Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Processing of β-treated Zircaloy-4 by warm compressions along three orthogonal axes

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Journal of Materials Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The purpose of this work is to refine the grains of Zircaloy-4 before it is processed into cladding tubes containing the nuclear fuel. This raises the question of the mechanisms by which the Widmanstätten lamellae inherited from the β-quenching transform into smaller crystallites. With a view to accelerate this transformation, strain steps of compression along three orthogonal axes were performed in the upper α-range (i.e. 550–810 °C). The effects of the temperature, the size of the strain steps, the strain rate and the number of cycles of three compressions were investigated. All have a direct influence on the mechanical behavior, the global texture and the microstructural evolution. The latter was studied mostly by electron backscattering diffraction. The best conditions to break the initial lamellae were found at high strain rate (4 s−1): small recrystallized grains around 10 μm were obtained after one cycle at 750 °C. But at moderate strain rates (0.1 s−1), good results were also reached after two cycles at 650 °C. The mechanisms of globularization are different in both cases: in the first, germination of new grains prevails while in the second, a progressive evolution of the subgrains into grains was observed. Some consequences of heat treatments are also briefly described, pointing out the sensitivity of Zircaloy-4 to undesirable grain growth. The conclusion emphasizes the interest of multiaxial forging in the thermomechanical treatment of hexagonal alloys.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11
Fig. 12
Fig. 13
Fig. 14
Fig. 15
Fig. 16
Fig. 17
Fig. 18
Fig. 19
Fig. 20

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ahmer Wadee M, Hunt GW, Peletier MA (2004) Kink band instability in layered structures. J Mech Phys Solids 52:1071–1091

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Bieler TR, Semiatin SL (2002) The origins of heterogeneous deformation during primary hot working of Ti–6Al–4V. Int J Plast 18:1165–1189

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Crépin J, Bretheau T, Caldemaison D (1995) Plastic deformation mechanisms of β treated zirconium. Acta Metall Mater 43(10):3709–3719

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Massih AR, Dahlbäck M, Limbäck M, Andersson T, Lehtinen B (2006) Effect of beta-to-alpha phase transition rate on corrosion behavior of Zircaloy. Corros Sci 48:1154–1181

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Ben Ammar Y, Aoufi A, Darrieulat M (2012) Influence of the cooling rate on the texture and the microstructure of Zircaloy-4 studied by means of a Jominy end-quench test. Mater Sci Eng A 556:184–193

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Takayama A, Yang X, Miura H, Sakai T (2008) Continuous static recrystallization in ultrafine-grained copper processed by multi-directional forging. Mater Sci Eng A 478:221–228

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Belyakov A, Tsuzaki K, Miura H, Sakai T (2003) Effect of initial microstructures on grain refinement in a stainless steel by large strain deformation. Acta Mater 51(3):847–861

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Padap AK, Chaudhari GP, Pancholi V, Nath SK (2012) Microstructural evolution and mechanical behavior of warm multi-axially forged HSLA steel. J Mater Sci 47(22):7894–7900. doi:10.1007/s10853-012-6477-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Ringeval S, Piot D, Desrayaud C, Driver J (2006) Texture and microtexture development in an Al–3Mg–Sc(Zr) alloy deformed by triaxial forging. Acta Mater 54(11):3095–3105

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Lim SM, EI Wahabi M, Desrayaud C, Montheillet F (2007) Microstructural refinement of a Fe–C alloy within the ferritic range via two different strain paths. Mater Sci Eng A 460:532–541

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Segal VM (2005) Materials processing by simple shear. Mater Sci Eng A 197:157–164

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Dupuy L, Rauch EF (2002) Deformation paths related to equal channel angular extrusion. Mater Sci Eng A 337:241–247

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Valiev RZ, Ivanisenko YV, Rauch EF, Baudelet B (1996) Structure and deformation behaviour of Armco iron subjected to severe plastic deformation. Acta Mater 44:4705–4712

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Saito Y, Tsuji N, Utsunomiya H, Sakai T, Hong RG (1998) Ultra-fine grained bulk aluminium produced by accumulative roll-bonding (ARB) process. Scr Mater 39(9):1221–1227

