Abstract
Purpose
To evaluate implantation potential of cleavage-stage embryos cultured in medium containing 2 ng/ml granulocyte–macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) versus control medium, according to embryo morphological quality and then transferred on day 3.
Methods
Explorative secondary data analysis of a multicenter, randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blinded prospective study of 1149 couples with embryo transfer after IVF/ICSI. This analysis includes a subgroup of 422 subjects with either single-embryo transfer (SET, N = 286) or double-embryo transfer of two embryos with equivalent morphological quality (DET, N = 136). Implantation rate and live birth rate were assessed according to category of morphological embryo quality on day 3.
Results
Culture with GM-CSF did not increase the implantation rate for embryos classified as poor quality. A trend towards greater benefit of GM-CSF on implantation and survival until live birth for top-quality embryos (TQEs) compared with poor-quality embryos was observed, although not statistically significant. For TQEs, the percentage of transferred embryos resulting in a live born baby was: 40.9 ± 5.3% (GM-CSF) versus 30.5 ± 4.6% (control) (P = 0.24; odds ratio [OR] 1.43, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.79–2.59), and for embryos with less than 6 cells at day 3 this same rate was: 7.4 ± 3.3% (GM-CSF) versus 12.0 ± 4.0% (control) (P = 0.26; OR 0.53, 95% CI 0.17–1.61).
Conclusion
This exploratory analysis is consistent with GM-CSF protecting morphologically normal embryos from culture-induced stress and does not support an effect of GM-CSF in rescuing poor-quality embryos.
ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT00565747.
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
Introduction
Although current in vitro conditions for culture of human embryos attempt to mimic the in vivo environment, it is generally recognized that the achieved conditions are suboptimal, and ideal culture media for in vitro development of human embryos are yet to be developed [1, 2].
In the female reproductive tract, several of the cytokines and growth factors secreted by the lining epithelium of the human fallopian tube and uterus have demonstrated effects in promoting normal embryo development and supporting embryo implantation [3]. Granulocyte–macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF, also known as CSF2) is a lympho-hemopoietic cytokine with well-defined effects on proliferation and differentiation of different cell types. The expression of GM-CSF and its receptors in the human reproductive tract was first reported in the early nineties [4]. Later, it was demonstrated that GM-CSF increased significantly during a normally developing pregnancy, as estimated in plasma concentration levels, while that did not occur in women suffering from recurrent miscarriages [5]. These observations correspond well with data from animal studies, where GM-CSF deficient mice were found to have inherent fertility impairment [6], and abortion-prone mice could maintain gestation with improved neonatal outcome after treatment with exogenous GM-CSF [7]. Addition of GM-CSF to mouse embryo culture media has been shown to increase the proportion of transferred embryos generating viable progeny, and to partly alleviate the long-term adverse effects on fetal and postnatal growth after in vitro embryo culture [8].
The protective effects of GM-CSF identified for murine embryo culture include enhanced embryo viability by reduced cellular stress response and apoptosis [3, 9], and improved blastocyst development [10,11,12,13,14]. Similar beneficial effects of GM-CSF on development to blastocyst stage in embryo culture media have been observed in pigs, cattle and other livestock species [15,16,17,18,19,20,21] as well as in human embryos [22, 23]. In human studies, addition of GM-CSF to frozen/thawed human cleavage-stage embryos (2–4 cells) significantly improved rates of blastocyst development, from 30% in control to 76% in the GM-CSF group [22], and blastocysts cultured in the presence of GM-CSF were found to have 50% fewer apoptotic nuclei and 30% more viable inner cell mass cells [23]. However, data have been scarce with regard to the effect of GM-CSF on fresh cleavage-stage embryo development [24, 25].
A prospective randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blinded multicenter trial reported by Ziebe et al. [26], for which we here present a secondary explorative analysis, found that addition of GM-CSF to embryo culture medium elicited a significant increase in survival of transferred embryos to week 12 and live birth. This obvservation suggests that supplementation of culture medium with GM-CSF may increase developmental competence of pre-implantation cleavage-stage embryos [26]. Moreover, an exploratory analysis showed that GM-CSF increased embryo implantation rates in women who had experienced previous miscarriage, especially in women with a history of more than one miscarriage [26]. Similar results of improved ongoing pregnancy rates after three days of embryo culture in GM-CSF medium were obtained in a small study including 43 women with a history of previous miscarriage and/or implantation failure [27].
