Abstract
Operating theatres represent a significant cost burden for healthcare providers around the world. Theatre start time is widely acknowledged as an important target for efficiency savings. However, there is uncertainty surrounding the effectiveness of strategies to improve start time, and questions regarding the barriers to their implementation. We conducted a systematic review of bibliographic databases to identify primary research papers assessing the effect of interventions on theatre start time. Two hundred and nine papers were found from electronic literature search with 14 being included in the final review. Financial incentives, educational approaches, system-based techniques, communication, the ‘golden patient’ initiative and ‘the productive operating theatre’ scheme have all been shown to improve start time. However, questions remain over which is the most effective, the longevity of their effects and whether the results can be extrapolated beyond the context in which they were studied. We summarise the key approaches reported in the literature and identify areas for future research. This is of use to clinicians and hospital managers seeking to improve efficiency and achieve cost savings.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Rogers, H. The productive operating theatre – scheduling. NHS Ambulatory Emergency Care Network. https://www.ambulatoryemergencycare.org.uk/uploads/files/1/SAEC/TPOT/TPOT%20-%20Scheduling.pdf. Accessed November 2017. 2009.
Macario, A., Vitez, T., Dunn, B., and McDonald, T., Where are the costs in perioperative care? Analysis of hospital costs and charges for inpatient surgical care. Anesthesiology 1(83):1138–1144, 1995.
Mason, S. E., Nicolay, C. R., and Darzi, A., The use of lean and six sigma methodologies in surgery: A systematic review. Surgeon 13(2):91–100, 2015.
Foster, A. Operating theatres: Review of national findings. Audit Commission. http://webarchive.nationalarchives.gov.uk/20150423183452/http://archive.audit-commission.gov.uk/auditcommission/subwebs/publications/studies/studyPDF/3023.pdf. Accessed November 2017. 2003.
RCS response to deteriorating waiting times for planned surgery. Royal College of Surgeons. https://www.rcseng.ac.uk/news-and-events/media-centre/press-releases/rcs-response-to-deteriorating-waiting-times-for-planned-surgery/. Accessed November 2017. 2017.
Pandit, J. J., Westbury, S., and Pandit, M., The concept of surgical operating list ‘efficiency’: A formula to describe the term. Anaesthesia 62(9):895–903, 2007.
Fixler, T., and Wright, J. G., Comment on “identification and use of operating room efficiency indicators: The problem of definition”. Can. J. Surg. 56(5):E104, 2013.
Cox Bauer, C. M., Greer, D. M., Vander Wyst, K. B., and Kamelle, S. A., First-case operating room delays: Patterns across urban hospitals of a single health care system. J Patient Cent Res Rev 3(3):125–135, 2016.
Does, R., Vermaat, T., Verver, J., Bisgaard, S., and Heuvel, J., Reducing start time delays in operating rooms. J. Qual. Technol. 41(1):95–106, 2009.
Learning from patient safety incidents. NHS Improvement. http://www.nrls.npsa.nhs.uk/resources/?EntryId45=63054. Accessed November 2017. 2014.
Dhatariya, K., Flanagan, D., Hilton, L., Kilvert, A., Levy, N., Rayman, G., Watson, B. Management of adults with diabetes undergoing surgery and elective procedures: improving standards. NHS Diabetes. http://www.diabetologists-abcd.org.uk/JBDS/JBDS_IP_Surgery_Adults_Full.pdf. Accessed November 2017. 2011.
Nathanson, M. H., Barker, P., Creasey, P. E., Dhatariya, K., Levy, N., Lipp, A., Penfold, N., Watson, B., and Woodcock, T., Perioperative management of the surgical patient with diabetes. Anaesthesia 70:1427–1440, 2015.
Moher, D., Liberati, A., Tetzlaff, J., and Altman, D. G., Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: The PRISMA statement. PRISMA group. BMJ 339:b2535, 2009.
St Jacques, P. J., Patel, N., and Higgins, M. S., Improving anesthesiologist performance through profiling and incentives. J. Clin. Anesth. 16(7):523–528, 2004.
Overdyk, F. J., Harvey, S. C., Fishman, R. L., and Shippey, F., Successful strategies for improving operating room efficiency at academic institutions. Anesth. Analg. 86(4):896–906, 1998.
