Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Effects of granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor supplementation in culture medium on embryo quality and pregnancy outcome of women aged over 35 years

  • Assisted Reproduction Technologies
  • Published:
Journal of Assisted Reproduction and Genetics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Purpose

The purpose of this study is to explore whether a low concentration of granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) supplementation in culture medium is beneficial to infertile women aged over 35 years.

Methods

A retrospective cohort study was performed to analyze the embryo quality and pregnancy outcome of 212 controlled ovarian stimulation (COH) cycles with or without GM-CSF addition (n = 117 [GM-CSF, 0.2 ng/mL] vs n = 95 [control]).

Results

No significant difference was observed in cleavage rate (96.2 vs 96.5 %), blastocyst formation rate (53.2 vs 54.0 %), good blastocyst rate (26.8 vs 26.8 %), or available embryo rate (54.2 vs 49.7 %) between the GM-CSF group and the control group. However, the average age of the GM-CSF group (38.41 ± 3.13 years) was significantly 1 year older than that of the corresponding control group (37.45 ± 2.74 years) (P < 0.05). GM-CSF addition greatly decreased the occurrence of biochemical pregnancy (55.6 % [control] vs 20.8 % [GM-CSF], P < 0.05). No case of neonatal malformation was observed in the present study.

Conclusion

Although no benefit of GM-CSF on embryo quality was observed, the addition of this factor significantly decreased the occurrence of chemical pregnancy of women aged over 35 years, indicating the role of GM-CSF in improving implantation competence of embryos derived from elderly infertile women.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Chronopoulou E, Harper JC. IVF culture media: past, present and future. Hum Reprod Update. 2015;21:39–55.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Kawamura K, Chen Y, Shu Y, Cheng Y, Qiao J, Behr B. Promotion of human early embryonic development and blastocyst outgrowth in vitro using autocrine/paracrine growth factors. PLoS One. 2012;7:e49328.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Hansen PJ, Dobbs KB, Denicol AC. Programming of the preimplantation embryo by the embryokine colony stimulating factor 2. Anim Reprod Sci. 2014;149:59–66.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Kwak SS, Jeung SH, Biswas D, Jeon YB, Hyun SH. Effects of porcine granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor on porcine in vitro-fertilized embryos. Theriogenology. 2012;77:1186–97.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Dumoulin J, Land J, Van Montfoort A, Nelissen E, Coonen E, Derhaag J, et al. Effect of in vitro culture of human embryos on birthweight of newborns. Hum Reprod. 2010;25:605–12.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Nelissen ECM, Van Montfoort APA, Smits LJM, Menheere PPCA, Evers JLH, Coonen E, et al. IVF culture medium affects human intrauterine growth as early as the second trimester of pregnancy. Hum Reprod. 2013;28:2067–74.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Mantikou E, Youssef MAFM, van Wely M, van der Veen F, Al-Inany HG, Repping S, et al. Embryo culture media and IVF/ICSI success rates: a systematic review. Hum Reprod Update. 2013;19:210–20.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Zandstra H, Van Montfoort AP, Dumoulin JC. Does the type of culture medium used influence birthweight of children born after IVF? Hum Reprod. 2015;30:530–42.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Das M, Holzer HE. Recurrent implantation failure: gamete and embryo factors. Fertil Steril. 2012;97:1021–7.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Gardner DK, Reed L, Linck D, Sheehan C, Lane M. Quality control in human in vitro fertilization. Semin Reprod Med. 2005;23:319–24.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Agarwal A, Durairajanayagam D, du Plessis SS. Utility of antioxidants during assisted reproductive techniques: an evidence based review. Reprod Biol Endocrinol 2014; doi: 10.1186/1477-7827-12-112

  12. Binder NK, Evans J, Gardner DK, Salamonsen LA, Hannan NJ. Endometrial signals improve embryo outcome: functional role of vascular endothelial growth factor isoforms on embryo development and implantation in mice. Hum Reprod. 2014;29:2278–86.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Colazingari S, Fiorenza MT, Carlomagno G, Najjar R, Bevilacqua A. Improvement of mouse embryo quality by myo-inositol supplementation of IVF media. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2014;31:463–9.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  14. Castillo-Martín M, Yeste M, Soler A, Morató R, Bonet S. Addition of l-ascorbic acid to culture and vitrification media of IVF porcine blastocysts improves survival and reduces HSPA1A levels of vitrified embryos. Reprod Fertil Dev 2014; doi: 10.1071/RD14078

