Abstract
Engineers play a vital role in enabling the sustainable development of their societies. Thus, it is necessary to teach sustainability in universities, especially for engineering students, for a more sustainable future. The present work aims to measure and enhance engineering students’ awareness of sustainability by monitoring and evaluating learning and student outcomes during the last stages of an engineering curriculum and its culminating major design experience. A questionnaire to assess students’ awareness of sustainability and its tools is implemented. From this empirical study, obstacles to the awareness of sustainability through engineering education are discussed. The analysis of the results of the questionnaire implies the modification of the structure of senior projects and other capstone design courses in order to include a proposed teaching and assessment framework. This framework emphasizes students’ ability to understand and use effective sustainability tools, within the environment of their major design experience. The framework is composed of two paths. The first path concerns course design through which sustainability concepts and methods are included in several course elements. The second path addresses the assessment of the attainment of sustainability objectives by the students.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Abd-Elwahed, M. S., & El-Baz, M. A. (2018). Impact of implementation of total quality management: An assessment of the Saudi industry. South African Journal of Industrial Engineering, 29(1), 97–107.
Abdulwahed, M., & Hasna, M. (2017). The role of engineering design in technological and 21st century competencies capacity building: Comparative case study in the Middle East, Asia, and Europe. Sustainability, 9(4), 520.
ABET Engineering Accreditation Commission. (2012). Criteria for accrediting engineering programs, effective for evaluations during the 2011–2012 Accreditation Cycle. USA: ABET Engineering Accreditation Commission.
ABET Engineering Accreditation Commission. (2018). Criteria for accrediting engineering programs, effective for reviews during the 2019–2020 accreditation cycle. USA: ABET Engineering Accreditation Commission.
Al-Bahi, A. M., Taha, M. A., & Turkmen, N. (2014). Capstone design projects in the environment of weak industry-academia interaction. In IEEE global engineering education conference (EDUCON). IEEE Xplore®, Istanbul, Turkey.
Amrina, E., & Vilsi, A. L. (2015). Key performance indicators for sustainable manufacturing evaluation in cement industry. Procedia CIRP, 26, 19–23.
Amrina, E., & Yusof, S. M. (2011). Key performance indicators for sustainable manufacturing evaluation in automotive companies. In IEEE international conference on industrial engineering and engineering management. IEEE.
Badurdeen, F., et al. (2014) Sustainable value creation in manufacturing at product and process levels: A metrics-based evaluation. In Handbook of manufacturing engineering and technology (pp 1–28).
Badurdeen, F., & Jawahir, I. S. (2017). Strategies for value creation through sustainable manufacturing. Procedia Manufacturing, 8, 20–27.
Blottnitz, H. V., Case, J. M., & Fraser, D. M. (2015). Sustainable development at the core of undergraduate engineering curriculum reform: A new introductory course in chemical engineering. Journal of Cleaner Production, 106, 300–307.
Bruntland, G. H. (1987). Our common future. In G. H. Bruntland (Ed.), The World Commission on Environment and Development. Oxford.
Cheng, Y. (2017). Reliability prediction in early design stages. In Mechanical engineering. Missouri University of Science and Technology.
Chiu, M.-C., & Okudan, G. L. E. (2010). Evolution of design for X tools applicable to design stages: A literature review. In 15th design for manufacturing and the lifecycle conference; 7th symposium on international design and design education (Vol. 6, pp. 171–182).
Christie, B. A., et al. (2014). Environmental sustainability in higher education: What do academics think? Environmental Education Research, 21(5), 655–686.
Committee, A. I. M. L.-C. A. (1997). Life-cycle engineering and design. In G. E. Dieter (Ed.), ASM handbook: Materials selection and design (pp. 96–103). Cleveland: ASM International.
Coral, J. S. (2009). Engineering education for a sustainable future. Barcelona: Delft University of Technology.
