Abstract
Domestic violence victim advocacy is an integral part of the response to intimate partner stalking (IPS). However, research specifically examining the strategies that advocates use to support survivors of stalking is limited. The present study aims to expand the knowledge base on advocates’ practices with survivors of IPS. Through inductive analysis of interviews with 26 domestic violence victim advocates, advocates’ responses to IPS were examined. Findings indicated that advocates used macro, mezzo and micro level practices to respond to IPS. Micro level responses included advising clients to create logs of stalking behaviors, keeping detailed case notes of stalking behaviors disclosed in meetings with clients, and engaging in survivor centered safety planning that considered both emotional and physical well-being. Mezzo level responses involved working in community-based response models to improve justice and child welfare system responses to IPS. Macro level responses included successfully advocating for changes to state law to incorporate stalking behaviors as criteria for obtaining and enforcing orders of protection. Implications for advocacy include engaging in survivor centered safety planning and working collaboratively with survivors to gather evidence of stalking, developing policies mandating education about intimate partner violence in child welfare systems, establishing cross-training and informal relationships with law enforcement and CPS caseworkers, and mentorship and coalition building to facilitate legislative advocacy.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Adler, P., & Adler, P. (2008). The four faces of ethnography. The Sociological Quarterly, 49, 1–30.
Auchter, B., & Backes, B. (2013). NIJ’s program of domestic violence research collaborative efforts to build knowledge guides by safety for victims and accountability of perpetrators. Violence Against Women, 19(6), 713–736.
Backes, B., Fedina, L., & Holmes, J. L. (2020). The criminal justice system response to intimate partner stalking: a systematic review of quantitative and qualitative research. Journal of Family Violence.
Banks, D., Landsverk, J., & Wang, K. (2008a). Changing policy and practice in the child welfare system through collaborative efforts to identify and respond effectively to family violence. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 23, 903–932.
Banks, D., Dutch, N., & Wang, K. (2008b). Collaborative efforts to improve system response to families who are experiencing child maltreatment and domestic violence. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 23, 876–902.
Black, M. C., Basile, K. C., Breiding, M. J., Smith, S. G., Walters, M. L., Merrick, M. T., et al. (2011). The national intimate partner and sexual violence survey (NISVS): 2010 summary report. Atlanta: National Center for Injury Prevention and Control, Centers for Disease Prevention and Control.
Campbell, J. C. (2004). Helping women understand their risk in situations of intimate partner violence. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 19, 1464–1477.
Campbell, H., & Moore, M. (2011). Self-perceptions of stalking victimization and impacts on victim reporting. Police Practice and Research, 12(6), 506–517.
Charmaz, K. (2014). Constructing grounded theory. Thousand Oaks: SAGE.
Cho, H., Hong, J. S., & Logan, T. K. (2012). An ecological understanding of the risk factors associated with stalking behavior. Affilia, 17(4), 381–390.
Churcher, F., & Nesca, M. (2013). Risk factors for violence in stalking perpetration: a meta-analysis. FWU Journal of Social Sciences, 7, 100–112.
Corbin, J., & Strauss, A. (1990). Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory procedures and techniques. Newbury Park: SAGE.
Diette, T., Goldsmith, H., Hamilton, D., Darity, W., & McFarland, K. (2014). Stalking: does it leave a psychological footprint? Social Science Quarterly, 95(2), 563–580. https://doi.org/10.1111/ssqu.12058.
Elizabeth, V. (2017). Custody stalking: a mechanism of coercively controlling mothers following separation. Feminist Legal Studies, 25, 185–201. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10691-017-9349-9.
Ferreira, C., & Matos, M. (2013). Post-relationship stalking: the experience of victims with and without a history of partner abuse. Journal of Family Violence, 28, 393–401.
Glaser, B. G., & Strauss, A. L. (1967). The discovery of grounded theory. Chicago: Aldine.
Goodman, L. A., & Epstein, D. (2008). Listening to battered women: A survivor-centered approach to advocacy, mental health, and justice. Washington DC: American Psychological Association.
Guest, G., Bunce, A., & Johnson, L. (2006). How many interviews are enough? An experiment with data saturation and variability. Field Methods, 18, 59–82.
Hawkins, N. (2010). Perspectives on civil protective orders in domestic violence cases: the rural and urban divide. National Institute of Justice, 266, 4–8.
Kelleher, K., Gardiner, W., Coben, J., Barth, R., Edleson, J., & Hazen, A. (2006). Co-occurring intimate partner violence and child maltreatment: Local policies/practices and relationships to child placement, family services and residence. Washington, DC: National Institute of Justice.
Klein, A. K., Salomon, A., Huntington, N., Dubois, J., & Lang, D. (2009). A statewide study of stalking and its criminal justice response. (NCJ Publication # 228354). Washington, D.C.: National Institute of Justice, U.S. Department of Justice.
Kropp, P. R., Hart, S. D., & Lyon, D. R. (2008). Guidelines for stalking assessment and management (SAM) user manual. Vancouver: ProActive ReSolutions Inc..
Kropp, P. R., Hart, S. D., Lyon, D. R., & Storey, J. E. (2011). The development and validation of the guidelines for stalking assessment and management. Behavioral Sciences & the Law, 29, 302–316. https://doi.org/10.1002/bsl.978.
Kulkarni, S., Bell, H., & Rhodes, D. (2012). Back to basics: essential qualities of services for survivors of intimate partner violence. Violence Against Women, 18(1), 85–101.
Kulkarni, S., Herman-Smith, R., & Caldwell Ross, T. (2015). Measuring intimate partner violence (IPV) service providers’ attitudes: the development of the survivor-defined advocacy scale (SDAS). Journal of Family Violence, 30, 911–921.
