Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Double trouble? Impact of frozen embryo transfer on the monozygotic twinning rate: a retrospective cohort study from 8459 cycles

  • Assisted Reproduction Technologies
  • Published:
Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

To compare monozygotic twinning (MZT) rates in patients undergoing fresh embryo transfer (ET) and frozen embryo transfer.

Methods

All clinical pregnancies after single ET carried out in our IVF center between 2014 and 2018 (n = 8459) were retrospectively analyzed for the incidence of MZT. MZT rate was compared in women who underwent fresh ET (n = 3876) and frozen ET (n = 4583).

Results

There was a total of 120 MZT identified in the fresh ET group (3.10%) and 103 MZT in the frozen ET group (2.25%), which was significant (p = 0.015). In the univariate analysis, the risk of MZT was decreased with frozen embryo transfer (OR 0.72; 95% CI, 0.55–0.94, p = 0.016) and increased with mild stimulation protocol in the fresh cycle (OR 1.90; 95% CI, 1.04–3.45, p = 0.036). Multivariable logistic regression revealed that frozen embryo transfer was associated with a significant decrease risk of MZT (adjusted OR 0.66; 95% CI, 0.46–0.90, p = 0.011).

Conclusions

Frozen ET is associated with a lower risk of MZT.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Skiadas CC, Missmer SA, Benson CB, Gee RE, Racowsky C. Risk factors associated with pregnancies containing a monochorionic pair following assisted reproductive technologies. Hum Reprod. 2008;23(6):1366–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Derom C, Vlietinck R, Derom R, Van den Berghe H, Thiery M. Increased monozygotic twinning rate after ovulation induction. Lancet. 1987;1(8544):1236–8.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Saito H, Tsutsumi O, Noda Y, Ibuki Y, Hiroi M. Do assisted reproductive technologies have effects on the demography of monozygotic twinning? Fertil Steril. 2000;74:178e9.

    Google Scholar 

  4. Milki AA, Jun SH, Hinckley MD, Behr B, Giudice LC, Westphal LM. Incidence of monozygotic twinning with blastocyst transfer compared to cleavage-stage transfer. Fertil Steril. 2003;79(3):503–6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Jain JK, Boostanfar R, Slater CC, Francis MM, Paulson RJ. Monozygotic twins and triplets in association with blastocyst transfer. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2004;21(4):103–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Papanikolaou EG, Camus M, Kolibianakis EM, Van Landuyt L, Van Steirteghem A, Devroey P. In vitro fertilization with single blastocyst-stage versus single cleavage-stage embryos. N Engl J Med. 2006;354(11):1139–46.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Aston KI, Peterson CM, Carrell DT. Monozygotic twinning associated with assisted reproductive technologies: a review. Reproduction. 2008;136(4):377–86.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Hviid KVR, Malchau SS, Pinborg A, Nielsen HS. Determinants of monozygotic twinning in ART: a systematic review and a meta-analysis. Hum Reprod Update. 2018;24(4):468–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Vitthala S, Gelbaya TA, Brison DR, Fitzgerald CT, Nardo LG. The risk of monozygotic twins after assisted reproductive technology: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Hum Reprod Update. 2009;15(1):45–55.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Liu X, Bai H, Xie J, Shi J. Growth hormone co-treatment on controlled ovarian stimulation in normal ovarian response women can improve embryo quality. Gynecol Endocrinol. 2019;35(9):787–91.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Liu X, Qu P, Bai H, Shi W, Shi J. Endometrial thickness as a predictor of ectopic pregnancy in 1125 in vitro fertilization-embryo transfer cycles: a matched case-control study. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2019;300(6):1797–803.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Alikani M, Cekleniak NA, Walters E, Cohen J. Monozygotic twinning following assisted conception: an analysis of 81 consecutive cases. Hum Reprod. 2003;18(9):1937–43.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Moayeri SE, Behr B, Lathi RB, Westphal LM, Milki AA. Risk of monozygotic twinning with blastocyst transfer decreases over time: an 8-year experience. Fertil Steril. 2007;87(5):1028–32.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Knopman JM, Krey LC, Oh C, Lee J, McCaffrey C, Noyes N. What makes them split? Identifying risk factors that lead to monozygotic twins after in vitro fertilization. Fertil Steril. 2014;102(1):82–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Kanter JR, Boulet SL, Kawwass JF, Jamieson DJ, Kissin DM. Trends and correlates of monozygotic twinning after single embryo transfer. Obstet Gynecol. 2015;125(1):111–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Luke B, Brown MB, Wantman E, Stern JE. Factors associated with monozygosity in assisted reproductive technology pregnancies and the risk of recurrence using linked cycles. Fertil Steril. 2014;101(3):683–9.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Mateizel I, Santos-Ribeiro S, Done E, Van Landuyt L, Van de Velde H, Tournaye H, et al. Do ARTs affect the incidence of monozygotic twinning? Hum Reprod. 2016;31(11):2435–41.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Kawachiya S, Bodri D, Shimada N, Kato K, Takehara Y, Kato O. Blastocyst culture is associated with an elevated incidence of monozygotic twinning after single embryo transfer. Fertil Steril. 2011;95(6):2140–2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Nakasuji T, Saito H, Araki R, Nakaza A, Nakashima A, Kuwahara A, et al. The incidence of monozygotic twinning in assisted reproductive technology: analysis based on results from the 2010 Japanese ART national registry. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2014;31(7):803–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Sobek A Jr, Zbořilová B, Procházka M, Šilhánová E, Koutná O, Klásková E, et al. High incidence of monozygotic twinning after assisted reproduction is related to genetic information, but not to assisted reproduction technology itself. Fertil Steril. 2015;103(3):756–60.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. MacKenna A, Schwarze JE, Crosby J, Zegers-Hochschild F. Factors associated with embryo splitting and clinical outcome of monozygotic twins in pregnancies after IVF and ICSI. Hum Reprod Open. 2020;2020(1):hoaa024.

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. The Assisted Reproduction Center, The Assisted Reproduction Center, Northwest Women’s and Children’s Hospital, Xi’an, China

    Xitong Liu, Ping Li & Juanzi Shi

Authors
  1. Xitong Liu
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Ping Li
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Juanzi Shi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Juanzi Shi.

Additional information

Publisher’s note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Liu, X., Li, P. & Shi, J. Double trouble? Impact of frozen embryo transfer on the monozygotic twinning rate: a retrospective cohort study from 8459 cycles. J Assist Reprod Genet 37, 3051–3056 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10815-020-01985-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10815-020-01985-2

Keywords

Search

Navigation