Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Role of pre-procedural CT imaging on catheter ablation in patients with atrial fibrillation: procedural outcomes and radiological exposure

  • Published:
Journal of Interventional Cardiac Electrophysiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Background

Cardiac computed tomography (CT) is commonly used to study left atrial (LA) and pulmonary veins (PVs) anatomy before atrial fibrillation (AF) ablation. The aim of the study was to determine the impact of pre-procedural cardiac CT with 3D reconstruction on procedural outcomes and radiological exposure in patients who underwent radiofrequency catheter ablation (RFA) of AF.

Methods

In this registry, 493 consecutive patients (age 62 ± 8 years, 70% male) with paroxysmal (316) or persistent (177) AF who underwent first procedure of RFA were included. A pre-procedural CT scan was obtained in 324 patients (CT group). Antral pulmonary vein isolation was performed in all patients using an open-irrigation-tip catheter with a 3D electroanatomical navigation system. Procedural outcome, including radiological exposure, and clinical outcomes were compared among patients who underwent RFA with (CT group) and without (no CT group) pre-procedural cardiac CT.

Results

Acute PV isolation was obtained in all patients, with a comparable overall complication rate between CT and no CT group (4.3% vs 3%, p = 0.7). No differences were observed about mean duration of the procedure (231 ± 60 vs 233 ± 58 min, p = 0.7) and fluoroscopy time (13 ± 10 vs 13 ± 8 min, p = 0.6) among groups. Cumulative radiation dose resulted significantly higher in the CT group compared with no CT group (8.9 ± 24 vs 4.8 ± 15 mSv, P = 0.02). At 1 year, freedom from AF/atrial tachycardia were comparable among groups (CT group, 227/324 (70%), vs no CT group,119/169 (70%), p = ns).

Conclusions

Pre-procedural CT does not improve safety and efficacy of AF ablation, increasing significantly the cumulative radiological exposure.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Kistler PM, Earley MJ, Harris S, Abrams D, Ellis S, Sporton SC, et al. Validation of three-dimensional cardiac image integration: use of integrated CT image into electroanatomic mapping system to perform catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2006;17(4):341–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Ho SY, Sanchez-Quintana D, Cabrera JA, Anderson RH. Anatomy of the left atrium: implications for radiofrequency ablation of atrial fibrillation. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 1999;10(11):1525–33.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Heist EK, Holmvang G, Abbara S, Ruskin JN, Mansour M. Pre-Procedural Imaging to Direct Catheter Ablation of Atrial Fibrillation: Anatomy and Ablation Strategy. J Atr Fibrillation. 2008;1(2):13.4.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Yokokawa M, Olgun H, Sundaram B, Chugh A, Latchamsetty R, Good E, et al. Impact of preprocedural imaging on outcomes of catheter ablation in patients with atrial fibrillation. J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2012;34(3):255–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Chyou JY, Biviano A, Magno P, Garan H, Einstein AJ. Applications of computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging in percutaneous ablation therapy for atrial fibrillation. J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2009;26:47–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Niinuma H, George RT, Arbab-Zadeh A, Lima JA, Henrikson CA. Imaging of pulmonary veins during catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation: the role of multi-slice computed tomography. Europace. 2008;10(Suppl. 3):iii14–21.7.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Rordorf R, Sanzo A, Gionti V. Contact force technology integrated with 3Dm navigation system for atrial fibrillation ablation: improving results? Expert Rev Med Devices. 2017;14(6):461–7.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Nedios S, Sommer P, Bollmann A, Hindricks G. Advanced Mapping Systems To Guide Atrial Fibrillation Ablation: Electrical Information That Matters. J Atr Fibrillation. 2016;8(6):1337.

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. The Measurement, Reporting, and Management of Radiation Dose in CT Report of AAPM Task Group 23: CT Dosimetry Diagnostic Imaging Council CT Committee. AAPM REPORT NO. 96. 2008.

