Skip to main content
Log in

Primary Care Ethics is Just Medical Ethics: A Philosophical Argument for the Feasibility of Transitioning Acute Care Ethics to the Primary Care Setting

  • Published:
HEC Forum Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Whether practiced by ethics committees or clinical ethicists, medical ethics enjoys a solid foundation in acute care hospitals. However, medical ethics fails to have a strong presence in the primary care setting. Recently, some ethicists have argued that the reason for this disparity between ethics in the acute and primary care setting is that primary care ethics is distinct from acute care ethics: the failure to translate ethics to the primary care setting stems from the incorrect belief that acute care ethics can be applied to the primary care setting. In this paper, I argue that primary care ethics and acute care ethics are species of the same ethical genus, and that the ethical differences are not ones of kind but of circumstance. I do this by appealing to the role obligations that underlie acute care and primary care clinicians’ medical ethical obligations and the shared institutions that ground those obligations.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Medical systems may have concerns that extend past primary care to secondary care clinics as well. These concerns are important, but secondary care is already more like acute care than primary care. If primary care can be shown to be of the same ethical genus as acute care, I am confident that secondary care can as well.

  2. Is the genus-species relation the correct relation to use in describing the relation between medical ethics and primary/acute care ethics? It’s possible that casting the relationship as primary and acute care ethics being two subspecies of the same species would be appropriate: perhaps, it is easier to tie two subspecies together than two species or easier for two subspecies to interact with each other than two species. Which relation one picks, I believe, does not change the fundamental relation that exists between medical ethics, on the one hand, and primary and acute care ethics on the other hand. Thus, I invite the reader to read in her/his preferred relation for the rest of the paper. Thank you to an anonymous reviewer, Anna Perinchery-Herman, Doug Moore, and Stephanie Hull for helpful clarification on this point.

  3. This claim, in and of itself, is not incredibly controversial. Strict consequentialists might reject it since they think that all of one’s duties consist in maximizing/satisficing the good and this is a natural obligation. However, they would also reject that primary care ethics is sui generis, so they are not my primary target.

  4. There is a larger controversy in the background here about whether all special obligations must be voluntarily taken on or whether one can have a special obligation to someone without ever voluntarily taking it on—think, for example, of an obligation to one’s child. My argument does not depend on one of these sides being correct and is consistent with both. Thus, I shall set this aside.

  5. Of course, embedding need not stop there. For example, the Premier League is embedded in the institution of soccer more generally. In this case, one might say Özil is a midfielder playing soccer for the Premier League in Arsenal. There may be multiple orders of embedding for any role one inhabits.

  6. These ends are also echoed by Hirshon et al. (2013a; 2013b) and the World Health Organization (2013).

  7. Thank you to an anonymous reviewer for this helpful example.

  8. This is, indeed, a controversial assumption, as I’m sure some would say that one’s role-obligations could potentially outweigh one’s natural obligations. I am committed to the claim that this is false, but defending it is outside the scope of this paper. This will simply be a critical assumption of the paper, but given its defense in the literature, I take it to be reasonable.

  9. Of course, one can imagine scenarios in which I do possess such an obligation such as when someone’s life is on the line, but I presume most do not play chess under these scenarios.

  10. Or, at least, their moral significance is not tied to medical ethics and the ethicist need not concern herself with them.

  11. I want to thank a participant in the ACHE 2020 research symposium for discussion on this topic.

  12. I want to thank Elizabeth E. Magill for bringing this problem to my attention in a prior version of this paper.

  13. Though, one must remember, acute care facilities do sometimes deal with the issue of whether to fire a patient. See D’Arrigo (2013). Thanks to an anonymous reviewer for this helpful example.

  14. Thank you to an anonymous reviewer for raising this important objection.

References

  • Allert, G., Blasszauer, B., Boyd, K., & Callahan, D. (1996). The goals of medicine: Specifying the goals of medicine. The Hastings Center Report, 26(6), S9–S14.

