Abstract
Ethical theories normally make room both for global duties to human beings everywhere and special duties to those we are attached to in some way. Such a split-level view requires us to specify the kind of attachment that can ground special duties, and to explain the comparative force of the two kinds of duties in cases of conflict. Special duties are generated within groups that are intrinsically valuable and not inherently unjust, where the duties can be shown to be integral to relationships within the group. Since nations can be shown to meet these conditions, acknowledging special obligations towards compatriots is justified. However for such partiality to be reasonable, it must be balanced against recognition of duties of global justice. These duties include duties to respect human rights and duties of fairness towards non-nationals. Weighing such duties against domestic duties of social justice is not a simple task, and the outcome should depend on the precise specification of the duty at stake. In particular, the duty to respect human rights fragments into four sub-duties whose force when set against local duties is markedly different.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bader, V., Reasonable Partiality, Relational Impartiality, and Priority for Compatriots, Ethical Theory and Moral Practice 8 (2005), 83–103.
Beitz, C., Cosmopolitan Ideals and National Sentiment, Journal of Philosophy 80 (1983), pp. 591–600.
Brighouse, H., Against Nationalism, in J. Couture, K. Nielsen and M. Seymour (eds.), Rethinking Nationalism. Calgary: University of Calgary Press, 1998.
Buchanan, A., Justice and Charity, Ethics 97 (1987), pp. 558–575.
Caney, S., Individuals, Nations and Obligations, in S. Caney, D. George and P. Jones (eds.), National Rights, International Obligations. Boulder, Co.: Westview Press, 1996.
Cohen, L.J., Who is Starving Whom? Theoria 2 (1981), pp. 65–81.
Foot, P., The Problem of Abortion and the Doctrine of Double Effect, in P. Foot, Virtues and Vices and Other Essays in Moral Philosophy. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 2002.
Goodin, R., What is So Special about Our Fellow Countrymen? Ethics 98 (1988), pp. 663–686.
Hurka, T., The Justification of National Partiality, in R. McKim and J. McMahan (eds.), The Morality of Nationalism. New York: Oxford University Press, 1997.
McMahan, J., The Limits of National Partiality, in R. McKim and J. McMahan (eds.), The Morality of Nationalism. New York: Oxford University Press, 1997.
Mill, J.S., Utilitarianism, in H.B. Acton (ed.), Utilitarianism; On Liberty; Considerations on Representative Government. London: Dent, 1972.
Miller, D., On Nationality. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1995.
Miller, D., Justice and Global Inequality, in A. Hurrell and N. Woods (eds.), Inequality, Globalization, and World Politics. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1999.
Miller, D, Distributing Responsibilities, Journal of Political Philosophy 9 (2001), pp. 453–471.
Miller, D., Justice, Democracy, and Public Goods, in K. Dowding, R. Goodin and C. Pateman (eds.), Justice and Democracy: Essays for Brian Barry. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 2004.
Miller, R., Cosmopolitan Respect and Patriotic Concern, Philosophy and Public Affairs 27 (1998), pp. 202–224.
Moore, M., The Ethics of Nationalism. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2001.
Nagel, T., Equality and Partiality. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1991.
Nussbaum, M., For Love of Country. Boston: Beacon Press, 1996.
Pogge, T., The Bounds of Nationalism, in J. Couture, K. Nielsen and M. Seymour (eds.), Rethinking Nationalism. Calgary: University of Calgary Press, 1998.
Pogge, T., World Poverty and Human Rights. Cambridge: Polity Press, 2002.
Raz, J., Liberating Duties, in J. Raz, Ethics in the Public Domain. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1994.
Scheffler, S., Boundaries and Allegiances. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2001.
Scott, W., The Lay of the Last Minstrel, in J. MacQueen and T. Scott (eds.), The Oxford Book of Scottish Verse. Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1989.
Tamir, Y., Liberal Nationalism. Princeton, N.J.: Princeton University Press, 1993.
Thomson, J.J., The Trolley Problem, in Thomson, Rights, Restitution and Risk: Essays in Moral Theory. Cambridge, Mass.: Harvard University Press, 1986.
Walzer, M., The Argument about Humanitarian Intervention, Dissent 49(1) (2002), pp. 29–37.
Wellman, C., Friends, Compatriots, and Special Political Obligations, Political Theory 29 (2001), pp. 217–236.
Williams, B., Moral Luck, in Williams, Moral Luck: Philosophical Papers 1973–1980. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1981.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Miller, D. Reasonable Partiality Towards Compatriots. Ethic Theory Moral Prac 8, 63–81 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10677-005-3296-2
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10677-005-3296-2