Abstract
Thermal drying behavior of the municipal sewage sludge in nitrogen atmosphere was explored using a thermal analysis technique under isothermal and nonisothermal drying conditions. The Midilli model, \( {\text{MR}} = \exp ( - kt^{\text{n}} ) + bt \), was the best suitable for predicting both the isothermal and nonisothermal drying behavior of the sewage sludge with the highest R 2. The isothermal drying apparent activation energies of the first falling rate period and the second falling rate period were 18.03 and 11.87 kJ mol−1, respectively. The nonisothermal drying apparent activation energies of sewage sludge were from 33.61 to 47.37 kJ mol−1 in the first falling rate period and from 20.47 to 33.43 kJ mol−1 in the second falling rate period, respectively. In two falling rate periods, the dominant mechanism functions for the isothermal drying were identical, \( - \ln (1 - \alpha ) \). The dominant mechanism functions for the first falling rate period and the second falling rate period in the nonisothermal drying were described by \( [ - \ln (1 - \alpha )]^{1/2} \) and \( [ - \ln (1 - \alpha )]^{1/3} \), respectively.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Tyagi VK, Lo S-L. Sludge: a waste or renewable source for energy and resources recovery? Renew Sustain Energy Rev. 2013;25:708–28. doi:10.1016/j.rser.2013.05.029.
Mills N, Pearce P, Farrow J, Thorpe RB, Kirkby NF. Environmental and economic life cycle assessment of current and future sewage sludge to energy technologies. Waste Manag. 2014;34(1):185–95. doi:10.1016/j.wasman.2013.08.024.
Tuncal T, Uslu O. A review of dehydration of various industrial sludges. Drying Technol. 2014;32(14):1642–54. doi:10.1080/07373937.2014.909846.
Kelessidis A, Stasinakis AS. Comparative study of the methods used for treatment and final disposal of sewage sludge in European countries. Waste Manag. 2012;32(6):1186–95. doi:10.1016/j.wasman.2012.01.012.
Wahidunnabi AK, Eskicioglu C. High pressure homogenization and two-phased anaerobic digestion for enhanced biogas conversion from municipal waste sludge. Water Res. 2014;66:430–46. doi:10.1016/j.watres.2014.08.045.
Hong J, Xu C, Tan X, Chen W. Life cycle assessment of sewage sludge co-incineration in a coal-based power station. Waste Manag. 2013;33(9):1843–52. doi:10.1016/j.wasman.2013.05.007.
Jin L, Zhang G, Tian H. Current state of sewage treatment in China. Water Res. 2014;66:85–98. doi:10.1016/j.watres.2014.08.014.
Zhu F, Jiang H, Zhang Z, Zhao L, Wang J, Hu J, et al. Research on drying effect of different additives on sewage sludge. Proced Environ Sci. 2012;16:357–62. doi:10.1016/j.proenv.2012.10.051.
Zhu F, Zhang Z, Jiang H, Zhao L. The study of sewage sludge thermo-drying efficiency. Proced Environ Sci. 2012;16:363–7. doi:10.1016/j.proenv.2012.10.052.
Bennamoun L, Arlabosse P, Léonard A. Review on fundamental aspect of application of drying process to wastewater sludge. Renew Sustain Energy Rev. 2013;28:29–43. doi:10.1016/j.rser.2013.07.043.
Chen G, Lock Yue P, Mujumdar AS. Sludge dewatering and drying. Drying Technol. 2006;20(4–5):883–916. doi:10.1081/drt-120003768.
Cieślik BM, Namieśnik J, Konieczka P. Review of sewage sludge management: standards, regulations and analytical methods. J Clean Prod. 2015;90:1–15. doi:10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.11.031.
Chen D, Zhang Y, Zhu X. Drying kinetics of rice straw under isothermal and nonisothermal conditions: a comparative study by thermogravimetric analysis. Energy Fuels. 2012;26(7):4189–94.
