Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Individuals’ socioeconomic position, inequality perceptions, and redistributive preferences in OECD countries

  • Published:
The Journal of Economic Inequality Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The standard model of redistribution posits that attitudes towards redistribution are driven by pure economic self-interest, such as current income. From a social-psychological perspective, however, subjective social status, apart from objective income or social status, is also closely associated with policy preferences. This inquiry directly compares these two different approaches and further explores the role of individuals’ inequality perceptions, including personal norms of inequality to which researchers have paid little attention so far, in shaping individuals’ preferences for redistribution. The current evidence shows that the explanatory power of objective income position is not stronger than that of subjective social position in determining redistributive preferences, while objective social position, which is a summary measure of income, education, and occupation, is more strongly associated with the preferences than perceived social position. The results also demonstrate that individuals’ inequality norms play a more crucial role in the preference formation than does their perceptions of actual inequality. These new findings contribute to redistributive politics and behavioural economics on other-regarding preferences, first, by rebutting the determining role of objective income position in shaping redistributive preferences, as opposed to the basic assumption of the conventional redistribution hypothesis; second, by providing the empirical evidence of the importance of social preferences outside the field of experimental studies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Adler, N.E., Epel, E.S., Castellazzo, G., Ickovics, J.R.: Relationship of subjective and objective social status with psychological and physiological functioning: preliminary data in healthy white women. Health Psychol. 19, 586–592 (2000)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alesina, A., Glaeser, E.L.: Fighting Poverty in the US and Europe: a World of Difference. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2004)

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Alesina, A., La Ferrara, E.: Preferences for redistribution in the land of opportunities. J. Public Econ. 89, 897–931 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alesina, A., Giuliano, P.: Preferences for redistribution. In: Benhabib, J., Bisin, A., Jackson, M.O. (eds.) Handbook of Social Economics, vol. 1A, pp. 93–131. North-Holland (2011)

  • Alesina, A., Devleeschauwer, A., Easterly, W., Kurlat, S., Wacziarg, R.: Fractionalization. J. Econ. Growth. 8, 155–194 (2003)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Austin, P.C., Hux, J.E.: A brief note on overlapping confidence intervals. J. Vasc. Surg. 36, 194–195 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bartels, L.M.: Homer gets a tax cut: inequality and public policy in the American mind. Perspect. Polit. 3, 15–31 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Benabou, R., Ok, E.A.: Social mobility and the demand for redistribution: the POUM hypothesis. Q. J. Econ. 116, 447–487 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beramendi, P., Anderson, C.J.: Inequality and democratic representation: the road traveled and the path ahead. In: Beramendi, P., Anderson, C.J. (eds.) Democracy, Inequality, and Representation: a Comparative Perspective, pp. 387–416. Russell Sage Foundation, New York (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  • Bolton, G.E.: A comparative model of bargaining: theory and evidence. Am. Econ. Rev. 81, 1096–1136 (1991)

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowles, S., Gintis, H.: Reciprocity, self-interest, and the welfare state. Nord. J. Polit. Econ. 26, 33–53 (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  • Brown-Iannuzzi, J.L., Lundberg, K.B., Kay, A.C., Payne, B.K.: Subjective status shapes political preferences. Psychol. Sci. 26, 15–26 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bublitz, E.: Perceptions of Inequality Survey 2015/2016. Global Economic Dynamics Study. Bertelsmann Stiftung, Gütersloh (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  • Chambers, J.R., Swan, L.K., Heesacker, M.: Better off than we know: distorted perceptions of incomes and income inequality in America. Psychol. Sci. 25, 613–618 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Choi, G.: Revisiting the redistribution hypothesis with perceived inequality and redistributive preferences. Eur. J. Polit. Econ. 58, 220–244 (2019)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clark, A.E., D’Angelo, E.: Upward Social Mobility, Well-Being and Political Preferences: Evidence from the BHPS. Working paper. Paris School of Economics-CNRS, Paris (2013)

