Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Examining Stalking Assault by Victim Gender, Stalker Gender, and Victim-Stalker Relationship

  • Original Article
  • Published:
Journal of Family Violence Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The overall goals of this study were to explore factors associated with stalking assault and factors associated with stalking-related fear among those who were, and who were not, assaulted by victim gender. Men (n = 254) and women (n = 560) stalking victims were recruited through a crowdsourcing website and surveyed about their stalking experiences. Overall, one-third of stalking victims were assaulted. However, almost half of women were assaulted by (ex)partner stalkers compared to about one-quarter of women stalked by acquaintances or strangers. Additionally, about one-third of men were assaulted regardless of their relationship to the stalker. Three main findings are discussed including: (1) stalking assault rates and stalking-related fear levels differ by victim gender which may be, in part, because more women are stalked by males and by (ex)partners; (2) prior violence to the victim, threats, and frequency of confrontation were associated with stalking assault regardless of victim gender; and (3) among those not assaulted, threats and the stalker not caring about severe consequences was associated with stalking-related fear regardless of victim gender, but other factors associated with stalking-related fear differed by victim gender and assault experience. Arrest and increased concern for victim safety by professionals often hinges on physical violence and victim injury. However, educating professionals who work with stalking victims about the factors associated with assault, as well as the full range of harms and risks beyond assault, is crucial to supporting victims and holding stalkers accountable for the crime of stalking.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Available online at www.StalkingRisk.com

References

  • Andrews, D., & Bonta, J. (2010). The psychology of criminal conduct (5th ed.). New Providence: Matthew Bender & Company, Inc..

    Google Scholar 

  • Augustyn, M., Rennison, C., Pinchevsky, G., & Magnuson, A. (2019). IPS among college students: Examining situational contexts related to police notification. Advanced online publication. Journal of Family Violence., 27, 54–75. https://doi.org/10.1080/10926771.2017.1382631.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Baum, K., Catalano, S., Rand, M., & Rose, C. (2009). Stalking victimization in the United States (NCJ 224527). In Bureau of Justice Statistics Special Report. Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice.

    Google Scholar 

  • Black, M., Basile, K., Breiding, M., Smith, S., Walters, M., Merrick, M., Chen, J., & Stevens, M. (2011). The National Intimate Partner and sexual violence survey (NISVS): 2010 summary report. Atlanta: National Center for Injury Prevention and Control, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.

    Google Scholar 

  • Borum, R., Fein, R., Vossekuil, B., & Bergland, J. (1999). Threat assessment: Defining an approach for evaluating risk of targeted violence. Behavioral Sciences & the Law, 17, 323–337.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Brady, P., & Nobles, M. (2017). The dark figure of stalking: Examining law enforcement response. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 32(20), 3149–3173.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Brewster, M. (2000). Stalking by former intimates: Verbal threats and other predictors of physical violence. Violence and Victims, 15(1), 41–54.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Buhrmester, M., Kwang, T., & Gosling, S. (2011). Amazon’s mechanical Turk: A new source of inexpensive, yet high-quality, data? Perspectives on Psychological Science, 6(1), 3–5.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Buhrmester, M., Talaifar, S., & Gosling, S. (2018). An evaluation of Amazon’s mechanic turk, its rapid rise, and its effective use. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 13(2), 149–154.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Carlson, M., Harris, S., & Holden, G. (1999). Protective orders and domestic violence: Risk factors for re-abuse. Journal of Family Violence, 14(2), 205–226.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cass, A., & Rosay, A. (2012). College student perceptions of criminal justice system responses to stalking. Sex Roles, 66, 392–404.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cattaneo, L., Bell, M., Goodman, L., & Dutton, M. (2007). Intimate partner violence victims’ accuracy in assessing their risk of re-abuse. Journal of Family Violence, 22, 429–440.

    Google Scholar 

  • Churcher, F., & Nesca, M. (2013). Risk factors for violence in stalking perpetration: A meta-analysis. FWU Journal of Social Sciences, 7(2), 100–112.

    Google Scholar 

  • Coker, A., Davis, K., Arias, I., Desai, S., Sanderson, M., Brandt, H., & Smith, P. (2002). Physical and mental health effects of intimate partner violence for men and women. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 23(4), 260–268.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Dennison, S. (2007). Interpersonal relationships and stalking: Identifying when to intervene. Law and Human Behavior, 31, 353–367.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Dichter, M., Marcus, S., Morabito, M., & Rhodes, K. (2011). Explaining the IPV arrest decision: Incident, agency and community factors. Criminal Justice Review, 36(1), 22–39.

