Abstract
In this paper, an analytical–numerical solution is presented for a circular tunnel in the hydrostatic condition using a generalized nonlinear Hoek–Brown failure criterion. To a deep insight into the problem, the influence of the plastic zone weight, and the Young's modulus on the ground response curve of a deep tunnel in a strain-softening media is highlighted. Experimental results show that the magnitude of the confined stress can have a direct effect on the critical softening parameter. Thus, a variable critical softening parameter is also assumed. That is, as the radial stress magnitude increases, the critical softening parameter is enhanced. The equations are derived for different directions (e.g. crown, floor, and sidewall) around the circular tunnel. The accuracy of the proposed method is validated by some examples. The results show that assuming a constant Young's modulus in the plastic zone imposes a significant error in the predicting of the tunnel convergence.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Alejano L, Alonso E, Manín GF- (2007) Ground reaction curves of tunnels considering post-peak rock mass properties. In: Romana M (ed) Underground works under special conditions. CRC Press, pp 35–41
Alejano L, Alonso E, Rodriguez-Dono A, Fernandez-Manin G (2010) Application of the convergence–confinement method to tunnels in rock masses exhibiting Hoek–Brown strain-softening behaviour. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 1:150–160. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrmms.2009.07.008
Alejano LR, Alonso E (2005) Considerations of the dilatancy angle in rocks and rock masses. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 42:481–507. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrmms.2005.01.003
Alejano LR, Rodriguez-Dono A, Alonso E, Fdez-Manín G (2009) Ground reaction curves for tunnels excavated in different quality rock masses showing several types of post-failure behaviour. Tunn Undergr Space Technol 24:689–705. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tust.2009.07.004
Alejano LR, Rodríguez-Dono A, Veiga M (2012) Plastic radii and longitudinal deformation profiles of tunnels excavated in strain-softening rock masses. Tunn Undergr Space Technol 30:169–182. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tust.2012.02.017
Alonso E, Alejano L, Fdez-Manin G, Garcia-Bastante F (2008) Influence of post-peak properties in the application of the convergence–confinement method for designing underground excavations. In: Paper presented at the 5th international conference and exhibition on mass mining
Alonso E, Alejano LR, Varas F, Fdez-Manin G, Carranza-Torres C (2003) Ground response curves for rock masses exhibiting strain-softening behaviour. Int J Numer Anal Methods Geomech 27:1153–1185. https://doi.org/10.1002/nag.315
Brown ET, Bray JW, Ladanyi B, Hoek E (1983) Ground response curves for rock tunnels. J Geotech Eng 109:15–39. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9410(1983)109:1(15)
Carranza-Torres C (2003) Dimensionless graphical representation of the exact elasto-plastic solution of a circular tunnel in a Mohr–Coulomb material subject to uniform far-field stresses. Rock Mech Rock Eng 36:237–253. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00603-002-0048-7
Carranza-Torres C, Fairhurst C (1997) On the stability of tunnels under gravity loading, with post-peak softening of the ground. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 34:75.e71–75.e18. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1365-1609(97)00253-0
Chen R, Tonon F (2011) Closed-form solutions for a circular tunnel in elastic–brittle–plastic ground with the original and generalized Hoek–Brown failure criteria. Rock Mech Rock Eng 44:169–178. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00603-010-0122-5
Cui L, Zheng J-J, Zhang R-J, Dong Y-K (2015) Elasto-plastic analysis of a circular opening in rock mass with confining stress-dependent strain-softening behaviour. Tunn Undergr Space Technol 50:94–108. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tust.2015.07.001
Fahimifar A, Ghadami H, Ahmadvand M (2014) The influence of seepage and gravitational loads on elastoplastic solution of circular tunnels. Sci Iran Trans A, Civil Eng 21:1821
Fahimifar A, Ghadami H, Ahmadvand M (2015) The ground response curve of underwater tunnels, excavated in a strain-softening rock mass. Geomech Eng 8:323–359. https://doi.org/10.12989/gae.2015.8.3.323