    Google Scholar 

  • Corneo, G., Grüner, H.P.: Individual preferences for political redistribution. J. Public Econ. 83, 83–107 (2002)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cruces, G., Perez-Truglia, R., Tetaz, M.: Biased perceptions of income distribution and preferences for redistribution: evidence from a survey experiment. J. Public Econ. 98, 100–112 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cumming, G., Finch, S.: Inference by eye: confidence intervals and how to read pictures of data. Am. Psychol. 60, 170–180 (2005)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cusack, T.R., Iversen, T., Rehm, P.: Economic shocks, inequality, and popular support for redistribution. In: Beramendi, P., Anderson, C.J. (eds.) Democracy, Inequality, and Representation: a Comparative Perspective, pp. 203–231. Russell Sage Foundation, New York (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  • Dahlberg, M., Edmark, K., Lundqvist, H.: Ethnic diversity and preferences for redistribution. J. Polit. Econ. 120, 41–76 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dallinger, U.: Public support for redistribution: what explains cross-national differences? J. Eur. Soc. Policy. 20, 333–349 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dustmann, C., Preston, I.: Attitudes to ethnic minorities, ethnic context and location decisions. Econ. J. 111, 353–373 (2001)

  • Engelhardt, C., Wagener, A.: Biased perceptions of income inequality and redistribution. CESifo working paper no. 4838. Center for Economic Studies & Ifo institute, Munich (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  • Erikson, R., Goldthorpe, J.H., Portocarero, L.: International class mobility in three western European societies: England France and Sweden. Brit. J. Sociol. 30, 415–441 (1979)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eriksson, K., Simpson, B.: What do Americans know about inequality? It depends on how you ask them. Judgm. Decis. Mak. 7, 741–745 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Evans, M.D.R., Kelley, J.: Subjective social location: data from 21 nations. Int. J. Public Opin. R. 16, 3–38 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fatke, M.: Inequality perceptions, preferences conducive to redistribution, and the conditioning role of social position. Societies. 8, 1–14 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feenstra, R.C., Inklaar, R., Timmer, M.P.: The next generation of the Penn world table. Am. Econ. Rev. 105, 3150–3182 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Finseraas, H.: Income inequality and demand for redistribution: a multilevel analysis of European public opinion. Scand. Polit. Stud. 32, 94–119 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fong, C.M.: Social preferences, self-interest, and the demand for redistribution. J. Public Econ. 82, 225–246 (2001)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gimpelson, V., Treisman, D.: Misperceiving inequality. Econ. Polit. 30, 27–54 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gründler, K., Köllner, S.: Determinants of governmental redistribution: income distribution, development levels, and the role of perceptions. J. Comp. Econ. 45, 930–962 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Guillaud, E.: Preferences for redistribution: an empirical analysis over 33 countries. J. Econ. Inequal. 11, 57–78 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Güth, W., Schmittberger, R., Schwarze, B.: An experimental analysis of ultimatum bargaining. J. Econ. Behav. Organ. 3, 367–388 (1982)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hariri, J.G., Lassen, D.D.: Income and outcomes: social desirability bias distorts measurements of the relationship between income and political behaviour. Public Opin. Quart. 81, 564–576 (2017)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ISSP: Research Group: International Social Survey Programme (ISSP) 1985–2014. GESIS Data Archive, Cologne (2016)

    Google Scholar 

  • Jasso, G.: Studying justice: measurement, estimation, and analysis of the actual reward and the just reward. In: Törnblom, K., Vermunt, R. (eds.) Distributive and Procedural Justice: Research and Social Applications, pp. 225–253. Ashgate, Aldershot (2007)

