Abstract
Pyrus L. is a taxonomically difficult genus mainly because of interspecific and intergeneric hybridization. A majority of the wild species of Pyrus occurs in Iran, making this region very important for any study of the systematics of the genus. In this investigation, seven quantitative and seven qualitative characters of leaf epidermis, particularly epidermal cells shape, anticlinal walls patterns, type and size of stomata, and cuticular ornamentation of 22 taxa of Pyrus plus Malus orientalis are studied for assessment of their taxonomical value at different levels. Scanning electron microscopy and light microscopy were used for evaluation of epidermis features of these taxa. Some characters such as shape and anticlinal wall pattern of epidermal cells, presence of adaxial stomata, pattern of cuticular ornamentation and epicuticular wax types are useful in separation of some Pyrus taxa. Moreover, Malus orientalis is recognized easily from all Pyrus species via the density of stomata. According to ANOVA analysis, all quantitative variables show high level of between-group differentiation. Also, based on the hierarchical clustering results gained by multiple correspondence analysis and factor analysis of mixed data analyses of the current study, micromorphological characters of epidermal cells reflect the ecological conditions of pear taxa, so most of the mesophyte and xerophyte taxa can be separated from each other in accordance with epidermal cells characters, specially the anticlinal wall pattern. Totally, the application of some other biological markers, particularly suitable molecular data are needed to present well-resolved relationships among these taxa.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Akopian JA (2007) On the Pyrus L. (Rosaceae) species in Armenia. Flora, vegetation and plant resources of Armenia. Armen Acad Sci 16:15–26 (in Russian)
Bao L, Chen K, Zhang D, Cao Y, Yamamoto T, Teng Y (2007) Genetic diversity and similarity of pear (Pyrus L.) cultivars native to East Asia revealed by SSR (simple sequence repeat) markers. Genet Resour Crop Evol 54:959–971. doi:10.1007/s10722-006-9152-y
Bao L, Chen K, Zhang D, Li X, Teng Y (2008) An assessment of genetic variability and relationships within Asian pears based on AFLP (amplified fragment length polymorphism) markers. Sci Hort 116:374–380
Baranova MA (1987) Historical development of the present classification of morphological types of stomates. Bot Rev 53:53–79
Baranova MA (1992) Principles of comparative stomatographic studies of flowering plants. Bot Rev 58:49–99
Bartholtt W, Neinhuis C, Cutler D, Ditsch F, Meusel I, Theisen I, Wilhelmi H (1998) Classification and terminology of plant epicuticular waxes. Bot J Linn Soc 126:237–260
Bassil N, Postman JD (2010) Identification of European and Asian pears using EST-SSRs from Pyrus. Genet Resour Crop Evol 57:357–370. doi:10.1007/s10722-009-9474-7
Browicz K (1993) Conspect and chorology of the genus Pyrus L. Arbor Kornickie 38:17–33
Carpenter KJ (2005) Stomatal architecture and evolution in basal angiosperms. Am J Bot 92(10):1595–1615. doi:10.3732/ajb.92.10.1595
Challice JS, Westwood MN (1973) Numerical taxonomic studies of the genus Pyrus using both chemical and botanical characters. Bot J Linn Soc 67:121–148
Chen J, Sun H, Yang Y (2008) Comparative morphology of leaf epidermis of Salix (Salicaceae) with special emphasis on sections Lindleyanae and Retusae. Bot J Linn Soc 157:311–322. doi:10.1111/j.1095-8339.2008.00809.x
Core Team R (2015) R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna
Decaisne I (1871–1872) Le jardin fruitier du Museum ou iconographie de toutes les espèces et variétés d’arbres fruitiers cultivés dans cet établissement avec leur description, leur histoire, leur synonymie, etc. Tome 1. Le poirier, Paris, Firmin Didot frères ed
