Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Mechanical properties and decomposition performance of peelable coating containing UiO-66 catalyst and waterborne silane-terminated polyurethane dispersions

  • Polymers & biopolymers
  • Published:
Journal of Materials Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

An easily peelable coating was prepared using silane-terminated polyurethane dispersions (SPUDs) and UiO-66 catalyst (a zirconium(IV)-based metal–organic framework), to capture and decompose the nerve agent simulant, methyl paraoxon (MPO), at room temperature. SPUDs were used as the binder. The peel strength of the SPUD film containing UiO-66 decreased with increasing UiO-66 content, and the film with 40 wt% UiO-66 could not be easily peeled off. In contrast, the SPUD/PVB/UiO-66 peelable coating film could be easily peeled off. With increasing UiO-66 content, the Young’s moduli of the SPUD/UiO-66 and SPUD/PVB/UiO-66 coating films gradually increased, while the elongation decreased. The increase in the glass transition temperature was less than approximately 5%, depending on the UiO-66 content of the SPUD/UiO-66 film. Two peaks of tan δ appeared for the SPUD/PVB/UiO-66 coating film. As the UiO-66 content increased, the second peak shifted to the right. This could be attributed to the bond strength between the mixed polymeric binder and the nanoparticles. Furthermore, MPO decomposition by the SPUD/PVB/UiO-66 coating film increased with increasing UiO-66 content. These findings suggest the possibility of the development of a peelable coating film for the capture and decomposition of MPO.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Scheme 1
Scheme 2
Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 5
Figure 6
Figure 7
Figure 8
Figure 9
Figure 10
Figure 11

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

GPC:

Gel permeation chromatography

Tg:

Glass transition temperature

MOF:

Metal–organic framework

MPO:

Methyl paraoxon

PVB:

Poly(vinyl butyral)

SPUD:

Silane-terminated polyurethane dispersion

References

  1. Kreno LE, Leong K, Farha OK et al (2012) Metal–organic framework materials as chemical sensors. Chem Rev 112:1105–1125. https://doi.org/10.1021/cr200324t

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Lee J, Farha OK, Roberts J et al (2009) Metal–organic framework materials as catalysts. Chem Soc Rev 38:1450–1459. https://doi.org/10.1039/B807080F

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Liu J, Chen L, Cui H et al (2014) Applications of metal–organic frameworks in heterogeneous supramolecular catalysis. Chem Soc Rev 43:6011–6061. https://doi.org/10.1039/C4CS00094C

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Li J-R, Sculley J, Zhou H-C (2012) Metal–organic frameworks for separations. Chem Rev 112:869–932. https://doi.org/10.1021/cr200190s

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Mason JA, Veenstra M, Long JR (2014) Evaluating metal–organic frameworks for natural gas storage. Chem Sci 5:32–51. https://doi.org/10.1039/C3SC52633J

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Della Rocca J, Liu D, Lin W (2011) Nanoscale metal–organic frameworks for biomedical imaging and drug delivery. Acc Chem Res 44:957–968. https://doi.org/10.1021/ar200028a

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Moghadam PZ, Fairen-Jimenez D, Snurr RQ (2016) Efficient identification of hydrophobic MOFs: application in the capture of toxic industrial chemicals. J Mater Chem A 4:529–536. https://doi.org/10.1039/C5TA06472D

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Cavka JH, Jakobsen S, Olsbye U et al (2008) A new zirconium inorganic building brick forming metal organic frameworks with exceptional stability. J Am Chem Soc 130:13850–13851. https://doi.org/10.1021/ja8057953

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Schaate A, Roy P, Godt A et al (2011) Modulated synthesis of Zr-based metal–organic frameworks: from nano to single crystals. Chem Eur J 17:6643–6651. https://doi.org/10.1002/chem.201003211

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Liu X, Shen Z-Q, Xiong H-H et al (2015) Hierarchical porous materials based on nanoscale metal–organic frameworks dominated with permanent interparticle porosity. Microporous Mesoporous Mater 204:25–33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.micromeso.2014.11.005

