Skip to main content
Log in

Discrimination of weapons-grade plutonium from thermal reactors in nuclear forensics

  • Published:
Journal of Radioanalytical and Nuclear Chemistry Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

A simulated fingerprinting approach is demonstrated, aiming the discrimination of weapons-grade plutonium (WG-Pu) from different reactors. Light and heavy water and graphite moderated thermal reactors are considered, charged with fresh fuel assemblies of different enrichments. The plutonium isotopic composition is considered as the required characteristic fingerprints in the approach. Hence, plutonium isotopic ratios are used in 3D isotopic correlations for the discrimination purposes. The WG-Pu from the different reactors is well resolved between them. Within the light water moderated cases, the WG-Pu is resolved in groups according to their fresh fuel enrichment and the reactor and fuel assembly type. The fingerprinting approach is sensitive to a ‘Pu age’ beyond 0.5 years.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Carson MJ, von Hippel F, Lyman E (2009) Explosive properties of reactor-grade plutonium. Sci Glob Secur 17:170–185

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Chirayath SS, Osborn JM, Coles TM (2015) Trace fission product ratios for nuclear forensics attribution of weapons-grade plutonium from fast and thermal reactors. Sci Glob Secur 23:48–67

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Fedchenko V (2014) The role of nuclear forensics in nuclear security. Strateg Anal 38:230–247

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Jakopic R, Richter S, Kühn H, Benedik L, Pihlar B, Aregbe Y (2009) Isotope ratio measurements of pg-size plutonium samples using TIMS in combination with “multiple ion counting” and filament carburization. Int J Mass Spectrom 279(2–3):87–92

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Kristo MJ, Tumey SJ (2013) The state of nuclear forensics. Nucl Instrum Methods Phys Res 294:656–661

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Kristo MJ, Gaffney AM, Naomi Marks N, Knight K, Cassata WS, Hutcheon ID (2016) Nuclear forensic science: analysis of nuclear material out of regulatory control. Annu Rev Earth Planet Sci 44:555–579

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Lantzos I, Kouvalaki Ch, Nikolaou G (2015) Plutonium fingerprinting in nuclear forensics of spent nuclear fuel. Prog Nuclear Energy 85:335–336

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Nicolaou G, Koch L (1995) Identification of nuclear material with unknown irradiation history: a case study. In: Proceedings 17th annual ESARDA symposium on safeguards and nuclear material management, Aachen, Germany, 9–11 May 1995

  9. Nicolaou G (2008) Provenance of unknown plutonium material. J Environ Radioact 99:1708–1710

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Nicolaou G, Biegalski SR (2018) Discrimination of plutonium from thermal reactors in the frame of nuclear forensics. J Radioanal Nuclear Chem 317:559–564

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. ORNL/TM-2005/39 (2011) SCALE: a comprehensive modeling and simulation suite for nuclear safety analysis and design ORNL/TM-2005/39 Version 61 Oak Ridge National Laboratory Tennessee

  12. Osborn JM, Kitcher ED, Burns JD, Folden CM, Chirayath SS (2018) Nuclear forensics methodology for reactor-type attribution of chemically separated plutonium. Nuclear Technol 201:1–10

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Osborn JM, Glenon KJ, Kitcher ED, Burns JD, Folden CM, Chirayath SS (2018) Computational and experimental forensics characterisation of weapons-grade plutonium in a thermal neutron environment. Nuclear Eng Tehnol 50:820–828

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Robel M, Kristo MJ (2008) Discrimination of source reactor type by multivariate statistical analysis of uranium and plutonium isotopic concentrations in unknown irradiated nuclear fuel material. J Env Radioact 99:1789–1799

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Sendis M, Gauld I, Martinez JS, Alejano C, Bossant M, Boulanger D, Cabellos O, Chrapciak V, Cond J, Fast I, Gren M, Govers K, Gysemans M, Hannstein V, Havluj F, Hennebach M, Hondosy G, Ilias G, Kilger R, Mills R, Mountford D, Orlego P, Radulescu G, Rahimi M, Ranta-Aho A, Rantamaki K, Ruprecht B, Soppera N, Stuke M, Suyama K, Tittelbach S, Tore C, van Winckel S, Vasiliev A, Watanabe T, Toru Yamamoto, Toshihisa Yamamoto (2017) SFCOMPO-2.0: an OECD NEA database of spent nuclear fuel isotopic assays, reactor design specifications, and operating data. Ann Nuclear Energy 110:779–788

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Varga Z, Nicholl A, Wallenius M, Mayer K (2016) Plutonium age dating (production date measurement) by inductively coupled plasma mass spectrometry. J Radioanal Nuclear Chem 307:1919–1926

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Wallenius M, Peerani P, Koch L (2000) Origin determination of plutonium material in nuclear forensics. J Radioanal Nuclear Chem 246(2):317–321

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to G. Nikolaou.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Nikolaou, G., Biegalski, S.R. Discrimination of weapons-grade plutonium from thermal reactors in nuclear forensics. J Radioanal Nucl Chem 322, 513–518 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10967-019-06810-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10967-019-06810-4

Keywords

Navigation