Scalea, T. M., Carco, D., Reece, M., Fouche, Y. L., Pollak, A. N., and Nagarkatti, S. S., Effect of a novel financial incentive program on operating room efficiency. JAMA Surg. 149(9):920–924, 2014.
Brown, M. J., Kor, D. J., Curry, T. B., Marmor, Y., and Rohleder, T. R., A coordinated patient transport system for ICU patients requiring surgery: Impact on operating room efficiency and ICU workflow. J. Healthc. Qual. 37(6):354–362, 2015.
McNamara, R., Butler, A., Baker, C., Mullen, J., Lenehan, B., Grimes, S. et al., Use of lean principals to improve flow of patients with fractured neck of femur--the HOPE study. Ir. Med. J. 107(3):70–72, 2014.
Han, S. J., Rolston, J. D., Zygourakis, C. C., Sun, M. Z., McDermott, M. W., Lau, C. Y., and Aghi, M. K., Preventing delays in first-case starts on the neurosurgery service: A resident-led initiative at an academic institution. J Surg. Educ. 73(2):291–295, 2016.
Bethune, R., Sasirekha, G., Sahu, A., Cawthorn, S., and Pullyblank, A., Use of briefings and debriefings as a tool in improving team work, efficiency, and communication in the operating theatre. Postgrad. Med. J. 87(1027):331–334, 2011.
Mathews, L., Kla, K. M., Marolen, K. N., Sandberg, W. S., and Ehrenfeld, J. M., Measuring and improving first case on-time starts and analysis of factors predicting delay in neurosurgical operating rooms. J. Neurosurg. Anesthesiol. 27(3):203–208, 2015.
Javed, S., Peck, C., Salthouse, D., and Woodruff, M. J., A predetermined first patient on the trauma list can improve theatre start times. Injury 44(11):1528–1531, 2013.
Roberts, S., Saithna, A., and Bethune, R., Improving theatre efficiency and utilisation through early identification of trauma patients and enhanced communication between teams. BMJ Qual. Improv. Rep. 4(1), 2015.
Ahmed, K., Khan, N., Anderson, D., Watkiss, J., Challacombe, B., Khan, M. S., Dasgupta, P., and Cahill, D., Introducing the productive operating theatre programme in urology theatre suites. Urol. Int. 90(4):417–421, 2013.
Phieffer, L., Hefner, J. L., Rahmanian, A., Swartz, J., Ellison, C. E., Harter, R., Lumbley, J., and Moffatt-Brice, S. D., Improving operating room efficiency: First case on-time start project. J. Healthc. Qual. 39(5):70–78, 2017.
Ernst, C., Szczesny, A., Soderstrom, N., Siegmund, F., and Schleppers, A., Success of commonly used operating room management tools in reducing tardiness of first case of the day starts: Evidence from German hospitals. Anesth. Analg. 115(3):671–677, 2012.
Saw, N., Vacanti, J. C., Liu, X., SaRego, M., Flanagan, H., Kodali, B. S., and Urman, R. D., Process redesign to improve first case surgical starts in an academic institution. J. Investig. Surg. 28(2):95–102, 2015.
Lansky, D., Nwachukwu, B., and Bozic, K., Using financial incentives to improve value in Orthopaedics. Clin. Orthop. Relat. Res. 470:1027–1037, 2012.
NHS to introduce new financial incentive to improve staff health. NHS England. https://www.england.nhs.uk/2016/03/improve-staff-health/. Accessed November 2017. 2016.
Coiera, E., Communication Systems in Healthcare. Clin. Biochem. Rev. 27(2):89–98, 2006.
Chen, Y., Gabriel, R. A., Kodali, B. S., and Urman, R. D., Effect of anesthesia staffing ratio on first-case surgical start time. J. Med. Syst. 40(5):115, 2016.
The NCEPOD Classification of Intervention. National Confidential Enquiry into Patient Outcome and Death. http://www.ncepod.org.uk/classification.html. Accessed November 2017. 2004
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.
Additional information
This article is part of the Topical Collection on Systems-Level Quality Improvement
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Halim, U.A., Khan, M.A. & Ali, A.M. Strategies to Improve Start Time in the Operating Theatre: a Systematic Review. J Med Syst 42, 160 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10916-018-1015-5
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10916-018-1015-5