Fahimifar A, Zareifard MR (2009) A theoretical solution for analysis of tunnels below groundwater considering the hydraulic–mechanical coupling. Tunn Undergr Space Technol 24:634–646. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tust.2009.06.002
Fahimifar A, Zareifard MR (2013) A new closed-form solution for analysis of unlined pressure tunnels under seepage forces. Int J Numer Anal Meth Geomech 37:1591–1613. https://doi.org/10.1002/nag.2101
Fahimifar A, Zareifard MR (2014) A new elasto-plastic solution for analysis of underwater tunnels considering strain-dependent permeability. Struct Infrastruct Eng 10:1432–1450. https://doi.org/10.1080/15732479.2013.824489
González-Cao J, Varas F, Bastante FG, Alejano LR (2013) Ground reaction curves for circular excavations in non-homogeneous, axisymmetric strain-softening rock masses. J Rock Mech Geotech Eng 5:431–442. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jrmge.2013.08.001
Hedayat A (2016) Stability of circular tunnels excavated in rock masses under gravity loading. In: Paper presented at the 50th US rock mechanics/geomechanics symposium, Houston, Texas, 26 June 2016
Hedayat A, Oreste P, Spagnoli G (2019) Analysis of the effects of blast-induced damage zone with attenuating disturbance factor on the ground support interaction. Geomech Geoeng. https://doi.org/10.1080/17486025.2019.1664777
Hedayat A, Weems J (2019) The elasto-plastic response of deep tunnels with damaged zone and gravity effects. Rock Mech Rock Eng. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00603-019-01834-4
Hoek E, Carranza-Torres C, Corkum B (2002) Hoek–Brown failure criterion-2002 edition. Proc NARMS-Tac 1:267–273
Hoek E, Diederichs MS (2006) Empirical estimation of rock mass modulus. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 43:203–215. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrmms.2005.06.005
Katebian E, Molladavoodi H (2017) Practical ground response curve considering post-peak rock mass behaviour. Eur J Environ Civil Eng 21:1–23. https://doi.org/10.1080/19648189.2015.1090928
Lee Y-K, Pietruszczak S (2008) A new numerical procedure for elasto-plastic analysis of a circular opening excavated in a strain-softening rock mass. Tunn Undergr Space Technol 23:588–599. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tust.2007.11.002
Liu W (2020) Analysis of deformation of circular roadway considering effects of intermediate principal stress and dilatancy. Geotech Geol Eng 38:529–536. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10706-019-01043-4
Lu A-Z, Xu G-s, Sun F, Sun W-Q (2010) Elasto-plastic analysis of a circular tunnel including the effect of the axial in situ stress. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 47:50–59. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrmms.2009.07.003
Meng QX, Wang W (2014) A novel closed-form solution for circular openings in generalized Hoek–Brown media. Math Probl Eng 2014:7. https://doi.org/10.1155/2014/870835
Oreste P, Hedayat A, Spagnoli G (2019) Effect of gravity of the plastic zones on the behavior of supports in very deep tunnels excavated in rock masses. Int J Geomech 19:04019107. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GM.1943-5622.0001490
Pan X-D, Brown ET (1996) Influence of axial stress and dilatancy on rock tunnel stability. J Geotech Eng 122:139–146. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9410(1996)122:2(139)
Park K-H, Tontavanich B, Lee J-G (2008) A simple procedure for ground response curve of circular tunnel in elastic-strain softening rock masses. Tunn Undergr Space Technol 23:151–159. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tust.2007.03.002
Ranjbarnia M, Fahimifar A, Oreste P (2015) Analysis of non-linear strain-softening behaviour around tunnels. Proc Inst Civil Eng Geotech Eng 168:16–30. https://doi.org/10.1680/geng.13.00144
Ranjbarnia M, Zaheri M, Dias D (2020) Three-dimensional finite difference analysis of shallow sprayed concrete tunnels crossing a reverse fault or a normal fault: a parametric study. Front Struct Civ Eng. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11709-020-0621-8
Reed MB (1988) The influence of out-of-plane stress on a plane strain problem in rock mechanics. Int J Numer Anal Meth Geomech 12:173–181. https://doi.org/10.1002/nag.1610120205
Timoshenko SP, Goodier J (1982) Theory of elasticity. Mcgraw Hill Education, New York
Wang F, Qian D (2018) Difference solution for a circular tunnel excavated in strain-softening rock mass considering decayed confinement. Tunn Undergr Space Technol 82:66–81. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tust.2018.08.001
