Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

International opportunity recognition as a critical component for leveraging Internet capabilities and international market performance

Reconocimiento de oportunidad internacional como un componente critico para apalancar capacidades de Internet en el desempeño de mercados internacionales

  • Published:
Journal of International Entrepreneurship Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Recent research in the field of international entrepreneurship has emphasized the need for a better conceptualization of international opportunity recognition. Further, with advancements in information and communication technologies, such as the Internet, there has been a profound impact on the way in which international business is conducted, for example, enabling entrepreneurial firms to capitalize on the economic opportunities of an Internet environment. In this study, we propose a model, highlighting the importance of international opportunity recognition, as a critical component for leveraging Internet capabilities and international market performance. Through the lens of a resource capabilities approach, a quantitative, online survey was used to collect data from Australian, international entrepreneurial firms. Structural equation modelling results indicate that international opportunity recognition plays a central role in explaining how resources and Internet capabilities combine for the firm’s realization of international opportunities, and subsequent international performance. The findings enrich current understanding of how international entrepreneurial firms realize opportunities in Internet-based environments.

Abstracto

Investigaciones recientes en el campo de emprendimiento internacional ha enfatizado la necesidad de una mejor conceptualización de reconocimiento de oportunidad internacional. Adicionalmente, el avance en tecnologías de información y comunicaciones, tal como la Internet, ha tenido un impacto profundo en la forma en que se desarrollan los negocios internacionales. En este estudio, proponemos un modelo que destaca la importancia de reconocimiento de oportunidad internacional como un componente critico para apalancar las capacidades de Internet en el desempeño de mercados internacionales. Utilizando una metodología cuantitativa, se aplicó una encuesta online a empresas emprendedoras internacionales Australianas. Utilizando modelamiento de ecuaciones estructurales, los resultados explican como los recursos y capacidades de Internet de una empresa emprendedora internacional se combinan para lograr un reconocimiento de oportunidad internacional y subsecuente desempeño internacional. Los resultados aportan al actual entendimiento de como empresas emprendedoras internacionales reconocen oportunidades en contextos tecnológicos de Internet.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Allen P, Bennett K (2012) SPSS statistics. A practical guide: version 20. CENGAGE Learning, South Melbourne

    Google Scholar 

  • Alvarez SA, Barney JB (2007) Discovery and creation: alternative theories of entrepreneurial action. Strateg Entrep J 1(1–2):11–26

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Andersson S, Evangelista F (2006) The entrepreneur in the born global firm in Australia and Sweden. J Small Bus Enterp Dev 13(4):642–659

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arenius P, De Clercq D (2005) A network-based approach on opportunity recognition. Small Bus Econ 24(3):249–265

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aspelund A, Moen Ø (2004) Internationalization of small high-tech firms: the role of information technology. J Eur Mark 13(1):85–105

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Australian Bureau of Statistics (ABS) (2015) Counts of Australian businesses, including entries and exits, June 2010 to June 2014. Retrieved from http://www.abs.gov.au/ausstats/abs@.nsf/mediareleasesbytitle/950EC94DB899312ECA2573B00017B8F4

  • Barney JB (1986) Strategic factor markets: expectations, luck, and business strategy. Manag Sci 32(10):123–1241

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barney JB (1991) Firm resources and sustained competitive advantage. J Manag 17(1):99–120

    Google Scholar 

  • Barney JB (2001) Resource-based theories of competitive advantage: a ten-year retrospective on the resource-based view. J Manag 27(6):643–650

    Google Scholar 

  • Bell J, Loane S (2010) New-wave’ global firms: web 2.0 and SME internationalisation. J Mark Manag 26(3/4):213–229

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bengtsson M, Boter H, Vanyusyn V (2007) Integrating the internet and marketing operations: a study of antecedents in firms of different sizes. Int Small Bus J 25(1):27–48

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bentler PM, Bonnet DC (1980) Significance tests and goodness of fit in the analysis of covariance structures. Psychol Bull 88(3):588–606

  • Berglund H (2007) Opportunities as existing and created: a study of entrepreneurs in the Swedish mobile internet industry. J Enterp Cult 15(3):243–273

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bianchi C, Mathews S (2016) Internet marketing and export market growth in Chile. J Bus Res 69(2):426–434

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Butler JE, Doktor R, Lins FA (2010) Linking international entrepreneurship to uncertainty, opportunity discovery, and cognition. J Int Entrep 8(2):121–134

