Introduction

Starch is an environmentally friendly, carbohydrate, macromolecular compound which finds it applications in many field of industry such as a food, pharmaceutical, medicine and paper industries. According to the literature survey, the decomposition mechanism of this natural polymer under various environments, artificial and natural, is widely studied and discussed. Generally, different, simultaneous phase transformations under the heating of starch happen. The most significant of all are melting, evaporation, sublimation, chemical condensation, decomposition and carbonization leading to the creation of the mixture of volatiles [1,2,3,4,5,6]. Due to the availability of starch, its low cost and the presence of hydroxyl groups in its structure, it can be chemically modified and thus different structure starch graft copolymers with potential applications as fillers, stabilizers, impact resistant materials, plastics, modifiers, matrices, excipients, etc., can be prepared. Among them, the thermal properties of starch graft copolymers obtained using different structure methacrylate and acrylate monomers have been widely studied [7,8,9,10,11,12,13,14,15,16,17,18,19,20,21]. Recently, at the Department of Polymer Chemistry UMCS, the intensive studies on the synthesis, physicochemical properties and thermal behavior of novel, non-described in the literature data, starch-g-copolymers are conducted. To this time, we succeed in the preparation the starch-g-copolymers based on aromatic methacrylate and acrylate monomers such as phenyl and benzyl meth(acrylates). The studies of their properties affirmed that the decomposition course of those copolymers is complex and leads to the formation of the mixture of volatile products and covered series, simultaneous processes [22,23,24,25,26]. Due to the fact that those copolymers were characterized by promising physicochemical properties and thermal stability which acted them as attractive materials for the preparation of more environmentally friendly products which could replace petrochemical plastics, we decided to continue our studies on the chemical modification of starch by other methacrylate and acrylate monomers. Lately, applying the monomers prepared from methacryloyl or acryloyl chloride and natural terpene alcohol: citronellol allowed obtaining amphiphilic starch-g-copolymers with excellent chemical resistance toward acidic, neutral and buffer environment, high moisture resistance, which were resistant to polar and nonpolar solvents with satisfactory thermal properties under inert atmosphere. However, most of the materials are processed and manufactured in the presence of air, so the thermal properties of novel materials under oxidative conditions are of high importance on account of their practical utilization. And thus, the present paper describes the thermal properties and the studies on the evaluation of decomposition course of two types of novel materials: starch-g-poly(citronellyl methacrylate) and starch-g-poly(citronellyl acrylate) copolymers which differ in their grafting percent (%G). The influence of copolymer structure on the course of their degradation under the heating in the presence of oxidative conditions has been evaluated.

Materials

To the present studies, the series of copolymers which differ in their grafting percent (%G) were chosen, as shown in Table 1. The copolymers were obtained according to the methodology described in Refs. [24, 26, 27]. Generally, the graft copolymerization conditions are placed in Table 1.

Table 1 Graft copolymerization reaction conditions

Copolymer 1—13C/CP MAS NMR (75.5 MHz, δ ppm)

174.8 (C=O), 81.1, 93.5, 101.8 (CH–O), 72.6 (C–O), 61.5 (CH2–O), 20.0, 25.8, 30.3, 37.5 (CH3, CH2, CH); FTIR (thin film, cm−1): 3336 (ν OH), 2866, 2922, 2945 (ν C–H), 1728 (ν C=O), 1375, 1448 (δ C–H), 1018, 1076, 1150 (ν C–O), 758, 839, 928 (ν=C–H).

Copolymer 2—13C/CP MAS NMR (75.5 MHz, δ ppm)

174.9 (C=O), 81.2, 93.5, 101.7 (CH–O), 72.6 (C–O), 61.6 (CH2–O), 20.1, 25.8, 30.1, 37.7 (CH3, CH2, CH); FTIR (thin film, cm−1): 3338 (ν OH), 2867, 2920, 2947 (ν C–H), 1728 (ν C=O), 1377, 1448 (δ C–H), 1018, 1074, 1150 (ν C–O), 760, 838, 929 (ν=C–H).

