Abstract
Annual preventive care is essential for diabetes patients to reduce the risk of complications including hypoglycemic events and blindness. Our aim was to examine the relative efficiency of Diabetes Belt (DB) and non-Diabetes Belt (NDB) counties in providing recommended preventive care for Medicare beneficiaries with diabetes using available health professional resources and to understand county-level socioeconomic factors associated with inefficient provision of preventive care. A data envelopment analysis (DEA) model was developed to assess relative efficiency of counties in providing diabetes preventive care. Logistic regression was performed to identify socioeconomic characteristics associated with inefficiencies. We used Medicare claims data to extract individual-level information of diabetes preventive service use and obtained county-level estimates of health resources information from the Area Health Resources File. More than 80% of counties had more than 10% inefficiencies on average. Compared to counties in the NDB, the odds of being inefficient were 2.44 times more likely in the DB (OR 2.44, CI 1.67–3.58). Counties with lower median income, with a smaller proportion of non-Hispanic Black population, and in a rural area had higher odds of being inefficient in providing preventive care. Our DEA results showed that counties in the DB and NDB were mostly inefficient. The availability of care providers may be less of a problem than how efficiently the resources are used in providing preventive care. Identifying sources of inefficiency within each community with low resource utilization and developing targeted strategies is needed to improve uptake of preventive care cost-effectively.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
American Diabetes Association.: Economic Costs of diabetes in the U.S. in 2017. Diabetes Care 41(5), 917–928 (2018). https://doi.org/10.2337/dci18-0007
American Diabetes Association.: Introduction: Standards of Medical Care in Diabetes—2020. Diabetes care. 43(Supplement_1):S1–S2 (2019). doi: https://doi.org/10.2337/dc20-Sint
Andersen, R.M., McCutcheon, A., Aday, L.A., Chiu, G.Y., Bell, R.: Exploring dimensions of access to medical care. Health Serv. Res. 18(1), 49–74 (1983)
Bailey, S.R., O’Malley, J.P., Gold, R., Heintzman, J., Marino, M., DeVoe, J.E.: Receipt of diabetes preventive services differs by insurance status at visit. Am. J. Prev. Med. 48(2), 229–233 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amepre.2014.08.035
Banker, R.D., Charnes, A., Cooper, W.W.: Some models for estimating technical and scale inefficiencies in data envelopment analysis. Manag. Sci. 30(9), 1078–1092 (1984). https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.30.9.1078
Barker, L.E., Kirtland, K.A., Gregg, E.W., Geiss, L.S., Thompson, T.J.: Geographic distribution of diagnosed diabetes in the U.S.: a diabetes belt. Am. J. Prev. Med. 40(4), 434–439 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1016/J.AMEPRE.2010.12.019
Begley, C.E., Lairson, D., Morgan, R.O., Rowan, P.J., Balkrishnan, R.: Evaluating the Healthcare System: Effectiveness, Efficiency, and Equity. Health Administration Press, Chicago (2013)
Brown, D., McBride, T.: Impact of the affordable care act on access to care for US adults with diabetes, 2011–2012. Prev. Chronic. Dis. 12, 140431 (2015). https://doi.org/10.5888/pcd12.140431
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.: Diabetes Report Card 2019. Atlanta, GA (2020). https://www.cdc.gov/diabetes/pdfs/library/Diabetes-Report-Card-2019-508.pdf
Centers for Disease Control and Prevention.: Prevalence of Both Diagnosed and Undiagnosed Diabetes. Atlanta, GA (2022). https://www.cdc.gov/diabetes/data/statistics-report/diagnosed-undiagnosed-diabetes.html
Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services.: CMS manual system. Pub. 100–04 medicare claims processing (2005)
Chilingerian, J.A.: Evaluating physician efficiency in hospitals: a multivariate analysis of best practices. Eur. J. Oper. Res. 80(3), 548–574 (1995). https://doi.org/10.1016/0377-2217(94)00137-2
Clements, J.M., West, B.T., Harissa, B., Hayden, N., Khan, M.M., Palepu, R.: Race disparities in the use of prevention, screening, and monitoring services in michigan medicare beneficiaries with type 2 diabetes and combinations of multiple chronic conditions. Clin. Diabetes. 38(4), 363–370 (2020). https://doi.org/10.2337/CD19-0088