    Google Scholar 

  • Austin, W. (2017). What is the role of ethics consultation in the moral habitability of health care environments? AMA Journal of Ethics, 19(6), 595–600. https://doi.org/10.1001/journalofethics.2017.19.6.pfor1-1706.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barina, R. (2014). Ethics outside of inpatient care: The need for alliances between clinical and organizational ethics. HEC Forum, 26(4), 309–323.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Batten, J. (2013). Assessing clinical ethics consultation: Processes and outcomes. Medicine and Law, 32(2), 141–152.

    Google Scholar 

  • Beans, B. E. (2016). Experts forsee a major shift from inpatient to amulatory care. Pharmacy and Therapeutics, 41(4), 231–232–235–237.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bishop, J. P., Fanning, J. B., & Bliton, M. J. (2009). Of goals and goods and floundering about: A dissensus report on clinical ethics consultation. HEC Forum, 21(3), 275–291. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10730-009-9101-1.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Braunack-Mayer, A. J. (2001). What makes a problem an ethical problem? An empirical perspective on the nature of ethical problems in general practice. Journal of Medical Ethics, 27(2), 98–103. https://doi.org/10.1136/jme.27.2.98.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bruce, C. R., Lapointe, J., Koch, P., Lee, K., & Fedson, S. (2018). Building a vibrant clinical ethics consultation service. NCBC Quarterly, 18(1), 29–38.

    Google Scholar 

  • Bruce, C. R., Smith, M. L., Hizlan, S., & Sharp, R. R. (2011). A systematic review of activities at a high-volume ethics consultation serivce. Journal of Clinical Ethics, 22(2), 151–164.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Burge, S., White, D., Bajorek, E., Bazaldua, O., Trevino, J., Albright, T. et al. (2005). Correlates of medication knowledge and adherence: findings from the residency research network of South Texas. Family Medicine, 37(10), 712–718.

    Google Scholar 

  • Chandra, S., Mohammadnezhad, M., & Ward, P. (2018). Trust and communication in a doctor-patient relationship: A literature review. Journal of Healthcare Communications, 3(3), 36. https://doi.org/10.4172/2472-1654.100146.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cheung, L., Leung, T. I., Ding, V. Y., Wang, J. X., Norden, J., Desai, M., et al. (2018). Healthcare service utilization under a new virtual primary care delivery model. Telemedicine and e-Health, 25(7), 551–559. https://doi.org/10.1089/tmj.2018.0145.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Clark-Grill, M. (2016). Ethics support for GPs: What should it look like? Journal of Primary Health Care, 8(1), 75–81. https://doi.org/10.1071/HC14999.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dang, B. N., Westbrook, R. A., Hartman, C. M., & Giordano, T. P. (2016). Retaining HIV patients in care: The role of initial patient care experiences. AIDS and Behavior, 20(10), 2477–2487. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10461-016-1340-y.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dang, B. N., Westbrook, R. A., Njue, S. M., & Giordano, T. P. (2017). Building trust and rapport early in the new doctor-patient relationship: a longitudinal qualitative study. BMC Medical Education. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12909-017-0868-5.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Dare, T. (2016). Robust role-obligation: How do roles make a moral difference? The Journal of Value Inquiry, 50(4), 703–719. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10790-016-9577-2.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • de Zulueta, P. (2008). Welcome to the ethics section of the London Journal of Primary Care. London Journal of Primary Care, 1(1), 5–7. https://doi.org/10.1080/17571472.2008.11493183.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Doukas, D. J., & Brody, H. (1992). After the Cruzan case: The primary care physician and the use of advance directives. The Journal of the American Board of Family Practice, 5(2), 201–205.