    Google Scholar 

  • Durfee, A., & Fetzer, M. (2016). Offense type and the arrest decision in cases of intimate partner violence. Crime & Delinquency, 62(7), 954–977.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fissel, E., & Reyns, B. (2020). The aftermath of cyberstalking: School, work, social and health costs of victimization. American Journal of Criminal Justice, 45, 70–87.

    Google Scholar 

  • Fleming, K., Newton, T., Fernandez-Botran, R., Miller, J., & Burns, V. (2013). Intimate partner stalking victimization and posttraumtic stress symptoms in post-abuse women. Violence Against Women, 18(12), 1368–1389.

    Google Scholar 

  • Freed, D., Palmer, J., Minchala, D., Levy, K., Ristenpart, T., & Dell, N. (2018). “A stalker’s paradise”: How intimate partner abusers exploit technology. Advanced online publication. ACM conference on human factors in computing systems (CHI 2018). Nixdell.com/papers/stalkers-paradise-intimate.

  • Garza, A., Franklin, C., & Goodson, A. (2020). The nexus between intimate partner violence and stalking. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 47(8), 1014–1031.

  • Gonzalez-Mendez, R., & Santana-Hernandez, J. (2014). Perceived risk and safety-related behaviors after leaving a violent relationship. The European Journal of Psychology Applied to Legal Context, 6, 1–7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Groenen, A., & Vervaeke, G. (2009). Violent stalkers: Detecting risk factors by the police. European Journal on Criminal Policy Research, 15, 279–291.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamilton, M., & Worthen, M. (2017). Sex disparities in arrest outcomes for domestic violence. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 26(8), 1559–1578.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hauser, D., & Schwarz, N. (2016). Attentive turkers: Mturk participants perform better on online attention checks than do subject pool participants. Behavior Research Methods, 48(1), 400–407.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Jordan, C., Logan, T., Walker, R., & Nigoff, A. (2003). Stalking victimization: the efficacy of criminal justice response. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 18(2), 148–165.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kindness, A., Kim, H., Alder, S., Edwards, A., Parekh, A., & Olson, L. (2009). Court compliance as a predictor of postadjudication recidivism for domestic violence offenders. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 24(7), 1222–1238.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Klein, A., Salomon, A., Huntington, N., Dubois, J., & Lang, D. (2009). A statewide study of stalking and its criminal justice response. (Grant number 2007-WG-BX-003). Washington, DC: National Institute of Justice, U.S. Department of Justice.

    Google Scholar 

  • Korkodeilou, J. (2017). ‘No place to hide’: Stalking victimization and its psycho-social effects. International Review of Victimology, 23(1), 17–32.

    Google Scholar 

  • Kropp, P. (2008). Intimate partner violence risk assessment and management. Violence and Victims, 23(2), 202–220.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Langenderfer-Madruder, L., Walls, E., Whitfield, D., Kattari, S., & Ramos, D. (2020). Stalking victimization in LGBTQ adults: A brief report. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 35(5–6), 1442–1453.

    Google Scholar 

  • Logan, T. (2010). Research on partner stalking: Putting the pieces together. Lexington: University of Kentucky, Department of Behavioral Science & Center on Drug and Alcohol Research www.cdar.uky.edu/vaw.

    Google Scholar 

  • Logan, T. (2016). SHARP narratives convey the big picture of victims’ experience of stalking. Promising practices and policies. Battered Women’s Justice Project (March). http://www.bwjp.org/resource-center/resource-results/sharp-narratives-convey-stalking-experience.html.

  • Logan, T. (2017). SHARP: A new tool for stalking assessment and safety planning. Domestic Violence Report, 22(6), 89–91.

    Google Scholar 

  • Logan, T. (2020). Examining stalking experiences and outcomes for men and women stalked by (ex) partners and non-partners. Journal of Family Violence, 35(7), 729–739.

    Google Scholar 

  • Logan, T., & Lynch, K. (2018). Dangerous liaisons: Examining the connection of stalking and gun threats among partner abuse victims. Violence and Victims, 33(3), 399–416.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Logan, T., & Walker, R. (2009). Partner stalking: Psychological dominance or business as usual? Trauma, Violence, and Abuse, 10(3), 247–270.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Logan, T., & Walker, R. (2010). Toward a deeper understanding of the harms caused by partner stalking. Violence and Victims, 25(4), 440–455.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Logan, T., & Walker, R. (2017a). Stalking: A multidimensional framework for assessment and safety planning. Trauma, Violence, and Abuse: A review Journal, 18(2), 200–222.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Logan, T., & Walker, R. (2017b). The impact of stalking victimization on separation: Assessing and addressing safety and economic security. Domestic Violence Report, 22(5), 69–74.

