Skip to main content
Log in

Open-irrigated laser catheter ablation: influence of catheter–tissue contact force on lesion formation

  • Published:
Journal of Interventional Cardiac Electrophysiology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

Catheter–tissue contact force (CF) is a major determinant for radiofrequency (RF) ablation lesion size and quality. We sought to test the influence of catheter CF on lesion formation by using an open-irrigated electrode-laser mapping and ablation (ELMA) catheter.

Methods

With the ELMA catheter in a stable vertical position, continuous wave 1064 nm laser impacts at 15 W (9.5 W/mm2), 30 s (285 J/mm2), irrigation flow 30 mL/min, were aimed at the endocardial surface of bovine myocardium in heparinized stagnant blood (ACT >350 s) at room temperature (18 °C). Lesions were produced with CFs of 100 g, 10 g, in contact but without pressure, with the catheter tip 2.0 mm, and 5.0 mm away (n = 10, each). Lesions were evaluated morphometrically and were compared by the unpaired t tests.

Results

There were no significant differences between volumes of lesions achieved with catheter–tissue CF of 100 g, 10 g, and in contact without pressure: 297 ± 56.0 vs. 300 ± 39 vs. 320 ± 24, respectively (p > 0.05). However, volumes of lesions produced at a distance of 2 mm (95 ± 14 mm3) were significantly smaller (p < 0.0001), whereas at a distance of 5.0 mm, no lesions were produced. No steam-pop with crater or thrombus formation occurred.

Conclusions

By using an open-irrigated ELMA catheter, catheter–tissue CF is not a determinant for laser ablation lesion size and quality. Maximum sizes of lesions can be achieved with the catheter in intimate endocardial contact without pressure. However, lesions can be produced also at a catheter–tissue distance of 2.0 mm. Noticeably, there is no thrombus formation during laser application with the free floating ELMA catheter in the stagnant blood.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Okumura, Y., Johnson, S. B., Bunch, T. J., Henz, B. D., O'Brien, C. J., & Packer, D. L. (2008). A systematical analysis of in vivo contact force on virtual catheter tip/tissue surface contact during cardiac mapping and intervention. Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology, 19, 632–640.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Shah, D. C., Lambert, H., Nakagawa, H., Langenkamp, A., Aeby, N., & Leo, G. (2010). Area under the real-time contact force curve (force-time integral) predicts radiofrequency lesion size in an in vitro contractile model. Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology, 21, 1038–1043.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Sacher, F., Wright, M., Derval, N., Denis, A., Ramoul, K., Roten, L., et al. (2013). Endocardial versus epicardial ventricular radiofrequency ablation. Utility of in vivo contact force assessment. Circulation. Arrhythmia and Electrophysiology, 6, 144–150.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Yokoyama, K., Nakagawa, H., Shah, D. C., Lambert, H., Leo, G., Aeby, N., et al. (2008). Novel contact force sensor incorporated in irrigated radiofrequency ablation catheter predicts lesion size and incidence of steam pop and thrombus. Circulation. Arrhythmia and Electrophysiology, 1, 354–362.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Di Biase, L., Natale, A., Barrett, C., Tan, C., Elayi, C. S., Ching, C. K., et al. (2009). Relationship between catheter force, lesion characteristics, “Poping”, and char formation: experience with robotic navigation system. Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophysiology, 20, 436–440.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Kumar, S., Morton, J. B., Lee, J., Halloran, K., Spence, S. J., Gorelik, A., et al. (2012). Prospective characterization of catheter-tissue contact force at different anatomic sites during antral pulmonary vein isolation. Circulation. Arrhythmia and Electrophysiology, 5, 1124–1129.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Reddy, V. Y., Shah, D., Kautzner, J., Schmidt, B., Saoudi, N., Herrera, C., et al. (2012). The relationship between contact force and clinical outcome during radiofrequency catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation in the TOCCATA study. Heart Rhythm, 9(11), 1789–1795.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Neuzil, P., Reddy, V. Y., Kautzner, J., Petru, J., Wichterle, D., Shah, D., et al. (2013). Electrical reconnections after pulmonary vein isolation is contingent on contact force during initial treatment. Results from the EFFICAS I Study. Circulation. Arrhythmia and Electrophysiology, 6, 327–333.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Nakagawa, H., Kautzner, J., Natale, A., Peichl, P., Cihak, R., Wichterle, D., et al. (2013). Locations of high contact force during left atrial mapping in atrial fibrillation patients. Electrogram amplitude and impedance are poor predictors of electrode-tissue contact force for ablation of atrial fibrillation. Circulation. Arrhythmia and Electrophysiology, 6, 746–753.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Tilz, R. R., Makimoto, H., Lin, T., Rilling, A., Metzner, A., Mathew, S., et al. (2014). In vivo left-ventricular contact force analysis: comparison of antegrade transseptal with retrograde transaortic mapping strategies and correlation of impedance and electrical amplitude with contact force. Europace, 16, 1387–1395.

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Weber, H., & Sagerer-Gerhardt, M. (2013). Open-irrigated laser catheter ablation produces flow dependent sizes of lesions. Pacing and Clinical Electrophysiology, 36, 1132–1137.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Weber, H., & Sagerer-Gerhardt, M. (2014). Open-irrigated laser catheter ablation: influence of catheter irrigation and of contact and noncontact mode of laser application on lesion formation in bovine myocardium. Lasers in Medical Science, 29, 1183–1187.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Weber, H., Heinze, A., Enders, S., Hauptmann, G., Ruprecht, L., & Unsoeld, E. (1997). In vivo temperature measurement during transcatheter endomyocardial Nd:YAG laser irradiation. Lasers in Medical Science, 12, 352–356.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Fisher, J. C. (1993). Photons, physiatrics, and physicians: a practical guide to understanding interaction of laser light with living tissue: Part II: basic mechanisms of tissue destruction by laser beams. Journal of Clinical Laser Medicine and Surgery, 11, 291–303.