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Byrne BM (2010) Structural equation modelling with Amos: basic concepts, applications, and programming. Multivariate applications book series. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Canina L, Palacios D, Devece C (2012) Management theories linking individual and organizational level analysis in entrepreneurship research. Int Entrep Manag J 8(3):271–284

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cavusgil ST, Zou S (1994) Marketing strategy-performance relationship: an investigation of the empirical link in export market ventures. J Mark 1–21

  • Cavusgil ST, Knight G (2015) The born global firm: an entrepreneurial and capabilities perspective on early and rapid internationalization. J Int Bus Stud 46(1):3–16

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chandra Y, Styles C, Wilkinson I (2009) The recognition of first-time international entrepreneurial opportunities: evidence from firms in knowledge-based industries. Int Mark Rev 26(1):30–61

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chandra Y, Styles C, Wilkinson IF (2015) Opportunity portfolio: moving beyond single opportunity explanations in international entrepreneurship research. Asia Pac J Manag 32(1):199–228

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chang SJ, van Witteloostuijn A, Eden L (2010) From the editors: common method variance in international business research. J Int Bus Stud 41(2):178–184

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chen PYS, Hitt LM (2002) Measuring switching costs and the determinants of customer retention in Internet-enabled businesses: a study of the online brokerage industry. Inf Syst Res 13(3):255–274

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chetty S, Agndal H (2007) Social capital and its influence on changes in internationalization mode among small and medium-sized enterprises. J Int Mark 15(1):1–29

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Churchill JGA (1979) A paradigm for developing better measures of marketing constructs. J Market Res 16(1):64–73

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coviello N (2015) Re-thinking research on born globals. J Int Bus Stud 46(1):17–26

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coviello N, Munro H (1995) Growing the entrepreneurial firm: networking for international market development. Eur J Mark 29(7):49–61

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Covin JG, Miller D (2014) International entrepreneurial orientation: conceptual considerations, research themes, measurement issues, and future research directions. Enterp Theory Pract 38(1):11–44

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Covin JG, Slevin DP (1991) A conceptual model of entrepreneurship as a firm behaviour. Entrep Theory Pract 16(1):7–25

    Google Scholar 

  • Dana LP (2001) Networks, internationalization & policy. Small Bus Econ 16(2):57–62

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dana LP, Etemad H, Wright RW (2004) Back to the future: international entrepreneurship in the new economy. In: Jones MV, Dimitriatos P (eds) Emerging paradigms in international entrepreneurship. Elgar, Cheltenham, pp 19–34

    Google Scholar 

  • Department of Broadband, Communications and the Digital Economy. Australian Government (2013) Statistical snapshot. Retrieved from http://www.dbcde.gov.au/__data/assets/pdf_file/0006/163059/Statistical_snapshot_20130417.pdf

  • Dimitratos P, Voudouris I, Plakoyiannaki E, Nakos G (2012) International entrepreneurial culture: toward a comprehensive opportunity-based operationalization of international entrepreneurship. Int Bus Rev 21(4):708–721

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Easterby- Smith M, Lyles M, Peteraf MA (2009) Dynamic capabilities: current debates and future directions. Br J Manag 20(1):S1–S8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Edelman L, Yli‐Renko H (2010) The impact of environment and entrepreneurial perceptions on venture‐creation efforts: bridging the discovery and creation views of entrepreneurship. Enterp Theory Pract 34(5):833–856

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eisenhardt KM, Martin JA (2000) Dynamic capabilities: what are they? Strateg Manag J 21(10–11):1105–1121

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ellison NB, Steinfield C, Lampe C (2011) Connection strategies: social capital implications of Facebook-enabled communication practices. New Media Soc 13(6):873–892

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Etemad H (2004) E-commerce: the emergence of a field and its knowledge network. Int J Technol Manag 28(7–8):776–800

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Etemad H, Wilkinson I, Dana LP (2010) Internetization as the necessary condition for internationalization in the newly emerging economy. J Int Entrep 8(4):319–342

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Andersson S, Evers (2015) International opportunity recognition in international new ventures—a dynamic managerial capabilities perspective. J Int Entrep 13(3):260–276

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fowler A (1988) Determinants of rate of language growth in children with Down syndrome. Psychobiol Down Syndr 217–245

  • Frank H, Mitterer G (2009) Opportunity recognition—state of the Art und Forschungsperspektiven. Z Betriebswirt 79(3):367–406

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Freeman S, Cavusgil ST (2007) Toward a typology of commitment states among managers of born-global firms: a study of accelerated internationalization. J Int Mark 15(4):1–40