Regarding the possible mechanisms involved, a report by Karagenc et al. in mouse embryos [12] suggested that the effect of GM-CSF is more evident in embryos exposed to higher culture-induced stress achieved by virtue of reduced albumin content in the culture medium. This postulate is supported by further explorative analysis reported by Ziebe et al. [26] where subgroups were distinguished by different concentrations of human serum albumin (HSA) (2 mg/ml and 5 mg/ml, respectively) in both the GM-CSF and control medium, used in an initial and subsequent later phase of the trial, respectively. The largest effect of GM-CSF was observed when the medium contained 2 mg/ml HSA. However, independent of the HSA concentration in the culture media, Ziebe et al. found no significant differences in the morphology of embryo development in the GM-CSF versus control media [26].
In this explorative secondary analysis of data generated during the multicenter prospective randomized trial reported by Ziebe et al. [26], we aimed to investigate whether culture of human cleavage-stage embryos until day 3 in the presence of GM-CSF exerts beneficial effects on embryo implantation rate through differentially elevating the implantation competence of poor-quality embryos, or alternatively whether effects are exerted on embryos regardless of quality as judged by morphological characteristics.
Materials and methods
Study design and participants
This is an explorative secondary analysis of a subset of data from a previously reported prospective randomized, placebo-controlled, double-blinded, multicenter trial (ClinicalTrials.gov identifier: NCT00565747) [26]. Briefly, between April 2009 and August 2010, 528 women were enrolled at 13 Scandinavian fertility clinics, 11 Danish and 2 Swedish. The women were randomized to have their embryos cultured in the same culture medium without cytokine (control) or formulated with 2 ng/ml GM-CSF (test). Both media were produced by ORIGIO a/s and with optimized concentration of human serum albumin (5 mg/ml). This report focuses on a subgroup of 422 women characterized by having a single-embryo transfer (SET) (N = 286) or a double-embryo transfer (DET) (N = 136) of two embryos of comparable morphological quality. Women transferred with two embryos of different morphological quality (N = 106) were excluded from this investigation.
Study procedures
Details on study design and randomization procedure have been described previously [26]. Briefly, patients were eligible for inclusion if they were aged 25–39 years, had a regular menstrual cycle of 21–35 days, were treated with a standard GnRH agonist or antagonist protocol, and had three or more follicles with a diameter of > 17 mm on the day of hCG administration. Exclusion criteria were previous participation in the study, use of assisted hatching, use of non-ejaculated sperm, medical conditions or genetic disorders prohibiting IVF/ICSI or interfering with interpretation of results, use of investigational drugs within 30 days before oocyte retrieval, severe chronic disease of relevance for reproduction/implantation, and oocyte donation.
Sample size and data analysis
Embryos were categorized by morphological score, with ‘Abnormally Developed’ embryos (ADE) having < 6 cells at 68 h post-insemination, ‘Normally Developed’ embryos (NDE) having ≥ 6 cells and ≤ 20% fragmentation at 68 h post-insemination, without fulfilling the criteria for Top Quality Embryo (TQE); and TQE having 4–5 cells at 44 h post-insemination, ≥ 7 cells at 68 h post-insemination, ≤ 20% fragmentation, equally sized blastomeres with < 25% difference, and no signs of multinucleation.
The effect of GM-CSF on embryo implantation was investigated by exploratory statistical analysis to evaluate trends with regard to embryo implantation rate and survival until live birth when comparing embryos of comparable morphology. Data analysis were performed for a combined group of women with single-embryo transfer or double-embryo transfer with embryos of equivalent morphological quality (N = 422 subjects). Odds ratios (ORs) for the effect parameters (ongoing implantation rate gestational week 7 and week 12, and live babies born per embryo transferred) were analyzed with the use of a logistic regression model (SAS software version 9.2) with treatment group (GM-CSF/control) as main factor, and covariates including age, smoking status and number of oocytes collected. Age, BMI and number of oocytes collected were compared between GM-CSF and control group using the t test. All categorical comparisons were performed using Fisher’s exact test.
Results
Patient characteristics and clinical outcome by group assigned to transfer of embryo(s) cultured in GM-CSF or control medium are presented in Tables 1 and 2. There were no statistically significant differences between test and control groups with regard to age or BMI of the women, cause of infertility, IVF or ICSI insemination procedures, or number of oocytes obtained.
