Abstract
B4C coatings for 10B-based neutron detector applications were deposited using high-power impulse magnetron sputtering (HiPIMS) and direct current magnetron sputtering (DCMS) processes. The coatings were deposited on Si(001) as well as on flat and macrostructured (grooved) Al blades in an industrial coating unit using B4C compound targets in Ar. The HiPIMS and DCMS processes were conducted at substrate temperatures of 100 and 400 °C and the Ar pressure was varied between 300 and 800 mPa. Neutron detector-relevant coating characterization was performed and the coating properties were evaluated with regard to their growth rate, density, level of impurities, and residual coating stress. The coating properties are mainly influenced by general process parameters such as the Ar pressure and substrate temperature. The deposition mode shows only minor effects on the coating quality and no effects on the step coverage. At a substrate temperature of 100 °C and an Ar pressure of 800 mPa, well-adhering and functional coatings were deposited in both deposition modes; the coatings showed a density of 2.2 g/cm3, a B/C ratio of ~3.9, and the lowest compressive residual stresses of 180 MPa. The best coating quality was obtained in DCMS mode using an Ar pressure of 300 mPa and a substrate temperature of 400 °C. Such process parameters yielded coatings with a slightly higher density of 2.3 g/cm3, a B/C ratio of ~4, and the compressive residual stresses limited to 220 MPa.
Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Discover the latest articles, news and stories from top researchers in related subjects.Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
The recent intense and focused search for alternatives to 3He-based detectors has shown that detectors based on the boron isotope 10B are feasible alternatives [1, 2] both in their performance and economically [3–10]. 10B has a relatively high neutron absorption cross section compared to 3He, and by optimizing the design of the detector, a detection efficiency comparable to 3He has been presented [3, 11]. When a neutron is absorbed by a 10B atom, there is a 94 % probability that the nuclear reaction 10B + n → 7Li (0.84 MeV) + 4He (1.47 MeV) + γ (0.48 MeV) takes place, otherwise 10B + n → 7Li (1.02 MeV) + 4He (1.78 MeV).
For many 10B-based detector applications, 10B has to be deposited as “high-quality” thin films onto various substrate types. In this case, “high quality” is defined by neutron-hard, well-adhering films of thicknesses >1 µm featuring low residual stresses, maximum amounts of the neutron absorbing element 10B, and thus a minimum of unfavorable impurities like H, O, C, and N. The process must also be scalable to several hundred square meters of two-side coated substrates at affordable production prices. Natural boron contains 20 % 10B, but the isotope separation is relatively easy and >95 % 10B-enriched material is commercially available.
In previous publications [3, 12, 13], direct current magnetron sputtering (DCMS) was shown to provide suitable deposition processes for the production of 10B4C large area neutron detectors. 10B4C is the preferred material, instead of 10B, 10BN, or other 10B-containing compounds, due to its relatively high boron content in combination with excellent wear resistance and thermal and chemical stability [14–17]. Additionally, the radiation hardness has recently been shown to be appropriate for these neutron detector applications [18].
Reference [12] addresses adhesion issues that often arise for micrometer-range-thick B4C films due to high residual film stresses in combination with low adhesive forces between the B4C film and the substrate. Here, the film adhesion on Al substrates was reported to improve significantly as elevated substrate temperatures between 300 and 400 °C are used. However, there is still a need for a well-working process at substrate temperatures below 200 °C, allowing the deposition of adhering, high-quality 10B4C coatings on temperature sensitive substrates.
Additionally, the inherently poor step coverage of coatings deposited by DCMS on macrostructured (commonly grooved) Al blades [4] needs further investigation. The poor step coverage arises due to the line-of-sight deposition nature of this technique [19]. As was pointed out by Stefanescu et al., 10B4C coating thickness non-uniformity on such macrostructured blades may lead to detector efficiency losses of up to 10 % [20].
A possible solution to the above mentioned concerns, yet still using an industrial-scale magnetron sputtering process, may be high-power impulse magnetron sputtering (HiPIMS). In HiPIMS processes, the flux of ionized target material usually exceeds the flux of ionized working gas [21–25]. This implies not only benefits with regard to the film morphology and density, but also for the residual stress [26, 27] and the step coverage [21]. Although ion bombardment of the growing film has frequently been reported to yield high film stresses [28], the comparison of films deposited by DCMS and HiPIMS showed significantly reduced stresses without sacrificing film hardness or density in case HiPIMS was used [29]. Here, mainly the sputter gas and target material properties, i.e., mass and ionization potentials, together with appropriate bias voltage setting were found decisive.
