Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Morphology and Spelling in Arabic: Development and Interface

  • Published:
Journal of Psycholinguistic Research Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In the current study, two experiments were carried out: the first tested the development of derivational root and word-pattern morphological awareness in Arabic; the second tested morphological processing in Arabic spelling. 143 Arabic native speaking children with normal reading skills in 2nd, 4th and 6th grade participated in the study. The results of the first experiment demonstrated the early emergence of derivational morphological awareness in children, with root awareness emerging earlier than word-pattern awareness. The second experiment supported the implication of morphological processing in spelling words and pseudo words across all grades tested. The results are discussed within a developmental psycholinguistic framework with particular emphasis on the characteristics of the Arabic language and orthography.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abu-Rabia, S., & Taha, H. (2006). Phonological errors predominate in Arabic spelling across grades 1–9. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 35(2), 167–188.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Anglin, J. M. (1993). Vocabulary development: A morphological analysis. Monographs of the Society for Research in Child Development, 58(10, Serial No. 238), 1–165.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arnbak, E., & Elbro, C. (2000). The effects of morphological awareness training on the reading and spelling skills of young dyslexics. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 44(3), 229–251.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ben-Dror, I., Bentin, S., & Frost, R. (1995). Semantic, phonologic, and morphologic skills in reading disabled and normal children. Reading Research Quarterly, 30, 876–893.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bentin, S., & Feldman, L. B. (1990). The contribution of morphological and semantic relationship to repetition priming at short and long lags: Evidence from Hebrew. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Experimental Psychology, 42A(4), 693–711.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Berent, I., & Shimron, J. (1997). The representation of Hebrew words: Evidence from the contour principle. Cognition, 64, 39–72.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Berman, R. A. (1985). The acquisition of Hebrew. In D. I. Slobin (Ed.), The cross-linguistic study of language acquisition (Vol. 1, pp. 25–371). Hillsdale: Lawrence Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berman, R. A. (1993). Developmental perspectives on transitivity: A confluence of cues. In Y. Levy (Ed.), Other children, other languages: Issues in the theory of acquisition (pp. 189–241). Hilsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Berman, R. A. (1999). Children’s innovative verbs versus nouns: Structured elicitations and spontaneous coinages. In L. Menn & N. Bernstein-Ratner (Eds.), Methods in studying language production (pp. 69–93). Mahhwah, NJ: Erlbaum.

    Google Scholar 

  • Boudelaa, S., & Marslen-Wilson, W. D. (2001). Morphological units in the Arabic mental lexicon. Cognition, 81(1), 65–92. Retrieved from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/11525482.

  • Boudelaa, S. (2014). Is the Arabic mental lexicon morpheme-based or stem based? Implications for spoken and written word recognition. In E. Saiegh-Haddad & M. Joshi (Eds.), Handbook of Arabic literacy: Insights and perspectives. Dordrecht: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Caramazza, A., Miceli, G., Silveri, M. C., & Laudanna, A. (1985). Reading mechanisms and the organization of the lexicon: Evidence from acquired dyslexia. Cognitive Neuropsychology, 2(1), 81–114.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carlisle, J. F. (2000). Awareness of the structure and meaning of morphologically complex words: Impact on reading. Reading and Writing, 12, 169–190.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clark, E. V., & Berman, R. A. (1984). Structure and use in the acquisition of word formation. Language, 60, 542–590.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Daniels, P. T. (1992). The syllabic origin of writing and the segmental origin of the alphabet. In P. Downing, S. D. Lima, & M. Noonan (Eds.), The linguistics of literacy (pp. 83–110). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Elbro, C., & Arnbak, E. (1996). The role of morpheme recognition and morphological awareness in dyslexia. Annals of Dyslexia, 46, 209–240.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Fletcher, M. J. & Denton, C. (2003). Validity of alternative approaches to the identification of L.D.: Operationalizing unexpected underachievement. The National Research Center on Learning Disabilities: Symposium focusing on responsiveness-to-intervention, pp. 1–11.