The clinical success rates after IVF/ICSI and embryo culture and transfer in GM-CSF and control medium, respectively, according to the morphological category of the embryo(s) transferred, are shown in Table 3. For the subgroups of embryos categorized as having the highest morphological quality (TQE), data show tendencies to improved embryo survival until live birth after culture and transfer in GM-CSF medium, with the percentage of transferred embryos resulting in a live born baby being 40.9 ± 5.3% (GM-CSF) versus 30.5 ± 4.6% (control) (P = 0.24; odds ratio [OR] 1.43, 95% confidence interval [CI] 0.79–2.59).
However, no beneficial effect of culture with GM-CSF was observed in the remaining subgroups of abnormally (ADE) and normally developed embryos (NDE). In contrast, a tendency to decreased implantation potential was observed for the group of embryos with poor morphological quality (ADE) when cultured in GM-CSF medium, with the percentage of transferred embryos resulting in a live born baby being 7.4 ± 3.3% (GM-CSF) versus 12.0 ± 4.0% (control) (P = 0.26; OR 0.53, 95% CI 0.17–1.61). Moreover, there was no effect of GM-CSF on the group of NDE’s (embryos of transferable quality but not fulfilling the criteria for TQE): with the percentage of transferred embryos resulting in a live born baby being 22.9 ± 4.8% (GM-CSF) versus 22.4 ± 4.9% (control) (P = 0.63; OR 1.21, 95% CI 0.56–2.61).
No differences between GM-CSF and control groups were observed with regard to stillbirth, perinatal death, abnormalities or birth weight of babies born (data not shown).
Discussion
Here, we report an exploratory secondary analysis investigating a subgroup of patients participating in a multicenter prospective randomized trial reported by Ziebe et al. [26]. The subgroup is characterized by being enrolled in the late phase of the trial where all embryos were cultured in either test (GM-CSF) or control medium (without GM-CSF) with optimized concentration of human serum albumin (5 mg/ml). Secondly, the patient population was limited to those with single-embryo transfer or double-embryo transfer (DET) of two embryos of comparable morphological quality.
Although statistical significance was not reached due to insufficient power for this exploratory subgroup analysis, it was a consistent observation for all success parameters both on the embryo level and patient level that the presence of GM-CSF reduced favorable outcomes in the poor embryo quality group; while in the highest embryo quality group, GM-CSF exhibited favorable effects. In the intermediate group, no effect of GM-CSF was observed on the success parameters. These data suggest that the improved implantation rates and progression to live birth found by Ziebe et al. [26] is principally the result of effects of GM-CSF on morphologically normal as opposed to morphological abnormal embryos.
Importantly, this analysis alleviates any concerns that pro-survival cytokines may cause embryos otherwise destined for demise, to survive. It has been suggested that GM-CSF might rescue developmentally compromised embryos, potentially resulting in implantation and ongoing development of embryos that would not have survived in the absence of cytokine [28]. Our exploratory analysis does not support the interpretation that GM-CSF acts to rescue inferior or damaged embryos that could be associated with impaired fetal development and/or poor neonatal outcomes.
The current data also imply that beneficial effects of GM-CSF cannot be attributed to rescuing human embryos from poor or highly stressful culture conditions [12], as all embryos were cultured in test (2 ng/ml GM-CSF) or control medium, both with optimized concentration of human serum albumin (5 mg/ml).
Our rationale for this analysis was to search for evidence of GM-CSF effects acquired by the cleavage-stage embryo during culture. Effects of GM-CSF that are evident at blastocyst stage, particularly reduced incidence of apoptosis and elevated cell number [22], might become evident if cleavage-stage embryos were cultured for a longer period, but were not evident in this study as embryos were transferred on day 3 of embryo culture. Our observations provide support for the argument that embryo exposure to pro-survival cytokines exert beneficial effects on implantation potential without necessarily being reflected in effects on cleavage-stage embryo morphology.
This result adds to previous evidence that exposure of human embryos to GM-CSF in culture does not increase the likelihood of stillbirth, perinatal death, congenital abnormalities or abnormal birth weight of singletons and twins when compared with control medium without GM-CSF [26]. The result is also consistent with previous data showing similar chromosomal constitution of human embryos cultured in vitro with or without the presence of 2 ng/ml GM-CSF [25].