    Google Scholar 

  • Juster, F.T., Smith, J.P.: Improving the quality of economic data: lessons from the HRS and AHEAD. J. Am. Stat. Assoc. 92, 1268–1278 (1997)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jæger, M.M.: The effect of macroeconomic and social conditions on the demand for redistribution: a pseudo panel approach. J. Eur. Soc. Policy. 23, 149–163 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karabarbounis, L.: One dollar, one vote. Econ. J. 121, 621–651 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Karadja, M., Möllerström, J., Seim, D.: Richer (and holier) than thou? The effect of relative income improvements on demand for redistribution. IFN working paper no. 1042. Research Institute of Industrial Economics, Stockholm (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  • Kelley, J., Evans, M.D.R.: Class and class conflict in six Western nations. Am. Sociol. Rev. 60, 157–178 (1995)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kelly, N.J., Enns, P.K.: Inequality and the dynamics of public opinion: the self-reinforcing link between economic inequality and mass preferences. Am. J. Polit. Sci. 54, 855–870 (2010)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kenworthy, L., McCall, L.: Inequality, public opinion and redistribution. Socio-Econ. Rev. 6, 35–68 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kerr, W.R.: Income inequality and social preferences for redistribution and compensation differentials. J. Monetary Econ. 66, 62–78 (2014)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kim, H., Lee, Y.: Socioeconomic status, perceived inequality of opportunity, and attitudes toward redistribution. Soc. Sci. J. 55, 300–312 (2018)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kluegel, J.R., Smith, E.R.: Beliefs about Inequality: Americans’ Views of What Is and What Ought to be. Aldine de Gruyter, Hawthorne (1986)

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuhn, A.: In the eye of the beholder: subjective inequality measures and individuals’ assessment of market justice. Eur. J. Polit. Econ. 27, 625–641 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kuhn, A.: The subversive nature of inequality: subjective inequality perceptions and attitudes to social inequality. IZA discussion paper no. 9406. Institute for the Study of labor, Bonn (2015a)

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuhn, A.: The individual perception of wage inequality: a measurement framework and some empirical evidence. IZA discussion paper no. 9579. Institute for the Study of labor, Bonn (2015b)

    Google Scholar 

  • Kuziemko, I., Norton, M.I., Saez, E., Stantcheva, S.: How elastic are preferences for redistribution? Evidence from randomized survey experiments. Am. Econ. Rev. 105, 1478–1508 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lareau, A., Conley, D. (eds.): Social Class: how Does it Work? Russell Sage Foundation, New York (2008)

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindemann, K.: The impact of objective characteristics on subjective social position. Trames-J. Humanit. Soc. 11, 54–68 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCarty, N., Pontusson, J.: The political economy of inequality and redistribution. In: Salverda, W., Nolan, B., Smeeding, T.M. (eds.) The Oxford Handbook of Economic Inequality, pp. 665–692. Oxford University Press, Oxford (2009)

    Google Scholar 

  • Meltzer, A.H., Richard, S.F.: A rational theory of the size of government. J. Polit. Econ. 89, 914–927 (1981)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Merton, R.K.: Social Theory and Social Structure. Free Press, New York (1968)

    Google Scholar 

  • Moore, J.C., Stinson, L.L., Welniak Jr., E.J.: Income measurement error in surveys: a review. J. Off. Stat. 16, 331–361 (2000)

    Google Scholar 

  • Mosimann, N., Pontusson, J.: Bounded Communities of Solidarity: Union Membership and Support for Redistribution in Contemporary Europe. Working Paper. University of Geneva, Geneva (2014)

  • Neckerman, K.M., Torche, F.: Inequality: causes and consequences. Annu. Rev. Sociol. 33, 335–357 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Niehues, J.: Subjective Perceptions of Inequality and Redistributive Preferences: an International Comparison. Discussion Paper. Cologne Institute for Economic Research, Cologne (2014)

    Google Scholar 

  • Norton, M., Ariely, D.: Building a better America—one wealth quintile at a time. Perspect. Psychol. Sci. 6, 9–12 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Osberg, L., Smeeding, T.: “Fair” inequality? Attitudes towards pay differentials: the United States in comparative perspective. Am. Sociol. Rev. 71, 450–473 (2006)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Page, B.I., Shapiro, R.Y.: Effects of public opinion on policy. Am. Polit. Sci. Rev. 77, 175–190 (1983)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Page, B.I., Bartels, L.M., Seawright, J.: Democracy and the policy preferences of wealthy Americans. Perspect. Polit. 11, 51–73 (2013)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Peters, Y., Ensink, S.J.: Differential responsiveness in Europe: the effects of preference difference and electoral participation. West Eur. Polit. 38, 577–600 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pfarr, C.: Meltzer-Richard and social mobility hypothesis: revisiting the income redistribution nexus using German choice data. Discussion paper 10-12. University of Bayreuth, Bayreuth (2012)

