Abstract
Increased income strongly correlates with improved health and lower mortality risk. Yet in spite of having a lower mean and median income, both Hispanics and the foreign-born living within the U.S. have higher longevity compared with native-born, non-Hispanics. We explored the role of structural social capital in conferring protection against poor health outcomes among Hispanics and the foreign-born in the US. We used the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey III 1988–1994 linked to prospective mortality follow up to examine the relationship between five measures of structural social capital and: (1) intermediate health outcomes (blood pressure, plasma fibrinogen, C-reactive protein, and total cholesterol) and (2) a distal outcome (all cause mortality). The foreign-born and Hispanics generally had lower measures of structural social capital relative to native-born non-Hispanics. Additionally, while structural social capital was protective against poor health or mortality among native-born persons, the association disappeared for Hispanics and the foreign-born.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Muennig P, et al. The relative health burden of selected social and behavioral risk factors in the United States: implications for policy. Am J Public Health. 2010;100(9):1758–64.
Singh GK, Siahpush M. All-cause and cause-specific mortality of immigrants and native born in the United States. Am J Public Health. 2001;91(3):392–9.
Singh GK, Miller BA. Health, life expectancy, and mortality patterns among immigrant populations in the United States. Can J Public Health. 2004;95(3):I14–21.
Muennig P, Jia H, Khan K. Hospitalization for heart disease, stroke, and diabetes mellitus among Indian-born persons: a small area analysis. BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2004;4(1):19.
Abraido-Lanza AF, et al. The Latino mortality paradox: a test of the “salmon bias” and healthy migrant hypotheses. Am J Public Health. 1999;89(10):1543–8.
Marmot MG, Syme SL. Acculturation and coronary heart disease in Japanese–Americans. Am J Epidemiol. 1976;104(3):225–47.
Franzini L, Ribble JC, Keddie AM. Understanding the Hispanic paradox. Ethn Dis. 2001;11(3):496–518.
Muennig P, Wang Y, Jacubowski A. The health of immigrants to New York City from Mainland China: evidence from the New York health examination and nutrition survey. J Immigr Refugee Stud. 2012;10:1–7.
Palloni A, Arias E. Paradox lost: explaining the Hispanic adult mortality advantage. Demography. 2004;41(3):385–415.
Abraído-Lanza AF, Chao MT, Flórez KR. Do healthy behaviors decline with greater acculturation?: Implications for the Latino mortality paradox. Soc Sci Med. 2005;61(6):1243–55.
Crimmins EM, et al. Hispanic paradox in biological risk profiles. Am J Public Health. 2007;97(7):1305–10.
Singh GK, Siahpush M. Ethnic-immigrant differentials in health behaviors, morbidity, and cause-specific mortality in the United States: an analysis of two national data bases. Hum Biol. 2002;74(1):83–109.
Kawachi I, Subramanian SV, Kim D. Social capital and health. New York: Springer; 2010.
Hagan J, Macmillan R, Wheaton B. New kid in town: social capital and the life course effects of family migration on children. Am Sociol Rev. 1996;61(3):368–85.
Sanders JM, Nee V. Social capital, human capital, and immigrant self-employment. Am Sociol Rev. 1996;61(2):231–49.
Muennig P, et al. The relationship between five different measures of structural social capital, medical examination outcomes, and mortality. Soc Sci Med. 2013;85:18–26.
Coleman JS. Social capital in the creation of human capital. Am J Sociol. 1988;94(S1):95.
Knack S, Keefer P. Does social capital have an economic payoff? A cross-country investigation. Q J Econ. 1997;112(4):1251–88.
Lochner K, Kawachi I, Kennedy BP. Social capital: a guide to its measurement. Health Place. 1999;5(4):259–70.
Song L. Social capital and psychological distress. J Health Soc Behav. 2011;52(4):478–92.
Farley T, et al. Stress, coping, and health: a comparison of Mexican immigrants, Mexican–Americans, and non-Hispanic whites. J Immigr Health. 2005;7(3):213–20.
Portes A. Social capital: its origins and applications in modern sociology. Annu Rev Sociol. 1998;24(1):1–24.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
Authors Elizabeth Singer, Roisin McElroy, Peter Muennig each declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Ethical Standards
This article does not contain any studies with human participants performed by any of the authors. Ethics approval for this study and analysis was not required because data was not collected directly from human subjects. This was a review of the NHANES-III survey, a nationally representative cross-sectional health and nutrition survey, without any direct or indirect human identifiers. Similarly, the National Death Index (NDI), used for prospective mortality follow up, did not directly or indirectly link mortality to any specific human subjects. The NHANES-III protocol was approved by a government ethics Institutional Review Board.
Electronic supplementary material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Singer, E., McElroy, R. & Muennig, P. Social Capital and the Paradox of Poor but Healthy Groups in the United States. J Immigrant Minority Health 19, 716–722 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10903-016-0396-0
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10903-016-0396-0