Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Barriers to Using the Blackboard System in Teaching and Learning: Faculty Perceptions

  • Original research
  • Published:
Technology, Knowledge and Learning Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this digital age, the success of faculty members in adopting technology definitely affects the success of their students and ultimately the educational institution. However, there are many who have not incorporated technology tools such as Blackboard into their courses. Therefore, this paper investigated faculty perceptions of barriers to using the Blackboard system in teaching and learning. This study was conducted at King Saud University in Saudi Arabia during the 2015/2016 academic year. An online questionnaire was circulated to 117 faculty members in order to determine how they perceive barriers to using Blackboard. Findings of the study showed that academic rank, experience, gender, and training had statistically significant effects on faculty perceptions regarding barriers to using Blackboard in teaching and learning. However, there were no statistically significant differences on faculty perceptions regarding barriers to the utilization of Blackboard triggered by the use or non-use of Blackboard. The current study also showed that ‘technological barriers’ and ‘institutional barriers’ were the most highly identified barriers among the four categories of barriers explored in this study. The student barriers category came as a third important factor, while the faculty barriers category ranked at the lower end.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Abdalla, I. (2005). Evaluating effectiveness of Blackboard system using TAM framework: A structural analysis approach. In G. Richards (Ed.), Proceedings of E-Learn: World Conference on E-Learning in Corporate, Government, Healthcare, and Higher Education 2005 (pp. 477–481). Chesapeake, VA: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE).

    Google Scholar 

  • Al-Fadhli, S. (2008). Students’ perceptions of e-learning in Arab Society: Kuwait University as a case study. E-Learning and Digital Media, 5(4), 418–428.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alharbi, S., & Drew, S. (2014). Using the technology acceptance model in understanding academics’ behavioural intention to use learning management systems. International Journal of Advanced Computer Science and Applications, 5(1), 143–155.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Allen, E., & Seaman, J. (2008). Staying the course: Online education in the United States. The Sloan Consortium, Newburyport, MA 01950. USA.

  • Al-Mashaqbeh, I. F. (2009). The use of Blackboard software as a course delivery method. Journal of Educational & Psychological Sciences, 10(3), 12–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Al-Naibi, S. A., Madarsha, K. B., & Ismail, N. A. (2015). Blackboard use by faculty members in the colleges of applied sciences in the Sultanate of Oman. International Journal for Innovation Education and Research, 3(4), 26–40.

    Google Scholar 

  • Al-Senaidi, S., Lin, L., & Poirot, J. (2009). Barriers to adopting technology for teaching and learning in Oman. Computers & Education, 53(3), 575–590.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Al-Shammari, M. O., & Higgins, S. (2015). Obstacles facing faculty members in the effective implementation of e-learning at some universities in Saudi Arabia. International Journal of Information Technology & Computer Science (IJITCS), 36(1), 1–139.

    Google Scholar 

  • Al-Shboul, M. (2013). The level of e-learning integration at the University of Jordan: Challenges and opportunities. International Education Studies, 6(4), 93.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Beatty, B., & Ulasewicz, C. (2006). Faculty perspectives on moving from Blackboard to the Moodle learning management system. TechTrends, 50(4), 36–45.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bennett, J., & Bennett, L. (2003). A review of factors that influence the diffusion of innovation when structuring a faculty training program. Internet and Higher Education, 6, 53–63.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Butler, D. L., & Sellbom, M. (2002). Barriers to adopting technology for teaching and learning. Educause Quarterly, 8(2), 22–28.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chang, C. (2008). Faculty perceptions and utilization of a learning management system in higher education. Doctoral dissertation. Ohio University, USA.

  • Chawdhry, A., Paullet, K., & Benjamin, D. (2011). Assessing Blackboard: Improving online instructional delivery. Information Systems Education Journal, 9(4), 20.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chawdhry, A., Paullet, K., & Benjamin, D. (2012). Comparatively assessing the use of Blackboard versus Desire2learn: Faculty perceptions of the online tools. Information Systems Education Journal, 10(3), 47.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chen, K. C., & Jang, S. J. (2010). Motivation in online learning: Testing a model of self-determination theory. Computers in Human Behavior, 26(4), 741–752.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Choy, D., Xiao, J., & Iliff, J. (2005). How can technology help improve the quality of Blackboard faculty training and encourage faculty to use Blackboard? In 2005 Annual proceedings-Orlando, Vol. 1, pp. 130.

  • Davis, F. D., Bagozzi, R. P., & Warshaw, P. R. (1989). User acceptance of computer technology: A comparison of two theoretical models. Management Science, 35, 982–1003.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • DeNeui, D. L., & Dodge, T. L. (2006). Asynchronous learning networks and student outcomes: The utility of online learning components in hybrid courses. Journal of Instructional Psychology, 33(4), 256.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dryden, J. E. (2008). Copyright in the real world: Making archival material available on the Internet. Doctoral dissertation. University of Toronto, USA.