Font R, Gomez-Rico MF, Fullana A. Skin effect in the heat and mass transfer model for sewage sludge drying. Sep Purif Technol. 2011;77(1):146–61. doi:10.1016/j.seppur.2010.12.001.
Leonard A, Vandevenne P, Salmon T, Marchot P, Crine M. Wastewater sludge convective drying: influence of sludge origin. Environ Technol. 2004;25(9):1051–7. doi:10.1080/09593330.2004.9619398.
Celma AR, Cuadros F, López-Rodríguez F. Convective drying characteristics of sludge from treatment plants in tomato processing industries. Food Bioprod Process. 2012;90(2):224–34. doi:10.1016/j.fbp.2011.04.003.
Léonard A, Blacher S, Marchot P, Pirard JP, Crine M. Convective drying of wastewater sludges: influence of air temperature, superficial velocity, and humidity on the kinetics. Drying Technol. 2005;23(8):1667–79. doi:10.1081/drt-200065082.
Cai J, Liu R. Research on water evaporation in the process of biomass pyrolysis. Energy Fuels. 2007;21(6):3695–7. doi:10.1021/ef700442n.
Chen D, Zheng Y, Zhu X. Determination of effective moisture diffusivity and drying kinetics for poplar sawdust by thermogravimetric analysis under isothermal condition. Bioresour Technol. 2012;107:451–5. doi:10.1016/j.biortech.2011.12.032.
Joardder MUH, Karim A, Kumar C, Brown RJ. Determination of effective moisture diffusivity of banana using thermogravimetric analysis. Proced Eng. 2014;90:538–43. doi:10.1016/j.proeng.2014.11.769.
Madhava M, Rao PS, Goswami TK. Drying kinetics of paddy using thermogravimetric analysis. Drying Technol. 2001;19(6):1201–10. doi:10.1081/drt-100104815.
Luo F, Dong B, Dai L, He Q, Dai X. Change of thermal drying characteristics for dewatered sewage sludge based on anaerobic digestion. J Therm Anal Calorim. 2012;114(1):307–12. doi:10.1007/s10973-012-2879-0.
Qian J, Yoon YW, Youn PS, Kim JH, Choi DS, Choi J-H, et al. Drying characteristics of sewage sludge. Korean J Chem Eng. 2011;28(7):1636–40. doi:10.1007/s11814-011-0009-5.
Chen D-Y, Zhang D, Zhu X-F. Heat/mass transfer characteristics and nonisothermal drying kinetics at the first stage of biomass pyrolysis. J Therm Anal Calorim. 2012;109(2):847–54.
Chen D, Zheng Y, Zhu X. In-depth investigation on the pyrolysis kinetics of raw biomass. Part I: kinetic analysis for the drying and devolatilization stages. Bioresour Technol. 2013;131:40–6. doi:10.1016/j.biortech.2012.12.136.
Vyazovkin SV, Lesnikovich AI, Goryachko VI. A method of comparing kinetic curves obtained under isothermal and nonisothermal conditions. Thermochim Acta. 1991;177:259–64. doi:10.1016/0040-6031(91)80102-O.
Cai J, Chen S. Determination of drying kinetics for biomass by thermogravimetric analysis under nonisothermal condition. Drying Technol. 2008;26(12):1464–8. doi:10.1080/07373930802412116.
Fornasini P. The uncertainty in physical measurements—an introduction to data analysis in the physics laboratory. New York: Springer; 2008.
Pusat S, Akkoyunlu MT, Erdem HH, Dağdaş A. Drying kinetics of coarse lignite particles in a fixed bed. Fuel Process Technol. 2015;130:208–13. doi:10.1016/j.fuproc.2014.10.023.
Doymaz İ. Effect of pre-treatments using potassium metabisulphide and alkaline Ethyl Oleate on the drying kinetics of Apricots. Biosyst Eng. 2004;89(3):281–7. doi:10.1016/j.biosystemseng.2004.07.009.
Biswas S, Mohanty P, Sharma DK. Studies on synergism in the cracking and co-cracking of Jatropha oil, vacuum residue and high density polyethylene: kinetic analysis. Fuel Process Technol. 2013;106:673–83. doi:10.1016/j.fuproc.2012.10.001.
