1 Introduction

Numerous efforts have been made in recent years to create better energy storage technologies aiming to solve the increasing clean energy demand under the rising environmental and climate change. Supercapacitors, also known as electrochemical capacitors, have been viewed as one type of promising energy storage technology due to their high-power density, long lifetime, and very fast charge/discharge rates [1, 2]. High efficient energy storage systems and consumer electronic devices is highly desired because of the global energy problem arising from the increasing population and international economic growth.

In principle, RuO2, NiO, Co3O4, and MnO2 are well-known transition metal oxides (TMOs) that have been widely studied as supercapacitor electrode materials [3,4,5,6]. The fact that they store energy through fast, reversible redox reactions, which are called pseudo-capacitance. Among TMOs manganese dioxide (MnO2) is one of the most significant materials for supercapacitors due to its superior specific capacitance [7, 8], not harmful to the environment, and lower cost [9]. However, due to the insufficient electronic conductivity of MnO2 as well as its relatively lower specific surface area, the electrochemical efficiency of MnO2 is limited. [10]. MnO2 on the nanoscale can offer a significantly greater surface area, increasing storage capacity and enhancing specific capacitance.

However, it has been found that pure MnO2 nanostructures are easily destroyed during the redox process, which lowers the cycle stability [11]. During reaction in a supercapacitor, micro-cracks occur, and the volume expansion happens for the electrode materials. To solve this situation, intensive work has focused on new nanoscale materials. For example, activated carbon, carbon nanotubes, and fullerene-C60 graphene were conjugated with the MnO2 to improve the electrochemical efficiency, and the electro-catalytic properties [12,13,14,15].

Currently, carbon nanomaterials CNMs are the most studied material for energy storage electrode in pseudo-capacitor, electric double layer capacitor (EDLC), and Li-ion battery [16,17,18,19]. The results demonstrated the high potential of carbon-based materials to improve today’s energy storage field. Specifically, they could enhance several features for energy storage devices. e.g., flexible and smaller capacitors, [20], transparent batteries, with high capacity and fast charging ability.

Nevertheless, CNMs have low volumetric energy density and low specific capacitance [21, 22]. Thus, the CNMs-based metal oxide nanocomposites are suggested to overcome this problem. In this regard, there is a challenge to prepare CNMs/TMOs composite with simple and low-cost preparation methods with good electrochemical properties.

On the other hand, synthesis of nanomaterials with the aid of microwave irradiation has many advantages such as fast, easy, symmetric, and energy-efficient heating. Consequently, the microwave-assisted approaches have been widely applied to synthesize such nanomaterials [23], inorganic complexes, nanocrystalline particles, and organic compounds. In contrast to pristine carbon, microwave irradiation plays an effective role to activate the surface pores of carbon and significantly raises specific capacitance. A few articles have been studying the synthesis of GO/CNTs/MnO2 composites prepared by microwave assistants. Zhang et al. prepared RGO/MnO2-CNTs by microwave-assisted hydrothermal and the specific capacitance value reached 250 F g−1 at 10Ag−1 in 1.0 M of Na2SO4 as an electrolyte [24]. On the other hand, CNMs-based metal oxides have been intensively studied as a promising material for improving the performance and efficiency of sensors [6], 25, 26. For instance, the detection of hydrogen peroxide has received great attention due to its significance in a number of industrial sectors [6].

Here, microwave-assisted synthesis was utilized for the fast fabrication of MnO2-based nanocomposites, without any further preparation process like the other chemical synthesis methods. The structure and morphological characterization of all nanocomposites have been identified in order to identify all chemical and physical characters. The newly synthesized nanocomposites exhibited good enhancement in their electrochemical properties including high electrical conductivity and high catalytic activity. For this reason, the sensing behavior of the as-synthesized materials was evaluated for the direct amperometric detection of hydrogen peroxide.

