Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Computer Technology Integration and Student Learning: Barriers and Promise

  • Published:
Journal of Science Education and Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Political and institutional support has enabled many institutions of learning to spend millions of dollars to acquire educational computing tools (Ficklen and Muscara, Am Educ 25(3):22–29, 2001) that have not been effectively integrated into the curriculum. While access to educational technology tools has remarkably improved in most schools, there is still concern about instructional integration of computer technology to support student learning. Appropriate integration of computer tools constitutes a major change in people’s lives; technology integration is a complex phenomenon that involves understanding teachers’ motivations, perceptions, and beliefs about learning and technology (Woodbridge, http://www.techlearning.com/story/showArticle.php?articleID=17701367). Although computer technology has a great potential to reform or even transform education, barriers come in the way of achieving success especially with student learning. This paper presents an overview of technology use in education with a focus on barriers to computer technology integration. Further, this paper provides suggestions to maximize the benefits of learning with computer technology.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Anderson R, Becker J (2001) School investments in instructional technology. Teaching, learning, and computing report, report 8. Retrieved February 25, 2008, from http://www.crito.uci.edu/tlc/findings/report_8/startpage.htm

  • Beggs TA (2000) Influences and barriers to the adoption of instructional technology. In Proceedings of the mid-south instructional technology conference. Retrieved April, 20, 2008, from http://www.mtsu.edu/%7Eitconf/proceed00/beggs/beggs.htm

  • Bitner N, Bitner J (2002) Integrating technology into the classroom: eight keys to success. J Technol Teach Educ 10(1):95–100

    Google Scholar 

  • Brooks J, Brooks M (2001) In search of understanding: the case for constructivist classrooms. Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development, Alexandria, VA

    Google Scholar 

  • Burnham L, Miller A, Ray L (2000) Putting the pieces together. Paper presented at the international conference on learning with technology, does technology make a difference? Temple University, Philadelphia, March 2000

  • Candiotti A, Clark N (1998) Combining universal access with faculty development and academic facilities. Commun ACM 41(1):36–41. doi:10.1145/268092.268106

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cuban L (2001) Oversold and underused: computers in the classroom. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • Cuban L, Kirkpatrick H, Craig P (Winter 2001) High access and low use of technologies in high school classrooms: explaining an apparent paradox. Am Educ Res J

  • Debard R, Guidera S (2000) Adapting asynchronous communication to meet the seven principles of effective teaching. J Educ Technol Syst 28(3):219–230. doi:10.2190/W1U9-CB67-59W0-74LH

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dede C (2000) Rethinking how to invest in technology. In: Pea Roy D (ed) Technology and learning. Jossey-Bass, San Francisco, CA

    Google Scholar 

  • Dias LB (1999) Integrating technology: some things you should know. Leading learn technol 27(3):10–13

    Google Scholar 

  • Duhaney DC (2001) Teacher education: preparing teachers to integrate technology. Int J Instr Media 28(1):23–30

    Google Scholar 

  • Dvorak J, Buchanan K (2002) Using technology to create and enhance collaborative learning (ERIC document reproduction service no. EJ 477001)

  • Fabry D, Higgs J (1997) Barriers to the effective use of technology in education. J Educ Comput 17(4):385–395

    Google Scholar 

  • Ficklen E, Muscara C (2001) Harnessing technology in the classroom. Am Educ 25(3):22–29

    Google Scholar 

  • Fuller H (2000) First teach their teachers: technology support and computer use in academic subjects. J Res Comput Educ 32(4):511–537

    Google Scholar 

  • Ginserb R, McCormick V (1998) Computer use in effective schools. J Staff Dev 19(1):22–25

    Google Scholar 

  • Green KC (2001) The 2001 national survey of information technology in US higher education. The campus computing project. Retrieved April 24, 2008 from http://www.campuscomputing.net/summaries/2001/

  • Harris P, Sullivan M (Summer 2000) Using technology to create a new paradigm for a learner-centered educational experience. Technos Quart, 9(2). Retrieved May 25, 2008, from http://findarticles.com/p/articles/mi_m0HKV/is_2_9/ai_65014465

  • Henson KT (2004) Constructivist teaching strategies for diverse middle-level classrooms. Allyn & Bacon, Boston, MA

    Google Scholar 

  • International society for technology in education (ISTE) (2000). National educational technology standards (NETS) for teachers. Retrieved March 25, 2008 from http://cnets.iste.org/teachers/

  • Jacobsen DM (2000) Examining technology adoption patterns by faculty in higher education. Proceedings of ACEC 2000. Learning technologies, teaching and the future of schools, Melbourne, Australia, 6–9 July 2000

  • Jacobsen M, Clifford P, Friesen S (2002) Preparing teachers for technology integration: creating a culture of inquiry in the context of use. Contemporary issues in technology and teacher education, 2(3). Retrieved May 12, 2008 from http://www.citejournal.org/vol2/iss3/currentpractice/article2.cfm

  • Johnson DL, Liu L (2000) Fist step toward a statistically generated information technology integration model. Comput Schools 16(2):3–12. doi:10.1300/J025v16n02_02

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jonassen DH (2000) Computers as mindtools for schools: engaging critical thinking, 2nd edn. Merrill Publishers, Columbus, Ohio