  • D’Silva, R., & Reeder, K. (2005). Factors that influence faculty members’ uptake and continued use of course management systems. British Journal of Educational Technology, 36(6), 1071–1073.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Eldridge, B. (2014). Exploring faculty adoption and utilization of Blackboard at a community college in the Kentucky Community and Technical College System. Doctoral dissertation, University of Kentucky, USA.

  • Gibbs, D., & Gosper, M. (2012). The upside-down-world of e-learning. Journal of learning design, 1(2), 46–54.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Graham, C. M., & Jones, N. (2011). Cognitive dissonance theory and distance education: Faculty perceptions on the efficacy of and resistance to distance education. International Journal of Business, Humanities, and Technology, 1(2), 212–227.

    Google Scholar 

  • Griffiths, M. E. (2007). Patterns of user activity in the Blackboard course management system across all courses in the 2004–2005 Academic Year at Brigham Young University (2007). All theses and dissertations. Paper 905. Retrieved December 15, 2016 from: http://scholarsarchive.byu.edu/cgi/viewcontent.cgi?article=1904&context=etd.

  • Hayes, W. S. (2007). Leadership and no child left behind. Technological Horizons in Education (THE) Journal, 31 (10). Retrieved 15th April 2016 from http://www.ctrserc.org/library.

  • Heirdsfield, A., Walker, S., Tambyah, M., & Beutel, D. (2011). Blackboard as an online learning environment: What do teacher education students and staff think? Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 36(7), 1–16.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Houtz, S., & Gupta, P. (2001). Gender roles, computer attitudes and dyadic computer interaction performance among university lecturers in Egypt. Journal of Organisational Behaviour, 20(3), 1–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ituma, A. (2011). An evaluation of students’ perceptions and engagement with e-learning components in a campus based university. Active Learning in Higher Education, 12(1), 57–68.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones, A. E., & Moller, L. (2002). A comparison of continuing education and resident faculty attitudes towards using distance education in a higher education institution in Pennsylvania. College and University Media Review, 9(1), 11–37.

    Google Scholar 

  • Joseph, J. (2012). The barriers of using education technology for optimizing the educational experience of learners. Procedia-Social and Behavioral Sciences, 64, 427–436.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Keengwe, J., Onchwari, G., & Wachira, P. (2008). Computer technology integration and student learning: Barriers and promise. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 17(6), 560–565.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kenan, T., Pislaru, C., & Elzawi, A. (2012). Analysing the effectiveness of e-learning based on national and international cultures and approaches to pedagogy. In 17th UKAIS conference on information systems, 2012, 27–28 March 2012, New College, Oxford University.

  • Laverty, J. P., Wood, D. F., Tannehill, D., Kohun, F. G., & Turchek, J. (2012). Factors affecting the usage of online course delivery tools. Issues in Information Systems, 13(2), 41–50.

    Google Scholar 

  • Leeder, C., Lonn, S., & Hollar, S. (2012). Use of library tools in a learning management system. In Proceedings of the 2012, February conference (pp. 595–597). New York, NY: ACM.

  • Li, Y. (2004). Faculty perceptions about attributes and barriers impacting diffusion of web-based distance education (WBDE) at the China Agricultural University. Doctoral dissertation, Texas A&M University.

  • Liaw, S. S. (2008). Investigating students’ perceived satisfaction, behavioral intention, and effectiveness of e-learning: A case study of the Blackboard system. Computers & Education, 51(2), 864–873.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Margaryan, A., Littlejohn, A., & Vojt, G. (2011). Are digital natives a myth or reality? University students’ use of digital technologies. Computers & Education, 56(2), 429–440.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Meyer, K. A., & Xu, Y. J. (2009). A causal model of factors influencing faculty use of technology. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 13(2), 57–70.

    Google Scholar 

  • Mohsen, M. A. (2014). EFL teachers’ perceptions on Blackboard applications. English Language Teaching, 7(11), p108.

    Google Scholar 

  • Nanayakkara, C. (2007). A model of user acceptance of learning management systems: A study within tertiary institutions in New Zealand. The International Journal of Learning, 13(12), 223–232.

    Google Scholar 

  • Ngeze, L. V. (2016). Learning management systems in higher learning institutions in Tanzania: Analysis of Studentsâ [euro](TM) attitudes and challenges towards the use of UDOM LMS in teaching and learning at the University of Dodoma. International Journal of Computer Applications, 136(11), 975–8887.

  • Nichols, D. L. (2011). An exploration of Blackboard utilization by faculty at a Midwestern University. Doctoral Dissertation, Ohio University, USA.

  • Panthee, R. (2014). Inviting citizens designers to design digital interface for the democratization of web online environment. Computational Linguistics: Concepts, Methodologies, Tools, and Applications, V3, 1727, Information Resources Management Association, USA.

  • Pereira, A. S. (2015). Faculty willingness to complete information technology training on course management systems. Walden Dissertations and Doctoral Studies, Scholar Works. Doctoral Dissertation, Walden University, USA.

  • Petherbridge, D. T. (2007). A concerns-based approach to the adoption of web-based learning management systems. Doctoral Dissertation, North Carolina State University, USA.