2 Experimental work

2.1 Materials and methods of characterization

Multiwall carbon nanotubes (MCNTs) powder was obtained from Nanoridge-Houston-USA. Potassium permanganate, sulfuric acid and manganese chloride hexahydrate from loba-chemie PVT-LTD in India. X-ray diffraction (XRD) analyses were performed using Philips (Model X-Pert). FTIR spectroscopic analysis was performed using the Nicolet 6700 FTIR spectrometer within the range of 400–4000 cm−1. The surface morphology of nanocomposites was morphology using a scanning electron microscope (SEM Model Quanta-250 FEG). Electrochemical studies were carried out using screen-printed electrodes (SPEs) which contain three-electrode system (working, counter and reference electrodes). Palmsens-4-potentiostat electrochemical workstation.

2.2 Synthesis of carbon nanomaterials

Graphene oxide (GO) was chemically synthesized using the modified Hummers protocols [27, 28]. In detail, 1.0 g of graphite powder and 0.5 g sodium nitrate with 23 ml sulfuric acid were mixed in 500 ml flask put it in an ice bath. Afterward, 3.0 g potassium permanganate was slowly added, followed by stirring for 2 h. After that, the flask was transferred to a water bath at 35 °C and the mixture was stirred for another 30 min. A 46 ml of deionized (DI) water was added, the temperature was raised to 98 °C. The mixture was maintained at this temperature for 30 min. Then, additional 140 ml of DI water and 10 ml of hydrogen peroxide (H2O2) were added sequentially. The product was filtered and washed with 5% HCl. Followed by washing with DI water several times and finally drying at 60 °C to obtain GO powder.

For MCNTs preparation, CNTs were modified by microwave-assisted route before being used. Briefly, the solution of (1.0 mg/ml) CNTs was stirred for 5 min with a small droplet of surfactant. Afterward, CNTs solution was exposed to microwave radiation for 5.0 min with moderate power. The final MCNTs powder was obtained after drying at 60 ºC.

2.3 Synthesis of MnO2/GO and MnO2/MCNTs nanocomposites

The previously published microwave-assisted synthesis approaches were applied [27], whereas the MnO2 nanoparticles were prepared firstly. Briefly, 0.3 g potassium permanganate was slowly added to MnCl2.6H2O solution (10 mg/ml) under continuous stirring for 20 min. The mixture was exposed to microwave irradiation for 5.0 min, and then it was washed, filtered out, and dried to obtain the MnO2. By following the same steps, MnO2/GO and MnO2/MCNTs nanocomposites were prepared, whereas 50 ml of GO suspension (1.0 mg/ml) or MCNTs (1.0 mg/ml) was added. To obtain the MCNTs/MnO2/GO, 0.5 g of MnCl2.6H2O, in addition to 25 ml of each suspension of (1.0 mg/ml) CNT, and (1.0 mg/ml) GO were mixed and stirred for 30 min. Next, a 0.3 g of potassium permanganate was added gradually with stirring for 20 min. The resultant mixture suspension was further irradiated with a microwave for 5 min, filtered out and dried at 60 °C to obtain the MCNTs/MnO2/GO nanocomposite. Scheme 1 illustrates the preparation steps of the nanocomposites.

Scheme 1
scheme 1

Schematic illustration of the preparation procedure of the different nanocomposites

2.4 Electrochemical characterization and electrode modification

For the modification of working electrodes (sensor chips) with the nanomaterials, 5.0 mg of the synthetic nanocomposite was suspended in 1.0 ml of double distilled water, and then ultrasonicated for 30 min to produce a homogenous suspended solution. A 30 μl of the suspended solution was drop-casted on the electrode surface and left to dry at room temperature. For SPE characterization, CV and EIS measurements were conducted in 5.0 mM of ferricyanide [Fe (CN)6]3−/4−, as the standard redox probe in 0.1 M KCl (as the supporting electrolyte). Scheme 2 summarizes the fabrication and electrochemical characterization steps.

