Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Degradation of Polyfurfuryl Alcohol-Based Biopolymer by Soil-Burial and Photo-Degradation Methods

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Journal of Polymers and the Environment Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Recently, polyfurfuryl alcohol (PFA) based material has been gaining attention. Despite its use as an intermediate in various industries, the degradation process of PFA has rarely been reported. In this study, neat PFA (PF) and polylactic acid (PLA) incorporated PFA (PF-PL) based thermoset biopolymers were prepared by casting method. The degradation of the prepared biopolymer specimens was carried out under environmental conditions via soil-burial test and photo-degradation method for 21-months. The extent of degradation of PF and PF-PL was assessed by evaluating weight loss, variation in mechanical properties and change in complex viscosity. Structural and morphological changes of degraded PF and PF-PL samples were evaluated by Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (FTIR) and scanning electron microscopy (SEM), respectively. Weight loss percentage in case of photo-degraded samples was found to be much higher compared to soil buried specimens. SEM micrographs showed a blistered surface and visible cracks on the surface of soil buried and photo-degraded samples, respectively. FTIR spectra of photo-degraded samples showed a new peak at 673 cm−1 indicating the furan ring opening during the degradation process. Significant variation in mechanical properties of PF and PF-PL specimens after soil-burial test also indicated biodegradable nature of the biopolymers. Approximately 45% and 63% of loss in tensile strength was obtained in PF and PF-PL soil buried specimens, respectively. Complex viscosity was lowest for PF and PF-PL samples after 21 months of degradation compared to undegraded specimens thus indirectly indicating the decrease in molecular weight after degradation. All the obtained data revealed the fragmentation of biopolymers, hence supporting the biodegradable nature of PFA-based biopolymer.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13

(Adapted from Ref. 26 (Open Access Journal))

Similar content being viewed by others

Data Availability

Not applicable.

Code Availability

Not applicable.

References

  1. Geyer R, Jambeck JR, Law KL (2017) Sci Adv 3:25–29

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Okada M, Okada Y, Tao A, Aoi K (1996) J Appl Polym Sci 62:2257–2265

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Singh P, Kumar R (2019) J Polym Environ 27:901–906

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Kumar R, Kumar R, Anandjiwala R (2012) Plast Rubber Compos 41:1–7

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Spange S (2000) Prog Polym Sci 25:781–849

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Guigo N, Mija A, Vincent L, Sbirrazzuoli N (2010) Eur Polym J 46:1016–1023

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Toriz G, Arvidsson R, Westin M, Gatenholm P (2003) J Appl Polym Sci 88:337–345

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Grund S, Kempe P, Baumann G, Seifert A, Spange S (2007) Angew Chem—Int Ed 46:628–632

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Kumar R, Rashmi D (2018) World J Microbiol Biotechnol 34:1–9

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Pischedda A, Tosin M, Degli-Innocenti F (2019) Polym Degrad Stab 170:109017

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Kumar AP, Depan D, Singh Tomer N, Singh RP (2009) Prog Polym Sci 34:479–515

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Obasi HC, Igwe IO, Madufor IC (2013) Adv Mater Sci Eng 2013:326538

    Google Scholar 

  13. Wang H, Wei D, Zheng A, Xiao H (2015) Polym Degrad Stab 116:14–22

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Sharib M, Kumar R, Kumar KD (2018) J Therm Anal Calorim 132:1593–1600

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Bergstrom JS, Hayman D (2016) Ann Biomed Eng 44:330–340

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Hamad K, Kaseem M, Yang HW, Deri F, Ko YG (2015) Express Polym Lett 9:435–455

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Bhushan B, Kumar R (2019) Plasma treated and untreated thermoplastic biopolymer/biocomposites in tissue engineering and biodegradable implants. In: Grumezescu A, Holban A-M (eds) Materials for biomedical engineering: hydrogels and polymer-based scaffolds. Elsevier, United States, pp 339–369

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  18. Irin SC, Begila DS (2014) Int J Chem Stud 2:46–54

    Google Scholar 

  19. Radu ER, Panaitescu DM, Nicolae CA, Gabori RA, Rădiţoiu V, Stoian S, Alexandrescu V, Fierăscu R, Chiulan I (2021) J Polym Environ 29:2310–2320

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Kausch HH (2005) Macromol Symp 225:165–178

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Kazemi NS, Mostafazadeh MM, Chaharmahali M (2010) J Polym Environ 18:720–726

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Riyajan SA, Sukhlaaied W (2019) J Polym Environ 27:1918–1936

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Lucas N, Bienaime C, Belloy C, Queneudec M, Silvestre F, Saucedo JE (2008) Chemosphere 73:429–442

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Yao J, Wang H, Liu J, YuChan K, Zhang L, Xu N (2005) Carbon 43:1709–1715

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Moazzen K, Zohuriaan-Mehr MJ, Jahanmardi R, Kabiri K (2018) J Appl Polym Sci 135:45921

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Tondi G, Cefarin N, Sepperer T, D’Amico F, Berger RJF, Musso M, Birarda G, Reyer A, Schnabel T, Vaccari L (2019) Polymers 11:1–15

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Tondi G, Link M, Oo CW, Petutschnigg A (2015) J Spectrosc 3:1–8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Kumar R (2012) Recent Patents Catal 1:35–42

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

Author Ms. Priyaragini Singh is grateful to the Council of Scientific and Industrial Research (CSIR), New Delhi, India, for financial assistance in the form of Senior Research fellowship Grant (Sanction Letter No. 09/1144(0002)/2018-EMR-1).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Biotechnology, Central University of South Bihar, Gaya, 824236, India

    Priyaragini Singh & Rakesh Kumar

  2. Department of Materials Science & Engineering, Indian Institute of Technology, Patna, 801106, India

    K. Dinesh Kumar & Rakesh Kumar

Authors
  1. Priyaragini Singh
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. K. Dinesh Kumar
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Rakesh Kumar
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rakesh Kumar.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work cited in this paper.

Ethical Approval

Not applicable.

Consent to Participate

Not applicable.

Consent for Publication

Only subscription based.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Singh, P., Kumar, K.D. & Kumar, R. Degradation of Polyfurfuryl Alcohol-Based Biopolymer by Soil-Burial and Photo-Degradation Methods. J Polym Environ 30, 1920–1931 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10924-021-02330-z

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10924-021-02330-z

Keywords

Search

Navigation