Skip to main content
Log in

Identification of Unknown Electromagnetic Interference Sources Based on Siamese-CNN

  • Published:
Journal of Electronic Testing Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The prerequisite for promptly locating electromagnetic interference sources (EMIS) is the identification of EMIS. This research provides a new method for EMIS identification based on Siamese-CNN. A new convolutional neural network (CNN) structure is developed to extract the features of the EMIS. The symmetrical Siamese is adopted to enhance the number of training samples. The similarity metric of Siamese and the CNN-based subnetwork are merged in order to increase the similarity of samples from the same class and the differences between samples from different classes. A new loss function based on contrastive loss and cross-entropy loss is proposed to increase classification accuracy and discover unknown EMIS. The spectrums of EMIS are used as experimental datasets. The results show that the proposed method based on Siamese-CNN is resilient and has good generalization for training sets of various sizes. The identification accuracy for known EMIS can reach 100%, and the identification accuracy for unknown EMIS is more than 90%.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6
Fig. 7
Fig. 8
Fig. 9
Fig. 10
Fig. 11

Similar content being viewed by others

Data Availability

The datasets generated during and/or analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.

References

  1. Axell E, Tengstrand SÖ, Wiklundh K (2017) Online classification of class a impulse interference. Proc IEEE Military Commun Conf 180–184

  2. Brauer F, Sabath F, Haseborg JL (2009) Susceptibility of IT network systems to interference by HPEM. Proc IEEE Int Symp Electromagn Compat 237–242

  3. Chopra S, Hadsell R, LeCun Y (2005) Learning a similarity metric discriminatively, with application to face verification. Proc IEEE Comput Soc Conf Comput Vis Pattern Recognit 539–546

  4. Ding L, Wang S, Wang F, Zhang W (2018) Specific emitter identification via convolutional neural networks. IEEE Commun Lett 22(12):2591–2594

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Gao J, Xu L, Bouakaz A, Wan M (2019) A deep siamese-based plantar fasciitis classification method using shear wave elastography. IEEE Access 7:130999–131007

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Gok G, Alp YK, Arikan O (2020) A new method for specific emitter identification with results on real radar measurements. IEEE Trans Inf Forensics Secur 15:3335–3346

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Gong J, Xu X, Lei Y (2020) Unsupervised specific emitter identification method using radio-frequency fingerprint embedded InfoGAN. IEEE Trans Inf Forensics Secur 15:2898–2913

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Goodfellow I, Bengio Y, Courville A (2016) Deep learning. MIT Press, USA

    Google Scholar 

  9. He B, Wang F (2020) Cooperative specific emitter identification via multiple distorted receivers. IEEE Trans Inf Forensics Secur 15:3791–3806

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Hoad R, Carter NJ, Herke D, Watkins SP (2004) Trends in EM susceptibility of IT equipment. IEEE Trans Electromagn Compat 46(3):390–395

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Hoad R, Lambourne A, Wraight A (2006) HPEM and HEMP susceptibility assessments of computer equipment. Proc Int Zurich Symp Electromagn Compat 168–171

  12. Jin L, Liu G (2020) A method of radiation source identification based on DST-IFS. Proc IEEE Int Conf Inf Technol Big Data Artif Intell 438–442

  13. Kingma D, Ba J (2014) Adam: a method for stochastic optimization. Proc Int Conf Learn Represent 156–160

  14. Klambauer G, Unterthiner T, Mayr A (2017) Self normalizing neural networks. Adv Neural Inf Process Syst 30:972–981

    Google Scholar 

  15. Kreth A, Genender E, Doering O, Garbe H (2012) Identifying electromagnetic attacks against airports. Proc ESA Workshop Aerosp Electromagn Compat 1–5

  16. Kulin M, Kazaz T, Moerman I, De Poorter E (2018) End-to-end learning from spectrum data: a deep learning approach for wireless signal identification in spectrum monitoring applications. IEEE Access 6:18484–18501

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. LeCun Y, Boser BE, Denker J, Henderson D, Jackel L (1990) Handwritten digit recognition with a back propagation network. Adv Neural Inf Process Syst 1990:396–404

    Google Scholar 

  18. Li D, Yang R, Li X, Zhu S (2020) Radar signal modulation recognition based on deep joint learning. IEEE Access 8:48515–48528