Copolymer 3—13C/CP MAS NMR (75.5 MHz, δ ppm)

:174.8 (C=O), 81.1, 93.7, 101.5 (CH–O), 72.5 (C–O), 61.6 (CH2–O), 20.1, 25.6, 30.0, 37.8 (CH3, CH2, CH); FTIR (thin film, cm−1): 3338 (ν OH), 2865, 2921, 2947 (ν C–H), 1728 (ν C=O), 1378, 1445 (δ C–H), 1018, 1074, 1152 (ν C–O), 758, 838, 930 (ν=C–H).

Copolymer 4—13C/CP MAS NMR (75.5 MHz, δ ppm)

176.8 (C=O), 81.3, 93.3, 102.0 (CH–O), 72.6 (C–O), 61.3 (CH2–O), 19.9, 25.7, 30.4, 37.5, 45.1 (CH3, CH2, CH); FTIR (thin film, cm−1): 3320 (ν OH), 2865, 2950 (ν C–H), 1726 (ν C=O), 1370, 1445 (δ C–H), 997, 1014, 1076, 1145 (ν C–O), 748, 840, 927 (ν=C–H).

Copolymer 5—13C/CP MAS NMR (75.5 MHz, δ ppm)

:176.8 (C=O), 81.2, 93.3, 102.1 (CH–O), 72.6 (C–O), 61.4 (CH2–O), 19.9, 25.8, 30.5, 37.5, 45.0 (CH3, CH2, CH); FTIR (thin film, cm−1): 3322 (ν OH), 2867, 2950 (ν C–H), 1726 (ν C=O), 1368, 1445 (δ C–H), 998, 1015, 1076, 1147 (ν C–O), 748, 842, 927 (ν=C–H).

Copolymer 6—13C/CP MAS NMR (75.5 MHz, δ ppm)

176.6 (C=O), 81.3, 93.1, 101.9 (CH–O), 72.6 (C–O), 61.1 (CH2–O), 19.8, 25.5, 30.4, 37.2, 45.1 (CH3, CH2, CH); FTIR (thin film, cm−1): 3324 (ν OH), 2865, 2952 (ν C–H), 1726 (ν C=O), 1370, 1447 (δ C–H), 998, 1014, 10767, 1147 (ν C–O), 749, 840, 925 (ν=C–H).

Methodology

Thermo-oxidative behavior of starch-g-poly(citronellyl acrylate) and starch-g-poly(citronellyl methacrylate) copolymers was studied using a STA 449 F1 Jupiter Netzsch instrument (Germany) linked online with a FTIR gas analyzer Bruker Tensor 27, TGA 585 (Germany). Simultaneous, TG/DTG/DSC studies in Al2O3 crucibles using sensor thermocouple type S TG-DSC, at the temperature range of 40–700 °C with sample mass ca. 10 mg and with a heating rate of 10 °C min−1 were performed. The synthetic air with a flow rate of 100 mL min−1 was applied as a furnace atmosphere. The gaseous FTIR spectra in the range from 600 to 4000 cm−1 with a resolution of 4 cm−1 were collected over the whole analysis time.

Results and discussion

Starch-g-poly(citronellyl acrylate) copolymers

Figure 1 presents the TG, DTG and DSC curves achieved under the heating of starch-g-poly(citronellyl acrylate) copolymers. As it is clearly visible, the course of the presented curves is very similar and it is independent on %G of copolymers. Generally, on TG/DTG curves, three main temperature ranges where the changes in mass loss are indicated. The first mass loss (Δm1) from 2.5 to 4.7% at the temperatures up to ca. 170 °C and with Tmax1 ca. 89–96 °C was observed, as shown in Table 2. In addition, when one have a look at the DSC curves, one can see only one endothermic peak at this temperature range. Analyzing the gaseous FTIR results, gathered at Tmax1, the presence of the absorption signals responsible for the water vapor (bands at the wavelength of approx. 1400–1800 and 3500–3900 cm−1) was indicated, as shown in Fig. 2. So, the results confirmed that this stage was not connected with the degradation of copolymers but only with the physical transformation (water evaporation from the samples which was absorbed under the synthesis of copolymers and the sample storage).