Cooper, W.W., Seiford, L.M., Zhu, J.: Handbook on Data Envelopment Analysis. Springer, Boston (2004a)
Cooper, W.W., Seiford, L.M., Zhu, J.: Data Envelopment analysis. In: Handbook on Data Envelopment Analysis. Springer, Boston (2004b). https://doi.org/10.1007/1-4020-7798-X_1
Cooper, W.W., Seiford, L.M., Tone, K.: Data Envelopment Analysis: A Comprehensive Text with Models, Applications, References and DEA-Solver Software, vol. 2. Springer, New York (2007)
Dougherty, S., Gurmu, S., Hotchkiss, J., Moore, R., Pitts, S., Robertson, J.: The quality of preventive and diagnostic medical care: why do southern states underperform? Econ. Rev. 90(1), 59–68 (2005)
Endocrine Society.: Diabetes and Older Adults. (2022). https://www.endocrine.org/patient-engagement/endocrine-library/diabetes-and-older-adults
Fiallos J., Farion K., Michalowski W., Patrick J.: Evaluating emergency physicians: data envelopment analysis approach. In: AMIA Annual Symposium Proceedings, vol. 2013, p. 423 (2013)
Gold, R., DeVoe, J.E., McIntire, P.J., Puro, J.E., Chauvie, S.L., Shah, A.R.: Receipt of diabetes preventive care among safety net patients associated with differing levels of insurance coverage. J. Am. Board Fam. Med. 25(1), 42 (2012). https://doi.org/10.3122/JABFM.2012.01.110142
Harris, M.I.: Racial and ethnic differences in health care access and health outcomes for adults with type 2 diabetes. Diabetes Care 24(3), 454–459 (2001). https://doi.org/10.2337/DIACARE.24.3.454
Hu, R., Shi, L., Rane, S., Zhu, J., Chen, C.C.: Insurance, racial/ethnic, SES-related disparities in quality of care among US adults with diabetes. J. Immigr. Minor. Heal. 16(4), 565–575 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/S10903-013-9966-6
Kang, H., Bastian, N.D., Riordan, J.P.: Evaluating the relationship between productivity and quality in emergency departments. J. Healthc. Eng. (2017). https://doi.org/10.1155/2017/9626918
Kang, H., Kim, S., Malloy, K., et al.: Evaluating efficiency of counties in providing diabetes preventive care using data envelopment analysis. Health Serv. Outcomes Res. Methodol. 21(3), 324–338 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10742-020-00237-1
Kohl, S., Schoenfelder, J., Fügener, A., Brunner, J.O.: The use of data envelopment analysis (DEA) in healthcare with a focus on hospitals. Health Care Manag. Sci. 22(2), 245–286 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10729-018-9436-8
Laiteerapong, N, Huang, E.S.: Diabetes in older adults. Diabetes Am. (2018). https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK567980/. Accessed March 2, 2022
Lundeen, E., Wittenborn, J., Benoit, S., Saaddine, J.: Disparities in receipt of eye exams among medicare part B fee-for-service beneficiaries with diabetes—United States, 2017. MMWR Morb. Mortal. Wkly. Rep. 68, 1020–1023 (2019). https://doi.org/10.15585/mmwr.mm6845a3externalicon
Marcondes, F.O., Cheng, D., Alegria, M., Haas, J.S.: Are racial/ethnic minorities recently diagnosed with diabetes less likely than white individuals to receive guideline-directed diabetes preventive care? BMC Health Serv. Res. 21(1), 1–8 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1186/S12913-021-07146-0/TABLES/2
Martin, T.L., Selby, J.V., Zhang, D.: Physician and patient prevention practices in NIDDM in a large urban managed-care organization. Diabetes Care 18(8), 1124–1132 (1995). https://doi.org/10.2337/DIACARE.18.8.1124
McGarvey, R.G., Thorsen, A., Thorsen, M.L., Reddy, R.M.: Measuring efficiency of community health centers: a multi-model approach considering quality of care and heterogeneous operating environments. Health Care Manag. Sci. 22(3), 489–511 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10729-018-9455-5
Nayar, P., Ozcan, Y.A., Yu, F., Nguyen, A.T.: Benchmarking urban acute care hospitals. Health Care Manag. Rev. 38(2), 137–145 (2013a)
Nayar, P., Ozcan, Y.A., Yu, F., Nguyen, A.T.: Benchmarking urban acute care hospitals: efficiency and quality perspectives. Health Care Manag. Rev. 38(2), 137–145 (2013b)
Oladele, C.R.W., Barnett, E.: Racial/ethnic and social class differences in preventive care practices among persons with diabetes. BMC Public Health 6(1), 1–8 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2458-6-259/TABLES/4
