Skip to main content
Log in

The Cross-Cultural Importance of Animal Protection and Other World Social Issues

  • Articles
  • Published:
Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In an increasingly global landscape, NFP (not-for-profit) initiatives including those addressing animal protection, are increasingly operating cross-borders. Doing so without respect, local engagement, and a thorough understanding of the issues of concern is fraught with danger, and potentially wasteful of resources. To this purpose, we sought to understand attitudes to the importance of 13 major world social issues in relation to animal protection (including reducing poverty, racial, LGBT and gender equality, environmental protection, sustainable development, genetic engineering and capital punishment) by surveying 3433 students from at least 103 universities across 12 nations. The emergence of a ‘nature trifecta’ was suggested, with animal and environmental protection and sustainable development recurring as the most highly rated in importance across all countries, with these issues also consistently rating amongst the highest in each individual country. It is concluded that significant differences exist between attributed importance of world issues by nation, pointing towards the benefit of tailoring NFP (including animal protection) initiatives by country and region. It is also suggested that nation, or more specifically, sociopolitical and cultural region, is a vitally important demographic for consideration in social development.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Andreasen, A. R., & Kotler, P. (2008). Strategic marketing for nonprofit organizations (1st ed.). New Jersey, USA: Pearson/Prentice Hall.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bai, K., Zhou, S., & Lv, Y. (2008). The progress of social cultural geography in china in recent 10 years. Acta Geologica Sinica, 69(8), 1190–1206.

    Google Scholar 

  • Brammer, S., Williams, G., & Zinkin, J. (2007). Religion and attitudes to corporate social responsibility in a large cross-country sample. Journal of Business Ethics, 71(3), 229–243. doi:10.1007/s10551-006-9136-z.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carreiras, H. (2006). Gender and the military: Women in the armed forces of western democracies. UK: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Cater, E. (1993) Ecotourism in the third world: Problems for sustainable tourism development. Tourism Management 14(2), 85–90.

  • Cornell Law School. (2015). Death penalty worldwide: women. Retrieved December 5, 2015 from http://www.deathpenaltyworldwide.org/women.cfm.

  • Cho, K. (2008). Death penalty in Korea: From unofficial moratorium to abolition? Asian Journal of Comparative Law. doi:10.1017/S2194607800000120.

    Google Scholar 

  • Davis, M. H. (1983). Measuring individual differences in empathy: Evidence for a multidimensional approach. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 44(1), 113. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.44.1.113.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eisenberg, N., & Lennon, R. (1983). Sex differences in empathy and related capacities. Psychological Bulletin, 94(1), 100. doi:10.1037/0033-2909.94.1.100.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harper, G. C., & Makatouni, A. (2002). Consumer perception of organic food production and farm animal welfare. British Food Journal., 104(3/4/5), 287–299. doi:10.1108/00070700210425723.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Itaborahy, L. P., & Zhu, J. (2012). State-sponsored homophobia: A world survey of laws criminalising same-sex sexual acts between consenting adults. Brussels: The International Lesbian, Gay, Bisexual. Trans and Intersex Association (ILGA).

  • Izmirli, S., & Phillips, C. J. (2011). The relationship between student consumption of animal products and attitudes to animals in Europe and Asia. British Food Journal, 113(3), 436–450. doi:10.1108/00070701111116482.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Library of Congress. Federal Research Division. (1993). Portugal: A country study. Washington, DC: Library of Congress.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ling, R. Z., Zulkifli, I., Lampang, P. N., Nhiem, D. V., Wang, Y., & Phillips, C. J. C. (2016). Attitudes of students from southeast and east Asian countries to slaughter and transport of livestock. Animal Welfare. In press

  • Lorenzoni, I., & Pidgeon, N. F. (2006). Public views on climate change: European and USA perspectives. Climatic Change, 77(1), 73–95.

  • Meng, J., Hanlon, A., Handziska, A., Choe, B. I., Illmann, G., Lee, G. H., & Alonso, M. (2009). Attitudes to animals in Eurasia: The identification of different types of animal protection through an international survey. In Minding animals international conference (pp. 30–30). Minding Animals Australia.

  • Nisbett, R. E., & Cohen, D. (1996). Culture of honor: The psychology of violence in the south. Boulder, USA: Westview Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Phillips, C., Izmirli, S., Aldavood, J., Alonso, M., Choe, B. I., Hanlon, A., et al. (2010). An international comparison of female and male students’ attitudes to the use of animals. Animals, 1(1), 7–26. doi:10.3390/ani1010007.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Phillips, C. J. C., Izmirli, S., Aldavood, S. J., Alonso, M., Choe, B. I., Hanlon, A., et al. (2012). Students’ attitudes to animal welfare and rights in Europe and Asia. Animal Welfare-The UFAW Journal, 21(1), 87.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Phillips, C. J., & McCulloch, S. (2005). Student attitudes on animal sentience and use of animals in society. Journal of Biological Education, 40(1), 17–24. doi:10.1080/00219266.2005.9656004.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Porter, M. E., Stern, S., & Green, M. (2015). Social progress index 2015. Washington, DC: Social Progress Imperativ.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sarat, A., & Boulanger, C. (Eds.). (2005). The cultural lives of capital punishment: Comparative perspectives. Palo Alto, USA: Stanford University Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Sinclair, M. (2016). Internationalization of animal welfare standards. Encyclopaedia of food and agricultural ethics. New York City, USA: Springer.

    Google Scholar 

  • Solsten, E., & Meditz, S. W. (Eds.). (1990). Spain: A country study. Washington, DC: Library of Congress.

    Google Scholar 

  • Steel, B. S. (1996). Thinking globally and acting locally?: Environmental attitudes, behavior and activism. Journal of Environmental Management, 47(1), 27–36. doi:10.1006/jema.1996.0033.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tonsor, G. T., & Olynk, N. J. (2011). Impacts of Animal Well‐Being and Welfare Media on Meat Demand. Journal of Agricultural Economics, 62(1), 59–72.

  • Vogel, D. (1997). Trading up and governing across: Transnational governance and environmental protection. Journal of European Public Policy, 4(4), 556–571. doi:10.1080/135017697344064.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Vogel, D. (2009). Trading up: Consumer and environmental regulation in a global economy. Harvard University Press.

  • Wiegand, P. (1991). Does travel broaden the mind? Education, 19(1), 54–58. doi:10.1080/03004279185200111.

    Google Scholar 

  • Zelezny, L. C., Chua, P. P., & Aldrich, C. (2000). New ways of thinking about environmentalism: Elaborating on gender differences in environmentalism. Journal of Social Issues, 56(3), 443–457. doi:10.1111/0022-4537.00177.

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Michelle Sinclair.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Sinclair, M., Phillips, C.J.C. The Cross-Cultural Importance of Animal Protection and Other World Social Issues. J Agric Environ Ethics 30, 439–455 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10806-017-9676-5

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10806-017-9676-5

Keywords

Navigation