  • Ritter, M. (2012). Barriers to teaching introductory physical geography online. Review of International Geography Education Online, 2(1), 61–77.

    Google Scholar 

  • Rogers, P. L. (2000). Barriers to adopting emerging technologies in education. Journal of Computing Research, 22(4), 455–472.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ryan, T. G., Toye, M., Charron, K., & Park, G. (2012). Learning management system migration: An analysis of stakeholder perspectives. The International Review of Research in Open and Distributed Learning, 13(1), 220–237.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schoepp, K. (2004). Technology integration barriers in a technology-rich environment: A CBAM perspective. Online Submission. Doctoral Dissertation, Calgary, Alberta.

  • Schoepp, K. (2005). Barriers to technology integration in a technology-rich environment. Learning and Teaching in Higher Education: Gulf perspectives, 2(1), 1–24.

    Google Scholar 

  • Schwartz, K., Northrup, J., Israel, N., Crowell, K., Lauder, N., & Neale, A. V. (2003). Use of on-line evidence-based resources at the point of care. Family Medicine-Kansas City, 35(4), 251–256.

    Google Scholar 

  • Shamoail, E. (2005). Teachers’ perceptions and experiences in adopting Blackboard computer program in a Victorian secondary school: A case study. Doctoral Dissertation, Victoria University, Australia.

  • Smith, T. (2011). Interactive online technology tools to enhance learning for english composition students. In Society for information technology & teacher education international conference, Vol. 2011, No. 1, pp. 3755–3757.

  • Sneller, J. E. (2004). A web dream team: The seven principles and WebCT. Academic Exchange Quarterly, 8(4), 130–134.

    Google Scholar 

  • Souza, J., & Bingham, P. M. (2005). Integration of available and new technologies to raise student understanding and engagement. Journal of Educational Technology Systems, 34(2), 189–198.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sowan, A. K., & Jenkins, L. S. (2013). Designing, delivering and evaluating a distance learning nursing course responsive to students needs. International Journal of Medical Informatics, 82(6), 553–564.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Taylor, F. (2011). A quadripolar model of identity in adolescent foreign language learners. Doctoral dissertation, University of Nottingham, UK.

  • Tella, A. (2011). Reliability and factor analysis of a Blackboard course management system success: A scale development and validation in an educational context. Journal of Information Technology Education, 10, 53–80.

    Google Scholar 

  • Voytecki, K., Engleman, M., & Jeffs, T. (2010). A preliminary investigation into pedagogical and practical difficulties encountered by University Faculty in Online Teaching. In D. Gibson & B. Dodge (Eds.), Proceedings of society for information technology & teacher education international conference 2010 (pp. 956–961). Chesapeake, VA: Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education (AACE). Retrieved May 5, 2016 from https://www.learntechlib.org/p/33471.

  • Vrazalic, L., MacGregor, R., & Behl, D. (2010). E-learning barriers in the United Arab Emirates: Preliminary results from an empirical investigation. Journal IBIMA Business Review., 2010, 1–9.

    Google Scholar 

  • Wang, J., Kourik, J. L., & Maher, P. E. (2010). Introducing leading it technologies into curricula via the IBM academic initiative. In Proceedings of ASBBS annual conference, Las Vegas, February 2010, Vol. 17(1), pp. 888–899.

  • Wanjala, A. S. (2015). Teachers’ perceptions on the use of information communication technology in the administration of public secondary schools in Kimilili District, Bungoma Country. Doctoral Dissertation. The Catholic University of Eastern Africa, Kenya.

  • West, R. E., Waddoups, G., Kennedy, M. M., & Graham, C. R. (2007). Evaluating the impact on users from implementing a course management system. International Journal of Instructional Technology and Distance Learning, 4(2). http://hdl.lib.byu.edu/1877/2134.

  • Woods, R., Baker, J. D., & Hopper, D. (2004). Hybrid structures: Faculty use and perception of web-based courseware as a supplement to face-to-face instruction. The Internet and Higher Education, 7(4), 281–297.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zirkle, C. (2002). Identification of distance education barriers for trade and industrial teacher education. Journal of Industrial Teacher Education (JITE), 40(1), 20–44.

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

This work was funded by the Educational Research Center, Deanship of Research, King Saud University. The authors also highly appreciate the faculty of King Saud University who participated in this study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Curriculum and Instruction, College of Education, King Saud University, P.O. Box: 2458, Riyadh, 11451, Saudi Arabia

    Talal Mohammad Al Meajel

  2. AlKharj Community College, Prince Sattam Bin Abdulaziz University, P.O. Box: 1866, AlKharj, 11942, Saudi Arabia

    Talha Abdullah Sharadgah

Authors
  1. Talal Mohammad Al Meajel
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Talha Abdullah Sharadgah
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Talal Mohammad Al Meajel.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Al Meajel, T.M., Sharadgah, T.A. Barriers to Using the Blackboard System in Teaching and Learning: Faculty Perceptions. Tech Know Learn 23, 351–366 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10758-017-9323-2

Download citation

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10758-017-9323-2

Keywords

Search

Navigation