    Google Scholar 

  • Logan, T., & Walker, R. (2019). The impact of stalking-related fear and gender on personal safety outcomes. Journal of Interpersonal Violence. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260519829280 Advanced online publication.

  • Logan, T., Cole, J., Shannon, L., & Walker, R. (2006). Partner stalking: How women respond, cope, and survive. New York: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Logan, T., Faragher, T., & Brotherton, M. (2016). The stalking and harassment assessment and risk profile (SHARP). The Police Chief, LXXXIII, 1, 32–35.

    Google Scholar 

  • Logan, T., Walker, R., Hoyt, W., & Faragher, T. (2009). The Kentucky civil protective order study: A rural and urban multiple perspective study of protective order violation consequences, responses, & costs. (NCJ Publication # 228350). Washington, DC: National Institute of Justice, U.S. Department of Justice http://www.ncjrs.gov/pdffiles1/nij/grants/228350.pdf.

    Google Scholar 

  • Malsch, M., de Keijser, J., & Debets, S. (2011). Are stalkers recidivists? Repeated offending by convicted stalkers. Violence and Victims, 26(1), 3–15.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • McEwan, T., Daffern, M., MacKenzie, R., & Ogloff, J. (2017). Risk factors for stalking violence, persistence, and reoccurrence. The Journal of Forensic Psychiatry & Psychology, 28(1), 38–56.

    Google Scholar 

  • McEwan, T., Mullen, P., & MacKenzie, R. (2009a). A study of the predictors of persistence in stalking situations. Law and Human Behavior, 33, 149–158.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • McEwan, T., Mullen, P., & Purcell, R. (2007). Identifying risk factors in stalking: A review of current research. International Journal of Law and Psychiatry, 30, 1–9.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • McEwan, T., Mullen, P., MacKenzie, R., & Ogloff, J. (2009b). Violence in stalking situations. Psychological Medicine, 39, 1469–1478.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • McFarlane, J., Campbell, J., & Watson, K. (2002). Intimate partner stalking and femicide: Urgent implications for women’s safety. Behavioral Sciences & the Law, 20, 51–68.

    Google Scholar 

  • McFarlane, J., Campbell, J., Wilt, S., Sachs, C., Ulrich, Y., & Xu, X. (1999). Stalking and intimate partner femicide. Homicide Studies, 3(4), 300–316.

    Google Scholar 

  • Meloy, J. (1998). The psychology of stalking: Clinical and forensic perspectives. San Diego: Academic Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Melton, H. (2012). Stalking, intimate partner violence, and the police. The Open Criminology Journal, 5(1), 1–7.

    Google Scholar 

  • Menzies, R., Federoff, J., Green, C., & Isaacson, K. (1995). Prediction of dangerous behavior in male erotomania. British Journal of Psychiatry, 166, 529–536.

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Mertler, C., & Vannatta, R. (2005). Advanced and multivariate statistical methods: Practical application and interpretation (3rd ed.). Glendale: Pyrczak Publishing.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mohandie, K., Meloy, J., McGowan, M., & Williams, J. (2006). The RECON typology of stalking: Reliability and validity based upon a large sample of north American stalkers. Journal of Forensic Sciences, 51, 147–155.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Mullen, P., Pathé, M., Purcell, R., & Stuart, G. (1999). Study of stalkers. American Journal of Psychiatry, 156(8), 1244–1249.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • National Center for Victims of Crime. (2007). The model stalking code revisited: Responding to the new realities of stalking. Washington, DC: National Center for Victims of Crime.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ngo, F. (2019). Stalking: An examination of the correlates of subsequent police responses. Policing: An International Journal, 42(3), 362–375.

