Skip to main content
Log in

3D printing of structural gradient soft actuators by variation of bioinspired architectures

  • Materials for life sciences
  • Published:
Journal of Materials Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Soft actuators, which ensure the safety of robot–human interactions, extend the range of robotic operations to fragile and sensitive objects. Shape memory polymers are one of the building material for soft actuators due to their spontaneous shape memory properties under stimulation. However, the global, discontinuous and imprecise motion put significant limitations on their wide application. Recently, it has been demonstrated that by using motifs in nature, anisotropic, heterogeneous properties of soft actuators can be fabricated. Here, it is shown that soft actuators with local response and continuously varying shape memory properties can be realized through integrating bioinspired arranged building blocks (fibers). The modified 3D printing technique provides the pathway of assembling these fibers as designed. We have revealed the underlying mechanism of the formation of gradient shape memory properties. Simulations successfully demonstrate the feasibility of our approach to manipulate shape memory behaviors. The translation of nature’s design motifs offers synthetic soft actuators the opportunity towards unprecedented applications such as soft robot, drug carrier and other intelligent applications.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 5
Figure 6
Figure 7
Figure 8

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Liu Z, Meyers MA, Zhang Z, Ritchie RO (2017) Functional gradients and heterogeneities in biological materials: design principles, functions, and bioinspired applications. Prog Mater Sci 88:467–498

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Studart AR (2013) Biological and bioinspired composites with spatially tunable heterogeneous architectures. Adv Funct Mater 23:4423–4436

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Murphy T (2010) Gradients of dentine exposure in human molar tooth attrition. Am J Phys Anthropol 17:179–186

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Miserez A, Schneberk T, Sun C, Zok FW, Waite JH (2008) The transition from stiff to compliant materials in squid beaks. Science 319:1816–1819

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Chen Y, Wang L, Xue Y, Jiang L, Zheng Y (2013) Bioinspired tilt-angle fabricated structure gradient fibers: micro-drops fast transport in a long-distance. Sci Rep 3:2927

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Bentov S, Zaslansky P, Alsawalmih A, Masic A, Fratzl P, Sagi A et al (2012) Enamel-like apatite crown covering amorphous mineral in a crayfish mandible. Nat Commun 3:839

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Elbaum R, Zaltzman L, Burgert I, Fratzl P (2007) The role of wheat awns in the seed dispersal unit. Science 316:884–886

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Dawson C, Vincent JFV, Rocca AM (1997) How pine cones open. Nature 390:668

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Gibson LJ (2012) The hierarchical structure and mechanics of plant materials. J R Soc Interface 9:2749–2766

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Eder M, Jungnikl K, Burgert I (2009) A close-up view of wood structure and properties across a growth ring of norway spruce. Trees 23:79–84

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Tadayon M, Amini S, Masic A, Miserez A (2015) Saddle structures: the mantis shrimp saddle: a biological spring combining stiffness and flexibility. Adv Funct Mater 25:6429

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Miserez A, Weaver JC, Thurner PJ, Aizenberg J, Dauphin Y, Fratzl P, Morse DE, Zok FW (2008) Effects of laminate architecture on fracture resistance of sponge biosilica: lessons from nature. Adv Funct Mater 18:1241–1248

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Färber J, Lichtenegger HC, Reiterer A, Stanzl-Tschegg S, Fratzl P (2001) Cellulose microfibril angles in a spruce branch and mechanical implications. J Mater Sci 36:5087–5092. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1012465005607

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Zhang Y, Paris O, Terrill NJ, Gupta HS (2016) Uncovering three-dimensional gradients in fibrillar orientation in an impact-resistant biological armour. Sci Rep 6:26249

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Raabe D, Sachs C, Romano P (2005) The crustacean exoskeleton as an example of a structurally and mechanically graded biological nanocomposite material. Acta Mater 53:4281–4292

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Watanabe T, Imamura Y, Hosaka Y, Ueda H, Takehana K (2007) Graded arrangement of collagen fibrils in the equine superficial digital flexor tendon. Connect Tissue Res 48:332–337

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Elbaum R, Gorb S, Fratzl P (2008) Structures in the cell wall that enable hygroscopic movement of wheat awns. J Struct Biol 164:101–107