Therefore, this study explores DCMS and HiPIMS process parameters for the growth of B4C coatings on temperature-sensitive or macrostructured substrates. In order to put the quality of coatings deposited using HiPIMS or DCMS at low substrate temperature into perspective, their properties are compared to high-grade coatings deposited by DCMS at elevated substrate temperature. The aim is the deposition of uniform, high-quality B4C films onto Si and various Al substrates with a thickness of >1 µm at low substrate temperatures without adhesion-enhancing interlayers in order to meet the requirements of different 10B-based neutron detector technologies.
Experimental details
B4C films were deposited in an industrial coating unit (CC800/9, CemeCon AG, Germany). A base pressure of less than 0.5 mPa was achieved prior to deposition. The depositions were carried out in DCMS and HiPIMS modes. All coating processes utilized two rectangular B4C compound targets with an area of 440 cm2. The B4C targets were mounted on two, each other facing cathodes and sputtered in Ar atmosphere.
Prior to deposition, the sputter system was evacuated at full pumping speed for 2 h and the substrates were degassed at the intended deposition temperature. The deposition of the B4C films was conducted at 75 % of the full pumping speed. The influences of the substrate temperature and deposition pressure on the B4C coating properties grown in DCMS and HiPIMS modes were investigated. For our experiments, the deposition temperatures of 100 and 400 °C were chosen. The working gas pressures were adjusted to 300, 450, 600, and 800 mPa by the Ar flow and kept constant throughout the deposition. In DCMS mode, a power of 3500 W was applied to each cathode. In HiPIMS mode, the same average target power of 3500 W together with a pulse frequency of 700 Hz and a pulse width of 200 µs was used. The pulse parameters yielded an energy per pulse (EpP) of 5 Ws. No additional bias voltage was supplied to the substrate table in both deposition modes in order to reduce residual coating stresses and to provide well-adhering coatings. The floating potential was measured to be approximately −40 V.
Films with thicknesses between 1.4 and 1.9 µm were grown onto Si(001) wafer pieces, on flat Al blades (alloy EN AW-5754) [30], and on macrostructured Al blades [20]. The chosen substrates allow for various material analysis techniques and correspond to frequently used substrates in 10B-based neutron detectors. All Al blades were mounted on a sample carousel with a 2-axis planetary rotation for 2-sided deposition. The Si wafer pieces were attached with stainless steel wires to the flat Al blades and mounted in a similar position as the flat Al substrates without Si. The macrostructured Al blades were mounted inside the deposition chamber so that the grooves were vertical and rotated around their primary axis using twofold rotation.
Cross-sectional scanning electron microscopy (SEM, LEO 1550 Gemini, Zeiss, Germany) was carried out in order to determine the B4C thickness and hence the deposition rates of the sputter processes. The instrument, equipped with an in-lens detector, was operated at an acceleration voltage of 5 kV at a working distance of ~3 mm.
In order to study the thickness uniformity of B4C coatings on grooved Al blades, cross-sectional SEM was conducted. For sample preparation, the grooved Al blades were cut perpendicular to the grooves, embedded into Bakelite resin (Polyfast, Struers), and subsequently mirror polished. The above mentioned instrument settings were applied for SEM imaging.
The composition and bonding states of the B4C films were examined by X-ray photoelectron spectroscopy (Axis UltraDLD, Kratos Analytical, Manchester, UK) using monochromatic Al(Kα) X-ray radiation (hν = 1486.6 eV). The base pressure in the analysis chamber during acquisition was less than 1 × 10−7 Pa. The XPS survey spectrum and core-level spectra of the B 1s, Ar 2p, C 1s, and O 1s regions were recorded on the as-received samples and after Ar+ etching with a 4 keV Ar+ ion beam. In order to remove the surface oxide layer that is generated upon exposure to air, the Ar+ beam was rastered over an area of 3 × 3 mm2 at an incidence angle of 20°. Automatic charge compensation was applied throughout the acquisition. After subtraction of a Shirley-type background, the compositions were extracted from the core-level spectra obtained from sputter cleaned samples applying elemental cross sections provided by Kratos Analytical.
Isotope-specific compositional analysis was performed with time-of-flight elastic recoil detection analysis (ToF-ERDA), using a 36 MeV 127I9+ beam at 66° incidence and 45° recoil scattering angle. The recoil energy of each element was converted to relative elemental depth profiles using the CONTES code [31].
