Abstract
Naturally, the ever-growing number of drone operations conducted worldwide carries with it an increase in the number of safety-related incidents and occurrences. The reporting and subsequent investigation of unmanned aircraft system (UAS) accidents and serious incidents seems like a proven solution towards improving operational safety. Such procedures also stem from the fact that UAS are of recognized as aircraft – and aircraft accidents and serious incidents are subject to obligatory investigation. From a technical perspective, a key issue concerns discrepancies in the investigation process as there are significant differences between manned and unmanned aviation operations. From a regulatory perspective, one key question is to what extent should it be obligatory to conduct independent technical investigation of occurrences involving UAS? Such occurrences are not only accidents and serious incidents that involve both UAS and manned aircraft, where “traditional” rules of conducting a full and independent technical investigation apply – the majority occurrences involve only UAS that were either destroyed, damaged or acted as a hazard to third parties. The method of study comprised of content analysis of existing legislation. Current doctrines were confronted with existing regulations, documents, materials, safety reports and statistics. Results of the study shows that the extension of regulations created for manned aviation accident reporting and investigation may not be enough, and certain improvements are necessary, e.g. to standardize the reporting of occurrences and the criteria to conduct a formal accidents and serious incidents investigation. It is also reasonable to take actions aimed at raising awareness among UAS users of the need to report accidents and serious incidents, as well as engage them in the investigative process. The lack of standardization in this field has resulted in the lack of data that is “good enough” to indicate the main causes and factors that contribute to UAS accidents.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Explore related subjects
Find the latest articles, discoveries, and news in related topics.Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Sánchez, S.M., Valdés, R.M.A., Comendador, F.G., Cuerno-Rejado, C.: Unmanned vs manned Aircraft Systems accidents investigation: post-accident analysis, benchmarking and improvements. https://doi.org/10.13009/EUCASS2019-429
Guzzetti, J.: Why it Makes a Difference to Report and Investigate UAS Incidents Even When They Don’t Really Happen, International Society of Air Safety Investigators Submission for the 2017 ISASI Seminar in San Diego, California
https://aviation-safety.net/database/issue/drones.php. Accessed: 15 April 2020
Kasprzyk, P, Konert, A.: Reporting UAS related incidents under aviation occurrence reporting legislation, 2020 International Conference on Unmanned Aircraft Systems (ICUAS), IEEE Xplore
Milde, M.: International Air Law and ICAO, p. 94
ICAO Doc.: 10019. Manual on Remotely Piloted Aircraft Systems (RPAS). 1st Edition, 2015
Unmanned Aircraft System Handbook and Accident/Incident Investigation Guidelines (International Society of Air Safety Investigators, 2015)
Regulation (EU) No 996/2010 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 20 October 2010 on the investigation and prevention of accidents and incidents in civil aviation, Official Journal of the European Union L 295/35 of 12/11/2010 as amended
Konert, A, Kasprzyk, P.: Drones Are Flying outside of Segregated Airspace in Poland. New Rules for BVLOS UAS Operations, Journal of Intelligent and Robotic Systems (2020), Drones Are Flying outside of Segregated Airspace in Poland
Regulation (EC) No 216/2008 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 20 February 2008 on common rules in the field of civil aviation and establishing a European Aviation Safety Agency. Official Journal of the European Union L 79/1 of 19/03/2008
Support study to the evaluation of Regulation (EU) No 996/2010 on the Investigation and Prevention of Accidents and Incidents in. Civil Aviation. Final Report
Regulation (EU) 2018/1139 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 4 July 2018 on common rules in the field of civil aviation and establishing a European Union Aviation Safety Agency. Official Journal of the European Union L 212/1 of 22/08/2018
ENCASIA opinion dated 30.08.2015, https://ec.europa.eu/transport/modes/air/encasia/activities/opinions_en. Access 02.03.2021
Commission Delegated Regulation (EU) 2019/945 of 12 March 2019 on unmanned aircraft systems and on third-country operators of unmanned aircraft systems. Official Journal of the European Union L 152/1 of 11/06/2019
Special Conditions SC Light-UAS Medium Risk 01
Commission Implementing Regulation (EU) 2019/947 of 24 May 2019 on the rules and procedures for the operation of unmanned aircraft. Official Journal of the European Union L 152/45 of 11/06/2019
Air Accidents Investigation Branch. Annual Safety Review 2018
PART 830–75 Fed. Reg. 51955, August 24, 2010
https://www.ntsb.gov/investigations/_layouts/ntsb.aviation/brief.aspx?ev_id=20150505X85410& key=1. Access 05.03.2021
NTSB Advisory to Operators of Civil Unmanned Aircraft Systems in the United States, July 29th, 2017
Wild, G. et al.: A Post-Accident Analysis of Civil Remotely-Piloted Aircraft System Accidents and Incidents, J. Aerosp. Technol. Manag. 9(2), (2017)
https://www.gov.uk/aaib-reports/aaib-investigation-to-dji-matrice-210-uas-registration-n-a-16-march-2019. Access 05.03.2021
https://mobilit.belgium.be/sites/default/files/downloads/accidents/final_report_2016-aii-01.pdf. Access 05.03.2021
https://www.gov.pl/documents/905843/1047987/20160376RK.pdf. Access 05.03.2021
https://pkbwl.gov.pl/images/raporty/Raport_Ko%C5%84cowy_4305_19.pdf. Access 05.03.2021
https://www.easa.europa.eu/document-library/general-publications/annual-safety-review-2017. Access 05.03.2021
Wild, G., Murray, J., Baxter, G.: Exploring civil drone accidents and incidents to help prevent potential air disasters. Aerospace. 3(3), 22 (2016)
https://www.sust.admin.ch/inhalte/AV-berichte/SUI-9909_D.pdf. Access 15.03.2021
https://www.sust.admin.ch/inhalte/AV-berichte/ZB_SUI-9903.pdf. Access 15.03.2021
https://www.easa.europa.eu/document-library/agency-decisions/ed-decision-2020022r. Access 15.03.2021
Acknowledgements
Research financed by the National Science Centre, Poland. Project No 2017/27 /B/HS5/0008 “Unmanned Aircraft. A New Era in Aviation Law”.
Funding
Article is the effect of a research grant financed by the National Science Centre, Poland. Project No 2017/27 /B/HS5/0008 “Unmanned Aircraft. A New Era in Aviation Law”.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Piotr Kasprzyk – Sections 1,2,3,4,5,6.
Anna Konert – sections 1,2,3,5,6,.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Ethical Approval
Not applicable’.
Consent to Participate
Not applicable’.
Consent to Publish
Not applicable’.
Competing Interests
Not applicable’.
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Kasprzyk, P.J., Konert, A. Reporting and Investigation of Unmanned Aircraft Systems (UAS) Accidents and Serious Incidents. Regulatory Perspective. J Intell Robot Syst 103, 3 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10846-021-01447-6
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10846-021-01447-6