Dilcher DL (1974) Approaches to the identification of angiosperm leaf remains. Bot Rev 40:1–157
Esau K (1953) Plant Anatomy. Wiley, New York
Fedorov AA (1958) Pyrus L. In: Takhtajan A (ed) Flora Armenii, vol 3. Erevan, pp 235–254
Ganeva T (2009) Leaf epidermis structure in Cydonia oblonga Mill. (Rosaceae). Biotechnol Biotechnol Eq 23:965–967. doi:10.1080/13102818.2009.10818582
Ganeva T, Uzunova K (2010a) Comparative leaf epidermis study in species of genus Malus Mill. (Rosaceae). Bot Serbica 34:45–49
Ganeva T, Uzunova K (2010b) Leaf epidermis structure in Amelanchier ovalis Medic. (Rosaceae). Biotechnol Biotechnol Eq 24:36–38
Ganeva T, Uzunova K, Koleva D (2009) Comparative leaf epidermis investigation in species of genus Crataegus L. (Rosaceae) from Bulgaria. Feddes Repert 120:169–184. doi:10.1002/fedr.200811105
Ghahremaninejad F, Khalili Z, Maassoumi AA, Mirzaie-Nodoushan H, Riahi M (2012) Leaf epidermal features of Salix species (Salicaceae) and their systematic significance. Am J Bot 99:769–777
Grossheim AA (1952) Pyrus L. In: Grossheim AA (ed) Flora Kavkaza, vol 5. Moskva-Leningrad, pp 14–27
Haider N, Al-Oudat M, Nabulsi I, MirAli N (2007) Molecular characterization of some Pyrus syriaca trees using chloroplast DNA. Adv Hort Sci 21(3):172–176
Holmgren PK, Holmgren NH, Barnett LC (1990) Index Herbariorum I: The Herbaria of the World, 8th edn. Regnum Veg, New York
Hooker JD (1879) Pyrus L. In: Flora of British India, vol 2. London, pp 372–389
Iketani H, Manabe T, Matsuta N, Akihama T, Hayashi T (1998) Incongruence between RFLPs of chloroplast DNA and morphological classification in east Asian pear (Pyrus spp.). Genet Resour Crop Evol 45:533–539
Katayama H, Tachibana M, Iketani H, Zhang S, Uematsu C (2012) Phylogenetic utility of structural alterations found in the chloroplast genome of pear: hypervariable regions in a highly conserved genome. Tree Genet Genomes 8:313–326
Khatamsaz M (1992) Pyrus L. In: Assadi M (ed) Flora of Iran, no. 6. Research institute of forests and rangelands, pp 181–200 (in Persian)
Koehne E (1890) Die Gattunqen der Pomaceen. Berlin
Le S, Josse J, Husson F (2008) FactoMineR: an R package for multivariate analysis. J Stat Softw 25:1–18
Lin B, Shen D (1983) Studies on the germplasmic characteristics of Pyrus by use of isozymic patterns. Acta Agric Univ Zhejiang 9:235–243 (in Chinese with English summary)
Maleev PV (1971) Pyrus L. In: Komarov VL (ed) Flora of USSR, vol 9. Academy of Science of the USSR, pp 259–274
Metcalfe CR, Chalk L (1965) Anatomy of dicotyledons, vol 1. Oxford, pp 539–550
MirAli N, Haider N, Nabulsi I, Al-Oudat M (2007) Pyrus syriaca: an ecological and molecular study. Adv Hort Sci 21(2):89–95
Monte-Corve L, Cabrita L, Oliveira C, Leitao J (2000) Assessment of genetic relationships among Pyrus species and cultivars using AFLP and RAPD markers. Genet Resour Crop Evol 47:257–265
Oliveira CM, Motaa M, Monte-Corvoa L, Goulao L, Silva DM (1999) Molecular typing of Pyrus based on RAPD markers. Sci Hort 79:163–174
Popova M, Kovacheva D, Anastassov H (1995) Anatomical studies of leaves of Pyrus L. species in Bulgaria. In: Proceedings of a jubilee symposium marking 100 years from the birthday of the academician Boris Stephanov (1894–1979), Sofia, Bulgaria, 2–3 June (Bulgarian with English summary)
Potter D, Eriksson T, Evans RC, Oh S, Smedmark JEE, Morgan DR, Kerr M, Robertson KR, Arsenault M, Dickinson TA, Campbell CS (2007) Phylogeny and classification of Rosaceae. Plant Syst Evol 266:5–43
IBM Corp. Released 2012. IBM SPSS Statistics for Windows, Version 21.0. IBM Corp., Armonk
