Skip to main content
Log in

Effect of periodic complete anolyte replacement on the long term performance of a four air cathodes single chamber microbial fuel cell

  • Research Article
  • Published:
Journal of Applied Electrochemistry Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Periodic anolyte replacement was investigated as a means of enhancing the performance of a four air–cathodes single chamber microbial fuel cell (4ACMFC) during its long term operation. The 938 cc unit exhibited very good stability over a period of 53 days in continuous mode operation, attributed to reduction of the growth of antagonistic non-electrogenic bacteria in the bulk solution as a result of the periodic anolyte replacement. Moreover, the MnO2 catalyst layer coating remained stable for approximately 105 days of total cell operation, both in batch and continuous mode. During the long term continuous operation at 32 °C, the steady-state cell voltage was equal to 0.413 ± 0.023 V, the coulombic efficiency ranged from 14 to 16.5 %, while the COD removal remained stable at an average value of 80 %. A maximum power density Pmax of 10 W/m3 was achieved. The 4ACMFC was further assessed at different temperatures and conductivities. Its optimum performance was obtained at 32 °C while the ionic strength was not a limiting factor of the cell performance. The aforementioned results highlight periodic anolyte replacement as a potential operation mode for more stable MFC performance over time.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Pant D, Bogaert G, Diels L, Vanbroekhoven K (2010) A review of the substrates used in microbial fuel cells (MFCs) for sustainable energy production. Bioresour Technol 101:1533–1543

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Dekker A, Heijne AT, Saakes M, Hamelers HVM, Buisman CJN (2009) Analysis and improvement of a scaled-up and stacked microbial fuel cell. Environ Sci Technol 43:9038–9042

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Ieropoulos I, Greenman J, Melhuish C (2010) Improved energy output levels from small-scale microbial fuel cells. Bioelectrochemistry 78:44–50

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Heijne AT, Liu F, Van Rijnsoever LS, Saakes M, Hamelers HVM, Buisman CJN (2011) Performance of a scaled-up microbial fuel cell with iron reduction as the cathode reaction. J Power Sour 196:7572–7577

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Logan BE (2008) Microbial fuel cells. Wiley, New Jersey

    Google Scholar 

  6. Zhang G, Wang K, Zhao Q, Jiao J, Lee D-J (2012) Effect of cathode types on long-term performance and anode bacterial communities in microbial fuel cells. Bioresour Technol 118:249–256

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Zhang F, Pant D, Logan BE (2011) Long term performance of activated carbon air cathodes with different diffusion layer porosities in microbial fuel cells. Biosens Bioelectron 30:49–55

    Google Scholar 

  8. Cheng S, Liu H, Logan BE (2006) Power densities using different cathode catalysts (Pt and CoTMPP) and polymer binders (Nafion and PTFE) in single chamber microbial fuel cells. Environ Sci Technol 40:364–369

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Yang S, Jia B, Liu H (2009) Effects of the Pt loading side and cathode-biofilm on the performance of a membrane-less and single-chamber microbial fuel cell. Bioresour Technol 100:1197–1202

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Kiely PD, Rader G, Regan JM, Logan BE (2011) Long-term cathode performance and the microbial communities that develop in microbial fuel cells fed different fermentation end products. Bioresour Technol 102:361–366

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Tremouli A (2013) Development of an innovative fuel cell for energy valorisation of wastewaters. Dissertation, University of Patras, Greece

  12. Gonzalez del Campo A, Perez JF, Canizares P, Rodrigo MA, Fernandez FR, Lobato J (2015) Characterization of light/dark cycle and long-term performance test in a photosynthetic microbial fuel cell. Fuel 140:209–216

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Santoro C, Lei Y, Li B, Cristiani P (2010) Power generation from wastewater using single-chamber microbial fuel cells (MFCs) with platinum-free cathodes and pre-colonized anodes. Biochem Eng J 62:8–16

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Xu J, Sheng G-P, Luo H-W, Li W-W, Wang L-F, Yu H-Q (2012) Fouling of proton exchange membrane (PEM) deteriorates the performance of microbial fuel cell. Water Res 46:1817–1824

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Oliveira VB, Simões M, Melo LF, Pinto AMFR (2013) Overview on the developments of microbial fuel cells. Biochem Eng J 73:53–64

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Larrosa-Guerrero A, Scott K, Head IM, Mateo F, Ginesta A, Godinez C (2010) Effect of temperature on the performance of microbial fuel cells. Fuel 89:3985–3994