Scheme 2
scheme 2

Steps of SPEs modification with the prepared nanocomposite before testing their electrochemical properties using a portable potentiostat

3 Results and discussion

3.1 XRD analysis

Crystalline and structural features of the as-synthesized nanomaterials were investigated using the XRD, as shown in in Fig. 1. For the GO sample, an intense peak at 2θ = 10.5º has been observed which is corresponding to shifted plan (002) of GO due to the functional groups intercalated between the sheets with an interplanar distance of d = 0.8 nm. One more less-intensive peak was obtained at 2θ = 26.2º with interplanar distance of = 0.34 nm to refer to the unaffected (not oxidized) graphite layers. The significant shift of two theta towards the lower values indicated the increase in d-spacing, which is considered as an evidence to the intercalation of functional groups and the successful formation of GO. These characteristic peaks of GO have good agreement with previously published reports [29,30,31]. On the other hand, in the case of CNTs, XRD peaks were slightly broadened. Two significant characteristic peaks were obtained at 26.2º and 44.8º which are related to (002), and (100) planes of graphite [30, 31]. The composite of MCNTs and GO displayed the typical peaks of both constituents (GO and MCNTs) reflecting the successful dispersion of the GO among the CNTs.

Fig. 1
figure 1

XRD analysis of GO, CNTs, MCNTs, and GO/MCNTs samples

On the other hand, interspacing layer was calculated by Bragg’s equation ( = 2dsinθ) where n is an integer, λ is the wavelength of the diffracted x-ray, d is the spacing of the crystal layers, and θ peak position [32].

The XRD of carbon nanomaterials doped by MnO2 shown broaden peaks at 2θ around 22°, 37°, 42 and 56° (Fig. 2) for all nanocomposites, the pattern indexed to the pure orthorhombic gamma-phase of MnO2 consistent with the (JCPDS) 14-0644 [33, 34]. However, the characteristic peaks of CNTs and GO from Fig. 1 were not observed in the MCNTs/MnO2, GO/MnO2 and GO/MCNTs/MnO2 nanocomposites. The most likely cause is due to the formation of the thick coating layer of the MnO2 coated the nanocomposite while the presence of carbon nanomaterials confirmed in the subsequent structure analysis.

Fig. 2
figure 2

XRD of prepared nanocomposites of MnO2 doped with different carbon nanomaterials

3.2 FTIR analysis

FTIR analysis is very crucial to identify chemical functional groups, and the formed intermolecular forces among the formation of hybrid or mixture from different compounds. Thus, the FTIR was applied here. As illustrated in Fig. 3, the most intensive and remarkable peaks of GO were found at wavenumber 3400 cm−1 that is related to O–H stretching vibrations of the adsorbed water molecules and the peak at 1720 cm−1 is attributed to the C=O stretching vibration from carbonyl and carboxyl groups. These resultant peaks indicated the attachment of the oxygen-containing functional groups to the carbon skeleton of graphite during the oxidation process to form the GO. The adsorption peak at 1600 cm−1 is assigned to the components from the un-oxidized graphitic domains (C=C). The MCNTs spectra showed the aromatic C=C at around 1600 cm−1 (the characteristic band of all carbon nanomaterials) beside some functional groups such as the O–H (3500 cm−1), and C–O (1030 cm−1) due to the pretreatment of the pristine CNTs. A combination of the characteristic FTIR peaks of GO and MCNTs were collected in Fig. 3 for the GO/MCNTs composite.

Fig. 3
figure 3

FTIR of carbon nanomaterials

On the other hand, the FTIR results of the MnO2 nanocomposites (depicted in Fig. 4) showed a distinctive peak around 430 cm−1 this peak is attributed to MnO2 vibrational mode [35, 36]. Similar peaks for all samples have been appeared at the same positions indicating the successful formation of the nanocomposites that contain carbon nanomaterials combined with the MnO2. Other less-intensive peaks that are related to carbon nanomaterials were obtained as illustrated in the previous section for FTIR results of GO, MCNTs, GO/MCNTs.