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Katz MJ, Brown ZJ, Colón YJ et al (2013) A facile synthesis of UiO-66, UiO-67 and their derivatives. Chem Commun 49:9449. https://doi.org/10.1039/c3cc46105j

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Cho KY, Seo JY, Kim H-J et al (2019) Facile control of defect site density and particle size of UiO-66 for enhanced hydrolysis rates: insights into feasibility of Zr(IV)-based metal–organic framework (MOF) catalysts. Appl Catal B Environ 245:635–647. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apcatb.2019.01.033

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Natali I, Carretti E, Angelova L et al (2011) Structural and mechanical properties of “peelable” organoaqueous dispersions with partially hydrolyzed poly(vinyl acetate)-borate networks: applications to cleaning painted surfaces. Langmuir 27:13226–13235. https://doi.org/10.1021/la2015786

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Lewandowski K, Krepski LR, Mickus DE (2004) Dry-peelable temporary protective coatings from waterborne self-crosslinkable sulfourethane-silanol dispersions. J Appl Polym Sci 91:1443–1449. https://doi.org/10.1002/app.13316

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Shirai M, Bamba T, Hayashi K et al (2000) Sheet for protecting paint film

  16. Ozeki K, Wada T, Ito K et al (1982) Peelable film-forming urethane/isocyanate paints

  17. Rahman MM, Kim H-D, Lee W-K (2009) Properties of waterborne polyurethane adhesives: effect of chain extender and polyol content. J Adhes Sci Technol 23:177–193. https://doi.org/10.1163/156856108X344667

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Lei L, Zhong L, Lin X et al (2014) Synthesis and characterization of waterborne polyurethane dispersions with different chain extenders for potential application in waterborne ink. Chem Eng J 253:518–525. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cej.2014.05.044

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Li S, Kong X, Feng S (2015) Preparation of uniform poly(urea-siloxane) microspheres through precipitation polymerization. RSC Adv 5:90313–90320. https://doi.org/10.1039/C5RA18140B

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Hou Z, Qu W, Kan C (2015) Synthesis and properties of triethoxysilane-terminated anionic polyurethane and its waterborne dispersions. J Polym Res 22:111. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10965-015-0757-8

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Kim K, Seo JY, Baek K-Y et al (2019) Metal–organic framework (UiO-66)-dispersed polyurethane composite films for the decontamination of methyl paraoxon. Polym Int. https://doi.org/10.1002/pi.5856

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Mondloch JE, Katz MJ, Isley WC III et al (2015) Destruction of chemical warfare agents using metal–organic frameworks. Nat Mater 14:512–516. https://doi.org/10.1038/nmat4238

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Katz MJ, Mondloch JE, Totten RK et al (2014) Simple and compelling biomimetic metal–organic framework catalyst for the degradation of nerve agent simulants. Angew Chem 126:507–511. https://doi.org/10.1002/ange.201307520

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Katz MJ, Moon S-Y, Mondloch JE et al (2015) Exploiting parameter space in MOFs: a 20-fold enhancement of phosphate-ester hydrolysis with UiO-66-NH 2. Chem Sci 6:2286–2291. https://doi.org/10.1039/C4SC03613A

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Mirmohseni A, Akbari M, Najjar R, Hosseini M (2019) Self-healing waterborne polyurethane coating by pH-dependent triggered-release mechanism. J Appl Polym Sci 136:47082. https://doi.org/10.1002/app.47082

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Feng L, Iroh JO (2013) Novel polyimide-b-polyurea supramacromolecule with remarkable thermomechanical and dielectric properties. Eur Polym J 49:1811–1822. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eurpolymj.2013.04.007

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Maya-Visuet E, Gao T, Soucek M, Castaneda H (2015) The effect of TiO2 as a pigment in a polyurethane/polysiloxane hybrid coating/aluminum interface based on damage evolution. Prog Org Coat 83:36–46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.porgcoat.2015.02.001

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Wu G, An J, Sun D et al (2014) Robust microcapsules with polyurea/silica hybrid shell for one-part self-healing anticorrosion coatings. J Mater Chem A 2:11614–11620. https://doi.org/10.1039/C4TA01312C