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gabrielsson M, Manek Kirpalani VH (2004) Born globals: how to reach new business space rapidly. Int Bus Rev 13(5):555–571

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • García-Cabrera AM, García-Soto MG (2009) A dynamic model of technology-based opportunity recognition. J Entrep 18(2):167–190

    Google Scholar 

  • George NM, Parida V, Lahti T, Wincent J (2016) A systematic literature review of entrepreneurial opportunity recognition: insights on influencing factors. Int Entrep Manag J 12(2):309–350

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gerbing DW, Anderson JC (1988) An updated paradigm for scale development incorporating unidimensionality and its assessment. J Market Res 25(2):186–192

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gibbs JL, Kraemer KL (2004) A cross‐country investigation of the determinants of scope of ecommerce use: an institutional approach. Electron Mark 14(2):124–137

  • Glavas C, Mathews S (2014) How international entrepreneurial characteristics influence Internet capabilities for the international business processes of the firm. Int Bus Rev 23(1):228–245

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Google, PWC (2015) Start with code report http://www.google.com.au/campaigns/startwithcode/

  • Grégoire DA, Shepherd DA (2012) Technology-market combinations and the identification of entrepreneurial opportunities: an investigation of the opportunity-individual nexus. Acad Manage J 55(4):753–785

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gupta VK, Niranjan S, Goktan BA, Eriskon J (2015) Individual entrepreneurial orientation role in shaping reactions to new technologies. Int Entrep Manag J. doi:10.1007/s11365-015-0373-4

    Google Scholar 

  • Hair JF Jr, Black WC, Babin BJ, Anderson RE (2010) Multivariate data analysis: a global perspective, 7th edn. Pearson Prentice Hall, New Jersey

    Google Scholar 

  • Hamill J (1997) The internet and international marketing. Int Mark Rev 14(5):300–323

  • Harman HH (1976) Modern factor analysis. University of Chicago Press, Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  • Huber GP, Power DJ (1985) Retrospective reports of strategic‐level managers: guidelines for increasing their accuracy. Strateg Manag J 62(2):171–180

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Internet Word Statistics (2015) Retrieved from: http://www.internetworldstats.com/stats6.htm

  • Jantunen A, Puumalainen K, Saarenketo S, Kylaheiko K (2005) Entrepreneurial orientation, dynamic capabilities and international performance. J Int Entrep 3(3):232–243

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johanson J, Vahlne JE (2009) The Uppsala internationalization process model revisited: from liability of foreignness to liability of outsidership. J Int Bus Stud 40(9):1411–1431

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Johnson JE (2004) Factors influencing the early internationalization of high technology start-ups: US and UK evidence. J Int Entrep 2(1):139–154

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones MV, Coviello N, Tang YK (2011) International entrepreneurship research (1989–2009): a domain ontology and thematic analysis. J Bus Ventur 26(6):632–659

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kirzner IM (1997) Entrepreneurial discovery and the competitive market process: an Austrian approach. J Econ Lit 35(1):60–85

    Google Scholar 

  • Kline RB (2005) Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. Guilford Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Knight GA (2001) Entrepreneurship and strategy in the international SME. J Int Manag 7(3):155–171

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Knight GA, Cavusgil ST (2004) Innovation, organizational capabilities, and the born-global firm. J Int Bus Stud 35(2):124–141

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lechner C, Gudmundsson SV (2014) Entrepreneurial orientation, firm strategy and small firm performance. Int Small Bus J 32(1):36–60

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liao J, Kickul JR, Ma H (2009) Organizational dynamic capability and innovation: an empirical examination of internet firms. J Small Bus Manag 47(5):263–286

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lin N (1999) Building a network theory of social capital. Connections 22(1):28–51

    Google Scholar 

  • Lindell MK, Whitney DJ (2001) Accounting for common method variance in cross-sectional research designs. J Appl Psychol 86(1):114–121

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Loane S (2006) The role of the Internet in the internationalisation of small and medium sized companies. J Int Entrep 10(1):263–277

    Google Scholar 

  • Lumpkin GT, Dess GG (1996) Clarifying the entrepreneurial orientation construct and linking it to performance. Acad Manag Rev 21(1):135–172

  • Madsen TK (1998) Managerial judgment of export performance. J Int Mark 82–93

  • Mainela T, Puhakka V (2009) Organising new business in a turbulent context: opportunity discovery and effectuation for IJV development in transition markets. J Int Entrep 7(2):111–134

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mainela T, Puhakka V, Servais P (2014) The concept of international opportunity in international entrepreneurship: a review and a research agenda. Int J Manag Rev 16(1):105–129