Fig. 4
figure 4

FTIR of the prepared nanocomposites (MnO2-based carbon nanocomposites)

3.3 Morphological analysis

SEM images were used to show the microscopic surface morphology of the prepared nanomaterials, as shown in Fig. 5. Graphene oxide nano-sheets appeared in Fig. 5A indicating the successful exfoliation process. Smooth carbon nanotubes with diameter around 80 nm and few micrometers in length were clearly shown in Fig. 5B, whereas the smoothen of CNTs changed to quiet roughness due to the treatment with the surfactant in MCNTs sample (Fig. 5C). It is worth mentioning that no change in diameter or length was observed. From Fig. 5D, MCNTs with large area nano-sheets of GO together in GO/MCNTs nanocomposites were obtained.

Fig. 5
figure 5

SEM image of A GO, B CNTs as received, C MCNTs after microwave irradiation treatment D GO/MCNTs nanocomposites

MnO2 sample showed self-assembled nano-sheets to form flower-like architecture microspheres with sphere diameter in the range of 200–300 nm (Fig. 6a). Further, 3D images of the SEM revealed that these microspheres are composed of interconnected well-defined ultrathin nano-flakes, which form a network of flower-like nanostructures. The sphere structure of MnO2 nanomaterials exhibited a high spongy cluster structure referring to the high specific surface area, and increasing the rate capacity and cycling stability of the MnO2 materials. MnO2 clearly appeared on graphene oxide sheets in Fig. 6b for GO/MnO2 nanocomposite while in Fig. 8c the MCNTs and MnO2 nano-spheres were distinguished in the whole MCNTs/MnOmaterials. Almost the same morphology appeared for GO/MCNTs/MnOnanocomposite with faint transparent GO sheets as shown in Fig. 6d.

Fig. 6
figure 6

SEM images of a MnO2, b GO/MnO2, c MCNTs/MnO2 and d GO/MCNTs/MnO2

3.4 Electrochemical characterization of nanomaterials

In general, the storage of the electrical charge in the surface and solid phases of electrodes depends on double layer charging, faradaic processes, or a combination of both storage mechanisms. For instance, the mechanism of charging-discharging process in activated carbon electrodes is due to the charge adsorption or accumulation at the interface between the electrode and the electrolyte, leading to the electric double layer (EDL) capacitance. This process is mostly electrostatic and non-faradaic. This indicates that there was no electron transfer across the electrode/electrolyte interface and that no chemical changes occurred inside the electrode's solid phase during the storage of electric charge. For the charge storage in a faradaic process, it is generally agreed that significant pseudo-capacitance results from the electro-sorption of ions along with surface redox reactions where electron transfer happens across the interface of the current collector and active material. However, it is important to note that both EDL and pseudocapacitive storage processes are capacitive. It is acknowledged that charge storage is a non-capacitive faradaic process [34]. The specific capacitance could be given using the following equation [33]:

$$C\, = \,\frac{{\int {I\,dV} }}{2\, \times \,v\, \times m\, \times \,\Delta V},$$
(1)

where C is the specific capacitance (F g−1), v is the scan rate (V s−1), m is the mass of the active material (g), ΔV is the potential difference (V), and IdV represents the area under the voltammetric peak (Q).

Consequently, the electrochemical behaviors of the prepared nanocomposites are characterized by cyclic voltammetry (CV) and electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) in a solution of the stranded redox mediator (ferricyanide). As a result, voltammetric analysis of the fabricated nanomaterials was illustrated in Fig. 7. A higher faradaic current (due to the faster oxidation–reduction of the standard redox probe) was applied for all electrodes that were modified with the nanocomposite. As reported in many researches before the untreated CNTs has a quasi-rectangular voltammogram like a supercapacitor [34, 35] while the metal oxides-based CNTs have a couple of weak oxidation/reduction peaks at 0.25 V and 0.038 V, which can be attributed to the surface functional group after treatment. The potential peak separation (ΔEp) refers to the conductivity of materials, the larger the (ΔEp) the less the electrode conductivity [36]. The electrochemical parameters (CV & EIS) for all nanocomposites were shown in Table 1.

