clays. Clay Clay Miner. 2003;51:451–8.

    Google Scholar 

  11. Boyd SA, Chiou CT, Mortland MM. Sorption characteristics of organic compounds on hexadecyltrimethylammoniumsmectite. Soil Sci Soc Am J. 1998;52:652–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Boyd SA, Jaynes WF, Ross BS. Immobilization of organic contaminants by organo-clays. Application to soil restoration and hazardous waste containment. In: Baker RS, editor. Organic substances and sediments in water. Chelsea: Lewis Publishers; 1989. p. 181–200.

    Google Scholar 

  13. Yariv S, Borisover M, Lapides I. Few introducing comments on the thermal analysis of organoclays. J Therm Anal Calorim. 2011;105:897–906.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Lemić J, Kovačević D, Tomašević-Čanović M, Kovačević D, Stanić T, Pfend R. Removal of atrazine, lindane and diazinone from water by organo-zeolites. Water Res. 2006;40:1079–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Kovacević D, Lemić J, Damjanović M, Petronijević R, Janaćković Đ, Stanić T. Fenitrothion adsorption—desorption on organo—minerals. Appl Clay Sci. 2011;52:109–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Lemić J, Tomašević-Čanović M, Adamović M, Kovačević D, Milićević S. Competitive adsorption of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons on organo-zeolites. Microporous Mesoporous Mater. 2007;105:317–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Milićević S, Matović LJ, Petrović Đ, Đukić A, Milošević V, Đokić D, Kumrić K. Surfactant modification and adsorption properties of clinoptilolite for the removal of pertechnetate from aqueous solutions. J Radioanal Nucl Chem. 2016;310:805–15.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Gottardi G, Galli E. General information on zeolites. Natural Zeolites. Berlin: Springer; 1985. p. 1–34.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  19. Doula M. Removal of Mn2 + ions from drinking water by using clinoptilolite and a clinoptilolite-Fe oxide system. Water Res. 2006;40:3167–76.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Schulze DG, Dixon JB, Weed SB. Minerals in soil environments. Medison: SSSA; 1989.

    Google Scholar 

  21. Grimshaw RW. The chemistry and physics of clays. London: Ernest Benn Limited; 1971.

    Google Scholar 

  22. Jansson SO, Modin R, Schill G. Two phase titration of organic ammonium ions with lauryl sulphate and methyl yellow as indicator. Talanta. 1974;21(9):905–18.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Dultza S, Riebeb B, Bunnenbergb C. Temperature effects on iodine adsorption on organo-clay minerals II. Structural effects. Appl Clay Sci. 2005;28:17–30.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Uchida Y, Hishiya S, Fujii N, Kohmura K, Nakayama T, Tanaka H, Kikkawa T. Effect of moisture adsorption on the properties of porous-silica ultralow-k films. Microelectron Eng. 2006;83:2126–9.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. De La Calle C, Suquet H, Pons C. Stacking order in a 14.30-A Mg-vermiculite. Clays Clay Miner. 1988;36(6):481–90.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Yariv S. Wettability of clay minerals. In: Schrader ME, Loeb G, editors. Modern approach to wettability. New York: Plenum Press; 1992. p. 279–326.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  27. Yariv S. The role of charcoal on DTA curves of organo-clay complexes: an overview. Appl Clay Sci. 2004;24:225–36.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research has been financed by the Ministry of Education, Science, and Technological Development of Republic of Serbia as part of the Project TR 033007. The authors would like to express their gratitude for this support.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Vladan Milošević.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Milićević, S., Martinović, S., Milošević, V. et al. Differences in coating mechanism of structurally different aluminosilicates observed through the thermal analysis. J Therm Anal Calorim 134, 1011–1019 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10973-018-7351-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10973-018-7351-3

Keywords

Navigation