Cosme, N., et al. (2018). Learning-by-doing: Experience from 20 years of teaching LCA to future engineers. The International Journal of Life Cycle Assessment, 24(3), 553–565.
Davim, J. P. (2017). Curricula for sustainability in higher education. In J. Paulo Davim (Ed.), Management and industrial engineering. Berlin: Springer.
De, D., et al. (2020). Impact of lean and sustainability oriented innovation on sustainability performance of small and medium sized enterprises: A data envelopment analysis-based framework. International Journal of Production Economics, 219, 416–430.
Derrick, S. (2013). Time and sustainability metrics in higher education. In S. Caeiro, et al. (Eds.), Sustainability assessment tools in higher education institutions. Cham: Springer.
Desha, C. J., Hargroves, K. C., & Smith, M. H. (2009). Addressing the time lag dilemma in curriculum renewal towards engineering education for sustainable development. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, 10, 184–199.
Elkington, J. (1997). Cannibals with forks: The triple bottom line of the 21st century business. Oxford: Capstone Publishing Limited Oxford Centre for Innovation.
Fergus, J. W. (2013). Materials engineering as a catalyst for sustainability education. In ASEE annual conference & exposition 2013, Atlanta.
Flowers, J., Rauch, C., & Wierzbicki, A. (2018). Teaching upcycling to impact environmental attitudes. Journal of Technology Education, 30(1), 30–45.
Fürst, C., et al. (2014). Evaluating the role of ecosystem services in participatory land use planning: Proposing a balanced score card. Landscape Ecology, 29(8), 1435–1446.
Galankashi, M. R., Helmi, S. A., & Hashemzahi, P. (2016). Supplier selection in automobile industry: A mixed balanced scorecard-fuzzy AHP approach. Alexandria Engineering Journal, 55(1), 93–100.
Guinée, J. B., et al. (2011). Life cycle assessment: Past, present, and future. Environmental Science and Technology, 45(1), 90–96.
Hanning, A., et al. (2012). Are we educating engineers for sustainability? International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, 13(3), 305–320.
Hans-Carl-von-Carlowitz-Gesellschaft, S. (2013). Die Erfindung der Nachhaltigkeit. Leben, Werk und Wirkung des Hans Carl von Carlowitz. Muenchen: Oekom Verlag.
Hashmi, M. A., Abdulghaffar, N., & Edinat, I. (2015). Sustainability commitment in Saudi Arabia and need. International Business & Economics Research Journal, 14(1), 47–54.
Huang, A., & Badurdeen, F. (2017). Sustainable manufacturing performance evaluation: Integrating product and process metrics for systems level assessment. Procedia Manufacturing, 8, 563–570.
Huang, A., & Badurdeen, F. (2018). Metrics-based approach to evaluate sustainable manufacturing performance at the production line and plant levels. Journal of Cleaner Production, 192, 462–476.
Jawahir, I. S., & Bradley, R. (2016). Technological elements of circular economy and the principles of 6R-based closed-loop material flow in sustainable manufacturing. Procedia CIRP, 40, 103–108.
Jovane, F., et al. (2008). The incoming global technological and industrial revolution towards competitive sustainable manufacturing. CIRP Annals, 57(2), 641–659.
Ketchman, K., et al. (2017). Sustainable engineering cognitive outcomes: Examining different approaches for curriculum integration. Journal of Professional Issues in Engineering Education and Practice 143(3), 04017002.
Kuei, C.-H., & Lu, M. H. (2013). Integrating quality management principles into sustainability management. Total Quality Management & Business Excellence, 24(1–2), 62–78.
Lozano, F. J., & Lozano, R. (2014). Developing the curriculum for a new Bachelor’s degree in engineering for sustainable development. Journal of Cleaner Production, 64, 136–146.
Meadows, D. H., et al. (1972). The limits to growth: A report for the club of Rome’s project on the predicament of mankind. New York: Universe Books.