  • Frost, R., Forster, K., & Deutsch, A. (1997). What can we learn from the morphology of Hebrew? A masked priming investigation of morphological representation. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 23, 829–856.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Frost, R. (2012). Towards a universal model of reading. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 35, 263–279.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Gillis, S., & Ravid, D. (2006). Typological effects on spelling development: A cross linguistic study of Hebrew and Dutch. Journal of Child Language, 33, 621–659.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Halliday, M. A. K. (1977). Aims and perspectives in Linguistics. Occasional papers number 1. Applied Linguistics Association of Australia, Center for Language, Learning and Teaching, University of Southern Queensland, Australia.

  • Jimĕnez, E. J., Siegel, S. L., & Lòpez, R. M. (2003). The relationship between I.Q and reading disabilities in English-speaking Canadian and Spanish children. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 36(1), 15–23.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Larcher, P. (2006). Derivation. In K. Versteegh (Ed.), The encyclopedia of Arabic language and linguistics (Vol. I, pp. 573–579). Leiden: E. J. Brill.

  • Levin, I., Ravid, D., & Rapaport, S. (2001). Morphology and spelling among Hebrew-speaking children: From kindergarten to first grade. Journal of Child Language, 28, 741–772.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Lyon, G. R., Fletcher, J. M., & Barnes, M. C. (2002). Learning disabilities. In E. J. Mash & R. A. Barkley (Eds.), Child psychopathology (2nd ed., pp. 520–586). New York: Guilford.

    Google Scholar 

  • McCarthy, J. (1981). A prosodic theory of non-concatenative morphology. Linguistic Inquiry, 12, 373–418.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nunes, T., Bryant, P., & Bindman, M. (1997). Morphological spelling strategies: Developmental stages and processes. Developmental Psychology, 33, 637–649.

  • Perfetti, C., Cao, F., & Booth, J. (2013). Specialization and universals in the development of reading skill: How Chinese research informs a universal science of reading. Scientific Studies of Reading, 17(1), 5–21.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Perfetti, C. A., & Harris, L. N. (2013). Universal reading processes are modulated by language and writing system. Language Learning and Development, 9(4), 296–316.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ravid, D., & Bar-On, A. (2001). The Semitic root in language acquisition. GALA (Generative Approaches to Language Acquisition), 2001 Proceedings. University of Lisbon, Cidade Universita’ ria—Faculdade de Letras, Portugal.

  • Ravid, D. (2001). Learning to spell in Hebrew: Phonological and morphological factors. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 14, 459–485.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ravid, D. (2002). A developmental perspective on root perception in Hebrew and Palestinian Arabic. In J. Shimron (Ed.), Language processing and acquisition in languages of Semitic, root-based morphology (pp. 293–319). Amsterdam: Benjamins.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ravid, D. (2012). Spelling morphology: The psycholinguistics of Hebrew spelling. New York: Springer.

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Ravid, D., & Malenky, D. (2001). Awareness of linear and nonlinear morphology in Hebrew: A developmental study. First Language, 21, 25–56.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ravid, D., & Schiff, R. (2006). Roots and patterns in Hebrew language development: Evidence from written morphological analogies. Reading and Writing, 19, 789–818.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rubin, H. (1991). Morphological knowledge and writing ability. In R. M. Joshi (Ed.), Written Language Disorders (pp. 43–69). Boston: Kluwer Academic.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Saiegh-Haddad, E. (in press). Modelling reading in Arabic: Vowelization, morphology and diglossia. Journal of Learning Disabilities. Special Issue, Models of reading in different orthographies (guest editor, Malt Joshi).