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Liu S, Yan X, Li P, Hao X, Wang K (2018) Radar emitter recognition based on SIFT position and scale features. IEEE Trans Circuits Syst II Express Briefs 65(12):2062–2066

    Google Scholar 

  20. Liu Y, Xu H, Qi Z, Shi Y (2020) Specific emitter identification against unreliable features interference based on time-series classification network structure. IEEE Access 8:200194–200208

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Maaten LV, Hinton GE (2008) Visualizing data using t-SNE. J Mach Learn Res 86:2579–2605

    Google Scholar 

  22. Paoletti U (2020) Broadband electromagnetic noise source identification using modulation frequency analysis. Proc Int Symp Electromagn Compat 1–5

  23. Qian Y, Qi J, Kuai X, Han G, Sun H, Hong S (2021) Specific emitter identification based on multi-level sparse representation in automatic identification system. IEEE Trans Inf Forensics Secur 16:2872–2884

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Rossi A, Hosseinzadeh M, Bianchini M, Scarselli F, Huisman H (2021) Multi-modal siamese network for diagnostically similar lesion retrieval in prostate MRI. IEEE Trans Med Imaging 40(3):986–995

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Satija U, Trivedi N, Biswal G, Ramkumar B (2019) Specific emitter identification based on variational mode decomposition and spectral features in single hop and relaying scenarios. IEEE Trans Inf Forensics Secur 14(3):581–591

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Standard: International Electrotechnical Commission (2006) CISPR 16–1–1: Specification for radio disturbance and immunity measuring apparatus and methods – Part 1–1: Radio disturbance and immunity measuring apparatus – Measuring apparatus. IEC Standard CISPR 16–1–1, 1-76

  27. Shi D, Gao Y (2013) A new method for identifying electromagnetic radiation sources using backpropagation neural network. IEEE Trans Electromagn Compat 55(5):842–848

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Tan K, Yan W, Zhang L, Tang M, Zhang Y (2021) Specific emitter identification based on software-defined radio and decision fusion. IEEE Access 9:86217–86229

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Wang B, Wang D (2019) Plant leaves classification: a few-shot learning method based on siamese network. IEEE Access 7:151754–151763

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. West NE, Shea TO (2017) Deep architectures for modulation recognition. Proc IEEE Int Symp Dyn Spectr Access Netw 1–6

  31. Wong LJ, Headley WC, Michaels AJ (2019) Specific emitter identification using convolutional neural network-based IQ imbalance estimators. IEEE Access 7:33544–33555

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Xiao Y, Zhu F, Zhuang S, Yang Y (2022) A New Neural Network Based on CNN for EMIS Identification. Journal of electronic testing-theory and application 38(1):77–89

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Yang J, Zou H, Zhou Y, Xie L (2019) Learning gestures from WiFi: a siamese recurrent convolutional architecture. IEEE Internet Things J 6(6):10763–10772

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. You W, Zhang H, Zhao X (2021) A siamese CNN for image steganalysis. IEEE Trans Inf Forensics Secur 16:291–306

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Zhang F, Hu C, Yin Q, Li W, Li H, Hong W (2017) Multi-aspect-aware bidirectional LSTM networks for synthetic aperture radar target recognition. IEEE Access 5:26880–26891

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Zhang J, Wang F, Dobre OA, Zhong Z (2016) Specific emitter identification via Hilbert-Huang transform in single-hop and relaying scenarios. IEEE Trans Inf Forensics Secur 11(6):1192–1205

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Zhang Q, Guo Y, Song Z (2021) Dynamic curve fitting and BP neural network with feature extraction for mobile specific emitter identification. IEEE Access 9:33897–33910

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Zhao X, Wen Z, Pan X, Ye W, Bermak A (2019) Mixture gases classification based on multi-label one-dimensional deep convolutional neural network. IEEE Access 7:12630–12637

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This work is supported by National Key R&D Program of China (No. 2018YFC0809500).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Ying-Chun Xiao.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of Interest

I certify that there is no actual or potential conflict of interest in relation to this article.

Additional information

Responsible Editor: S. Sindia

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Xiao, YC., Zhu, F., Zhuang, S. et al. Identification of Unknown Electromagnetic Interference Sources Based on Siamese-CNN. J Electron Test 39, 597–609 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10836-023-06082-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10836-023-06082-7

Keywords

Navigation