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Wei L, Han H, Shen J (2013) Effects of temperature and ferrous sulfate concentrations on the performance of microbial fuel cell. Int J Hydrog Energ 38:11110–11116

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Lefebvre O, Tan Z, Kharkwal S, Ng HY (2012) Effect of increasing anodic NaCl concentration on microbial fuel cell performance. Bioresour Technol 112:336–340

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Fan Y, Sharbrough E, Liu H (2008) Quantification of the internal resistance distribution of microbial fuel cells. Environ Sci Technol 42:8101–8107

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Gil GC, Chang IS, Kim BH, Kim M, Jang JK, Park HS, Kim HJ (2003) Operational parameters affecting the performance of a mediator-less microbial fuel cell. Biosens Bioelectron 18:327–334

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Zhuang L, Zhou S, Wang Y, Liu C, Geng S (2009) Membrane-less cloth cathode assembly (CCA) for scalable microbial fuel cells. Biosens Bioelectron 24:3652–3656

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Freguia S, Rabaey K, Yuan Z, Keller J (2007) Non-catalyzed cathodic oxygen reduction at graphite granules in microbial fuel cells. Electrochim Acta 53:598–603

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Tremouli A, Antonopoulou G, Bebelis S, Lyberatos G (2013) Operation and characterization of a microbial fuel cell fed with pretreated cheese whey at different organic loads. Bioresour Technol 131:380–389

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Logan BE, Hamelers B, Rozendal R, Schröder U, Keller J, Freguia S, Aelterman P, Verstraete W, Rabaey K (2006) Microbial fuel cells: methodology and technology. Environ Sci Technol 40(2006):5181–5192

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. APHA, AWWA, WEF (1998) Standard methods for the examination of water and wastewater, 20th edn. American Public Health Association, Washington, DC

    Google Scholar 

  26. Del Campo AG, Lobato J, Cañizares P, Rodrigo MA, Fernandez Morales FJ (2013) Short-term effects of temperature and COD in a microbial fuel cell. Appl Energ 101:213–217

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Patil SA, Harnisch F, Kapadnis B, Schröder U (2010) Electroactive mixed culture biofilms in microbial bioelectrochemical systems: the role of temperature for biofilm formation and performance. Biosens Bioelectron 26:803–808

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Wang X, Feng YJ, Qu YP, Li DM, Li H, Ren NQ (2008) Effect of temperature on performance of microbial fuel cell using beer wastewater. Huanjing Kexue/Environ Sci 29:3128–3132

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. He Z, Minteer S, Angenent L (2005) Electricity generation from artificial wastewater using an upflow microbial fuel cell. Environ Sci Technol 39:5262–5267

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  30. Jadhav GS, Ghangrekar MM (2009) Performance of microbial fuel cell subjected to variation in pH, temperature, external load and substrate concentration. Bioresour Technol 100:717–723

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  31. Ahn Y, Logan BE (2010) Effectiveness of domestic wastewater treatment using microbial fuel cells at ambient and mesophilic temperatures. Bioresour Technol 101:469–475

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Rozendal RA, Hamelers HVM, Rabaey K, Keller J, Buisman CJN (2008) Towards practical implementation of bioelectrochemical wastewater treatment. Trends Biotechnol 26:450–459

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Harnisch F, Schröder U, Scholz F (2008) The suitability of monopolar and bipolar ion exchange membranes as separators for biological fuel cells. Environ Sci Technol 42:1740–1746

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  34. Liu H, Cheng S, Logan BE (2005) Power generation in fed-batch microbial fuel cells as a function of ionic strength, temperature, and reactor configuration. Environ Sci Technol 39:5488–5493

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  35. Nam JY, Kim HW, Lim KH, Shin HS, Logan BE (2010) Variation of power generation at different buffer types and conductivities in single chamber microbial fuel cells. Biosens Bioelectron 25:1155–1159

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  36. Cheng S, Logan BE (2011) Increasing power generation for scaling up single-chamber air cathode microbial fuel cell. Bioresour Technol 102:4468–4473

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

This research has been co-financed by the European Union (European Social Fund—ESF) and Greek national funds through the Operational Program “Education and Lifelong Learning” of the National Strategic Reference Framework (NSRF)—Research Funding Program: Heracleitus II. Investing in knowledge society through the European Social Fund.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to A. Tremouli.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Tremouli, A., Intzes, A., Intzes, P. et al. Effect of periodic complete anolyte replacement on the long term performance of a four air cathodes single chamber microbial fuel cell. J Appl Electrochem 45, 755–763 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10800-015-0842-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10800-015-0842-z

Keywords

Navigation