Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Transcutaneous PtcCO2 measurement in combination with arterial blood gas analysis provides superior accuracy and reliability in ICU patients

  • Original Research
  • Published:
Journal of Clinical Monitoring and Computing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Hyper or hypoventilation may have serious clinical consequences in critically ill patients and should be generally avoided, especially in neurosurgical patients. Therefore, monitoring of carbon dioxide partial pressure by intermittent arterial blood gas analysis (PaCO2) has become standard in intensive care units (ICUs). However, several additional methods are available to determine PCO2 including end-tidal (PetCO2) and transcutaneous (PtcCO2) measurements. The aim of this study was to compare the accuracy and reliability of different methods to determine PCO2 in mechanically ventilated patients on ICU. After approval of the local ethics committee PCO2 was determined in n = 32 ICU consecutive patients requiring mechanical ventilation: (1) arterial PaCO2 blood gas analysis with Radiometer ABL 625 (ABL; gold standard), (2) arterial PaCO2 analysis with Immediate Response Mobile Analyzer (IRMA), (3) end-tidal PetCO2 by a Propaq 106 EL monitor and (4) transcutaneous PtcCO2 determination by a Tina TCM4. Bland–Altman method was used for statistical analysis; p < 0.05 was considered statistically significant. Statistical analysis revealed good correlation between PaCO2 by IRMA and ABL (R2 = 0.766; p < 0.01) as well as between PtcCO2 and ABL (R2 = 0.619; p < 0.01), whereas correlation between PetCO2 and ABL was weaker (R2 = 0.405; p < 0.01). Bland–Altman analysis revealed a bias and precision of 2.0 ± 3.7 mmHg for the IRMA, 2.2 ± 5.7 mmHg for transcutaneous, and −5.5 ± 5.6 mmHg for end-tidal measurement. Arterial CO2 partial pressure by IRMA (PaCO2) and PtcCO2 provided greater accuracy compared to the reference measurement (ABL) than the end-tidal CO2 measurements in critically ill in mechanically ventilated patients patients.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Curley G, Laffey JG, Kavanagh BP. Bench-to-bedside review: carbon dioxide. Crit Care. 2010;14(2):220. doi:10.1186/cc8926.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Georgiou AP, Gouldson S, Amphlett AM. The use of capnography and the availability of airway equipment on intensive care units in the UK and the Republic of Ireland. Anaesthesia. 2010;65(5):462–7. doi:10.1111/j.1365-2044.2010.06308.x.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Husain T, Gatward JJ, Hambidge OR, Asogan M, Southwood TJ. Strategies to prevent airway complications: a survey of adult intensive care units in Australia and New Zealand. Br J Anaesth. 2012;108(5):800–6. doi:10.1093/bja/aes030.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Kannan S, Manji M. Survey of use of end-tidal carbon dioxide for confirming tracheal tube placement in intensive care units in the UK. Anaesthesia. 2003;58(5):476–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Janssens JP, Howarth-Frey C, Chevrolet JC, Abajo B, Rochat T. Transcutaneous PCO2 to monitor noninvasive mechanical ventilation in adults: assessment of a new transcutaneous PCO2 device. Chest. 1998;113(3):768–73.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Fowler RA, Berenson M. Blood conservation in the intensive care unit. Crit Care Med. 2003;31(12 Suppl):S715–20. doi:10.1097/01.CCM.0000099350.50651.46.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Vincent JL, Baron JF, Reinhart K, Gattinoni L, Thijs L, Webb A, Meier-Hellmann A, Nollet G, Peres-Bota D, Investigators ABC. Anemia and blood transfusion in critically ill patients. JAMA J Am Med Assoc. 2002;288(12):1499–507.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Belenkiy S, Ivey KM, Batchinsky AI, Langer T, Necsoiu C, Baker W, Salinas J, Cancio LC. Noninvasive carbon dioxide monitoring in a porcine model of acute lung injury due to smoke inhalation and burns. Shock. 2013;39(6):495–500. doi:10.1097/SHK.0b013e318292c331.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Shoemaker WC, Wo CC, Yu S, Farjam F, Thangathurai D. Invasive and noninvasive haemodynamic monitoring of acutely ill sepsis and septic shock patients in the emergency department. Eur J Emerg Med. 2000;7(3):169–75.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Tatevossian RG, Wo CC, Velmahos GC, Demetriades D, Shoemaker WC. Transcutaneous oxygen and CO2 as early warning of tissue hypoxia and hemodynamic shock in critically ill emergency patients. Crit Care Med. 2000;28(7):2248–53.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Hinkelbein J, Floss F, Denz C, Krieter H. Accuracy and precision of three different methods to determine PCO2 (Paco2 vs. Petco2 vs. Ptcco2) during interhospital ground transport of critically ill and ventilated adults. J Trauma. 2008;65(1):10–8. doi:10.1097/TA.0b013e31815eba83.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Bland JM, Altman DG. Statistical methods for assessing agreement between two methods of clinical measurement. Lancet. 1986;1(8476):307–10.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Prause G, Ratzenhofer-Komenda B, Offner A, Lauda P, Voit H, Pojer H. Prehospital point of care testing of blood gases and electrolytes—an evaluation of IRMA. Crit Care. 1997;1(2):79–83. doi:10.1186/cc108.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Wahr JA, Lau W, Tremper KK, Hallock L, Smith K. Accuracy and precision of a new, portable, handheld blood gas analyzer, the IRMA. J Clin Monit. 1996;12(4):317–24.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Janssens JP, Laszlo A, Uldry C, Titelion V, Picaud C, Michel JP. Non-invasive (transcutaneous) monitoring of PCO2 (TcPCO2) in older adults. Gerontology. 2005;51(3):174–8. doi:10.1159/000083990.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Janssens JP, Perrin E, Bennani I, de Muralt B, Titelion V, Picaud C. Is continuous transcutaneous monitoring of PCO2 (TcPCO2) over 8 h reliable in adults? Respir Med. 2001;95(5):331–5. doi:10.1053/rmed.2001.1045.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Russell GB, Graybeal JM. End-tidal carbon dioxide as an indicator of arterial carbon dioxide in neurointensive care patients. J Neurosurg Anesthesiol. 1992;4(4):245–9.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Christensen MA, Bloom J, Sutton KR. Comparing arterial and end-tidal carbon dioxide values in hyperventilated neurosurgical patients. Am J Crit Care. 1995;4(2):116–21.

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Seguin P, Bleichner JP, Branger B, Guillou YM, Feuillu A, Malledant Y. The measurement of end-tidal carbon dioxide (PETCO2) is not a significant parameter to monitor in patients with severe traumatic brain injury. Can J Anaesth. 2001;48(4):396–400.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Barton C, Callaham M. Lack of correlation between end-tidal carbon dioxide concentrations and Paco2 in cardiac arrest. Crit Care Med. 1991;19(1):108–10.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by intradepartmental funds only. No external financial support was obtained. The Immediate Response Mobile Analyzer (IRMA) and the Tina TCM4 were provided by Keller Medical (Bad Soden, Germany) and Radiometer (Copenhagen, Denmark) solely for the duration of the study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Oliver Spelten.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Spelten, O., Fiedler, F., Schier, R. et al. Transcutaneous PtcCO2 measurement in combination with arterial blood gas analysis provides superior accuracy and reliability in ICU patients. J Clin Monit Comput 31, 153–158 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10877-015-9810-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10877-015-9810-8

Keywords

Navigation