Fig. 1
figure 1

TG, DTG and DSC curves for starch-g-poly(citronellyl acrylate) copolymers in air

Table 2 TG/DTG data for the starch-g-poly(citronellyl acrylate) copolymers in air
Fig. 2
figure 2

Gaseous FTIR spectra for the studied starch-g-poly(citronellyl acrylate) copolymers in air

The second mass loss (Δm2) happens between the temperatures ca. 170–440 °C. It is worth noticing that this stage is composed at least with two, non-well-separated stages. It indicates on the complex course of the studied samples. Commonly, the mass loss in this stage is comparable for all the studied copolymers and amounts ca. 65.6–66.5%. In addition, the first one stage was described by high intensity DTG peak with the rate of the transformation ca. 11.9–12.7% min−1 and DTG peak temperature at ca. 284–286 °C, as shown in Table 2. However, the second one is characterized by low-intensity DTG peak with the rate of the transformation ca. 1.5–2.5% min−1 and similar Tmax2a (399–405 °C). Comparing the DSC curves, its similar course was also observed at these temperature ranges. Only, exothermic signals which were likely due to the oxidation decomposition processes of the studied materials were appeared. The FTIR spectrum of the gases extracted at Tmax2 is a typical gases spectrum for starch decomposition products in oxidative conditions, which is in agreement with the literature data [1,2,3,4,5,6]. However, on the FTIR spectrum gathered at Tmax2a, one can see mainly the emission of CO2 (bands at the wavelength of approx. 670 and 2330–2365 cm−1), CO (bands at the wavelength of approx. 2000 and 2200 cm−1), H2O (bands at the wavelength of approx. 3500–3900 cm−1), CH4 (band at the wavelength of approx. 3014 cm−1) and small amounts of other organic gaseous products. Among them, it can be suspected the occurrence of some species having aliphatic structure which is confirmed by the presence of the bands at the wavelengths at the range of 2860–2960 cm−1 corresponding to the stretching vibrations of C–H and low-intensity bands at the wavelengths of 1380–1460 cm−1 responsible for the deformation vibrations of C–H. Besides those signals, on the FTIR spectrum, small-intensity absorption signal at the wavelength of approx. 3050 cm−1 connected with the stretching vibrations of =C–H and the signals at 900–980 cm−1 which are due to the out-of-plane deformation vibrations could testify to the emission of some alkene species. Unfortunately, the stretching bands of C=C were unseen from the spectra. It could be due to the emission of water vapor which masks the C=C bands. (As it is visible, the water bands give jagged spectra.) Under this decomposition stage, also the absorption bands responsible for the stretching vibrations of C–O (1060–1168 cm−1), for the stretching vibrations of C=O (ca. 1172 cm−1) and the stretching vibrations of C–H in aldehyde group (ca. 2720 cm−1) are clearly appeared [28, 29]. It indicates on the emission of some organics having oxygen in their structure. Taking into account the structure of obtained copolymers and the FTIR results it can be concluded that at temperatures above 300 °C, the decomposition of copolymers assumes a number of simultaneous reactions. Among them, main and side chains scissors, decarboxylation, dehydration and oxidation processes were the most expected. It led to the formation of alkanes, alkenes and aldehydes as main volatile products, as it was shown in Scheme 1.

Scheme 1
scheme 1

The main decomposition products of starch-g-poly(citronellyl acrylate) copolymers at Tmax2a

Finally, third main decomposition stage between the temperatures from ca. 440 °C to ca. 680 °C with Tmax3 at 502–520 °C and similar mass loss (26–28%) was appeared. The DTG peak with intermediate decomposition rate (3.0–3.2% min−1) was detected. At this temperature range, one, broad exothermic signal was visible from DSC curves which suggested the oxidation processes of formed residues. It was confirmed based on the FTIR results where only the emission of inorganic species such as CO2, CO and H2O was detected (Table 2).