  • Saiegh-Haddad, E. (2003). Linguistic distance and initial reading acquisition: The case of Arabic diglossia. Applied Psycholinguistics, 24(03), 431–451.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saiegh-Haddad, E. (2004). The impact of phonemic and lexical distance on the phonological analysis of words and pseudowords in a diglossic context. Applied Psycholinguistics, 25(04), 495–512.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saiegh-Haddad, E. (2007). Linguistic constraints on children’s ability to isolate phonemes in Arabic. Applied Psycholinguistics, 28(04), 607–625.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saiegh-Haddad, E., Levin, I., Hende, N., & Ziv, M. (2011). The linguistic affiliation constraint and phoneme recognition in diglossic Arabic. Journal of Child Language, 38(02), 297–315.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Saiegh-Haddad, E. (2013). A tale of one letter: Morphological processing in early Arabic spelling. Writing Systems Research, 5(2), 169–188.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saiegh-Haddad, E., & Geva, E. (2008). Morphological awareness, phonological awareness, and reading in English-Arabic bilingual children. Reading and Writing, 21(5), 481–504.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Saiegh-Haddad, E., & Henkin-Roitfarb, R. (2014). The structure of Arabic language and orthography. In E. Saiegh-Haddad & M. Joshi (Eds.), Handbook of Arabic Literacy: Insights and Perspectives (pp. 3–28). Dordrecht: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Saiegh-Haddad, E., & Spolsky, B. (2014). Acquiring literacy in a diglossic context: Problems and prospects. In E. Saiegh-Haddad & M. Joshi (Eds.), Handbook of Arabic Literacy: Insights and perspectives (pp. 225–240). Dordrecht: Springer.

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Schiff, R. (2003). The effects of morphology and word length on the reading of Hebrew nominals. Reading and Writing, 16(4), 263–287.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sénéchal, M. (2000). Morphological effects in children’s spelling of words. Canadian Journal of Experimental Psychology, 54, 76–85.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Sénéchal, M., Basque, T. M., & Leclaire, T. (2006). Morphological knowledge as revealed in children’s spelling accuracy and reports of spelling strategies. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 95, 231–254.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Taha, H., & Saiegh-Haddad, E. (2015). The role of phonological versus morphological skills in the development of Arabic spelling: An intervention study. Journal of Psycholinguistic Research, 1–29. doi: 10.1007/s10936-015-9362-6.

  • Taha, H. Y. (2013). Reading and spelling in Arabic: Linguistic and orthographic complexity. Theory and Practice in Language Studies, 3(5), 721–727.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Treiman, R., & Bourassa, D. C. (2000). The development of spelling skills. Topics in Language Disorders, 20, 1–18.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tsesmeli, S. N., & Seymour, P. H. K. (2006). Derivational morphology and spelling in dyslexia. Reading and Writing: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 19, 587–625.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tyler, A., & Nagy, W. (1989). The acquisition of English derivational morphology. Journal of Memory and Language, 28(6), 649–667.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Velan, H., & Frost, R. (2011). Words with and without internal structure: What determines the nurture of orthographic and morphological processing? Cognition, 118, 141–156.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Verhoeven, L., Schreuder, R., & Baayen, H. (2003). Units of analysis in reading Dutch bisyllabic pseudowords. Scientific Studies of Reading, 7(3), 255–271.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wolter, A. J., Wood, A., & D’zatko, W. K. (2009). The influence of morphological awareness on the literacy development of first-grade children. Language, Speech & Hearing Services in School, 40(3), 286–298.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. The Cognitive Lab for Reading and Learning and the Learning Disabilities Department, Sakhnin College for Teachers’ Education, Sakhnin, Israel

    Haitham Taha

  2. Safra Brain Research Center for Learning Disabilities, Haifa University, Haifa, Israel

    Haitham Taha

  3. Linguistics Division, English Department, Bar Ilan University, Ramat Gan, Israel

    Elinor Saiegh-Haddad

Authors
  1. Haitham Taha
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Elinor Saiegh-Haddad
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Haitham Taha.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Taha, H., Saiegh-Haddad, E. Morphology and Spelling in Arabic: Development and Interface. J Psycholinguist Res 46, 27–38 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10936-016-9425-3

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10936-016-9425-3

Keywords

Search

Navigation