Abstract
The current study proposes a novel field Torsional Direct Shear Test (TDST) that can measure the field shear strength of soils with particle sizes up to 12.5 mm. TDST apparatus comprises an open cylinder 300 mm in diameter and 90 mm in height. The cylinder has two vanes fixed at 90° to one another at the center. It also has a 25 mm thick circular cover plate, quarter plates covered by the vanes, and a vertical loading column. Here circular cover plate transfers the normal load applied to the loading column, and the torsional load is applied to the loading column using the lever arm. Quarter plates allow the soil to dilate while shearing, enabling the measurement of shear strength under a known, constant applied normal stress. To validate the performance of the TDST apparatus, set up modified, and used in the laboratory large box direct shear test setup. The results of the laboratory TDST setup were compared with those obtained using the laboratory DST. It was found that the angle of internal friction (ϕ) measured using the proposed TDST was nearly identical to that measured using the laboratory DST. In contrast, the cohesion (c) measured using TDST was about 1.2 times greater than that measured using DST. The proposed in situ TDST method does not require a large horizontal force. Instead, as the length of the lever arm increases, the required force to induce torsional stress in soil reduces, making the method much easier to perform than the conventional field DST.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data availability
The data supporting the findings of this study will be available upon request.
Abbreviations
- TDST:
-
Torsional Direct Shear Test
- DST:
-
Direct Shear Test
- c :
-
Cohesion
- ϕ :
-
Angle of internal friction
- G :
-
Specific gravity
- C u :
-
Coefficient of uniformity
- C c :
-
Coefficient of curvature
- MDD:
-
Maximum Dry Density
- OMC:
-
Optimum Moisture Content
- T :
-
Torque of moment
- τ :
-
Shear stress
- β:
-
Cadlings constant
References
Buchele, WF (1984) Means and method for soil testing US patent 4,480,481
Cadling L, Odenstad S (1950) The vane borer an apparatus for determining the shear strength of clay soils directly in the ground. STOCKHOLM 1950
Chandler MP. PDC and SMJ (1981) An open-sided field direct shear box with applications in geomorphology
Cross M, Limited SW (2010) The use of a field open-sided direct shear box for the determination of the shear strength of shallow residual and colluvial soils on hillslopes in the south Pennines, Derbyshire. North West Geogr 10:8–18
Das BM (2006) Principles of geotechnical engineering. Thompson learning, Chicago
Herold J, Gibbs, D (1959) Improved vane type soil testing apparatus. US Patent US2907204A
International A, Indexed by mero files (2006) Standard test method for in situ determination of direct shear strength of rock discontinuities 1
Klotz C, Beutinger PH, Vermeer PA (2003) Effects of inherent anisotropy and mode of shearing on the behaviour of geomaterials. In: 16th Engineering mechanics conference, University of Washington, Seattle, USA, pp. 16-17
Liu S-H (2009) Application of in situ direct shear device to shear strength measurement of rockfill materials. Water Sci Eng 2:48–57. https://doi.org/10.3882/j.issn.1674-2370.2009.03.005
Sharifounnasab M, Ullrich CR (1985) Rate of shear effects on vane shear strength. J Geotech Eng 111:135–139. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9410(1985)111:1(135)
Indian standard 2720-39-2 (1979) Direct shear test for soils containing gravel, section 2 in situ shear test
Stark TD, Santoyo RF (2017) Soil/geosynthetic interface strengths from torsional ring shear tests. Geotechnical frontiers 2017. American Society of Civil Engineers, Reston, VA, pp 260–268
Suits LD, Sheahan TC, Fakhimi A et al (2008) Development of a modified in situ direct shear test technique to determine shear strength parameters of mine rock piles. Geotech Test J 31:101152. https://doi.org/10.1520/GTJ101152
Suits LD, Sheahan TC, Messerklinger S et al (2011) A new pressurized vane shear apparatus. Geotech Test J 34:103175. https://doi.org/10.1520/GTJ103175
Acknowledgements
The authors express their gratitude to the Vice-chancellor, COEP Technological University (formerly College of Engineering Pune) Pune an,d the Head of the Civil Engineering Department for their valuable financial and technical support, which has greatly contributed to the successful completion of this work. Furthermore, the authors would like to extend their appreciation to the reviewers for their insightful comments and suggestions that have significantly enhanced the quality of the paper.
Funding
This work was supported by the R&D department of COEP Tech Pune.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
We declare no conflicts of interest related to this work.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Appendix 1
Appendix 1
The appendix contains some results of TDST. These results were taken before the introduction of quarter plates. When quarter plates were introduced, the results were found quite comparable.
Table 5 indicates that the values of cohesion and angle of internal friction were many variations comparable after the quarter plate was introduced to the TDST apparatus.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Waghmare, K.D., Tripathi, K.K. Development of a Field Torsional Direct Shear Test Apparatus. Geotech Geol Eng 42, 479–500 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10706-023-02584-5
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10706-023-02584-5