Table 3 TG/DTG data for starch-g-poly(citronellyl methacrylate) copolymers in air

Starch-g-poly(citronellyl methacrylate) copolymers

On the thermogravimetric curves, four main temperature ranges where the mass loss of the copolymers under the heating in oxidative atmosphere were observed, as shown in Fig. 3. The first stage was connected with the physical transformation: evaporation of moisture from the copolymers, as it was confirmed based on the gaseous FTIR spectra recorded at Tmax1, as shown in Fig. 4.

Fig. 3
figure 3

TG, DTG and DSC curves for the starch-g-poly(citronellyl methacrylate) copolymers in air

Fig. 4
figure 4

Gaseous FTIR spectra for the studied starch-g-poly(citronellyl methacrylate) copolymers in air

Between the temperatures of 150–210 °C and Tmax2 from 172 to 186 °C, the copolymers start to decompose, Table 3. The mass loss is small, and it does not exceed 10%. In addition, on DTG curves low-intensity peaks with the rate of the transformation ca. 1.2–2.0% min−1 were appeared. The presence of this signal was unexpected since the decomposition of starch and poly(citronellyl methacrylate) polymer happened at relatively higher temperatures [6, 27, 31]. However, analyzing the gaseous FTIR spectra gathered at Tmax2, the appearance of the bands characteristic for the stretching vibrations of C–H at 2827–2977 cm−1, the stretching vibrations of =C–H at 3068 cm−1, the stretching vibrations of C=O at 1700–1790 cm−1, the deformation vibrations of C–H at 1344–1470 cm−1, the stretching vibrations of C–O at 1066–1203 cm−1 and the deformation vibrations of =C–H below 900 cm−1 [28, 29] may indicate on the emission of some fragments from poly(citronellyl methacrylate) as a result of the depolymerization process initiated at the end polymer chains and further oxidation of the emitted species. What is interesting, on the DSC curves, the exothermic signals with Tmax ca. 166–172 °C are observed which is the confirmation that under this decomposition step some of the oxidation processes happen.

The further heating of the copolymers caused their subsequent decomposition and the creation of some other volatiles. The next decomposition stage was visible from the temperature of ca. 210 °C up to the temperature of ca. 430–450 °C, and it was composed of at least three stages named as Tmax3, Tmax3a Tmax3b. The mass loss was similar to all the studied methacrylate copolymers and amounted ca. 60–68%. Dividing this decomposition stage onto two stages: first from the temperature of ca. 210 °C to 315 °C (Tmax3) and the second from 315 °C to 430–450 °C (Tmax3a and Tmax3b) allowed us more accurately evaluating the decomposition course of the copolymers. The mass loss between the temperatures of 210–315 °C was from 32 to 38%. On the gaseous FTIR spectra collected at this temperature range, the presence of the following absorption bands: for water vapor above 3500 cm−1, for CO2 at 670 cm−1 and at 2300–2352 cm−1, for CO at 2000–2200 cm−1, for aldehydes (the stretching vibrations of C–H at 2720 and at 2800 cm−1, the stretching vibrations for C=O at 1735–1743 cm−1), for acids (the stretching vibrations of C–O at 1250–1300 cm−1 and the stretching vibrations of C=O at 1770–1795 cm−1), for furanes (the stretching vibrations of C=C at 1510–1540 cm−1 and the out-of-plane deformation vibrations of C=C at 820–970 cm−1) and for aliphatic species (the stretching vibrations of C–H at 2875–2974 cm−1 and the deformation vibrations of C–H below 900 cm−1) was indicated [28, 29]. The type of the emitted gaseous species proved the decomposition of starch from the copolymers at this stage and the partial oxidation processes of some gaseous decomposition products created under the heating of starch [1,2,3,4,5,630, 31]. The oxidation processes were confirmed based on DSC analysis where only the exothermic signals between the temperatures of 210–315 °C were observed.