Fig. 7
figure 7

A Voltammetric analysis for the nanomaterial performance. The CV measurements were conducted in a solution of standard redox probe of ferricyanide with the 5 mM in KCl as the supporting electrolyte. Scan rate of 50 mV s−1 was applied for all experiments. B EIS Nyquist spectra of modified electrodes with the nanomaterials. The inset figure represents magnification of figure B

Table 1 The electrochemical parameters (CV & EIS) obtained for the modified electrodes with the prepared nanomaterials

GO displayed two oxidation/reduction peaks at 0.25 V and 0.038 V, while less area under the curve was obtained to demonstrate the small specific capacitance with lower conductivity (larger ΔEp). Due to the high electric conductivity of CNTs, they can offer a direct conductive path for MnO2. Thus, reducing the internal resistance within the nanocomposite itself. Additionally, the CNTs inter-tube pores facilitated the fast transport of the redox species to the surface of MnO2 from the bulk solution.

Through Fig. 7B (the Nyquist plots), semicircle portions at high frequency were shown to represent the rate of electron transfer process, whereas the diameter of the semicircle refers to the charge transfer resistance (Rct) of the probe at the electrode interface. For EDLC devices, the charge transfer resistance is assumed to be the sum of the electrolyte resistance in the electrode with porous structure, the resistance of the electrode, and the contact resistance between the current collector diameter and the electrode. The presence of non-vertical line at intermediate frequencies is due to the ion transport limitation in the electrolyte in porous electrode structures. However, upon the introduction of rGO to MnO2/CNTs, the semicircle diameter becomes smaller, indicating a higher interfacial electron transfer efficiency. These results demonstrated that the GO/MnO2/CNTs represented an interesting electrode surface for electrochemical applications, where rGO can work as the conducting material and CNTs between rGO layers further facilitate charge transfer.

The redox peaks shown in the CV curves for the modified electrode surfaces with the nanomaterials demonstrated the significant pseudocapacitive features. In the charge/discharge process, a very fast reversible faradaic redox occurred along with the faradaic charge transfer and intercalation of protons at the surface of the electrodes.

For the GO/MnO2/CNTs, there was no peak within the potential range of -0.38 to 1 V. This is assigned to electrical double layer-type behavior, and a non-Faradaic constant current has appeared in the entire potential range for GO/MnO2/CNTs electrodes. However, the cyclic voltammogram exhibited a well-known hysteresis-type loop that is significant for a supercapacitor. A comparison of the specific capacity of GO/MnO2/MCNTs electrode with recently reported MnO2 materials is shown in Table 2.

Table 2 Comparison of electrochemical response between GO/MnO2/CNTs composite via different preparation techniques

The effect of scan rate on the electrochemical performance of each prepared sample was further investigated by CV (Fig. 8). In the scan rate range from 0.1 to 1.0 V/s, a pair of symmetric redox peaks appeared, and the redox peak currents (ipa and ipc) were increased gradually with the increase of the scan rate.

Fig. 8
figure 8

Specific capacitance of all nanocomposites at different scan rates

For the GO, lower peak current values were obtained due to the low electrical conductivity of the GO. However, the combination with MnO2 led to an increase in the peak current values.

For the CNTs, higher peak current values were observed; however, the addition of MnO2 increased the current values of redox peaks due to its capacitive properties that are assigned to as the MnO2 characteristics. For the GO/MnO2/MCNTs, no peak was obtained within the potential range of − 0.38 to 1 V. This is related to the electrical double layer-type behavior; however, a non-Faradaic constant current has been obtained in the entire potential range. However, the cyclic voltammogram exhibited a well-known hysteresis-type loop that is significant for a supercapacitor. Comparison of the specific capacity of GO/MnO2/MCNTs electrode with the recently reported MnO2 materials is shown in Table 2.

Worth mentioning here, that all nanomaterials were electrochemically stable over different applied scan rates, and no damage occurred in the electrode composition as seen in Fig. 9.