    Google Scholar 

  15. Knappe, V., Frank, F., & Rhode, E. (2001). Principles of lasers and biophotonic effects. Photomedicine and Laser Surgery, 22, 411–417.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Boulnois, J.-L. (1986). Photophysical processes in recent medical laser developments: a review. Lasers in Medical Science, 1, 47–66.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Bruneval, P., Mesnildrey, P., & Camilleri, P. (1987). Nd:YAG laser induced injury in dog myocardium: optical and ultrastructural study of early lesions. European Heart Journal, 8, 785–792.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. He, D. S. H., Sharma, P., Wang, H. Z., Bosnos, M., & Marcus, F. I. (1999). Bio-battery signal predicts myocardial lesion formation and depth in vivo. Journal of Interventional Cardiac Electrophysiology, 1, 69–77.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Haines, D. (2004). Biophysics of ablation: application to technology. Journal of Cardiovascular Electrophsiology, 15, S2–S11.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Soejima, K., Stevenson, W. G., Sapp, J. L., Selwyn, A. P., Couper, G., & Epstein, L. M. (2004). Endocardial and epicardial radiofrequency ablation of ventricular tachycardia associated with dilated cardiomyopathy: the importance of low-voltage scars. Journal of the American College of Cardiology, 43, 1834–1842.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Maury, P., Leoabon, B., Duparc, A., Delay, M., & Galiner, M. (2007). Epicardial catheter ablation of ventricular tachycardia using surgical subxyphoid approach. Europace, 9, 212–215.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Garcia, F. C., Bazan, V., Zado, E. S., Ren, J. F., & Marchlinski, F. E. (2009). Epicardial substrate and outcome with epicardial ablation of ventricular tachycardia in arrhythmogenic right ventricular cardiomyopathy/dysplasia. Circulation, 120, 366–375.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Kosmidou, I., Inada, K., Seiler, J., Koplan, B., Stevenson, W. G., & Tedrow, U. B. (2011). Role of repeat procedures for catheter ablation of postinfarction ventricular tachycardia. Heart Rhythm, 8, 1516–1522.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Dagres, N., Cantu, F., Geelen, P., Lewalter, T., Proclemer, A., & Blomstrom-Lundqvist, C. (2012). Current practice of ventricular tachycardia ablation in patients with implantable cardioverter-defibrillators. Europace, 14, 135–137.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Vergara, P., Maisano, F., Maccabelli, G., & Della Bella, P. (2013). Radiofrequency and cryoenergy endo-epicardial catheter and surgical approach for a case of incessant ventricular tachycardia ablation. Europace, 15, 540.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Perna, F., Heist, E. K., Danik, S. B., Barett, C. D., Ruskin, J. N., & Mansour, M. (2011). Assessment of catheter tip contact force resulting in cardiac perforation in swine atria using sensing technology. Circulation. Arrhythmia and Electrophysiology, 4, 218–224.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Makimoto, H., Lin, T., Rillig, A., Metzner, A., Wohlmuth, P., Arya, A., et al. (2014). In vivo contact force analysis and correlation with tissue impedance during left atrial mapping and catheter ablation of atrial fibrillation. Circulation. Arrhythmia and Electrophysiology, 7, 46–54.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Nakagawa, H., Kautzner, J., Natale, A., Peichl, P., Cihak, R., & Wichterle, D. (2013). Location of high contact force during left atrial mapping in atrial fibrillation patients. Circulation. Arrhythmia and Electrophysiology, 6, 746–753.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Wang, P. J., Homoud, M. K., Link, M. S., & Estes, M. (1999). Alternative energy sources for catheter ablation. Current Cardiology Reports, 1, 165–171.

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Weber, H., & Sagerer-Gerhardt, M. (2014). Open-irrigated laser catheter ablation: relationship between the level of energy, myocardial thickness, and collateral damages in a dog model. Europace, 16, 142–148.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Weber, H., & Sagerer-Gerhardt, M. (2014). Electrocardiographic monitoring of myocardial lesion formation during laser catheter ablation in a dog model. Innovations in Cardiac Rhythm Management , 5, 1641–1649.

    Google Scholar 

  32. Weber, H., & Sagerer-Gerhardt, M. (2015). Monitoring of laser effects on the conduction system by using an open-irrigated electrode-laser mapping and ablation catheter; laser catheter mapping. Europace.

Download references

Acknowledgments

This study was supported in part by the LasCor GmbH, Laser—Medical Devices, Taufkirchen, and Manufacturer of the open-irrigated ELMA catheter RytmoLas. Dr. M. Sagerer-Gerhardt is CTO and Dr. H. Weber is CEO of the LasCor Company, without any financial benefit from the company. Both the authors have full control of all primary data and both agree to allow the journal to review their data if requested.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Helmut P. Weber.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Sagerer-Gerhardt, M., Weber, H.P. Open-irrigated laser catheter ablation: influence of catheter–tissue contact force on lesion formation. J Interv Card Electrophysiol 42, 77–81 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10840-015-9977-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10840-015-9977-4

Keywords

Navigation