    Google Scholar 

  • Piketty, T.: Social mobility and redistributive politics. Q. J. Econ. 110, 551–584 (1995)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Powell, G.B.: The chain of responsiveness. In: Diamond, L., Morlino, L. (eds.) Assessing the Quality of Democracy, pp. 62–76. Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore (2005)

    Google Scholar 

  • Rainer, H., Siedler, T.: Subjective income and employment expectations and preferences for redistribution. Econ. Lett. 99, 449–453 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roodman, D.: Fitting fully observed recursive mixed-process models with cmp. Stata J. 11, 159–206 (2011)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roth, A.E., Prasnikar, V., Okuno-Fujiware, M., Zamir, S.: Bargaining and market behavior in Jerusalem, Ljubljana, Pittsburgh, and Tokyo: an experimental study. Am. Econ. Rev. 81, 1068–1095 (1991)

    Google Scholar 

  • Rueda, D.: Food comes first, then morals: redistribution preferences, altruism and group heterogeneity in Western Europe. CAGE Working Paper No. 200. Centre for Competitive Advantage in the Global Economy, University of Warwick (2014)

  • Schalembier, B.: Measuring perceived income inequality: an evaluation of different methods. Paper presented at the statistical conference (SIS 2015), Treviso (2015)

    Google Scholar 

  • Schmidt-Catran, A.W.: Economic inequality and public demand for redistribution: combining cross-sectional and longitudinal evidence. Socio-Econ. Rev. 14, 119–140 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schneider, S.M.: Income inequality and its consequences for life satisfaction: what role do social cognitions play? Soc. Indic. Res. 106, 419–438 (2012)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sen, A.: Social justice and the distribution of income. In: Atkinson, A.B., Bourguignon, F. (eds.) Handbook of Income Distribution, vol. I, pp. 59–85. Elsevier, Amsterdam (2000)

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Solt, F.: The Standardized World Income Inequality Database. Soc. Sci. Quart. 97, 1267–1281, SWIID Version 5.1 (2016)

  • Soroka, S.N., Wlezien, C.: On the limits to inequality in representation. PS-Polit. Sci. Polit. 41, 319–327 (2008)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Steele, L.G.: Income inequality, equal opportunity, and attitudes about redistribution. Soc. Sci. Quart. 96, 444–464 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stouffer, S.A., Suchman, E.A., de Vinney, L.C., Star, S.A., Williams Jr., R.M.: The American Soldier: Adjustment during Army Life. Princeton University Press, Princeton (1949)

    Google Scholar 

  • Tankard, M.E., Paluck, E.L.: Norm perception as a vehicle for social change. Soc. Iss. Policy Rev. 10, 181–211 (2016)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thøgersen, J.: The motivational roots of norms for environmentally responsible behaviour. Basic Appl. Soc. Psych. 31, 348–362 (2009)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tourangeau, R., Yan, T.: Sensitive questions in surveys. Psychol. Bull. 133, 859–883 (2007)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tóth, I.G., Keller, T.: Income distributions, inequality perceptions and redistributive claims in European societies. GINI Discussion Paper No. 7. Amsterdam Institute for Advanced Labour Studies (AIAS), Amsterdam (2011)

  • Whitmeyer, J.M.: Past and future applications of Jasso’s justice theory. Sociol. Theor. 22, 432–444 (2004)

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wolfe, J.D.: The effects of socioeconomic status on child and adolescent physical health: an organization and systematic comparison of measures. Soc. Indic. Res. 123, 39–58 (2015)

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Goyang-si, South Korea

    Gwangeun Choi

Authors
  1. Gwangeun Choi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gwangeun Choi.

Additional information

Publisher’s Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

ESM 1

(PDF 445 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Choi, G. Individuals’ socioeconomic position, inequality perceptions, and redistributive preferences in OECD countries. J Econ Inequal 19, 239–264 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10888-020-09471-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10888-020-09471-6

Keywords

Search

Navigation