    Google Scholar 

  • Dowdy, M. D., Robertson, C., & Bander, J. A. (1998). A study of proactive ethics consultation for critically and terminally ill patients with extended lengths of stay. Critical Care Medicine, 26(2), 252–259.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Doyal, L., Doyal, L., & Sokol, D. (2009). General practitioners face ethico-legal problems too! Postgraduate Medical Journal, 85(1006), 393–394. https://doi.org/10.1136/pgmj.2008.076604.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Emanuel, E. J., & Emanuel, L. L. (1992). Four models of the physician-patient relationship. JAMA: The Journal of the American Medical Association, 267(16), 2221–2226. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.267.16.2221.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fiester, A. (2012). The “Difficult” patient reconceived: An expanded moral mandate for clinical ethics. American Journal of Bioethics, 12(5), 2–7.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fox, E., Myers, S., & Pearlman, R. A. (2007). Ethics consultation in United States Hospitals: A national survey. The American Journal of Bioethics, 7(2), 13–25. https://doi.org/10.1080/15265160601109085.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Furler, J. S., & Palmer, V. J. (2010a). The ethics of everyday practice in primary medical care: Responding to social health inequities. Philosophy, Ethics, and Humanities in Medicine, 5(1), 6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Furler, J. S., & Palmer, V. J. (2010b). The ethics of everyday practice in primary medical care: Responding to social health inequities. Philosophy, ethics, and humanities in medicine: PEHM, 5, 6. https://doi.org/10.1186/1747-5341-5-6.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gágyor, I., Heßling, A., Heim, S., Frewer, A., Nauck, F., & Himmel, W. (2019). Ethical challenges in primary care: A focus group study with general practitioners, nurses and informal caregivers. Family Practice, 36(2), 225–230. https://doi.org/10.1093/fampra/cmy060.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gilmer, T., Schneiderman, L. J., Teetzel, H., Blustein, J., Briggs, K., Cohn, F., et al. (2005). The costs of nonbeneficial treatment in the intensive care setting. Health Affairs, 24(4), 961–971. https://doi.org/10.1377/hlthaff.24.4.961.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gorka, C., Craig, J. M., & Spielman, B. J. (2017). Growing an ethics consultation service: A longitudinal study examining two decades of practice. AJOB Empirical Bioethics, 8(2), 116–127. https://doi.org/10.1080/23294515.2017.1292327.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Greenblum, J., & Hubbard, R. K. (2019). Responding to religious patients: Why physicians have no business doing theology. Journal of Medical Ethics, 45(11), 705–710.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Harbishettar, V., Krishna, K. R., Srinivasa, P., & Gowda, M. (2019). The enigma of doctor-patient relationship. Indian journal of psychiatry, 61(Suppl 4), S776–S781. https://doi.org/10.4103/psychiatry.IndianJPsychiatry_96_19.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hardimon, M. O. (1994). Role obligations. The Journal of Philosophy, 91(7), 333–363. https://doi.org/10.2307/2940934.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hirshon, J. M., Risko, N., Calvello, E. J., de Ramirez, S. S., Narayan, M., Theodosis, C., & O’Neill, J. (2013a). Health systems and services: The role of acute care. Bulletin of the World Health Organization, 91, 386–388.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hirshon, J. M., Risko, N., Calvello, E. J., Stewart de Ramirez, S., Narayan, M., Theodosis, C., et al. (2013b). Health systems and services: The role of acute care. Bulletin of the World Health Organization, 91(5), 386–388.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Homan, M. E. (2018). Factors associated with the timing and patient outcomes of clinical ehtics consultation in a Catholic health care system. NCBC Quarterly, 18(1), 71–92.