Starink MJ. The determination of activation energy from linear heating rate experiments: a comparison of the accuracy of isoconversion methods. Thermochim Acta. 2003;404(1–2):163–76. doi:10.1016/s0040-6031(03)00144-8.
Criado JM. On the theoretical basis of the hancock and sharp “ln.ln method” of kinetic analysis of isothermal data. Thermochim Acta. 1980;39(3):361–2. doi:10.1016/0040-6031(80)87092-4.
Chen MQ, Chen YX, Jia L, Zhang YG, Li QH, Meng AH. Kinetic analysis on the drying of high moisture MSW. Heat Transf Asian Res. 2009;38(4):216–22.
Erceg M, Kovačić T, Klarić I. Poly(3-hydroxybutyrate) nanocomposites: isothermal degradation and kinetic analysis. Thermochim Acta. 2009;485(1–2):26–32. doi:10.1016/j.tca.2008.12.002.
Liu HM, Chen MQ, Han ZL, Fu BA. Isothermal kinetics based on two-periods scheme for co-drying of biomass and lignite. Thermochim Acta. 2013;573:25–31. doi:10.1016/j.tca.2013.08.030.
Kok MV, Özgür E. Thermal analysis and kinetics of biomass samples. Fuel Process Technol. 2013;106:739–43. doi:10.1016/j.fuproc.2012.10.010.
Ma Z, Chen D, Gu J, Bao B, Zhang Q. Determination of pyrolysis characteristics and kinetics of palm kernel shell using TGA–FTIR and model-free integral methods. Energy Convers Manag. 2015;89:251–9. doi:10.1016/j.enconman.2014.09.074.
Vlaev LT, Markovska IG, Lyubchev LA. Non-isothermal kinetics of pyrolysis of rice husk. Thermochim Acta. 2003;406(1–2):1–7. doi:10.1016/S0040-6031(03)00222-3.
Vyazovkin S, Burnham AK, Criado JM, Pérez-Maqueda LA, Popescu C, Sbirrazzuoli N. ICTAC Kinetics Committee recommendations for performing kinetic computations on thermal analysis data. Thermochim Acta. 2011;520(1–2):1–19. doi:10.1016/j.tca.2011.03.034.
Salmas CE, Tsetsekou AH, Hatzilyberis KS, Androutsopoulos GP. Evolution lignite mesopore structure during drying. Effect of temperature and heating time. Drying Technol. 2001;19(1):35–64. doi:10.1081/drt-100001351.
Belhamri A. Characterization of the first falling rate period during drying of a porous material. Drying Technol. 2003;21(7):1235–52. doi:10.1081/drt-120023178.
Choudhury D, Sahu JK, Sharma GD. Moisture sorption isotherms, heat of sorption and properties of sorbed water of raw bamboo (Dendrocalamus longispathus) shoots. Ind Crops Prod. 2011;33(1):211–6. doi:10.1016/j.indcrop.2010.10.014.
Lasagabaster A, Abad MJ, Barral L, Ares A. FTIR study on the nature of water sorbed in polypropylene (PP)/ethylene alcohol vinyl (EVOH) films. Eur Polymer J. 2006;42(11):3121–32. doi:10.1016/j.eurpolymj.2006.03.029.
Phanphanich M, Mani S. Impact of torrefaction on the grindability and fuel characteristics of forest biomass. Bioresour Technol. 2011;102(2):1246–53.
Feng H, Tang J, John Dixon-Warren S. Determination of moisture diffusivity of red delicious apple tissues by thermogravimetric analysis. Drying Technol. 2000;18(6):1183–99. doi:10.1080/07373930008917771.
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China under No. 51376017.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Zhang, X.Y., Chen, M.Q. A comparison of isothermal with nonisothermal drying kinetics of municipal sewage sludge. J Therm Anal Calorim 123, 665–673 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10973-015-4933-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10973-015-4933-1