Wang S, Wu Z, Guo M, Ge X (2012) Theoretical solutions of a circular tunnel with the influence of axial in situ stress in elastic–brittle–plastic rock. Tunn Undergr Space Technol 30:155–168. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tust.2012.02.016
Wang S, Yin X, Tang H, Ge X (2010) A new approach for analyzing circular tunnel in strain-softening rock masses. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 47:170–178. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrmms.2009.02.011
Wang Y (1996) Ground response of circular tunnel in poorly consolidated rock. J Geotech Eng 122:703–708. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)0733-9410(1996)122:9(703)
Yang X-l, Zou J-f, Sui Z-r (2007) Effects of intermediate principal stress on rock cavity stability. J Cent South Univ Technol 14:165–169. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11771-007-0237-3
Zaheri M, Ranjbarnia M, Oreste P (2019) Performance of systematic fully grouted rockbolts and shotcreted layer in circular tunnel under the hydrostatic conditions using 3D finite difference approach. Geomech Geoeng. https://doi.org/10.1080/17486025.2019.1648885
Zaheri M, Ranjbarnia M, Dias D, Oreste P (2020) Performance of segmental and shotcrete linings in shallow tunnels crossing a transverse strike-slip faulting. Transp Geotech 23:100333. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.trgeo.2020.100333
Zareifard MR (2019) Ground response curve of deep circular tunnel in rock mass exhibiting Hoek–Brown strain-softening behaviour considering the dead weight loading. Eur J Environ Civil Eng. https://doi.org/10.1080/19648189.2019.1632745
Zareifard MR (2020) A simple closed-form solution for analysis of tunnels in Mohr–Coulomb grounds considering gravity loading. Geotech Geol Eng. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10706-020-01255-z
Zareifard MR, Fahimifar A (2012) A new solution for shallow and deep tunnels by considering the gravitational loads. Acta Geotech Slov 2:37–49
Zareifard MR, Fahimifar A (2014) Effect of seepage forces on circular openings excavated in Hoek–Brown rock mass based on a generalised effective stress principle. Eur J Environ Civil Eng 18:584–600. https://doi.org/10.1080/19648189.2014.891470
Zareifard MR, Fahimifar A (2015) Elastic–brittle–plastic analysis of circular deep underwater cavities in a Mohr–Coulomb rock mass considering seepage forces. Int J Geomech 15:04014077. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GM.1943-5622.0000400
Zhang Q, Jiang B-S, Wang S-L, Ge X-R, Zhang H-Q (2012) Elasto-plastic analysis of a circular opening in strain-softening rock mass. Int J Rock Mech Min Sci 50:38–46. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijrmms.2011.11.011
Zhang Q, Li C, Guo Q, Min M, Wang Y, Jiang B (2017) A simple approach to the elasto-plastic coupling analyses of circular tunnels in confining pressure-dependent strain-softening rock masses. Geosyst Eng 20:261–270. https://doi.org/10.1080/12269328.2017.1301221
Zhang Q, Zhang C, Jiang B, Li N, Wang Y (2018) Elastoplastic coupling solution of circular openings in strain-softening rock mass considering pressure-dependent effect. Int J Geomech 18:04017132. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GM.1943-5622.0001043
Zhou XP, Li JL (2011) Hoek–Brown criterion applied to circular tunnel using elastoplasticity and in situ axial stress. Theor Appl Fract Mech 56:95–103. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tafmec.2011.10.005
Zou J, Su Y (2016) Theoretical solutions of a circular tunnel with the influence of the out-of-plane stress based on the generalized Hoek–Brown failure criterion. Int J Geomech 16:06015006. https://doi.org/10.1061/(ASCE)GM.1943-5622.0000547
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Appendix: Ground Response Curve Calculation
Appendix: Ground Response Curve Calculation
Input data:
\(\sigma_{ci}\) = uniaxial compression strength of the rock mass; GSI peak = geological strength index of the rock mass at the peak state; \(m_{i}\) = constant parameter of intact rock; \(r_{o}\) = external tunnel radius; \(\sigma_{0}\) = initial hydrostatic stress;\(\gamma\) = unit weight of rock mass; \(\theta\) = angle measured counter-clockwise from the spring line of the tunnel; \(D\) = degree of disturbance of the rock mass; \(v_{e}\) = Poisson's ratio of rock mass in the elastic zone; \(\alpha\) = curvature of the behavior model; \(n\) = number of rings in the plastic zone; \(P_{i}\) = internal support pressure; \(R_{P}\) = plastic radius.