    Google Scholar 

  • Huemer, M. (2017). Devil’s advocates: On the ethics of unjust legal advocacy. In E. Crookston, D. Killoren, & J. Trerise (Eds.), Ethics in politics: The rights and obligations of individual political agents. New York: Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Hulme, K., Chilcot, J., & Smith, M. A. (2018). Doctor-patient relationship and quality of life in Irritable Bowel Syndrome: An exploratory study of the potential mediating role of illness perceptions and acceptance. Psychology, Health & Medicine, 23(6), 674–684. https://doi.org/10.1080/13548506.2017.1417613.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hurst, S. A., Perrier, A., Pegoraro, R., Reiter-Theil, S., Forde, R., Slowther, A.-M., et al. (2007). Ethical difficulties in clinical practice: Experiences of European doctors. Journal of Medical Ethics, 33(1), 51–57. https://doi.org/10.1136/jme.2005.014266.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hurst, S. A., Reiter-Theil, S., Slowther, A.-M., Pegoraro, R., Forde, R., & Danis, M. (2008). Should ethics consultants help clinicians face scarcity in their practice? Journal of Medical Ethics, 34(4), 241–246. https://doi.org/10.1136/jme.2006.019828.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klemenc-Ketiš, Z., Kersnik, J., & Ojsteršek, J. (2008). Perceived difficulties in managing ethical problems in family practice in Slovenia: Cross-sectional study. Croatian Medical Journal, 49(6), 799–806. https://doi.org/10.3325/cmj.2008.49.799.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kornhaber, R., Walsh, K., Duff, J., & Walker, K. (2016). Enhancing adult therapeutic interpersonal relationships in the acute health care setting: An integrative review. Journal of Multidisciplinary Healthcare, 9, 537–546. https://doi.org/10.2147/JMDH.S116957.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Laabs, C. A. (2007). Primary care nuse pracitioners’ integrity when faced with moral conflict. Nursing Ethics, 14(6), 795–809. https://doi.org/10.1177/0969733007082120.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lees, D., Procter, N., & Fassett, D. (2014). Therapeutic engagement between consumers in suicidal crisis and mental health nurses. International Journal of Mental Health Nursing, 23(4), 306–315.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Leopold, N., Cooper, J., & Clancy, C. (1996). Sustained partnership in primary care. Journal of Family Practice, 42(2), 129–137.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lesandrini, J., & Muster, A. (2018). Practical steps for integrating an ethics program. NCBC Quarterly, 18(1), 39–47.

    Google Scholar 

  • Lin, E., Katon, W., Von Korff, M., Bush, T., Lipscomb, P., Russo, J., & Wagner, E. (1991). Frustrating patients: Physician and patient perspectives among distressed high users of medical services. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 6(3), 241–246. https://doi.org/10.1007/bf02598969.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Macleod, A. (2012). Moral permissibility constraints on voluntary obligations. Journal of Social Philosophy, 43(2), 125–139.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marsh, F. H., & Staver, A. (1991). Physician authority for unilateral DNR orders. Journal of Legal Medicine, 12(2), 115–165. https://doi.org/10.1080/01947649109510849.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Martin, R. (2004). Rethinking primary health care ethics: Ethics in contemporary primary health care in the United Kingdom. Primary Health Care Research & Development, 5(4), 317–328. https://doi.org/10.1191/1463423604pc222oa.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • McCabe, C. (2003). Nurse–patient communication: An exploration of patients’ experiences. Journal of Clinical Nursing, 13, 41–49.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mehrotra, A., Ray, K., Brockmeyer, D. M., Barnett, M. L., & Bender, J. A. (2020). Rapidly converting to “Virtual Practices”: Outpatient care in the era of Covid-19. NEJM Catalyst Innovations in Care Delivery. https://doi.org/10.1056/CAT.20.0091.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miksanek, T. (2008). On caring for ‘Difficult’ patients. Health Affairs, 27(5), 1422–1428. https://doi.org/10.1377/hlthaff.27.5.1422.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller, D. (2005). Reasonable partiality towards compatriots. Ethical Theory and Moral Practice, 8(1), 63–81.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Náfrádi, L., Kostova, Z., Nakamoto, K., & Schulz, P. J. (2018). The doctor–patient relationship and patient resilience in chronic pain: A qualitative approach to patients’ perspectives. Chronic Illness, 14(4), 256–270. https://doi.org/10.1177/1742395317739961.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nussbaum, M. (2003). Capabilities as fundamental entitlements: Sen and social justice. Feminist Economics, 9(2–3), 33–59. https://doi.org/10.1080/1354570022000077926.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Papanikitas, A., & Toon, P. (2011). Primary care ethics: A body of literature and a community of scholars? Journal of the Royal Society of Medicine, 104(3), 94–96. https://doi.org/10.1258/jrsm.2010.100353.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pellegrino, E. D. (2000). The goals and ends of medicine: How are they to be defined? In M. J. Hanson & D. Callahan (Eds.), The Goals of Medicine: The Forgotten Issues in Health Care Reform, (pp. 55–68). Washington, D.C.: Georgetown University Press.

