Skip to main content
Log in

Social Capital and the Paradox of Poor but Healthy Groups in the United States

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Journal of Immigrant and Minority Health Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Increased income strongly correlates with improved health and lower mortality risk. Yet in spite of having a lower mean and median income, both Hispanics and the foreign-born living within the U.S. have higher longevity compared with native-born, non-Hispanics. We explored the role of structural social capital in conferring protection against poor health outcomes among Hispanics and the foreign-born in the US. We used the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey III 1988–1994 linked to prospective mortality follow up to examine the relationship between five measures of structural social capital and: (1) intermediate health outcomes (blood pressure, plasma fibrinogen, C-reactive protein, and total cholesterol) and (2) a distal outcome (all cause mortality). The foreign-born and Hispanics generally had lower measures of structural social capital relative to native-born non-Hispanics. Additionally, while structural social capital was protective against poor health or mortality among native-born persons, the association disappeared for Hispanics and the foreign-born.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Muennig P, et al. The relative health burden of selected social and behavioral risk factors in the United States: implications for policy. Am J Public Health. 2010;100(9):1758–64.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Singh GK, Siahpush M. All-cause and cause-specific mortality of immigrants and native born in the United States. Am J Public Health. 2001;91(3):392–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Singh GK, Miller BA. Health, life expectancy, and mortality patterns among immigrant populations in the United States. Can J Public Health. 2004;95(3):I14–21.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Muennig P, Jia H, Khan K. Hospitalization for heart disease, stroke, and diabetes mellitus among Indian-born persons: a small area analysis. BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2004;4(1):19.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Abraido-Lanza AF, et al. The Latino mortality paradox: a test of the “salmon bias” and healthy migrant hypotheses. Am J Public Health. 1999;89(10):1543–8.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Marmot MG, Syme SL. Acculturation and coronary heart disease in Japanese–Americans. Am J Epidemiol. 1976;104(3):225–47.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Franzini L, Ribble JC, Keddie AM. Understanding the Hispanic paradox. Ethn Dis. 2001;11(3):496–518.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Muennig P, Wang Y, Jacubowski A. The health of immigrants to New York City from Mainland China: evidence from the New York health examination and nutrition survey. J Immigr Refugee Stud. 2012;10:1–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Palloni A, Arias E. Paradox lost: explaining the Hispanic adult mortality advantage. Demography. 2004;41(3):385–415.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Abraído-Lanza AF, Chao MT, Flórez KR. Do healthy behaviors decline with greater acculturation?: Implications for the Latino mortality paradox. Soc Sci Med. 2005;61(6):1243–55.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Crimmins EM, et al. Hispanic paradox in biological risk profiles. Am J Public Health. 2007;97(7):1305–10.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Singh GK, Siahpush M. Ethnic-immigrant differentials in health behaviors, morbidity, and cause-specific mortality in the United States: an analysis of two national data bases. Hum Biol. 2002;74(1):83–109.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Kawachi I, Subramanian SV, Kim D. Social capital and health. New York: Springer; 2010.

    Google Scholar 

  14. Hagan J, Macmillan R, Wheaton B. New kid in town: social capital and the life course effects of family migration on children. Am Sociol Rev. 1996;61(3):368–85.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Sanders JM, Nee V. Social capital, human capital, and immigrant self-employment. Am Sociol Rev. 1996;61(2):231–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Muennig P, et al. The relationship between five different measures of structural social capital, medical examination outcomes, and mortality. Soc Sci Med. 2013;85:18–26.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Coleman JS. Social capital in the creation of human capital. Am J Sociol. 1988;94(S1):95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Knack S, Keefer P. Does social capital have an economic payoff? A cross-country investigation. Q J Econ. 1997;112(4):1251–88.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Lochner K, Kawachi I, Kennedy BP. Social capital: a guide to its measurement. Health Place. 1999;5(4):259–70.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Song L. Social capital and psychological distress. J Health Soc Behav. 2011;52(4):478–92.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Farley T, et al. Stress, coping, and health: a comparison of Mexican immigrants, Mexican–Americans, and non-Hispanic whites. J Immigr Health. 2005;7(3):213–20.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Portes A. Social capital: its origins and applications in modern sociology. Annu Rev Sociol. 1998;24(1):1–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Elizabeth Singer.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

Authors Elizabeth Singer, Roisin McElroy, Peter Muennig each declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical Standards

This article does not contain any studies with human participants performed by any of the authors. Ethics approval for this study and analysis was not required because data was not collected directly from human subjects. This was a review of the NHANES-III survey, a nationally representative cross-sectional health and nutrition survey, without any direct or indirect human identifiers. Similarly, the National Death Index (NDI), used for prospective mortality follow up, did not directly or indirectly link mortality to any specific human subjects. The NHANES-III protocol was approved by a government ethics Institutional Review Board.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 12 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Singer, E., McElroy, R. & Muennig, P. Social Capital and the Paradox of Poor but Healthy Groups in the United States. J Immigrant Minority Health 19, 716–722 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10903-016-0396-0

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10903-016-0396-0

Keywords

Navigation