Mojarad, A. A. S., Atashbari, V., & Tantau, A. (2018). Challenges for sustainable development strategies in oil and gas industries. Proceedings of the International Conference on Business Excellence, 12(1), 626–638.
Nguyen, M., Phan, A., & Matsui, Y. (2018). Contribution of quality management practices to sustainability performance of Vietnamese firms. Sustainability, 10(2), 375.
Onat, N., et al. (2017). Systems thinking for life cycle sustainability assessment: A review of recent developments, applications, and future perspectives. Sustainability, 9(5), 1–25.
Pesce, M., et al. (2018). SWOT analysis of the application of international standard ISO 14001 in the Chinese context. A case study of Guangdong Province. Sustainability, 10(9), 3196.
Pochampally, K. K., & Gupta, S. M. (2014). Six sigma case studies with Minitab®. Boca Raton: CRC Press.
Popoff, A., & Millet, D. (2017). Sustainable life cycle design using constraint satisfaction problems and quality function deployment. Procedia CIRP, 61, 75–80.
Rio de Janerio. (1992). United Nations Conference on Environment & Development. In Agenda 21, Ch. 36: Promoting education and public awareness and training. UN: Rio de Janerio.
Sivapalan, S., Clifford, M. J., & Speight, S. (2017). Engineering education for sustainable development: Using online learning to support the new paradigms. Australasian Journal of Engineering Education, 21(2), 61–73.
Soliman, A. Y., & Al-Bahi, A. M. (2018). A win-win strategy to integrate sustainability objectives in product design—An educational approach. International Journal of Engineering Pedagogy (iJEP), 8(5), 29–43.
Steinhilper, R. (1998). Remanufacturing: The ultimate form of recycling (pp. 1–24). Stuttgart: Fraunhofer IRB Verlag.
Stoycheva, S., et al. (2018). Multi-criteria decision analysis framework for sustainable manufacturing in automotive industry. Journal of Cleaner Production, 187, 257–272.
Sujova, A., Simanova, L., & Marcinekova, K. (2016). Sustainable process performance by application of six sigma concepts: The research study of two industrial cases. Sustainability, 8(3), 260.
UNESCO. (2002). Education for sustainability-From Rio to Johannesburg: Lessons learnt from a decade of commitment. Paris: UNESCO.
Vinodh, S., Jayakrishna, K., & Vimal, K. E. K. (2014a). Modern mechanical engineering_ research, development and education. In J. P. Davim (Ed.), Materials forming, machining and tribology. Berlin: Springer.
Vinodh, S., Kamala, V., & Jayakrishna, K. (2014b). Integration of ECQFD, TRIZ, and AHP for innovative and sustainable product development. Applied Mathematical Modelling, 38(11–12), 2758–2770.
Vinodh, S., & Rathod, G. (2010). Integration of ECQFD and LCA for sustainable product design. Journal of Cleaner Production, 18(8), 833–842.
Zhang, X., et al. (2012) A metrics-based methodology for establishing product sustainability index (ProdSI) for manufactured products. In 19th CIRP international conference on life cycle engineering. 2012. Berkeley.
Zhang, J., Schmidt, K., & Li, H. (2016a). BIM and sustainability education: Incorporating instructional needs into curriculum planning in CEM programs accredited by ACCE. Sustainability, 8(6), 525.
Zhang, Q., et al. (2016b). More than target 6.3: A systems approach to rethinking sustainable development goals in a resource-scarce world. Engineering, 2(4), 481–489.
Acknowledgements
This work was supported by the Deanship of Scientific Research (DSR), King Abdulaziz University, Jeddah, under grant no. (D1440–036–135). The authors acknowledge with thanks the DSR’s technical and financial support.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Abd-Elwahed, M.S., Al-Bahi, A.M. Sustainability awareness in engineering curriculum through a proposed teaching and assessment framework. Int J Technol Des Educ 31, 633–651 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-020-09567-0
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10798-020-09567-0