The residual stresses in the films were determined by the wafer curvature method assessed by X-ray diffraction (XRD, PANalytical Empyrean) [32]. The diffractometer, equipped with a Cu Kα1 source, was operated at 45 kV and 40 mA. The Stoney formula for anisotropic single crystal Si(001) was used to extract residual coating stress from the measured substrate curvature. Here, uniform plane stress in the film was assumed [33]. The same instrument was chosen to study the film density by X-ray reflectivity (XRR). The density was evaluated using the PANalytical X’Pert reflectivity software. Here, a 3-layer model, resembling the substrate, the B4C films, and a surface oxide layer, was applied.
Results and discussion
Figure 1a–d presents the cross-sectional SEM images of B4C coatings deposited on Si(001) at a substrate temperature of 400 °C. In Fig. 1a, b, the B4C coatings were sputtered using an Ar pressure of 800 mPa in DCMS and HiPIMS modes, respectively. Figure 1c, d shows B4C coatings deposited at an Ar pressure of 300 mPa using DCMS and HiPIMS, respectively. As can be seen, all samples show columnar morphologies without significant differences. This columnar growth mode is attributed to comparatively low average particle energies and fluxes [34], which is expected for the sputter deposition from B4C compound targets and for the chosen bias voltage settings. The flux of sputtered particles is considered to be low due to the comparatively low B4C sputter yield of <0.5 at/ion at an Ar+ energy of 800 eV [35, 36]. The average particle energy can be estimated to be less than 10 eV on the basis of results in Ref. [29] (cf. Fig. 3a, f black lines in Ref. [29]), given that the peak target currents in the HiPIMS B4C processes did not exceed 72 A and the discharge characteristics of B4C were found to be similar to graphite. Moreover, in order to provide well-adhering coatings, the processes were conducted at floating potential, which maintains low particle energies at the growing film surface.
Figure 2 compares the growth rates of DCMS and HiPIMS processes using an average target power per cathode of 3500 W. HiPIMS processes were carried out at a frequency of 700 Hz yielding an EpP of 5 Ws. The growth rates for DCMS and HiPIMS processes are comparable, although non-reactive HiPIMS of commonly sputtered metals yields generally lower growth rates compared to DCMS [37]. The reduced growth rate in HiPIMS is mainly attributed to an increased amount of back-attracted ionized species caused by an increased ionization of the sputtered material [38, 39]. In case the B4C compound target is operated in HiPIMS mode, an enhanced ionization of sputtered target material is not apparent. We ascribe this to the comparatively high first ionization energies of B and C of 8.3 and 11.26 eV, respectively, as well as the low sputter yield of B4C.
Furthermore, Fig. 2 shows an increasing growth rate as the Ar pressure is raised from 300 to 800 mPa. Depending on the pressure, the substrate temperature of 100 °C yields growth rates between 0.50 and 0.64 µm/h, while the growth rates at 400 °C show slightly reduced values ranging between 0.45 and 0.54 µm/h. The drop in deposition rate at elevated temperatures can be attributed to an increased ad-atom mobility at the growing substrate surface. High ad-atom mobilities increase the probability for recombination reactions at the growing film substrate, where volatile species may form [40]. At T s = 400 °C, this process may be assisted by an elevated desorption of contaminants from the chamber walls. Moreover, the slightly increased densities (cf. discussion on coating densities below and Fig. 4) that were extracted for films deposited at T s = 400 °C contribute to reduced growth rates.
The B4C coating thickness uniformity on grooved Al blades of processes conducted at 400 °C is shown in Fig. 3a. Cross-sectional SEM images were acquired at the top, the slope, and the bottom of the grooves, which have a height of 2.1 mm and an opening angle of 45º [4] as depicted in Fig. 3b. As shown in Fig. 3a, the coating thickness uniformity of all investigated processes is neither significantly influenced by the deposition mode nor by the applied Ar pressure. The coating thickness at the slope of the grooves was found to range between 60 and 70 % of the coating thickness at the top, and drops further to values between 23 and 27 % at the bottom. The line-of-sight deposition of magnetron sputtering is well known [19]. Therefore, abruptly decreasing coating thicknesses at the slope and the bottom of the grooves are expected not only in DCMS mode, but also in HiPIMS mode, since an enhanced ionization of sputtered target material is not apparent as outlined above. The step coverage was also shown to be influenced by the particle mean free path, which in turn is affected by the Ar pressure [41–43]. Saito et al. [42] varied the process pressure and demonstrated that a particle mean free path resembling the target-to-substrate distance yielded the best step coverage. In our study, Ar pressures between 500 and 800 mPa result in a particle mean free path of sputtered target material that resembles the actual target-to-substrate distance between 6 cm and 10 cm [44] in the twofold rotational setup used for the grooved Al blades. The fact that the coating uniformities do not differ significantly may be ascribed to the twofold rotation of the grooved blades, which possibly disguises effects induced by the deposition pressure due to shadowing effects.
