Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Associations Between Behavioral Inflexibility, Sensory Sensitivity, and Feeding Problems in a Clinical Sample

  • ORIGINAL ARTICLE
  • Published:
Journal of Developmental and Physical Disabilities Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Past research suggests that children, particularly those with autism spectrum disorder, with general behavioral inflexibility to objects, persons, and environments may be at risk for feeding problems. However, questions remain about whether feeding problems are better predicted by behavioral inflexibility or sensory sensitivity, and whether general or food-specific measures are stronger predictors. The present study compared two types of behavioral inflexibility (general, food-specific) and two types of sensory sensitivity (food touch, temperature) for their association with children’s feeding problems. Participants were 372 children and their parents who completed surveys on their children’s demographics, as well as measures of behavioral inflexibility, sensory sensitivity, and feeding problems. The children, all referred to a feeding clinic were 71.8% male and had a mean age of 71.53 months. For this sample, 33. 7% had autism spectrum disorder (ASD), 28.7% had special needs other than ASD, and 37.5% had no special needs. ANCOVAs examined child demographics (age, weight status, medical problems, gender, special needs status) for their associations with each measure of inflexibility and sensitivity, finding that ASD was associated with more general and food-specific inflexibility, and younger age was associated with more food touch sensitivity. Hierarchical multiple regressions, which controlled for demographics, including ASD diagnosis, compared the four measures of inflexibility and sensitivity as predictors for each feeding problem. These analyses found food-specific behavioral inflexibility was the only significant predictor of all three feeding problems. Results suggest reducing the severity of children’s feeding problems, clinicians focus on increasing behavioral flexibility as it relates to food.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Keith E. Williams.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

The authors have no conflicts of interest to disclose.

Ethical Approval

This study was reviewed by the Penn State College of Medicine Institutional Review Board and found to be exempt. We certify this study was performed in accordance with the ethical standards as laid down in the 1964 Declaration of Helsinki and its later amendments.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Appendix A

Appendix A

List of 75 Common Foods Used to Measure Limited Diet Variety

20 FRUITS

19 VEGETABLES

17 PROTEINS

13 GRAINS

Bananas

Potatoes

Beef (roast, steak)

Cold cereal

Apples

Tomatoes

Chicken nuggets

Muffin

Grapes

Onions

Chicken, turkey

Hot cereal

Strawberries

Carrots

Ground beef

Poptart

Oranges

Lettuce

Ham, pork

Donuts

Watermelon

Peppers

Hot dog

Bagel, roll

Lemons

Celery

Lunch meat

Bread, tortilla

Blueberries

Cucumbers

Sausage

Pancake, waffle

Peaches

Corn

Lobster, shrimp

Rice

Cantaloupe

Sweet potatoes

Tuna, other fish

Pasta

Avocados

Spinach

Eggs

Stuffing, filling

Pineapple

Cabbage

Beans

Quinoa

Cherries

Green beans

Tofu, soybeans

 

Pears

Cauliflower

Peanut butter

6 DAIRY

Raisins

Asparagus

Nuts

Milk

Raspberries

Peas

Sunflower, seeds

Yogurt

Blackberries

Squash

 

Cheese

Plums

Lima beans

 

Cheese

Nectarines

Zucchini

 

Ice cream

Grapefruit

  

Pudding

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Williams, K.E., Adams, W., Sanchez, K. et al. Associations Between Behavioral Inflexibility, Sensory Sensitivity, and Feeding Problems in a Clinical Sample. J Dev Phys Disabil 35, 589–605 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10882-022-09868-3

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10882-022-09868-3

Keywords

Navigation