Abstract
We studied how mutation rates promote the evolution of advantageous traits in an asexual population. First, to examine the effects of mutation rates on the evolution of an advantageous trait (high competitive ability), we carried out simulation analyses with competition between individuals for survival. Second, to examine the mechanism underlying the promotion of advantageous trait evolution, we calculated the probabilities that new favorable effects of mutations on the phenotype were acquired and that existing favorable effects were maintained. In the simulation analyses, advantageous traits evolved in the population with a low mutation rate; however, when the mutation rate was extremely low, advantageous traits evolved slowly because few beneficial mutations occurred. Then, the numerical calculations showed that the probability of acquiring new favorable effects of mutations on the phenotype and the probability of maintaining existing favorable effects are high if the mutation rate is low. The former occurs because, if the mutation rate is high, multiple mutations may occur in a genome, and even if beneficial mutations occur, their favorable effects may be masked by simultaneously occurring deleterious mutations. However, if the mutation rate is low, it is likely that only one beneficial mutation occurs, and its favorable effect on the phenotype is direct. In conclusion, low mutation rates are advantageous because they promote favorable phenotypic effects of mutations without interference from deleterious mutations; these low rates not only prevent the occurrence of deleterious mutations but also help maintain existing beneficial mutations and promote the evolution of advantageous traits.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Arjan JA, de Visser GM, Zeyl CW, Gerrish PJ, Blanchard JL, Lenski RE (1999) Diminishing returns from mutation supply rate in asexual populations. Science. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.283.5400.404
Bachtrog D, Gordo I (2004) Adaptive evolution of asexual populations under Muller’s ratchet. Evolution 58(7):1403–1413. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0014-3820.2004.tb01722.x
Barrett RD, MacLean RC, Bell G (2006) Mutations of intermediate effect are responsible for adaptation in evolving Pseudomonas fluorescens populations. Biol Lett 2:236–238
Belshaw R, Gardner A, Rambaut A, Pybus OG (2008) Pacing a small cage: mutation and RNA viruses. Trends Ecol Evol 23(4):188–193
Birky CW, Walsh JB (1988) Linkage on rates of molecular evolution. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 85(September):6414–6418. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.85.17.6414
Dawson KJ (1998) Evolutionarily stable mutation rates. J Theor Biol 194:143–157. https://doi.org/10.1006/jtbi.1998.0752
Drake J, Charlesworth B, Charlesworth D, Crow J (1998) Rates of spontaneous mutation. Genetics 148:1667–1686
Eyre-Walker A, Keightley PD (2007) The distribution of fitness effects of new mutations. Nat Rev Genet 8:610–618. https://doi.org/10.1038/nrg2146
Fisher RA (1930) The genetical theory of natural selection. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Furió V, Moya A, Sanjuán R (2005) The cost of replication fidelity in an RNA virus. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 102:10233–10237. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0501062102
Furió V, Moya A, Sanjuán R (2007) The cost of replication fidelity in human immunodeficiency virus type 1. Proc R Soc B 274:225–230. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2006.3732
Gerrish PJ, Lenski RE (1998) The fate of competing beneficial mutations in an asexual population. Genetica 102–103:127. https://doi.org/10.1023/a:1017067816551
Gillespie JH (1981) Mutation modification in a random environment. Evolution 35:468–476. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1558-5646.1981.tb04910.x
Gordo I, Perfeito L, Sousa A (2011) Fitness effects of mutations in bacteria. June 2014:19–35. https://doi.org/10.1159/000332747
Haldane JBS (1927) A mathematical theory of natural and artificial selection, Part V: selection and mutation. Math Proc Camb Philos Soc 23(07):838. https://doi.org/10.1017/S0305004100015644
Huber CD, Kim BY, Marsden CD, Lohmueller KE (2017) Determining the factors driving selective effects of new nonsynonymous mutations. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 114:4465–4470. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1619508114
Ishii K, Hirotsugu M, Yoh I, Akira S (1989) Evolutionary stabile mutation rate in a periodically changing environment. Genet Soc Am 121(1):163–174
Jiang X, Xu Z, Li J, Shi Y, Wu W, Shiheng T (2011) The influence of deleterious mutations on adaptation in asexual populations. PLoS ONE 6:e27757. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0027757
Johnson T, Barton NH (2002) The effect of deleterious alleles on adaptation in asexual populations. Genetics 162:395–411
Kassen R, Bataillon T (2006) Distribution of fitness effects among beneficial mutations before selection in experimental populations of bacteria. Nat Genet 38(4):484–488. https://doi.org/10.1038/ng1751
Kimura M (1960) Optimum mutation rate and degree of dominance as determined by the principle of minimum genetic load. J Genet. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF02985336
Kimura M (1967) On the evolutionary adjustment of spontaneous mutation rates. Genet Res 9:23–34. https://doi.org/10.1017/s0016672300010284
Kondrashov AS (1995) Modifiers of mutation–selection balance: general approach and the evolution of mutation rates. Genet Res 66:53–70. https://doi.org/10.1017/S001667230003439X
Lynch M (2010) Evolution of the mutation rate. Trends Genet 26:345–352. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tig.2010.05.003
Manning JT, Thompson DJ (1984) Muller’s ratchet and the accumulation of favorable mutations. Acta Biotheor 33:219–225. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00048429
McDonald MJ, Cooper TF, Beaumont HJ, Rainey PB (2011) The distribution of fitness effects of new beneficial mutations in Pseudomonas fluorescens. Biol Lett 7:98–100
Muller HJ (1964) The relation of recombination to mutational advance. Mutat Res 1:2–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/0027-5107(64)90047-8
Nilsson M, Snoad N (2002) Optimal mutation rates in dynamic environments. Bull Math Biol 64:1033–1043. https://doi.org/10.1006/bulm.2002.0314
Orr H (2000) The rate of adaptation in asexuals. Genetics 155:961–968
Peck JR (1994) A ruby in the rubbish: beneficial mutations, deleterious mutations and the evolution of sex. Genetics 137:597–606
Pénisson S, Singh T, Sniegowski P, Gerrish P (2017) Dynamics and fate of beneficial mutations under lineage contamination by linked deleterious mutations. Genetics 205:1305–1318. https://doi.org/10.1534/genetics.116.194597
Regoes RR, Hamblin S, Tanaka MM (2013) Viral mutation rates: modelling the roles of within-host viral dynamics and the trade-off between replication fidelity and speed. Proc Royal Soc B Biol Sci 280(1750):20122047
Sanjuán R, Moya A, Elena SF (2004) The distribution of fitness effects caused by single-nucleotide substitutions in an RNA virus. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 101:8396–8401. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0400146101
Sniegowski PD, Gerrish PJ (2010) Beneficial mutations and the dynamics of adaptation in asexual populations. Philos Trans R Soc B 365:1255–1263. https://doi.org/10.1098/rstb.2009.0290
Sniegowski PD, Gerrish PJ, Johnson T, Shaver A (2000) The evolution of mutation rates: separating causes from consequences. BioEssays 22:1057–1066. https://doi.org/10.1002/1521-1878(200012)22:12%3c1057:AID-BIES3%3e3.0.CO;2-W
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Aoyagi Blue, Y., Sakai, S. Low mutation rates promote the evolution of advantageous traits by preventing interference from deleterious mutations. Genetica 148, 101–108 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10709-020-00091-6
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10709-020-00091-6