Robertson KR, Phipps JB, Rohrer JR, Smith PG (1991) A synopsis of genera of the Maloideae (Rosaceae). Syst Bot 16:376–394
Rubtsov GA (1944) Geographical distribution of the genus Pyrus and trends and factors in its evolution. Am Nat 78:358–366
Schönbeck-Temesy E (1969) Pyrus L. In: Rechinger K (ed) Flora Iranica, no. 66. Graz-Austria, pp 27–36
Shenghua L, Chengquan F (1994) Studies on chromosome of Pyrus in China. Acta Hortic 367:27–32
Stace CA (1965) Cuticular studies as an aid to plant taxonomy. Bull Brit Mus (Nat His) Bot 4:3–78
Stace CA (1989) Plant taxonomy and biosystematics, 2nd edn. Edward Arnold Publisher Ltd, London
Tahir SS, Rajput MTM (2009) SEM structure distribution and taxonomic significance of foliar stomata in Sibbaldia L. species (Rosaceae). Pak J Bot 41(5):2137–2143
Teng Y, Tanabe K, Tamura F, Itai A (2001) Genetic relationships of pear cultivars in Xinjiang, China, as measured by RAPD markers. J Hort Sci Biotech 76:771–779
Teng Y, Tanabe K, Tamura F, Itai A (2002) Genetic relationships of Pyrus species and cultivars native to East Asia revealed by randomly amplified polymorphic DNA markers. J Am Soc Hort Sci 127:262–270
Tuz AS (1972) K voprosu klassifikacii roda Pyrus L. Trudy Prikl Bot 46(2):70–91 (in Russian)
Whang SS, Pak J, Hill RS, Kim K (2001) Cuticle micromorphology of leaves of Pinus (Pinaceae) from Mexico and Central America. Bot J Linn Soc 135:349–373
Wissemann V (2000) Epicuticular wax morphology and the taxonomy of Rosa (Section Caninae, subsection Rubiginosae). Plant Syst Evol 221:107–112
Yamamoto T, Kimura T, Sawamura Y, Manabe T, Kotobuki K, Hayashi T, Ban Y, Matsuta N (2002) Simple sequence repeats for genetic analysis in pear. Euphytica 124:129–137
Yao L, Zheng X, Cai D, Gao Y, Wang K, Cao Y, Teng Y (2010) Exploitation of Malus EST-SSRs and the utility in evaluation of genetic diversity in Malus and Pyrus. Genet Resour Crop Evol 57:841–851
Zamani A, Attar F, Ghahreman A, Maroofi H (2008) Anatomical studies of the genus Pyrus L. (Rosaceae) in Iran and its taxonomical implications. Ir J Bot 14:132–142
Zamani A, Attar F, Maroofi H (2010) Pollen morphology of the genus Pyrus (Rosaceae) in Iran. Acta Biol Szeged 54(1):51–56
Zamani A, Attar F, Maroofi H (2012) A synopsis of the genus Pyrus (Rosaceae) in Iran. Nord J Bot 30:310–332
Zheng X, Cai D, Yao L, Teng Y (2008) Non-concerted ITS evolution, early origin and phylogenetic utility of ITS pseudogenes in Pyrus. Mol Phylogenet Evol 48:892–903
Zheng X, Hu C, Spooner D, Liu J, Cao J, Teng Y (2011) Molecular evolution of Adh and LEAFY and the phylogenetic utility of their introns in Pyrus (Rosaceae). BMC Evol Biol 11:255
Zheng X, Cai D, Potter D, Postman J, Liu J, Teng Y (2014) Phylogeny and evolutionary histories of Pyrus L. revealed by phylogenetic trees and networks based on data from multiple DNA sequences. Mol Phylogenet Evol 80:54–65
Zou L, Zhang X, Zhang Z, Sun B, Guo S (1986) Studies on systematic relationship of some of the species in the genus Pyrus based on pollen grain morphology. Acta Hortic Sin 13:219–224 (in Chinese with English summary)
Acknowledgments
The authors thank Ms. Avakh for assistance of preparation of slides. This work has been supported by the Center of International Scientific Studies and Collaboration (CISSC) and the Hubert Curien Partnership (HCP) Gundishapur by the French Embassy in Tehran and the Iran National Science Foundation.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Zamani, A., Attar, F. & Civeyrel, L. Leaf epidermis characters of Iranian Pyrus L. (Rosaceae) and their taxonomic implications. Genet Resour Crop Evol 64, 159–176 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10722-015-0341-4
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10722-015-0341-4