References
Hardy K, Handyside AH, Winston RML (1989) The human blastocyst: cell number, death and allocation during late preimplantation development in vitro. Development 107:597–604
Quinn P (2014) Culture media, solutions, and systems in human ART. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge
Robertson SA, Chin PY, Glynn DJ, Thompson JG (2011) Peri-conceptual cytokines—setting the trajectory for embryo implantation, pregnancy and beyond. Am J Reprod Immunol 66(Suppl. 1):2–10
Zhao Y, Chegini N (1994) Human fallopian tube expresses granulocyte-macrophage colony stimulating factor (GM-CSF) and GM-CSF alpha and beta receptors and contain immunoreactive GM-CSF protein. J Clin Endocrinol Metab 79(2):662–665
Perricone R, De Carolis C, Giacomelli R, Guarino MD, De Sanctis G, Fontana L (2003) GM-CSF and pregnancy: evidence of significantly reduced blood concentrations in unexplained recurrent abortion efficiently reverted by intravenous immunoglobulin treatment. Am J Reprod Immunol 50:232–237
Robertson SA, Roberts CT, Farr KL, Dunn AR, Seamark RF (1999) Fertility impairment in granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor-deficient mice. Biol Reprod 60(2):251–261
Chaouat G, Menu E, Clark DA, Dy M, Minkowski M, Wegmann TG (1990) Control of fetal survival in CBA × DBA/2 mice by lymphokine therapy. J Reprod Fertil 89:447–458
Sjöblom C, Roberts CT, Wikland M, Robertson SA (2005) Granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor alleviates adverse consequences of embryo culture on fetal growth trajectory and placental morphogenesis. Endocrinology 146:2142–2153
Chin PY, Macpherson AM, Thompson JG, Lane M, Robertson SA (2009) Stress response genes are suppressed in mouse preimplantation embryos by granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF). Hum Reprod 24(12):2997–3009
Sheikholslami B, Salehnia M, Valojerdi MR, Ramezanzadeh M (2008) Developmental potential of isolated blastomeres from early mouse embryos in the presence and absence of LIF and GM-CSF. J Assist Reprod Genet 25:7–12
Papayannis M, Eyheremendy V, Sanjurjo C, Blaquier J, Raffo FG (2007) Effect of granulocyte-macrophage colony stimulating factor on growth, resistance to freezing and thawing and re-expansion of murine blastocysts. Reprod Biomed Online 14:96–101
Karagenc L, Lane M, Gardner DK (2005) Granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor stimulates mouse blastocyst inner cell mass development only when media lack human serum albumin. Reprod Biomed Online 10:511–518
Behr B, Mooney S, Wen Y, Polan ML, Wang H (2005) Preliminary experience with low concentration of granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor: a potential regulator in preimplantation mouse embryo development and apoptosis. J Assist Reprod Genet 22:25–32
Robertson SA, Sjoblom C, Jasper MJ, Norman RJ, Seamark RF (2001) Granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor promotes glucose transport and blastomere viability in murine preimplantation embryos. Biol Reprod 64:1206–1215
Lee K, Redel BK, Spate L, Teson J, Brown AN, Park KW, Walters E, Samuel M, Murphy CN, Prather RS (2013) Piglets produced from cloned blastocysts cultured in vitro with GM-CSF. Mol Reprod Dev 80:145–154
Cui XS, Lee JY, Choi SH, Kwon MS, Kim T, Kim NH (2004) Mouse granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor enhances viability of porcine embryos in defined culture conditions. Anim Reprod Sci 84:169–177
Kwak SS, Cheong SA, Jeon Y, Hyun SH (2012) Porcine granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor improves the in vitro development of cloned porcine embryos. J Vet Med Sci 74:1095–1102
Kwak SS, Jeung SH, Biswas D, Jeon YB, Hyun SH (2012) Effects of porcine granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor on porcine in vitro-fertilized embryos. Theriogenology 77:1186–1197
Neira JA, Tainturier D, Pena MA, Martal J (2010) Effect of the association of IGF-I, IGF-II, bFGF, TGF-beta1, GM-CSF, and LIF on the development of bovine embryos produced in vitro. Theriogenology 73:595–604
Loureiro B, Bonilla L, Block J, Fear JM, Bonilla AQ, Hansen PJ (2009) Colony-stimulating factor 2 (CSF-2) improves development and posttransfer survival of bovine embryos produced in vitro. Endocrinology 150:5046–5054