  15. Lim KS, Chae SJ, Choo CW, Ku YH, Lee HJ, Hur CY, et al. In vitro maturation: clinical applications. Clin Exp Reprod Med. 2013;40:143–7.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Block J, Hansena PJ, Loureiroa B, Bonilla L. Improving post-transfer survival of bovine embryos produced in vitro: actions of insulin-like growth factor-1, colony stimulating factor-2 and hyaluronan. Theriogenology. 2011;76:1602–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Robertson SA, Roberts CT, Farr KL, Dunn AR, Seamark RF. Fertility impairment in granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor-deficient mice. Biol Reprod. 1999;60:251–61.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Robertson SA, Sjoblom C, Jasper MJ, Norman RJ, Seamark RF. Granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor promotes glucose transport and blastomere viability in murine preimplantation embryos. Biol Reprod. 2001;64:1206–15.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Ziebe S, Loft A, Povlsen BB, Erb K, Agerholm I, Aasted M, et al. A randomized clinical trial to evaluate the effect of granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) in embryo culture medium for in vitro fertilization. Fertil Steril. 2013;99:1600–9.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Siristatidis C, Vogiatzi P, Salamalekis G, Creatsa M, Vrachnis N, Glujovsky D, et al. Granulocyte macrophage colony stimulating factor supplementation in culture media for subfertile women undergoing assisted reproduction technologies: a systematic review. Int J Endocrinol. 2013;2013:704967.

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Sjöblom C, Wikland M, Robertson SA. Granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor promotes human blastocyst development in vitro. Hum Reprod. 1999;14:3069–76.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Agerholm I, Loft A, Hald F, Lemmen JG, Munding B, Sørensen PD, et al. Culture of human oocytes with granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor has no effect on embryonic chromosomal constitution. Reprod Biomed Online. 2010;20:477–84.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Robertson SA. GM-CSF regulation of embryo development and pregnancy. Cytokine Growth Factor Rev. 2007;18:287–98.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Ferraretti AP, La Marca A, Fauser BC, Tarlatzis B, Nargund G, Gianaroli L. ESHRE consensus on the definition of “poor response” to ovarian stimulation for in vitro fertilization: the Bologna criteria. Hum Reprod. 2011;26:1616–24.

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Alpha Scientists in Reproductive Medicine, ESHRE Special Interest Group of Embryology. The Istanbul consensus workshop on embryo assessment: the I proceedings of an expert meeting. Hum Reprod. 2011;26:1270–83.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Gardner DK, Schoolcraft WB. In vitro culture of human blastocyst. In: Jansen R, Mortimer D, editors. Towards reproductive certainty: infertility and genetics beyond 1999. Carnforth: Parthenon Press; 1999. p. 378–88.

    Google Scholar 

  27. Zhou W, Fu L, Sha W, Chu D, Li Y. Relationship of polar bodies morphology to embryo quality and pregnancy outcome. Zygote. 2015;22:1–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Bolton VN, Cutting R, Clarke H, Brison DR. ACE consensus meeting report: culture systems. Hum Fertil (Camb). 2014;17:239–51.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Sjöblom C, Wikland M, Robertson SA. Granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) receptor to prevent inner cell mass apoptosis in human embryos. Biol Reprod. 2002;67:1817–23.

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This work was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (81471511, 81270753, 81370758) and the Personnel Training Plan of The Health Care System of Beijing (2013-3-021, 2013-2-009).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yuan Li.

Ethics declarations

Competing interest

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Additional information

Capsule

Although no benefit of GM-CSF on embryo quality was observed, the addition of this factor significantly decreased the occurrence of chemical pregnancy of women aged over 35 years, indicating the role of GM-CSF in improving implantation competence of embryos derived from elderly infertile women.

Wenhui Zhou and Dapeng Chu contributed equally to this work.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Zhou, W., Chu, D., Sha, W. et al. Effects of granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor supplementation in culture medium on embryo quality and pregnancy outcome of women aged over 35 years. J Assist Reprod Genet 33, 39–47 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10815-015-0627-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10815-015-0627-7

Keywords

Navigation