Figure 4 shows that an elevated substrate temperate of 400 °C yields B4C densities of up to 2.30 g/cm3 in both deposition modes. Throughout the investigated range of Ar pressures, HiPIMS yields constant film densities of 2.23 ± 0.02 and 2.30 ± 0.01 g/cm3 at the substrate temperatures of 100 and 400 °C, respectively. The density of films deposited in DCMS mode appears to be affected by pressure. Here, an Ar pressure of 800 mPa results in decreased B4C densities of 2.10 and 2.23 g/cm3 at T s = 100 and 400 °C, respectively. Increasing B4C densities approaching the B4C bulk density of 2.52 g/cm3 at an elevated substrate temperature are a result of the above mentioned increased ad-atom mobility and lower contents of incorporated contaminates like O.
The O-contents and B/C ratios presented in Fig. 5a, b, respectively, were assessed by XPS measurements after Ar-ion cleaning. As shown in Fig. 5a, the O-content of the coatings is mainly influenced by the Ar pressure and the substrate temperature. The deposition mode affects the O-content only at the pressures of 600 and 800 mPa using a substrate temperature of 100 °C, where the highest O-contents of 5.7 and 6.3 at.%, respectively, were recorded for B4C coating grown in HiPIMS mode. The same process parameters applied in DCMS mode yield B4C coatings with the O-contents of 4.6 at.% (600 mPa) and 5.7 at.% (800 mPa). Such elevated levels of O in coatings deposited using HiPIMS are attributed to comparatively long pulse-off times of 1.2 ms, during which O from the residual gas can attach to the target and the growing film surface. The increase in film O-contents with the Ar pressure is attributed to decreased particle energies caused by an increased probability of particle collisions. At pressures of 600 mPa and above, the average particle mean free path is estimated to be ~6 cm using the approach proposed in [44]. This suggests that sputtered particles undergo one collision, which leads to reduced particle energies. The increased probability of collisions increases also the probability of reactions with the background gas. Moreover, lowered particle energies inhibit re-sputtering of O at the growing film surface. As the substrate temperature rises to 400 °C, the ad-atom mobility rises and the desorption of O-containing species is catalyzed, which is mirrored in lower O-contents but also lowered growth rates (cf. Figs. 2, 5a).
As presented in Fig. 5b, the films deposited in DCMS mode using a low Ar pressure of 300 mPa and a substrate temperature of 400 °C show the highest B/C ratio of ~4.0. The same conditions in HiPIMS mode yield films with a decreased B/C ratio of ~3.9. At a substrate temperature of 100 °C, increasing pressures from 300 to 800 mPa result also in decreased B/C ratios. The results are directly related to the above discussed O-contents as well as C contamination from the background and ambient gas.
Figure 6a, b shows the compositional depth profiles as obtained by ToF-ERDA of B4C films deposited by DCMS and HiPIMS, respectively, at T s = 400 °C and an Ar pressure of 300 mPa. The results suggest slightly higher levels of H, O, and N of the coating deposited in DCMS mode, while the B/C ratios of both coatings are comparable with the values of 4.77 and 4.74 for B4C films sputtered in DCMS and HiPIMS mode, respectively. The total amount of the impurities H, O, and N is 3.9 at.% for the coating sputtered by DCMS and 2.3 at.% for the coating grown in HiPIMS mode. The results show also that, apart from the near-surface region, the composition is homogenous for both coatings. The compositions of the near-surface regions of comparable B4C coatings were closer, as investigated in [45], where it was shown that surface oxidation extends to a maximum of 60 nm into the coatings.
Comparing ToF-ERDA and XPS data, the B/C ratios and O-contents are discrepant. This is mainly caused by the surface-sensitive nature of XPS measurements. XPS offers a probing depth of approximately 10 nm into the coating. Although only data recorded after Ar-ion etching were considered for data evaluation and the base pressure in the analysis chamber during acquisition was less than 1 × 10−7 Pa, an overestimation of elements in the background gas, i.e., O, C, and N, is apparent. Here, surface reactions of the background gas with the Ar-ion etched surface during measurement, residual surface contaminations after Ar-ion etching, or surface contamination that is mixed into the first monolayers of the coating due to the Ar-ion beam may be possible measurement method artifacts. ToF-ERDA data, on the other hand, present the coating composition including H contents up to a depth of 400 nm and are as such considered to mirror the coating composition better.