Lincoln, Y. S., & Guba, E. A. (1985). Naturalistic inquiry. Beverly Hills: SAGE.
Logan, T. (2010). Research on partner stalking: Putting the pieces together. Lexington: University of Kentucky, Department of Behavioral Science & Center on Drug and Alcohol Research.
Logan, T. K., & Walker, R. (2009). Partner stalking: psychological dominance or “business as usual”? Trauma, Violence & Abuse, 10(3), 247–270. https://doi.org/10.1177/1524838009334461.
Logan, T. K., & Walker, R. (2010). Toward a deeper understanding of the harms caused by partner stalking. Violence and Victims, 25(4), 440–455.
Logan, T. K., & Walker, R. (2017). Stalking: a multidimensional framework for assessment and safety planning. Trauma, Violence & Abuse, 18(2), 200–222.
Logan, T. K., & Walker, R. (2018a). Looking into the day-to-day process of safety planning. Journal of Family Violence, 33(3), 197–211.
Logan, T. K., & Walker, R. (2018b). Advocate safety planning training, feedback, and personal challenges. Journal of Family Violence, 33(3), 213–225.
Logan, T., Shannon, L., Cole, J., & Walker, R. (2006a). The impact of differential patterns of physical violence and stalking on mental health and help-seeking among women with protective orders. Violence Against Women, 12(9), 866–886.
Logan, T. K., Walker, R., Stewart, C., & Allen, J. (2006b). Victim service and justice system representative responses about partner stalking: what do professionals recommend? Violence and Victims, 21(1), 49–66.
Mackenzie, R. D., McEwan, T. E., Pathe, M. T., James, D. V., Ogloff, J. R. P., & Mullen, P. E. (2009). Stalking risk profile: Guidelines for assessing and managing stalkers. Melbourne: Stalk Inc. & Centre for Behavioural Science, Monash University.
McEwan, T., Mullen, P. E., & Purcell, R. (2007). Identifying risk factors in stalking: a review of current research. International Journal of Law and Psychiatry, 30, 1–9.
McEwan, T. E., Pathe, M. T., James, D. V., & Ogloff, J. R. P. (2011). Advances in stalking risk assessment. Behavioral Sciences & the Law, 29, 180–201.
McFarlane, J., Campbell, J., Wilt, S., Sachs, C., Ulrich, Y., & Xu, X. (1999). Stalking and intimate partner femicide. Homicide Studies, 3(4), 300–316.
Meloy, J. R. (2003). When stalkers become violent: the threat to private figures and public lives. Psychiatric Annals, 33, 659–665.
Meloy, J. R., & Gothard, S. (1995). Demographic and clinical comparison of obsessional followers and offenders with mental disorders. American Journal of Psychiatry, 152, 258-263. Retrieved from: http://ajp.psychiatryonline.org/article.aspx? article ID=170825.
Murray, C., Horton, G. E., Johnson, C. H., Notestine, L., et al. (2015). Domestic violence service providers’ perceptions of safety planning: a focus group study. Journal of Family Violence, 30, 381–392.
Nichols, A. J. (2013a). Survivor-defined practices to mitigate revictimization of battered women in the protective order process. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 28(7).
Nichols, A. J. (2013b). Meaning-making and domestic violence victim advocacy: an examination of feminist identities, ideologies, and practices. Feminist Criminology, 8(3), 177–201.
Nichols, A. J. (2014). Feminist advocacy. Gendered organizations in community based responses to domestic violence. Lanham, MD: Lexington Books.
Pathé, M., & Mullen, P. E. (1997). The impact of stalkers on their victims. The British Journal of Psychiatry, 170, 12–17. https://doi.org/10.1192/bjp.170.1.12.
Postmus, J. (2007). Challenging the negative assumptions surrounding civil protection orders: A guide for advocates. Affilia: Journal of Women and Social Work, 22(4), 347–356.
Rosenfeld, B., & Harmon, R. (2002). Factors associated with violence in stalking and obsessional harassment cases. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 29, 671–691. https://doi.org/10.1177/009385402237998.
Saunders, D., Faller, K., & Tolman, R. (2011). Child custody evaluators’ beliefs about domestic abuse allegations: Their relationship to evaluator demographics, background, domestic violence knowledge and custody-visitation recommendations. Washington, DC: National Institute of Justice.
Schechter, S. (1982). Women and male violence: The visions and struggles of the battered Women’s movement. Boston: South End Press.
Tjaden, P., & Thoennes, N. (1998). Stalking in America: Findings from the national violence against women study. (pp. 1–19) in Research Brief. National Institute of Justice.
Tjaden, P., Thoennes, N., & Allison, C. (2000). Comparing stalking victimization from legal and victim perspectives. Violence and Victims, 15(1), 7–22.
Walby, S., & Allen, J. (2004). Domestic violence, sexual assault and stalking: Findings from the British crime survey. Home Office Research Study. Retrieved from: http://ndvf.org.uk/files/document/1078/original.pdf
Warren, L., Mullen, P. & Ogloff, J. (2011). A clinical study of those who utter threats to kill. Behavioral Sciences & the Law, 29, 141–54.
Wright, J., Burgess, A. G., Burgess, A. W., Laszlo, A., McCrary, G., & Douglas, J. (1996). A typology of interpersonal stalking. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 11(4), 487–502.
Zeoli, A., Echo, R., Sullivan, C., & Kubiak, S. (2013). Post separation abuse of women and their children: boundary setting and family court utilization among victimized mothers. Journal of Family Violence, 28, 547–560.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Nichols, A.J. Advocacy Responses to Intimate Partner Stalking: Micro, Mezzo, and Macro Level Practices. J Fam Viol 35, 741–753 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10896-019-00125-4
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10896-019-00125-4