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Moghaddam ZS, Kaykhaii M, Khajeh M, Oveisi AR (2018) Synthesis of UiO-66-OH zirconium metal–organic framework and its application for selective extraction and trace determination of thorium in water samples by spectrophotometry. Spectrochim Acta A Mol Biomol Spectrosc 194:76–82. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.saa.2018.01.010

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Yuan Y, Zhang Y, Fu X et al (2016) Silane-terminated polyurethane applied to a moisture-curable pressure-sensitive adhesive using triethoxysilane. RSC Adv 6:83688–83696. https://doi.org/10.1039/C6RA19883J

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Blaine SJ, Wilson KK (1996) Protective solvent free liquid masking compounds and related method. US Patent 5,494,702, 27 Feb, 1996

  32. Muller H-P, Gruttmann H, Casselmann H, et al (1999) Cosolvent-free aqueous, anionic polyurethane dispersions and their use as peelable coatings. US Patent 5,965,195, 12 Oct, 1999

  33. Salamon PA 54) Temporary protective coatings for precision surfaces. 14

  34. Polymeric peel-off coating compositions and methods of use thereof. Google Patents US6124044A. https://patents.google.com/patent/US6124044A/en. Accessed 24 May 2019

  35. Adhesion performance of PSA–clay nano-composites by the in situ polymerization and mechanical blending. ScienceDirect. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0143749613001395. Accessed 2 July 2019

  36. Mahdi EM, Tan J-C (2016) Dynamic molecular interactions between polyurethane and ZIF-8 in a polymer-MOF nanocomposite: microstructural, thermo-mechanical and viscoelastic effects. Polymer 97:31–43. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.polymer.2016.05.012

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  37. Li P, Klet RC, Moon S-Y et al (2015) Synthesis of nanocrystals of Zr-based metal–organic frameworks with csq-net: significant enhancement in the degradation of a nerve agent simulant. Chem Commun 51:10925–10928. https://doi.org/10.1039/C5CC03398E

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Long NH, Park H, Chae G et al (2019) Preparation of peelable coating films with a metal organic framework (UiO-66) and self-crosslinkable polyurethane for the decomposition of methyl paraoxon. Polymers 11:1298. https://doi.org/10.3390/polym11081298

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was supported by the National Research Council of Science and Technology (NST) grant by the Korean government (MSIP) (No. CMP-16-04-KITECH).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Laboratory of Adhesion and Bio-Composites, Program in Environmental Materials Science, Research Institute of Agriculture and Life Sciences, College of Agriculture and Life Sciences, Seoul National University, Seoul, 08826, Republic of Korea

    Kyung-Min Kim, Gyu-Seong Shim, Seong-Wook Jang & Hyun-Joong Kim

  2. Green Chemistry and Materials Group, Korea Institute of Industrial Technology (KITECH), Cheonan, 31056, Republic of Korea

    Hee-Woong Park, Gyeong-Seok Chae & Seunghan Shin

  3. Department of Green Process and System Engineering, Korea University of Science and Technology (UST), Cheonan, 31056, Republic of Korea

    Gyeong-Seok Chae & Seunghan Shin

  4. Department of Chemical and Biological Engineering, Korea University, Seoul, 02841, Republic of Korea

    Hee-Woong Park & Jung-Hyun Lee

Authors
  1. Kyung-Min Kim
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Hee-Woong Park
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Gyu-Seong Shim
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Seong-Wook Jang
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Hyun-Joong Kim
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Gyeong-Seok Chae
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Seunghan Shin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Jung-Hyun Lee
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Contributions

K-M Kim, H-J Kim, and S Shin designed the experiments. H-W Park, G-S Shim, and G Chae carried out the measurements. S-W Jang and J-H Lee analyzed the data. K-M Kim wrote the manuscript.

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Hyun-Joong Kim or Seunghan Shin.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (PDF 1856 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Kim, KM., Park, HW., Shim, GS. et al. Mechanical properties and decomposition performance of peelable coating containing UiO-66 catalyst and waterborne silane-terminated polyurethane dispersions. J Mater Sci 55, 2604–2617 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-019-04184-2

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-019-04184-2

Search

Navigation