Phillips, A.Z., Brewster, A.L., Kyalwazi, M.J., Rodriguez, H.P.: The centers for medicaid and medicare services state innovation models initiative and social risk factors: improved diagnosis among hospitalized adults with diabetes. Am. J. Prev. Med. 59(4), e161 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1016/J.AMEPRE.2020.04.017
Pu, J., Chewning, B.: Racial difference in diabetes preventive care. Res. Soc. Adm. Pharm. 9(6), 790–796 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1016/J.SAPHARM.2012.11.005
Rosenblatt, R.A., Andrilla, C.H.A., Curtin, T., Hart, L.G.: Shortages of medical personnel at community health centers. JAMA 295(9), 1042 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.295.9.1042
Suckow, B.D., Newhall, K.A., Bekelis, K., et al.: Hemoglobin A1c testing and amputation rates in black, hispanic, and white medicare patients. Ann. Vasc. Surg. 36, 208–217 (2016). https://doi.org/10.1016/J.AVSG.2016.03.035
Testi, A., Fareed, N., Ozcan, Y.A., Tanfani, E.: Assessment of physician performance for diabetes: a bias-corrected data envelopment analysis model. Qual. Prim. Care. 21(6), 345–357 (2013)
Thanassoulis, E., Boussofiane, A., Dyson, R.G.: A comparison of data envelopment analysis and ratio analysis as tools for performance assessment. Omega 24(3), 229–244 (1996). https://doi.org/10.1016/0305-0483(95)00060-7
U.S. Department of Health and Human Services: Office of Disease Prevention and Health Promotion. Healthy People 2030. Washington, DC https://health.gov/healthypeople/objectives-and-data/browse-objectives/diabetes. Accessed March 1, 2022
USDA United States Department of Agriculture Economic Research Service.: Rural-urban continuum codes. https://www.ers.usda.gov/data-products/rural-urban-continuum-codes. Published 2020. Accessed August 12, 2021.
Valdmanis, V.G., Rosko, M.D., Mutter, R.L.: Hospital quality, efficiency, and input slack differentials. Health Serv. Res. 43(5p2), 1830–1848 (2008)
Wagner, J.M., Shimshak, D.G., Novak, M.A.: Advances in physician profiling: the use of DEA. Socioecon. Plann. Sci. 37(2), 141–163 (2003). https://doi.org/10.1016/S0038-0121(02)00038-1
Funding
The study was supported in part by the National Institutes of Health, National Institute of Diabetes and Digestive and Kidney Diseases (1R01DK113295). This funding supported HK, MWS, SK, RB, RA, AM, TM, and JML. The study sponsor had no role in study design, collection, analysis, interpretation of data, writing the report, or the decision to submit the report for publication.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
HK, MS, and JML developed the project. HK, MS, SK, and SZ performed data analysis. HK, MS, SK, and JML drafted the main manuscript text. All authors performed interpretation of findings and significant edits and review of the manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors have no conflict of interest to declare that are relevant to the content of this article.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary Information
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
10742_2023_310_MOESM3_ESM.png
Supplementary file3: Figure A1. Light colored counties represent the counties that are inefficient (efficiency score < 0.90) in all years 2009–2015. Dark colored counties represent the counties that had an efficiency score ≥ 0.90 in at least one year over the period. The Diabetes Belt (DB) counties are shown in orange and the non-Diabetes Belt (NDB) counties are shown in blue. Dots represent cities with a population of 40,000 or more according to the 2010 census and major highways are displayed. (PNG 255 KB)
10742_2023_310_MOESM4_ESM.gif
Supplementary file4: Supplementary File A2. GIF presenting county level efficiency scores for 2009–2015. The Diabetes Belt (DB) counties are shown in orange and the non-Diabetes Belt (NDB) counties are shown in blue. Dots represent cities with a population of 40,000 or more according to the 2010 census and major highways are displayed. (GIF 266 KB)
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Kang, H., Sohn, MW., Kim, S. et al. Diabetes Belt has lower efficiency in providing diabetes preventive care than surrounding counties. Health Serv Outcomes Res Method 24, 200–210 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10742-023-00310-5
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10742-023-00310-5