The compressive residual coating stresses are shown in Fig. 7. Here, the two substrate temperatures induce opposing trends as the pressure increases; at a substrate temperature of 100 °C, the compressive residual coating stress decreases, while the coatings deposited at 400 °C show increasing compressive stress values. The low-temperature HiPIMS processes span the widest range of stresses throughout the investigated Ar pressure range. While the lowest compressive film stress of −180 MPa is recorded for B4C coatings deposited at a pressure of 800 mPa, the highest residual stress of −380 MPa is obtained using a pressure of 300 mPa.
At a substrate temperature of 100 °C, the evolution of the coating stress is mainly attributed to lowered particle energies caused by increased particle scattering as the pressure increases. This, in turn, reduces forward sputtering, which was reported to be one of the major factors that contribute to compressive coating stresses [28]. As mentioned above, the average particle mean free path for collision was estimated to be ~6 cm at 800 mPa, while the collision mean free path increases to ~9 and ~15 cm at 450 and 300 mPa, respectively [44].
Other commonly reported factors that contribute to increased stress levels in thin films deposited by magnetron sputtering techniques are Ar incorporation and high particle energies. Incorporation of Ar can be excluded here based on its non-existence in ToF-ERDA and XPS measurements of the as-deposited samples. High particle energies arising due to an elevated target mass [46], peak target currents [47], or high bias potentials can also be excluded to contribute to elevated stress levels; HiPIMS processes conducted at 300 and 800 mPa showed comparable and low peak target currents of 68 and 69 A, respectively. Energetic, reflected Ar neutrals are also expected to play a minor role considering the low target/Ar gas mass ratio. Finally, our study was conducted at floating potential where ionized plasma species experience merely a potential drop of less than 40 V.
As the substrate temperature rises to 400 °C, the extracted compressive coating stresses are attenuated, where the values vary within 100 MPa over the investigated range of Ar pressures. The comparatively low stress levels are due to the low coefficient of thermal expansion (CTE, α) of Si (α = 2.7 × 10−6 K−1) compared to B4C (α = 5 × 10−6 K−1). Moreover, an increased ad-atom mobility at elevated substrate temperatures contributes to the reduction of intrinsic stresses, which is frequently reported for sputter deposited metallic films [28]. As shown in Fig. 7, this effect is reduced at elevated pressures since the deposition rate increases simultaneously. Similar results were reported by Sun et al. [48].
The level of compressive residual coating stress provides also an indication of the coating adhesion. Although the differences in compressive film stress for B4C deposited on Si substrates do not appear substantial, a slight rise of the film stress is mirrored in a delamination of the B4C coatings on Al substrates. The amplification is caused by the comparatively high coefficient of thermal expansion of Al (α = 22.2 × 10−6 K−1) compared to B4C (α = 5 × 10−6 K−1) and Si (α = 2.7 × 10−6 K−1).
It should be emphasized that the B4C coatings deposited at 100 °C at 800 mPa and all B4C films deposited at 400 °C showed good long-term adhesion on Si and Al substrates. Furthermore, at low deposition temperatures the substrate curvature of the Al blades was significantly reduced. Hence, the deposition of well-adhering B4C coatings on temperature sensitive substrates is successfully conducted using elevated pressures.
Conclusions
10B-based neutron detectors require B4C coatings of thicknesses >1 µm that feature highest possible B/C ratios, densities, and low amounts of impurities like H, O, and N, as well as adequate adhesion. This study investigated DCMS and HiPIMS process parameters for the growth of B4C coatings on temperature-sensitive or macrostructured substrates for neutron detector applications. The quality of coatings deposited using HiPIMS or DCMS at a substrate temperature of 100 °C was compared to high-grade coatings deposited by DCMS at 400 °C. Provided that optimized sputter parameters are applied, both magnetron sputter modes were shown to yield functional B4C coatings.
The coating quality was found to be mainly influenced by the substrate temperature and the Ar pressure, while the deposition mode influences the coating properties only slightly. Within the investigated range of process settings, a pressure of 300 mPa and a substrate temperature of 400 °C DCMS were shown to yield the highest coating quality. Under such conditions, coatings with a high B/C ratio of ~4, low residual compressive stresses of 220 MPa, a low total amount of impurities of 3.9 at.%, and a density >90 % of the B4C bulk density, specifically ~2.3 g/cm3, were deposited.
