Skip to main content
Log in

Activation Analysis and Comparison of Bio-shield Under ITER and ASP Neutron Irradiation

  • Original Research
  • Published:
Journal of Fusion Energy Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The leakage of fusion neutrons from ITER tokamak machine would cause bio-shield activation. Assessment of the shutdown dose rate from activated bio-shield is necessary from the standpoints of occupational safety. FISPACT inventory calculations have been performed for four different types of the bio-shield concrete under the neutron irradiation of ITER and ASP, which is a 14 MeV fusion neutron irradiation facility in UK. Shutdown contact dose rate and the dominant radioactive isotopes of each sample have been evaluated and cross compared for different concretes for ITER and ASP irradiations. The results show that activation products of same concrete are different under irradiation of predicted ITER moderated neutron source and ASP fast neutron source. Fast neutron activation leads to high dose rate dominated by 24Na for about 1 day after shutdown and it shows insignificant impact of impurities on dose rate. While moderated neutron activation leads concretes with impurities to a relative high dose rate for a long cooling time. These radiological hazard elements in impurity have been listed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. ITER Director, Summary of the ITER final design report, ITER IDM G A0 FDR 401-06-28 R 0.2 (2001)

  2. S. Kalcheva, Activation of the concrete in the bio shield of ITER. SCK-CEN, Boeretang 200, 2400 Mol (Belgium) (2005)

  3. A.P. Belian, J.F. Latkowski, E.C. Morse, Fusion Eng. (1997). doi:10.1109/FUSION.1997.687013

    Google Scholar 

  4. N. Bainbridge, ASP particle accelerator. Discovery 9, 30 (2004)

    Google Scholar 

  5. X-5 MONTE CARLO TEAM, MCNP-Manual (Version 5, Vol. I), Los Alamos National Laboratory. Report LA-UR-3-1987 (2003)

  6. R.A. Forrest, FISPACT-2007 User Manual. UKAEA FUS 534 (2007)

  7. R.A. Forrest, J. Kopecky, J.C. Sublet, The European activation file: EAF-2007 cross section library, UKAEA FUS 535/537 (2007)

  8. M.J. Loughlin, Activation of aluminium, ITER IDM JNKMWF (2013)

  9. M.J. Loughlin, N.P. Taylor, Recommendation on plasma scenarios, ITER_D_2V3V8G (2009)

  10. L.W. Packer et al., Fusion Eng. Des. 87, 662 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. M.R. Christopher et al., Radioanal Nucl. Chem. 291, 267 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. J.K. Shultis, E.F. Richard, Radiation Shielding. (Amer Nuclear Society, Santa Fe, 2000) P.305

  13. H. Iida, V. Khripunov, L. Petrizzi, et al., Nuclear Analysis Report (NAR), ITER IDM G 73 DDD 2W 0.2 (2004)

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was provided by the National special project for magnetic confined nuclear fusion energy of Grant No. 2013GB108004. We are grateful for the precious suggestions providing by Dr. Michael Loughlin and Dr. Eduard Polunovskiy from ITER IO.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jia Li.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Li, J., Liu, S., Zhao, P. et al. Activation Analysis and Comparison of Bio-shield Under ITER and ASP Neutron Irradiation. J Fusion Energ 34, 727–732 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10894-015-9850-6

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10894-015-9850-6

Keywords

Navigation