  • Jonassen DH, Peck KL, Wilson BG (1999) Learning with technology: a constructive perspective. Prentice Hall, NJ

    Google Scholar 

  • Kent TW, McNergney RF (1999) Will technology really change education? Thousand oaks. Corwin Press, CA

    Google Scholar 

  • Krueger K, Hansen L, Smaldino SE (2000) Preservice teacher technology competencies. Tech Trends 44(3):47–50

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Loeding BL, Wynn M (1999) Distance learning, planning, preparation, and presentation: instructor’s perspectives. Int J Instr Media 26(2):181–193

    Google Scholar 

  • Maddux CD (1998) Barriers to the successful use of information technology in education. Comput Schools 14(3/4):5–11. doi:10.1300/J025v14n03_02

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mehlinger HD, Powers SM (2002) Technology & teacher education: a guide for educators and policymakers. Houghton Mifflin, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  • Milone M (1999) Staff development: the inside story. Technol Learn 20(3):54–59

    Google Scholar 

  • Morgan T (1996) Using technology to enhance learning: changing the chunks. Learn Lead Technol 23(5):49–51

    Google Scholar 

  • Newhouse P (1999) Examining how teachers adjust to the availability of portable computers. Aust J Educ Technol, 15(2), 148–166. Retrieved April 28, 2008 from http://www.ascilite.org.au/ajet/ajet15/newhouse.html

  • National Center for Education Statistics, U.S. Department of Education (2000) Teacher use of the Internet in public schools. Retrieved May 29, 2008, from http://nces.ed.gov/pubsearch/pubsinfo.asp?pubid=2000090’

  • Niederhauser SD, Salem JD, Fields M (1999) Exploring teaching, learning, and instructional reform in an introductory technology course. J Technol Teach Educ 7(2):153–172

    Google Scholar 

  • Nisan-Nelson P (2001) Technology integration: a case of professional development. J Technol Teach Educ 9(1):83–103

    Google Scholar 

  • Novak JD (1998) Learning, creating, and using knowledge: concept maps as facilitative tools in schools and corporations. Lawrence Erlbaum and Associates, Mahwah, NJ

    Google Scholar 

  • Oppenheimer T (2003) The flickering mind: the false promise of technology in the classroom and how learning can be saved. Random House, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Rakes GC, Casey HB (2002) An analysis of teacher concerns toward instructional technology. Int J Educ Technol, 3(1). Retrieved June 12, 2006, from http://www.ao.uiuc.edu/ijet/v3n1/rakes/index.html

  • Rodriquez G, Knuth R (2000) Critical issues. North Central Regional Educational Laboratory, Naperville, IL

    Google Scholar 

  • Rogers E (1995) Diffusion of innovations, 4th edn. Free Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Rogers PL (2000) Barriers to adopting emerging technologies in education. J Educ Comput Res 22:455–472. doi:10.2190/4UJE-B6VW-A30N-MCE5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rosenberg M (2001) E-learning: strategies for delivering knowledge in the digital age. McGraw Hill, New York, NY

    Google Scholar 

  • Sharp V (2006) Computer education for teachers: integrating technology into classroom teaching, 5th edn. McGraw-Hill, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Snoeyink R, Ertmer P (2001) Thrust into technology: how veteran teachers respond. J Educ Technol Syst 30(1):85–111. doi:10.2190/YDL7-XH09-RLJ6-MTP1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sprague D, Kopfman K, Dorsey S (1998) Faculty development in the integration of technology in teacher education courses. J Comput Teach Educ 2(14):24–28

    Google Scholar 

  • Stronge JH (2002) Qualities of effective teachers. Association for Supervision and Curriculum Development, Alexandria, VA

  • T.H.E Journal (1999) Teachers of the 21st century know the what, why, and how of technological integration. Retrieved March 23, 2008, from http://www.thejournal.com/magazine/vault/A2084.cfm

  • Tolmie A (2001) Examining learning in relation to the contexts of use of ICT. J Comput Assist Learn 17:235–241. doi:10.1046/j.0266-4909.2001.00178.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang Y (2000) Preservice teachers’ perceptions of the teachers’ role in the classroom with computers. Society for information technology and teacher education international conference: Proceedings of SITE 2000. Association for the Advancement of Computing in Education, Charlottesville, VA

  • Wetzel K (2001) Toward the summit: students use of technology. AACTE Briefs 22(6):5. Jossey-Bass, Francisco, CA

    Google Scholar 

  • Woodbridge J (2004) Technology integration as a transforming teaching strategy. Retrieved April 20, 2008 from http://www.techlearning.com/story/showArticle.php?articleID=17701367

  • Zehr M (1997) Teaching the teachers. Technol Counts 17(11):23–29

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Teaching and Learning, University of North Dakota, Stop #7189, Grand Forks, ND, 58202, USA

    Jared Keengwe & Grace Onchwari

  2. Cleveland State University, Chester building Room 270, Cleveland, OH, 44115, USA

    Patrick Wachira

Authors
  1. Jared Keengwe
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Grace Onchwari
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Patrick Wachira
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jared Keengwe.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Keengwe, J., Onchwari, G. & Wachira, P. Computer Technology Integration and Student Learning: Barriers and Promise. J Sci Educ Technol 17, 560–565 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-008-9123-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10956-008-9123-5

Keywords

Search

Navigation