  10. Heidbuchel H, Wittkampf FHM, Vano E, Ernst S, Schilling R, Picano E, et al. Practical ways to reduce radiation dose for patients and staff during device implantations and electrophysiological procedures. Europace. 2014;16:946–64.11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Haissaguerre M, Jais P, Shah DC, Takahashi A, Hocini M, Quiniou G, et al. Spontaneous initiation of atrial fibrillation by ectopic beats originating in the pulmonary veins. N Engl J Med. 1998;339:659–66.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Nademanee K, McKenzie J, Kosar E, Schwab M, Sunsaneewitayakul B, Vasavakul T, et al. A new approach for catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation: mapping of the electrophysiologic substrate. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2004;43:2044–53.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Nademanee K, Schwab MC, Kosar EM, Karwecki M, Moran MD, Visessook N, et al. Clinical outcomes of catheter substrate ablation for high-risk patients with atrial fibrillation. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2008;51:843–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Chyou JY, Biviano A, Magno P, Garan H, Einstein AJ. Applications of computed tomography and magnetic resonance imaging in percutaneous ablation therapy for atrial fibrillation. J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2009;26:47–57.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Niinuma H, George RT, Arbab-Zadeh A, Lima JA, Henrikson CA. Imaging of pulmonary veins during catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation: the role of multi-slice computed tomography. Europace. 2008;10(Suppl. 3):iii14–21.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. D’Silva A, Wright M. Advances in imaging for atrial fibrillation ablation. Radiol Res Practice. 2011;2011:714864.

    Google Scholar 

  17. Kistler PM, Rajappan K, Harris S, Earley MJ, Richmond L, Sporton SC, et al. The impact of image integration on catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation using electroanatomic mapping: a prospective randomized study. Eur Heart J. 2008;29:3029–36.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Kistler PM, Rajappan K, Jahngir M, Earley MJ, Harris S, Abrams D, et al. The impact of CT image integration into an electroanatomic mapping system on clinical outcomes of catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2006;17:1093–101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Sra J, Narayan G, Krum D, Malloy A, Cooley R, Bhatia A, et al. Computed tomography-fluoroscopy image integration-guided catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2007;18:409–14.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Khaykin Y, Oosthuizen R, Zarnett L, Wulffhart ZA, Whaley B, Hill C, et al. CARTO-guided vs. NavX-guided pulmonary vein antrum isolation and pulmonary vein antrum isolation performed without 3-D mapping: effect of the 3-D mapping system on procedure duration and fluoroscopy time. J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2011;30:233–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Estner HL, Deisenhofer I, Luik A, Ndrepepa G, von Bary C, Zrenner B, et al. Electrical isolation of pulmonary veins in patients with atrial fibrillation: reduction of fluoroscopy exposure and procedure duration by the use of a non-fluoroscopic navigation system (NavX). Europace. 2006;8:583–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Rotter M, Takahashi Y, Sanders P, Haissaguerre M, Jais P, Hsu LF, et al. Reduction of fluoroscopy exposure and procedure duration during ablation of atrial fibrillation using a novel anatomical navigation system. Eur Heart J. 2005;26:1415–21.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Martinek M, Nesser HJ, Aichinger J, Boehm G, Purerfellner H. Impact of integration of multislice computed tomography imaging into threedimensional electroanatomic mapping on clinical outcomes, safety, and efficacy using radiofrequency ablation for atrial fibrillation. PACE. 2007;30:1215–23.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Kistler PM, Rajappan K, Jahngir M, Earley MJ, Harris S, Abrams D, et al. The impact of CT image integration into an electroanatomic mapping system on clinical outcomes of catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2006;17:1093–101.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Kimura M, Sasaki S, Owada S, Horiuchi D, Sasaki K, Itoh T, et al. Comparison of lesion formation between contact force-guided and non-guided circumferential pulmonary vein isolation: a prospective, randomized study. Heart Rhythm. 2014;11:984–91.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Stabile G, Solimene F, Calo L, et al. Catheter-tissue contact force for pulmonary veins isolation: a pilot multicentre study on effect on procedure and fluoroscopy time. Europace. 2014;16:335–40.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Reddy VY, Shah D, Kautzner J, et al. The relationship between contact force and clinical outcome during radiofrequency catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation in the TOCCATA study. Heart Rhythm. 2012;9:1789–95.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Yokoyama K, Nakagawa H, Shah DC, Lambert H, Leo G, Aeby N, et al. Novel contact force sensor incorporated in irrigated radiofrequency ablation catheter predicts lesion size and incidence of steam pop and thrombus. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2008;1:354–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Marijon E, Fazaa S, Narayanan K, Guy-Moyat B, Bouzeman A, Providencia R, et al. Real-time contact force sensing for pulmonary vein isolation in the setting of paroxysmal atrial fibrillation: procedural and 1-year results. J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol. 2014;25:130–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Zucchelli G, Sirico G, Rebellato L, Marini M, Stabile G, Del Greco M, et al. Contiguity Between Ablation Lesions and Strict Catheter Stability Settings Assessed by VISITAG(TM) Module Improve Clinical Outcomes of Paroxysmal Atrial Fibrillation Ablation- Results From the VISITALY Study. Circ J. 2018;82(4):974–82.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Yokokawa M, Olgun H, Sundaram B, Chugh A, Latchamsetty R, Good E, et al. Impact of preprocedural imaging on outcomes of catheter ablation in patients with atrial fibrillation. J Interv Card Electrophysiol. 2012;34(3):255–62.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Wagner M, Butler C, Rief M, Beling M, Durmus T, Huppertz A, et al. Comparison of non-gated vs. electrocardiogram-gated 64-detector-row computed tomography for integrated electroanatomic mapping in patients undergoing pulmonary vein isolation. Europace. 2010;12(8):1090–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Thai WE, Wai B, Truong QA. Preprocedural imaging for patients with atrial fibrillation and heart failure. Curr Cardiol Rep. 2012;14(5):584–92. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11886-012-0293-7.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  34. Niinuma H, George RT, Arbab-Zadeh A, Lima JA, Henrikson CA. Imaging of pulmonary veins during catheter ablation for atrial fibrillation: the role of multi-slice computed tomography. Europace. 2008;10(Suppl 3):iii14–21.