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Desrayaud C, Ringeval S, Driver J (2006) A novel high straining process for bulk materials—the development of a multipass forging system by compression along three axes. J Mater Process Technol 172:152–158

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Loge RE, Signorelli JW, Chastel YB, Perrin MY, Lebensohn RA (2000) Sensitivity of α-Zy4 high-temperature deformation textures to the β-quenched precipitate structure and to recrystallization: application to hot extrusion. Acta Mater 48:3917–3930

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Chauvy C, Barberis P, Montheillet F (2006) Microstructure transformation during warm working of β-treated lamellar Zircaloy-4 within the upper α-range. Mater Sci Eng A 431(1–2):59–67

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Chovet C, Desrayaud C, Montheillet F (2002) A mechanical analysis of the plane strain channel-die compression test: friction effects in hot metal testing. Int J Mech Sci 44:343–357

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. ABAQUS/Standard (2010) User’s Guide and Theoretical Manual, Version 6.7, Habbit, Karlsson and Serenson

  20. Kearns JJ (2001) On the relationship among ‘f’ texture factors for the principal planes of zirconium, hafnium and titanium alloys. J Nucl Mater 299:171–174

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Schmitt JH, Shen EL, Raphanel JL (1994) A parameter for measuring the magnitude of a change of strain path: validation and comparison with experiments on low carbon steel. Int J Plast 10(5):535–551

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Ringeval S (2006) Microtextures et textures d’alliages d’aluminium déformés par forgeage croisé (compression multidirectionnelle). PhD Dissertation (in French), Ecole Nationale Supérieure des Mines de Saint-Etienne

  23. Akhtar A (1975) Schmid’s law and prismatic slip of zirconium. Scr Metall 9(8):859–861

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Castan C, Montheillet F, Perlade A (2013) Dynamic recrystallization mechanisms of a Fe-8% Al low density steel under hot rolling conditions. Scr Mater 68:360–364

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Eghbali B (2010) Effect of strain rate on the microstructural development through continuous dynamic recrystallization in a microalloyed steel. Mater Sci Eng A 527(15):3402–3406

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Gourdet S, Montheillet F (2000) An experimental study of the recrystallization mechanism during hot deformation of aluminium. Mater Sci Eng A 283(1–2):274–288

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Yamagata H, Ohuchida Y, Saito N, Otsuka M (2001) Nucleation of new grains during discontinuous dynamic recrystallization of 99.998 mass% Aluminum at 453 K. Scr Mater 45(9):1055–1061

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Jazaeri H, Humphreys FJ (2004) The transition from discontinuous to continuous recrystallization in some aluminium alloys: II—effect of subsequent annealing. Acta Mater 52(11):3251–3262

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Hinton JS, Beynon JH (2007) Restoration processes during hot deformation in the δ-ferrite and austenite dual phase region of AISI430 ferritic stainless steel. ISIJ Int 47:1465–1474

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Lin Y, Liu W, Wang L, Lavernia E (2013) Ultra-fine grained structure in Al–Mg induced by discontinuous dynamic recrystallization under moderate straining. Mater Sci Eng A 573:197–204

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors are greatly indebted to Pierre Barberis, Senior Scientist with the CEZUS Company, for providing the Zircaloy-4 and for fruitful discussions, to Frank Montheillet, emeritus scientist at the French National Centre for Scientific Research (CNRS) and to Pauline Lambert for her technical support in the compression tests.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Ecole Nationale Supérieure des Mines de Saint-Etienne, Centre Sciences des Matériaux et des Structures, Laboratoire Georges Friedel (UMR CNRS n°5307), CS 62362, 158 Cours Fauriel, 42023, Saint-Étienne, France

    Michel Darrieulat, Yamen Ben Ammar & Asdin Aoufi

Authors
  1. Michel Darrieulat
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Yamen Ben Ammar
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Asdin Aoufi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Michel Darrieulat.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Darrieulat, M., Ben Ammar, Y. & Aoufi, A. Processing of β-treated Zircaloy-4 by warm compressions along three orthogonal axes. J Mater Sci 50, 2709–2725 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-015-8821-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10853-015-8821-7

Keywords

Search

Navigation