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Studart AR, Erb RM (2014) Bioinspired materials that self-shape through programmed microstructures. Soft Matter 10:1284–1294

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Yang Y, Chen Z, Song X, Zhang Z, Zhang J, Shung KK, Zhou Q, Chen Y (2017) Biomimetic anisotropic reinforcement architectures by electrically assisted nanocomposite 3d printing. Adv Mater 29:1605750

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Collino RR, Ray TR, Fleming RC, Sasaki CH, Haj-Hariri H, Begley MR (2015) Acoustic field controlled patterning and assembly of anisotropic particles. EML 5:37–46

    Google Scholar 

  21. Martin JJ, Fiore BE, Erb RM (2015) Designing bioinspired composite reinforcement architectures via 3d magnetic printing. Nat Commun 6:8641

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Rudykh S, Boyce MC (2014) Transforming small localized loading into large rotational motion in soft anisotropically structured materials. Adv Eng Mater 16:1311–1317

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Slesarenko V, Engelkemier S, Galich PI, Vladimirsky D, Klein G, Rudykh S (2018) Strategies to control performance of 3d-printed, cable-driven soft polymer actuators: from simple architectures to gripper prototype. Polymers 10:846

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Galich PI, Slesarenko V, Rudykh S (2016) Shear wave propagation in finitely deformed 3D fiber-reinforced composites. Int J Solids Struct 110–111:294–304

    Google Scholar 

  25. Bin S, Kim JG, Nam YY, Lee GH, Yu WR (2015) Mechanical analysis of carbon fiber shape memory polymer composites. In: World congress on advances in structural engineering and mechanics

  26. Ge Q, Luo X, Rodriguez ED, Zhang X, Mather PT, Dunn ML, Qi HJ (2012) Thermomechanical behavior of shape memory elastomeric composites. J Mech Phys Solids 60:67–83

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Kumar S, Reddy KVVS, Kumar A, Devi GR (2013) Development and characterization of polymer–ceramic continuous fiber reinforced functionally graded composites for aerospace application. Trends Cardiovasc Med 26:185–191

    Google Scholar 

  28. Illeperuma WRK, Sun JY, Suo Z, Vlassak JJ (2014) Fiber-reinforced tough hydrogels. EML 1:90–96

    Google Scholar 

  29. Erb RM, Sander JS, Grisch R, Studart AR (2013) Self-shaping composites with programmable bioinspired microstructures. Nat Commun 4:1712

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Wegst UG, Bai H, Saiz E, Tomsia AP, Ritchie RO (2015) Bioinspired structural materials. Nat Mater 14:23–36

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Naleway SE, Porter MM, Mckittrick J, Meyers MA (2015) Structural design elements in biological materials: application to bioinspiration. Adv Mater 27:5455–5476

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Mahajan C, Cormier D (2015) 3D printing of carbon fiber composites with preferentially aligned fibers. In: IIE annual conference. Proceedings

  33. Ayres C, Bowlin GL, Henderson SC, Taylor L, Shultz J, Alexander J, Telemeco TA, Simpson DG (2006) Modulation of anisotropy in electrospun tissue-engineering scaffolds: analysis of fiber alignment by the fast fourier transform. Biomaterials 27:5524–5534

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Ge Q, Serjouei A, Qi HJ, Dunn ML (2016) Thermomechanics of printed anisotropic shape memory elastomeric composites. Int J Solids Struct 102–103:186–199

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Debotton G, Hariton I, Socolsky EA (2016) Neo-Hookean fiber-reinforced composites in finite elasticity. J Mech Phys Solids 54:533–559

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Idiart MI (2016) Modeling the macroscopic behavior of two-phase nonlinear composites by infinite-rank laminates. J Mech Phys Solids 56:2599–2617

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This research was supported by National Key R&D Program of China (2018YFB1105100) and the Key Scientific and Technological Project of Jilin Province (No. 20170204061GX).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to Qingping Liu or Lei Ren.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (DOCX 3154 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Ren, L., Li, B., Song, Z. et al. 3D printing of structural gradient soft actuators by variation of bioinspired architectures. J Mater Sci 54, 6542–6551 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-019-03344-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-019-03344-8

Navigation