  • Pellegrino, E. D. (2006). Toward a reconstruction of medical morality target article. American Journal of Bioethics, 6(2), 65–71.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rasmussen, L. M. (2011). An ethics expertise for clinical ethics consultation. The Journal of Law, Medicine & Ethics, 39(4), 649–661. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1748-720X.2011.00632.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rawls, J. (1997). Idea of public reason revisited. The University of Chicago Law Review, 64(3), 765–808.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Repenshek, M. (2018). Examining quality and value in ethics consulation services. NCBC Quarterly, 18(1), 59–68.

    Google Scholar 

  • Scheffler, S. (1997). Relationships and responsibilities. Philosophy & Public Affairs, 26(3), 189–209. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1088-4963.1997.tb00053.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schneider, J., Kaplan, S. H., Greenfield, S., Li, W., & Wilson, I. B. (2004). Better physician-patient relationships are associated with higher reported adherence to antiretroviral therapy in patients with HIV infection. Journal of General Internal Medicine, 19(11), 1096–1103. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1525-1497.2004.30418.x.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schneiderman, L. J., Gilmer, T., & Teetzel, H. D. (2000). Impact of ethics consultations in the intensive care setting: A randomized, controlled trial. Critical Care Medicine, 28(12), 3920–3924. https://doi.org/10.1097/00003246-200012000-00033.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schneiderman, L. J., Gilmer, T., Teetzel, H. D., Dugan, D. O., Blustein, J., Cranford, R., et al. (2003). Effect of ethics consultations on nonbeneficial life-sustaining treatments in the intensive care setting: A randomized controlled trial. JAMA, 290(9), 1166–1172. https://doi.org/10.1001/jama.290.9.1166.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Slowther, A. (2009). Ethics case consultation in primary care: Contextual challenges for clinical ethicists. Cambridge Quarterly of Healthcare Ethics, 18(4), 397–405. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0963180109090598.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Slowther, Anne, & Parker, M. (2007). Ethics support and education in primary care. In D. Bowman & J. Spicer (Eds.), Primary care ethics (pp. 172–191). Boca Raton: CRC Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Slowther, A., & Parker, M. (2007a). Ethics support and education in primary care. In D. Bowman & J. Spicer (Eds.), Primary care ethics (pp. 172–191). Boca Raton: CRC Press.

  • Wall, B. M., & Nelson, S. (2003). Our heels are praying very hard all day. Holistic Nursing Practice, 17(6), 320–328.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • World Health Organization. (2013). Health systems strengthening glossary. Retreived April 3, 2021, from World Health Organization. https://www.who.int/healthsystems/Glossary_January2011.pdf.

Download references

Acknowledgements

Thanks to the participants at the ACHE 2020 research symposium for their helpful comments and questions. Thanks to Elizabeth E. Magill for helpful comments on earlier versions of this paper. Thank you also to Anna Perinchery-Herman, Doug Moore, Stephanie Hull, and Ash Navabi for their invaluable discussion on several different topics within this paper.

Funding

N/A.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Stephen Perinchery-Herman.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest to disclose.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Perinchery-Herman, S. Primary Care Ethics is Just Medical Ethics: A Philosophical Argument for the Feasibility of Transitioning Acute Care Ethics to the Primary Care Setting. HEC Forum 35, 73–94 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10730-021-09451-x

Download citation

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10730-021-09451-x

Keywords

Navigation