The study presented moreover the feasibility and limitations of a low-temperature deposition of B4C coatings. At a substrate temperate of 100 °C and a pressure of 800 mPa, the coatings deposited using HiPIMS and DCMS show an adequate adhesion due to very low residual compressive stresses of 180 MPa, but elevated O-contents of ~6 at.% as well as slightly reduced densities of 2.2 g/cm3. Such low-temperature processes are suited to coat temperature sensitive substrates such as glass-reinforced epoxy laminate sheets.
References
Zeitelhack K (2012) Search for alternative techniques to helium-3 based detectors for neutron scattering applications. Neutron News 23(4):10–13. doi:10.1080/10448632.2012.725325
Kouzes RT, Ely JH, Erikson LE, Kernan WJ, Lintereur AT, Siciliano ER, Stephens DL, Stromswold DC, Van Ginhoven RM, Woodring ML (2010) Neutron detection alternatives to 3He for national security applications. Nucl Instrum Methods A 623(3):1035–1045. doi:10.1016/j.nima.2010.08.021
Bigault T, Birch J, Buffet JC, Correa J, Hall-Wilton R, Hultman L, Höglund C, Guérard B, Khaplanov A, Piscitelli F, van Esch P (2012) 10B multi-grid proportional gas counters for large area thermal neutron detectors. Neutron News 23(4):20–25. doi:10.1080/10448632.2012.725329
Stefanescu I, Abdullahi Y, Birch J, Defendi I, Hall-Wilton R, Höglund C, Hultman L, Zee M, Zeitelhack K (2013) A B-10-based neutron detector with stacked multiwire proportional counters and macrostructured cathodes. J Instrum 8:11. doi:10.1088/1748-0221/8/12/p12003
Modzel G, Henske M, Houben A, Klein M, Köhli M, Lennert P, Meven M, Schmidt CJ, Schmidt U, Schweika W (2014) Absolute efficiency measurements with the 10B based Jalousie detector. Nucl Instrum Methods A 743:90–95. doi:10.1016/j.nima.2014.01.007
Henske M, Klein M, Köhli M, Lennert P, Modzel G, Schmidt CJ, Schmidt U (2012) The 10B based Jalousie neutron detector—an alternative for 3He filled position sensitive counter tubes. Nucl Instrum Methods A 686:151–155. doi:10.1016/j.nima.2012.05.075
Lacy JL, Sun L, Athanasiades A, Martin CS, Nguyen R, Lyons TD (2010) Initial performance of large area neutron imager based on boron coated straws. In: IEEE Nuclear Science Symposium Conference Record 30 Oct 2010–6 Nov 2010. pp 1786–1799. doi:10.1109/NSSMIC.2010.5874082
Klein M, Schmidt CJ (2011) CASCADE, neutron detectors for highest count rates in combination with ASIC/FPGA based readout electronics. Nucl Instrum Methods A 628(1):9–18. doi:10.1016/j.nima.2010.06.278
Kirstein O, Hall-Wilton R, Stefanescu I, Etxegarai M, Anastasopoulos M, Fissum K, Gulyachkina A, Höglund C, Imam M, Kanaki K, Khaplanov A, Kittelmann T, Kolya S, Nilsson B, Ortega L, Pfeiffer D, Piscitelli F, Ramos JF, Robinson L, Scherzinger J (2014) Neutron position sensitive detectors for the ESS. arXiv: 1411.6194
Peggs S (2013) ESS technical design report, ESS 2013-001. ESS technical design report, ESS 2013-001, https://europeanspallationsource.se/scientific-technical-documentation
Piscitelli F, Esch PV (2013) Analytical modeling of thin film neutron converters and its application to thermal neutron gas detectors. J Instrum 8(04):P04020
Höglund C, Birch J, Andersen K, Bigault T, Buffet J-C, Correa J, van Esch P, Guerard B, Hall-Wilton R, Jensen J, Khaplanov A, Piscitelli F, Vettier C, Vollenberg W, Hultman L (2012) B4C thin films for neutron detection. J Appl Phys 111(10):104908. doi:10.1063/1.4718573
Nowak G, Störmer M, Becker H-W, Horstmann C, Kampmann R, Höche D, Haese-Seiller M, Moulin J-F, Pomm M, Randau C, Lorenz U, Hall-Wilton R, Müller M, Schreyer A (2015) Boron carbide coatings for neutron detection probed by x-rays, ions, and neutrons to determine thin film quality. J Appl Phys 117(3):034901. doi:10.1063/1.4905716
Eckardt T, Bewilogua K, van der Kolk G, Hurkmans T, Trinh T, Fleischer W (2000) Improving tribological properties of sputtered boron carbide coatings by process modifications. Surf Coat Technol 126(1):69–75. doi:10.1016/S0257-8972(00)00525-9