Fig. 9
figure 9

CV of prepared nanocomposites at different scan rates. Screen printed electrodes were modified with a thin film of the nanomaterials and voltammetric

3.5 The use of MnO2-based carbon nanocomposite for H2O2 detection

The ability to provide high electro-catalytic activity that promotes direct oxidation and fast electron transfer in enzymatic biosensors is one of the key benefits of employing nanocomposite materials as electrode surface modifiers [6]. Thus, the competence of direct electron transfer resulting from the peroxides oxidation was tested among all nanocomposites. In addition, the possibility of direct oxidation was measured after injected different concentrations of peroxides into the electrochemical cell. Figures 10, 11, 12, represent a set of chronoamperometric calibration curves for all modified electrodes, while the higher signals were obtained by electrodes modified with the MnO2 and MnO2/CNTs. furthermore, the used nanostructured electrode given the high electro-catalytic activity that enabled the direct electrochemical oxidation of peroxide. Additionally, the oxidation peaks currents were increased as the concentration of H2O2 increased which reflect the sensitivity and reliability of the nanostructured modified SPE.

Fig. 10
figure 10

Chronoamperometric calibration curves of bare, GO, CNTs/GO/MnO2, MnO2, GO/MnO2, CNT/MnO2, CNT/GO and CNT toward different concentrations of H2O2 in PBS pH = 7.4) buffer

Fig. 11
figure 11

pH effect on the sensor performance towards the sensitivity of direct peroxides detection

Fig. 12
figure 12

A The corresponding calibration curve toward H2O2 response. B The corresponding calibration curve toward H2O2 response

3.5.1 Effect of pH

The chemical composition and the pH of the supporting electrolytes strongly affected electrochemical performance. Thus, effect of the pH changes on the amperometric signal of peroxide oxidation was measured. As illustrated in Fig. 11, the response of the MnO2/CNTs modified electrode surface towards the oxidation of peroxides was measured at several pHs. As the pH increases from 4.0 up to 7.0, the electrochemical signal increased. However, increasing the pH above 7.5 led to a strong decrease in the peroxide oxidation signal. At this pH, electrode surface modified with the nanomaterial could be protonated, hnce it affected the rate of the electron transfer. So, the pH 7.5 of PBS buffer was selected in all subsequent experiments.

3.5.2 Amperometric deection of peroxide

From the cyclic voltammetry (CV) study, the oxidation peak of peroxide using the modified SPEs with nanocomposites was produced at 0.7 V. Therefore, amperometric detection at 0.7 V was evaluated by standard addition of a certain amount of H2O2 at fixed time (30 s).

The relation between current response and the concentration of H2O2 (see Fig. 10) showed fast and high response that indicate the fast electron transfer the electro-catalytic behavior of the modified SPE with the selected nanocomposite. Furthermore, the linear range of a calibration curve (as it is clear in Fig. 12A, B) from 1.0 up to 210 µM with the detection limit (S/N = 3) of 0.08 µM approved the high sensitivity of the prepared nanocomposite to be effectively applied for the construction of different enzymatic based biosensors which have important role in biological analysis.

4 Conclusion

In this work, a straightforward, quick, low-temperature, and easy procedure was applied to fabricate various MnO2-based carbon nanocomposites by a microwave-assisted method. RGO 2D nano-sheets provided a considerable external surface area with outstanding ion adsorption. Notably, the CNTs played a prominent role in the electroactive network and supplied good electrical conductivity and electrolyte accessibility, besides improving the ion diffusion kinetics for additional EDL capacitance. The as-prepared birnessite-MnO2 provided superior electrochemical performance and high specific capacitance. In addition, the sensing performance of modified electrodes with the nanomaterials has been tested, and the chronoamperometric assay was fully optimized to eventually exploit them for the direct quantitative peroxide concentration. The newly prepared nanocomposites exhibited high supercapacitor efficiency alongside high sensing performance.