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Vorre MM, Abdulla J. Diagnostic accuracy and radiation dose of CT coronary angiography in atrial fibrillation: systematic review and meta-analysis. Radiology. 2013;267(2):376–86.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Gerber TC, Carr JJ, Arai AE, Dixon RL, Ferrari VA, Gomes AS, et al. Ionizing radiation in cardiac imaging: a science advisory from theAmerican Heart Association Committee on Cardiac Imaging of the Council on Clinical Cardiology and Committee on Cardiovascular Imaging and Intervention of the Council on Cardiovascular Radiology and Intervention. Circulation. 2009;119:1056–65.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Linet MS, Kim KP, Miller DL, Kleinerman RA, Simon SL, Berrington de Gonzalez A. Historical review of occupational exposures and cancer risks in medical radiation workers. Radiat Res. 2010;174:793–808.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  38. Ang R, Hunter RJ, Baker V, et al. Pulmonary vein measurements on pre-procedural CT/MR im- aging can predict difficult pulmonary vein isolation and phrenic nerve injury during cryoballoon abla- tion for paroxysmal atrial fibrillation. Int J Cardiol. 2015;195:253–8.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Rathi VK, Reddy ST, Anreddy S, et al. Contrast- enhanced CMR is equally effective as TEE in the evaluation of left atrial appendage thrombus in patients with atrial fibrillation undergoing pul- monary vein isolation procedure. Heart Rhythm. 2013;10:1021–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Siebermair J, Kholmovski EG, Marrouche N. Assessment of Left Atrial Fibrosis by Late Gadolinium Enhancement Magnetic Resonance Imaging: Methodology and Clinical Implications. JACC Clin Electrophysiol. 2017;3(8):791–802.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Casella M, Perna F, Pontone G, Dello Russo A, Andreini D, Pelargonio G, et al. Prevalence and clinical significance of collateral findings detected by chest computed tomography in patients undergoing atrial fibrillation ablation. Europace. 2012;14(2):209–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  42. Trattner S, Halliburton S, Thompson CM, Xu Y, Chelliah A, Jambawalikar SR, et al. Cardiac-Specific Conversion Factors to Estimate Radiation Effective Dose From Dose-Length Product in Computed Tomography. JACC Cardiovasc Imaging. 2018;11(1):64–74.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Second Division of Cardiology, New Santa Chiara Hospital Cardiac-Thoracic-Vascular Department, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Pisana, Via Paradisa 2, 56124, Pisa, Italy

    Andrea Di Cori, Giulio Zucchelli, Luca Segreti, Raffaele De Lucia, Valentina Barletta, Stefano Viani, Luca Paperini, Matteo Parollo, Ezio Soldati & Maria Grazia Bongiorni

  2. Diagnostic and Interventional Radiology, Azienda Ospedaliero Universitaria Pisana, Pisa, Italy

    Lorenzo Faggioni & Davide Caramella

Authors
  1. Andrea Di Cori
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Giulio Zucchelli
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Lorenzo Faggioni
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Luca Segreti
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Raffaele De Lucia
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Valentina Barletta
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  7. Stefano Viani
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  8. Luca Paperini
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  9. Matteo Parollo
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  10. Ezio Soldati
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  11. Davide Caramella
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  12. Maria Grazia Bongiorni
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Andrea Di Cori.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Di Cori, A., Zucchelli, G., Faggioni, L. et al. Role of pre-procedural CT imaging on catheter ablation in patients with atrial fibrillation: procedural outcomes and radiological exposure. J Interv Card Electrophysiol 60, 477–484 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10840-020-00764-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10840-020-00764-4

Keywords

Search

Navigation