Riedel R (1994) Novel ultrahard materials. Adv Mater 6(7–8):549–560. doi:10.1002/adma.19940060705
Thévenot F (1990) Boron carbide—a comprehensive review. J Eur Ceram Soc 6(4):205–225. doi:10.1016/0955-2219(90)90048-K
Martinez E, Lousa A, Esteve J (2001) Micromechanical and microtribological properties of BCN thin films near the B4C composition deposited by r.f. magnetron sputtering. Diam Relat Mater 10(9–10):1892–1896. doi:10.1016/S0925-9635(01)00429-0
Höglund C, Zeitelhack K, Kudejova P, Jensen J, Greczynski G, Lu J, Hultman L, Birch J, Hall-Wilton R (2015) Stability of 10B4C thin films under neutron radiation. Radiat Phys Chem 113:14–19. doi:10.1016/j.radphyschem.2015.04.006
Hopwood J (2000) Ionized physical vapor deposition, thin film series. Thin film, vol 27. Academic Press, San Diego
Stefanescu I, Abdullahi Y, Birch J, Defendi I, Hall-Wilton R, Höglund C, Hultman L, Seiler D, Zeitelhack K (2013) Development of a novel macrostructured cathode for large-area neutron detectors based on the B-10-containing solid converter. Nucl Instrum Methods A 727:109–125. doi:10.1016/j.nima.2013.06.003
Kouznetsov V, Macak K, Schneider JM, Helmersson U, Petrov I (1999) A novel pulsed magnetron sputter technique utilizing very high target power densities. Surf Coat Technol 122(2–3):290–293
Vlcek J, Kudlacek P, Burcalova K, Musil J (2007) Ion flux characteristics in high-power pulsed magnetron sputtering discharges. EPL 77(4):5. doi:10.1209/0295-5075/77/45002
Bohlmark J, Alami J, Christou C, Ehiasarian AP, Helmersson U (2005) Ionization of sputtered metals in high power pulsed magnetron sputtering. J Vac Sci Technol A 23(1):18–22. doi:10.1116/1.1818135
Hecimovic A, Ehiasarian AP (2011) Temporal Evolution of the ion fluxes for various elements in HIPIMS plasma discharge. IEEE Trans Plasma Sci 39(4):1154–1164. doi:10.1109/tps.2011.2106516
Macák K, Kouznetsov V, Schneider J, Helmersson U, Petrov I (2000) Ionized sputter deposition using an extremely high plasma density pulsed magnetron discharge. J Vac Sci Technol A 18(4):1533–1537. doi:10.1116/1.582380
Ehiasarian AP, Vetushka A, Gonzalvo YA, Sáfrán G, Székely L, Barna PB (2011) Influence of high power impulse magnetron sputtering plasma ionization on the microstructure of TiN thin films. J Appl Phys 109(10):104314. doi:10.1063/1.3579443
Machunze R, Ehiasarian AP, Tichelaar FD, Janssen G (2009) Stress and texture in HIPIMS TiN thin films. Thin Solid Films 518(5):1561–1565. doi:10.1016/j.tsf.2009.09.069
Windischmann H (1992) Intrinsic stress in sputter deposited thin-films. CRC Crit Rev Sol State 17(6):547–596. doi:10.1080/10408439208244586
Schmidt S, Czigány Z, Wissting J, Greczynski G, Janzén E, Jensen J, Ivanov IG, Hultman L (2016) A comparative study of direct current magnetron sputtering and high power impulse magnetron sputtering processes for CNx thin film growth with different inert gases. Diam Relat Mater 64:13–26. doi:10.1016/j.diamond.2016.01.009
Birch J, Buffet JC, Correa J, van Esch P, Guerard B, Hall-Wilton R, Höglund C, Hultman L, Khaplanov A, Piscitelli F (2013) (B4C)-B-10 multi-grid as an alternative to He-3 for large area neutron detectors. IEEE Trans Nucl Sci 60(2):871–878. doi:10.1109/tns.2012.2227798
Janson MS (2004) CONTES conversion of time-energy spectra—a program for ERDA data analysis. Internal Report, Uppsala University
Rosakis AJ, Singh RP, Tsuji Y, Kolawa E, Moore NR Jr (1998) Full field measurements of curvature using coherent gradient sensing: application to thin film characterization. Thin Solid Films 325(1–2):42–54. doi:10.1016/S0040-6090(98)00432-5
Janssen G, Abdalla MM, van Keulen F, Pujada BR, van Venrooy B (2009) Celebrating the 100th anniversary of the Stoney equation for film stress: developments from polycrystalline steel strips to single crystal silicon wafers. Thin Solid Films 517(6):1858–1867. doi:10.1016/j.tsf.2008.07.014