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Makadok R (2001) Toward a synthesis of the resource‐based and dynamic‐capability views of rent creation. Strateg Manag J 22(5):387–401

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mathews SW, Healy MJ (2007) The Internet and information capability reduces perceived risk of internationalisation: an Australian SME perspective. Int J Organ Behav 12(1):71–87

    Google Scholar 

  • Mathews SW, Healy MJ (2008) From garage to global: the Internet and international market growth, an SME perspective. Int J Internet Mark Advert 4(2/3):179–196

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mathews S, Healy M, Wickramasekera R (2012) The internetalisation of information, knowledge, and interaction components of the firm’s internationalisation process. J Mark Manag 28(5–6):733–754

  • Messersmith JG, Wales WJ (2011) Entrepreneurial orientation and performance in young firms: the role of human resource management. Int Small Bus J 31(2):115–136

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller D (1983) The correlates of entrepreneurship in three types of firms. Manag Sci 29(7):770–791

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Moen Ø, Koed Madsen T, Aspelund A (2008) The importance of the internet in international business-to-business markets. Int Mark Rev 25(5):487–503

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morgan-Thomas A (2009) Online activities and export performance of the smaller firm: a capability perspective. Eur J Int Manag 3(3):266–285

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Morgan-Thomas A, Bridgewater S (2004) Internet and exporting: determinants of success in virtual export channels. Int Mark Rev 21(4/5):393–408

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mostafa RHA, Wheeler C, Jones MV (2006) Entrepreneurial orientation commitment to the Internet and export performance in small and medium sized exporting firms. J Int Entrep 3(1):291–302

    Google Scholar 

  • Muzychenko O, Liesch PW (2015) International opportunity identification in the internationalisation of the firm. J World Bus 50(4):704–717

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Newbert SL (2008) Value, rareness, competitive advantage, and performance: a conceptual‐level empirical investigation of the resource‐based view of the firm. Strateg Manag J 29(7):745–768

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nummela N, Saarenketo S, Puumalainen K (2004) A global mindset: a prerequisite for successful internationalization. Can J Adm Sci 21(1):51–63

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • O’connor GC, Rice MP (2001) Opportunity recognition and breakthrough innovation in large established firms. Calif Manage Rev 43(2):95–116

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Oviatt BM, McDougall P (2005) Defining international entrepreneurship and modeling the speed of internationalization. Enterp Theory Pract 29(5):537–553

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Park JS (2005) Opportunity recognition and product innovation in entrepreneurial hi-tech start-ups: a new perspective and supporting case study. Technovation 25(7):739–752

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Petersen B, Welch LS, Liesch PW (2002) The Internet and foreign market expansion by firms. Manag Int Rev 42(2):207–221

    Google Scholar 

  • Pla-Barber J, Puig F (2009) Is the influence of the industrial district on international activities being eroded by globalization? Evidence from a traditional manufacturing industry. Int Bus Rev 18(5):435–445

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Podasakoff PM, MacKenzie SB, Lee JY, Podsakoff NP (2003) Common method biases in behavioral research: a critical review of the literature and recommended remedies. J Appl Psychol 88(5):879–903

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Podsakoff PM, Organ DW (1986) Self-reports in organizational research: problems and prospects. J Manag 12(4):531–544

    Google Scholar 

  • Poon S, Jevons C (1997) Internet‐enabled international marketing: a small business network perspective. J Mark Manag 13(1–3):29–41

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Priem RL, Butler JE (2001) Is the resource-based view a useful perspective for strategic management research? Acad Manage Rev 26(1):22–40

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ray G, Muhanna WA, Barney JB (2005) Information technology and the performance of the customer service process: a resource-based analysis. Manag Inf Syst Q 29(4):625–653

    Google Scholar 

  • Raymond L, Bergeron F (2008) Enabling the business strategy of SMEs through e-business capabilities: a strategic alignment perspective. Ind Manag Data Syst 108(5):577–595

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reuber R, Fischer E (1997) The influence of the management team’s international experience on the internationalization behaviors of SMEs. J Int Bus Stud 28(4):807–825

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reuber R, Fischer E (2011) International entrepreneurship in Internet-enabled markets. J Bus Ventur 26(6):660–679

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ripollés-Meliá M, Menguzzato-Boulard M, Sánchez-Peinado L (2007) Entrepreneurial orientation and international commitment. J Int Entrep 5(3–4):65–83