De Moraes AA, Hansen PJ (1997) Granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor promotes development of in vitro produced bovine embryos. Biol Reprod 57:1060–1065
Sjöblom C, Wikland M, Robertson SA (1999) Granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor promotes human blastocyst development in vitro. Hum Reprod 14:3069–3076
Sjöblom C, Wikland M, Robertson SA (2002) Granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) acts independently of the beta common subunit of the GM-CSF receptor to prevent inner cell mass apoptosis in human embryos. Biol Reprod 67:1817–1823
Kim D, Kim M, Kang H, Lee H, Park W, Kwon H (2001) The supplementation of granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) in culture medium improves the pregnancy rate in human ART programs. Fertil Steril 76(3):S6
Agerholm I, Loft A, Hald F, Lemmen JG, Munding B, Sorensen PD, Ziebe S (2010) Culture of human oocytes with granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor has no effect on embryonic chromosomal constitution. Reprod Biomed Online 20:477–484
Ziebe S, Loft A, Povlsen BB, Erb K, Agerholm I, Aasted M, Gabrielsen A, Hnida C, Zobel DP, Munding B, Bendz SH, Robertson SA (2013) A randomized clinical trial to evaluate the effect of granulocyte-macrophage colony-stimulating factor (GM-CSF) in embryo culture medium for in vitro fertilization. Fertil Steril 99:1600–1609
Hull L, Hull K, Norman R, Robertson S, Barry M (2014) Media supplementation with GM-CSF improves ongoing pregnancy rates per cycle started (P083). The 5th Congress of the Asia Pacific initiative on reproduction, Brisbane, p 181
Harper J, Magli MC, Lundin K, Barratt CL, Brison D (2012) When and how should new technology be introduced into the IVF laboratory? Hum Reprod 27(2):303–313
Acknowledgements
Open access funding provided by Karolinska Institute. The authors thank the investigators from the following Danish centers: Inge Agerholm, Fertility Clinic, Braedstrup Hospital, Braedstrup; Karin Erb, Odense University Hospital, Odense; Marie Louise Grøndahl, Hvidovre Hospital, Hvidovre; Betina B. Povlsen, Fertility Clinic, Skive Regional Hospital, Skive; Anette Gabrielsen, Ciconia Aarhus Private Hospital, Aarhus; Christina Hnida, Fertility Clinic, Herlev University Hospital, Copenhagen; Michael Aasted, Fertility Clinic Dronninglund, Aalborg University Hospital, Dronninglund; Thomas Høst, Holbæk Hospital, Holbæk; John Kirk, Maigaard Fertlity Clinic, Aarhus; Steen Laursen, Fertilitetsklinikken IVF-Syd, Fredericia; and from the Swedish centers: Julius Hreinsson, Uppsala University Hospital, Uppsala for their contributions to this study.
Funding
Dr Rodriguez-Wallberg was supported by the Young Investigators’ Grant from the Swedish Research Council, the Clinical Research Grant from Stockholm County Council and Research Funds of Karolinska Institutet. The study was supported by ORIGIO a/s, Måløv, Denmark.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
KARW, BM, SZ and SAR designed the study. KARW, BM and SZ collected and assembled data with KARW as lead investigator. KARW drafted the first version of the manuscript. KARW, BM, SZ and SAR contributed to data analysis and interpretation, manuscript revision and approved the final submitted version.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
Kenny A. Rodriguez-Wallberg has no potential conflict of interest to disclose. Bibi Munding is employed by CooperSurgical, ORIGIO a/s. Søren Ziebe has no potential conflict of interest to disclose. Sarah A. Robertson is inventor on a patent describing use of GM-CSF in human reproductive medicine, previously licensed to CooperSurgical, ORIGIO a/s.
Ethical approval
All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards. The study was approved by regional Ethics Committees and was in accordance with the principles of Helsinki Declaration II.
Informed consent
Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License, which permits use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by/4.0/.
About this article
Cite this article
Rodriguez-Wallberg, K.A., Munding, B., Ziebe, S. et al. GM-CSF does not rescue poor-quality embryos: secondary analysis of a randomized controlled trial. Arch Gynecol Obstet 301, 1341–1346 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-020-05532-3
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00404-020-05532-3