Anders A (2010) A structure zone diagram including plasma-based deposition and ion etching. Thin Solid Films 518(15):4087–4090. doi:10.1016/j.tsf.2009.10.145
Ono T, Kawamura T, Ishii K, Yamamura Y (1996) Sputtering yield formula for B4C irradiated with monoenergetic ions at normal incidence. J Nucl Mater 232(1):52–58. doi:10.1016/0022-3115(96)00393-5
Pugacheva TS, Jurabekova FG, Miyagawa Y, Valiev SK (1997) Computer simulation of SiC and B4C sputtering by Ar+ and He+ ions bombardment. Nucl Instrum Methods B 127–128:260–264. doi:10.1016/S0168-583X(96)00936-6
Samuelsson M, Lundin D, Jensen J, Raadu MA, Gudmundsson JT, Helmersson U (2010) On the film density using high power impulse magnetron sputtering. Surf Coat Technol 205(2):591–596. doi:10.1016/j.surfcoat.2010.07.041
Brenning N, Huo C, Lundin D, Raadu MA, Vitelaru C, Stancu GD, Minea T, Helmersson U (2012) Understanding deposition rate loss in high power impulse magnetron sputtering: I. Ionization-driven electric fields. Plasma Sources Sci Technol 21(2):9. doi:10.1088/0963-0252/21/2/025005
Anders A (2010) Deposition rates of high power impulse magnetron sputtering: physics and economics. J Vac Sci Technol A 28(4):783–790. doi:10.1116/1.3299267
Roth J (1983) Sputtering by particle bombardment II. Springer, Berlin
Wei TW, Cai J, Wang Q, Hu Y, Wang L, Liu ZY, Wu ZJ (2014) Optimization and evaluation of sputtering barrier/seed layer in through silicon via for 3-D integration. Tsinghua Sci Technol 19(2):150–160
Saito T, Hashimoto T, Ohashi N, Fujiwara T, Yamaguchi H (2002) Copper wires for high speed logic LSI prepared by low pressure long throw sputtering method. Mater Trans 43(7):1599–1604. doi:10.2320/matertrans.43.1599
Balzer M, Fenker M (2014) Three-dimensional thickness and property distribution of TiC films deposited by DC magnetron sputtering and HIPIMS. Surf Coat Technol 250:37–43. doi:10.1016/j.surfcoat.2014.02.011
Depla D, Mahieu S (2010) Reactive sputter deposition. Springer, Berlin. doi:10.1007/978-3-540-76664-3
Piscitelli F, Khaplanov A, Devishvili A, Schmidt S, Höglund C, Birch J, Dennison AJC, Gutfreund P, Hall-Wilton R, Van Esch P (2016) Neutron reflectometry on highly absorbing films and its application to 10B4C-based neutron detectors. Proc R Soc Lond A Math 472(2185):20150711. doi:10.1098/rspa.2015.0711
Wehner GK, Anderson GS (1970) The nature of physical sputtering. In: Maissel LI, Glang R (eds) Handbook of thin film technology. McGraw-Hill, New York
Hecimovic A, Burcalova K, Ehiasarian AP (2008) Origins of ion energy distribution function (IEDF) in high power impulse magnetron sputtering (HIPIMS) plasma discharge. J Phys D Appl Phys 41(9):10. doi:10.1088/0022-3727/41/9/095203
Sun RC, Tisone TC, Cruzan PD (1975) The origin of internal stress in low-voltage sputtered tungsten films. J Appl Phys 46(1):112–117. doi:10.1063/1.322250
Acknowledgements
The work has been partially supported by the BrightnESS Project (Horizon 2020, INFRADEV-3-2015, Grant 676548). J. Birch and L. Hultman are grateful for the support from Knut and Alice Wallenberg’s Foundation through the project Grant: “Isotopic Control for Ultimate Material Properties.” S. Schmidt acknowledges the support by the Carl Tryggers Foundation for Scientific Research (CTS 14:431).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/), which permits unrestricted use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons license, and indicate if changes were made.
About this article
Cite this article
Schmidt, S., Höglund, C., Jensen, J. et al. Low-temperature growth of boron carbide coatings by direct current magnetron sputtering and high-power impulse magnetron sputtering. J Mater Sci 51, 10418–10428 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-016-0262-4
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-016-0262-4