Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Exploring motivation to quit and risk appraisals of hookah tobacco smoking for self and partner among a member of single and dual smoker couples

  • Published:
Journal of Behavioral Medicine Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Negative health effects of waterpipe tobacco smoking (WTS) are likely more pronounced in dual rather than single smoker couples. Data on how smokers’ perceived harms for self and partner differ between couple types and how these perceptions are associated with motivation to quit are needed. We examined these associations by surveying one member of dual smoker (i.e., both partners smoke) and single smoker (i.e., one partner smokes) couples who engages in WTS. We enrolled online adults ages 18–32 who engaged in WTS during the last month and were in a committed relationship of at least six months. Participants rated their harm to self and, when relevant, to partner, how much they were harming their partner due to their WTS, and partner’s smoke exposure. Participants reported their motivation to quit. Of the 323 participants, 215 (67%) were in dual smoker couples. Participants in dual smoker couples reported lower own perceived risk, which correlated highly with perceived partner risk, than participants in single smoker couples; they also reported harming their partners more even though they downplayed how frequency of smoke exposure was harming the partner. Motivation to quit did not differ by couple type. Across couple types, motivation to quit increased with greater perceived harms. Smokers in dual compared to single smoker couples downplay their risks and perceived harms their smoking causes their partner. Interventions focused on harms to self and partner may be effective to increase motivation to quit and cessation in both couple types.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

Data and study materials are available upon request by contacting the first author.

Code availability

Not applicable.

References

Download references

Acknowledgements

We thank left black with Stacy Zhao for her editorial assistance and left blank with William Tatum for helping to program the online study

Funding

This work was supported by a grant from the National Cancer Institute, R01- CA217861 awarded to Darren Mays. The study sponsor had no role in the study design; in the collection, analysis and interpretation of data; in the writing of the report; and in the decision to submit the paper for publication. The content is solely the responsibility of the authors and does not necessarily represent the official views of the NIH.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

Drs. Lipkus and Mays contributed to the design. Data capture was conducted by Dr. Lipkus and Ms. Sanders. Analyses were conducted by Drs. Lipkus and Hatch. All authors contributed to the writing and review of paper drafts.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Isaac M. Lipkus.

Ethics declarations

Ethics approval

Due to the low risks involved of the study reported, the institutional review board the Duke University Medical Center deemed this study exempt.

Conflict of interest

The authors have no relevant financial or non-financial interests to disclose.

Human and animal rights

All procedures followed were in accordance with ethical standards of the responsible committee on human experimentation (institutional and national) and with the Helsinki Declaration of 1975, as revised in 2000. Informed consent was obtained from all participants for being included in the study.

Consent to participate

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study reported herein.

Consent for publication

Not applicable.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Lipkus, I.M., Mays, D., Sanders, C. et al. Exploring motivation to quit and risk appraisals of hookah tobacco smoking for self and partner among a member of single and dual smoker couples. J Behav Med 46, 460–471 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10865-022-00369-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10865-022-00369-4

Keywords

Navigation