    Google Scholar 

  • Peterson, C., Liu, Y., Kresnow, M., Florence, C., Merrick, M., DeGue, S., & Lokey, C. (2018). Short-term lost productivity per victim: Intimate partner violence, sexual violence, or stalking. American Journal of Preventive Medicine, 55(1), 106–110.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  • Podana, Z., & Imriskova, R. (2016). Victims’ responses to stalking: An examination of fear levels and coping strategies. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 31(5), 792–809.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Rai, A., Villarreal-Otalora, T., Blackburn, J., & Choi, J. (2020). Correlates of intimate partner stalking precipitated homicides in the United States. Journal of Family Violence, 35, 705–716. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10896-020-00137-5 Advanced online publication.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reyns, B., & Englebrecht, C. (2010). The stalking victim’s decision to contact the police: A test of Gottfredson and Gottfredson’s theory of criminal justice decision making. Journal of Criminal Justice, 38, 998–1005.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenfeld, B. (2004). Violence risk factors in stalking and obsessional harassment: A review and preliminary meta-analysis. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 31(1), 9–36.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rosenfeld, B., & Harmon, R. (2002). Factors associated with violence in stalking and obsessional harassment cases. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 29(6), 671–691.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott, A., & Sheridan, L. (2011). ‘Reasonable’ perceptions f stalking: The influence of conduct severity and the perpetrator-target relationship. Psychology, Crime, & Law, 17(4), 331–343.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott, A., Nixon, K., & Sheridan, L. (2013). The influence of prior relationship on perceptions of stalking: A comparison of laypersons, nonspecialist police officers, and specialist police officers. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 40(12), 1434–1448.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sheridan, L., & Lyndon, A. (2012). The influence of prior relationship, gender, and fear on the consequences of stalking victimization. Sex Roles, 66, 340–350. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11199-011-0106-2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sheridan, L., & Roberts, K. (2011). Key questions to consider in stalking cases. Behavioral Sciences & the Law, 29, 255–270.

    Google Scholar 

  • Southworth, C., Finn, J., Dawson, S., Fraser, C., & Tucker, S. (2007). Intimate partner violence, technology, and stalking. Violence Against Women, 13(8), 842–856.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Spencer, C., & Stith, S. (2018). Risk factors for male perpetration and female victimization of intimate partner homicide: A meta-analysis. Advanced online publication. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse. https://doi.org/10.1177/1524838018781101.

  • Spencer, C. M., & Stith, S. M. (2020). Risk factors for male perpetration and female victimization of intimate partner homicide: A meta-analysis. Trauma Violence Abuse, 21(3), 527–540. https://doi.org/10.1177/1524838018781101.

  • Spitzberg, B., & Cupach, W. (2007). State of the art of stalking: Taking stock of the emerging literature. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 12(1), 64–86.

    Google Scholar 

  • Strickland, J., & Stoops, W. (2019). The use of crowdsourcing in addiction science research: Amazon mechanical turk. Experimental and Clinical Psychopharmacology, 27(1), 1–18.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Tatum, K., & Pence, R. (2015). Factors that affect the arrest decision in domestic violence cases. Policing: An International Journal of Police Strategies & Management, 38(1), 56–70.

    Google Scholar 

  • Taylor-Dunn, H., Brown, E., & Gilchreist, E. (2018). Reporting harassment and stalking to the police: A qualitative study of victims’ experiences. Journal of Interpersonal Violence. Advanced online publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260518811423.

  • Thompson, C., Stewart, A., & Dennison, S. (2020). Using dynamic contextual factors to better understand the etiology and escalation of stalking violence. Criminal Justice an Behavior, 47(1), 99–122.

    Google Scholar 

  • Thompson, C., Dennison, S., & Stewart, A. (2012). Are female stalkers more violent than male stalkers? Understanding gender differences in stalking violence using contemporary sociocultural beliefs. Sex Roles, 66, 351–365.

    Google Scholar 

  • Weller, M., Hope, L., & Sheridan, L. (2013). Police and public perceptions of stalking: The role of prior victim-offender relationship. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 28(2), 320–339.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • White, E., Longpre, N., & Stefanska, E. (2020). Stalking behaviors presented by ex-intimate stalkers: A victim’s perspective. Journal of Interpersonal Violence. Advanced online publication. https://doi.org/10.1177/0886260520934429.

Download references

Acknowledgements

The author acknowledges the University of Kentucky Department of Behavioral Science for funding this research as well as Jaime Miller and Jeb Messer for their help with the data collection.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. University of Kentucky, 333 Waller Ave, Suite 480, Lexington, KY, 40504, USA

    TK Logan

Authors
  1. TK Logan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to TK Logan.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Logan, T. Examining Stalking Assault by Victim Gender, Stalker Gender, and Victim-Stalker Relationship. J Fam Viol 37, 87–97 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10896-020-00221-w

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10896-020-00221-w

Keywords

Search

Navigation