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sarasvathy SD, Dew N, Velamuri SR, Venkataraman S (2003) Three views of entrepreneurial opportunity. In: Acs Z, Audretsch DB (eds) Handbook of entrepreneurial research. Kluwer Academic Publishers, Great Britain, pp 141–160

    Google Scholar 

  • Schumacker RE, Lomax RG (2010) A beginner’s guide to structural equation modelling. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc., New Jersey

    Google Scholar 

  • Shane SA (2000) A general theory of entrepreneurship: the individual-opportunity nexus. Edward Elgar Publishing, Cheltenham

    Google Scholar 

  • Shane SA (2003) A general theory of entrepreneurship: the individual-opportunity nexus. Edward Elgar Publishing, Cheltenham

  • Shane SA, Venkataraman S (2000) The promise of entrepreneurship as a field of research. Acad Manage Rev 25(1):217–226

    Google Scholar 

  • Sigfusson T, Chetty S (2013) Building international entrepreneurial virtual networks in cyberspace. J World Bus 48(2):260–270

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Singh RP, Hills GE, Lumpkin GT, Hybels CR (1999) The entrepreneur opportunity recognition process: examining the role of self perceived alertness and social networks. Academy of Management Proceedings, Chicago

    Google Scholar 

  • Sinkovics R, Bell J (2006) Current perspectives on international entrepreneurship and the Internet. J Int Entrep 3(1):247–249

    Google Scholar 

  • Sundqvist S, Kyläheiko K, Kuivalainen O, Cadogan JW (2012) Kirznerian and Schumpeterian entrepreneurial-oriented behavior in turbulent export markets. Int Mark Rev 29(2):203–219

  • Teece DJ, Pisano G (1994) The dynamic capabilities of firms: an introduction. Ind Corp Chang 3(3):537–556

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Teece DJ, Pisano G, Shuen A (1997) Dynamic capabilities and strategic management. Strateg Manag J 18(7):509–533

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vandenberg RJ, Lance CE (2000) A review and synthesis of the measurement invariance literature: suggestions, practices, and recommendations for organizational research. Organ Res Methods 3(1):4–70

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wentrup R (2016) The online–offline balance: internationalization for Swedish online service providers. J Int Entrep. doi:10.1007/s10843-016-0171-2:1-33

    Google Scholar 

  • Wernerfelt B (1984) A resource-based view of the firm. Strateg Manag J 5(2):171–180

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wiklund J, Shepherd D (2003) Knowledge‐based resources, entrepreneurial orientation, and the performance of small and medium‐sized businesses. Strateg Manag J 24(13):1307–1314

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wiklund J, Shepherd D (2005) Entrepreneurial orientation and small business performance: a configurational approach. J Bus Ventur 20(1):71–91

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williams LJ, Hartman N, Cavazotte F (2010) Method variance and marker variables: a review and comprehensive CFA marker technique. Organ Res Methods 13(3):477–514

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Winter SG (2003) Understanding dynamic capabilities. Strateg Manag J 24(10):991–995

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wright RW, Dana LP (2003) Changing paradigms of international entrepreneurship strategy. J Int Entrep 1(1):135–152

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wright RW, Ricks DA (1994) Trends in international business research: twenty-five years later. J Int Bus Stud 25(4):687–701

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wu F, Mahajan V, Balasubramanian S (2003) An analysis of e-business adoption and its impact on business performance. J Acad Mark Sci 31(4):425–447

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zahra SA, Garvis DM (2000) International corporate entrepreneurship and firm performance: the moderating effect of international environmental hostility. J Bus Ventur 15(5):469–492

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zahra SA, George G (2002) International entrepreneurship: the current status of the field and future research agenda. In: Hitt MA, Ireland RD, Camp SM, Sexton DL (eds) Strategic entrepreneurship: creating a new mindset. Blackwell Publishers, London, pp 255–288

    Google Scholar 

  • Zahra SA, Korri JS, Yu J (2005) Cognition and international entrepreneurship: implications for research on international opportunity recognition and exploitation. Int Bus Rev 14(2):112–146

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhu K, Kraemer K (2002) E-commerce metrics for net-enhanced organizations: assessing the value of e-commerce to firm performance in the manufacturing sector. Inf Syst Res 13(3):275–295

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Charmaine Glavas.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Glavas, C., Mathews, S. & Bianchi, C. International opportunity recognition as a critical component for leveraging Internet capabilities and international market performance. J Int Entrep 15, 1–35 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10843-016-0191-y

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10843-016-0191-y

Keywords

Palabras claves

Navigation