In turn, the mass loss in the next temperature range where double, non-well-separated DTG peaks were observed was from 22.5 to 33%. Moreover, at this temperature range, the presence of exothermic signals on the DSC curves was confirmed, as shown in Fig. 3. What is interesting, the FTIR spectra extracted at Tmax3a and Tmax3b have a similar course. It may testify to the creation of similar volatile products and thus on the decomposition of the same part of copolymer. Looking at the FTIR spectra collected at Tmax3a and Tmax3b, one can see the appearance of the signals responsible for the stretching vibrations of =C–H (3083 cm−1), the stretching vibrations of C–H (2873–2990 cm−1), the stretching vibrations of C=O (1735–1790 cm−1), the deformation vibrations of C–H (1360–1450 cm−1), the stretching vibrations of C–O (1039–1290 cm−1), the out-of-plane deformation vibrations of =C–H (800–908 cm−1) and the bands characteristic for CO2, CO and H2O. Additionally, at Tmax3b, the emission of some CH4 was confirmed based on the occurrence of the absorption bands at 3014 cm−1. Although absorption signals at similar wavelengths on the FTIR spectra for starch-g-poly(citronellyl methacrylate) at Tmax3a and Tmax3b, as shown in Fig. 4, and for starch-g-poly(citronellyl acrylate) at Tmax2a, as shown in Fig. 3, were visible, the appearance of the FTIR spectra for starch-g-poly(citronellyl methacrylate) copolymers was quite different. It could indicate on the creation of completely different structure decomposition species under the heating of copolymers 4–6. Also, the exothermic effect at this temperature range is characterized by lower intensity for starch-g-poly(citronellyl methacrylate) copolymers as compared with starch-g-poly(citronellyl acrylate) copolymers, which could be due to the creation of volatiles which are resistant to oxidation, as shown in Figs. 1, 3. Analyzing the obtained results, we could suspect the depolymerization process of poly(citronellyl methacrylate) chains and the creation of citronellyl methacrylate monomer as a main decomposition product at temperatures above 315–320 °C, besides the formation of inorganic species which are due to the decarboxylation and oxidation processes, Scheme 2.

Scheme 2
scheme 2

The main decomposition products of starch-g-poly(citronellyl methacrylate) copolymers at Tmax3a and Tmax3b

The last decomposition stage above the temperature of 430–450 °C with Tmax4 533–555 °C and the mass loss ranges from 29.5 to 21.2% was observed. DTG curves indicated on low-intensity peaks with the rate of the transformation ca. 3.1–3.3% min−1. Moreover, huge, exothermic signals on DSC curves at Tmax ca. 524–556 °C were visible. Under this decomposition stage, the emission of CO2, CO and H2O as main volatile products was the confirmation of the oxidation processes of the formed residues.

Conclusions

Generally, based on the presented results, the course of thermogravimetric and calorimetrical curves and the position and type of absorption bands responsible for the emission of gaseous decomposition products had a similar appearance for copolymers independently on their %G. However, the thermal resistance, decomposition course and the type of volatiles were directly dependent on the type of the studied copolymers.

Comparing the TG/DTG/DSC/FTIR results, it was found completely different decomposition course of starch-g-poly(citronellyl acrylate) copolymers than starch-g-poly(citronellyl methacrylate) copolymers under air conditions.

Starch-g-poly(citronellyl acrylate) copolymers started to decompose at ca. 200–210 °C which was evaluated based on the 5% of mass loss. Its decomposition runs in two main stages visible at the temperature ranges from ca. 170–440 °C to ca. 440–680 °C. According to the gaseous FTIR results, main decomposition volatiles, besides the gaseous products characteristic for the oxidative decomposition of starch, were CO2, CO, H2O, alkane, alkene and aldehyde fragments. It indicated on the random main and side chains scissors, decarboxylation and oxidation of poly(citronellyl acrylate) chains and oxidation of formed residues.

The beginning of the decomposition of starch-g-poly(citronellyl methacrylate) copolymers at ca. 160–170 °C was observed. Its decomposition by three main stages at the temperature ranges of ca. 150–210 °C, ca. 210–430–450 °C and ca. 440–680 °C was characterized. As it was confirmed based on spectroscopic data, main decomposition products, besides the volatiles created from starch, were citronellyl methacrylate, CO2, CO and H2O which were due to the depolymerization of poly(citronellyl methacrylate), decarboxylation and oxidation of formed species and residues.