Preliminary calculation:
-
1.
\(F_{r} = \gamma sin\theta\)
-
2.
\(GSI^{res} = 17.25e^{{0.0107 \times GSI^{peak} }} for 25 < GSI^{peak} < 75\)
-
3.
\(s_{{\left( {peak} \right)}} = s_{{\left( {i = 1} \right)}} = e^{{\frac{{GSI^{peak} - 100}}{9 - 3D}}} ,s_{{\left( {res} \right)}} = e^{{\frac{{GSI^{res} - 100}}{9 - 3D}}}\)
-
4.
\(m_{{b\left( {peak} \right)}} = m_{{b\left( {i = 1} \right)}} = m_{i} e^{{\frac{{GSI^{peak} - 100}}{28 - 14D}}} , m_{{b\left( {res} \right)}} = m_{i} e^{{\frac{{GSI^{res} - 100}}{28 - 14D}}}\)
-
5.
\(a_{{\left( {peak} \right)}} = a_{{\left( {i = 1} \right)}} = 0.5 + \frac{1}{6}\left( {e^{{ - \frac{{GSI^{peak} }}{15}}} - e^{{ - \frac{20}{3}}} } \right), a_{{\left( {res} \right)}} = 0.5 + \frac{1}{6}\left( {e^{{ - \frac{{GSI^{res} }}{15}}} - e^{{ - \frac{20}{3}}} } \right)\)
-
6.
\(E_{{e\left( {peak} \right)}} \left( {MPa} \right) = E_{{e\left( {i = 1} \right)}} = 100000\left( {\frac{{1 - \frac{D}{2}}}{{1 + e^{{\frac{{75 + 25D - GSI^{peak} }}{11}}} }}} \right)\)
-
7.
\(E_{{e\left( {res} \right)}} \left( {MPa} \right) = 100000\left( {\frac{{1 - \frac{D}{2}}}{{1 + e^{{\frac{{75 + 25D - GSI^{res} }}{11}}} }}} \right)\)
-
8.
\(\sigma_{cm}^{^{\prime}} = \sigma_{ci} .\frac{{\left( {m_{{b\left( {peak} \right)}} + 4s_{{\left( {peak} \right)}} - a_{{\left( {peak} \right)}} \left( {m_{{b\left( {peak} \right)}} - 8s_{{\left( {peak} \right)}} } \right)} \right)\left( {\frac{{m_{{b\left( {peak} \right)}} }}{4} + s_{{\left( {peak} \right)}} } \right)^{{a_{{\left( {peak} \right)}} - 1}} }}{{2\left( {1 + a_{{\left( {peak} \right)}} } \right)\left( {2 + a_{{\left( {peak} \right)}} } \right)}}\)
-
9.
\(\sigma_{3n}^{^{\prime}} = \frac{{0.47\sigma_{cm}^{^{\prime}} \left( {\frac{{\sigma_{cm}^{^{\prime}} }}{{\sigma_{0} }}} \right)^{ - 0.94} }}{{\sigma_{ci} }}\)
-
10.
\(\varphi_{{\left( {peak} \right)}} = sin^{ - 1} \left[ {\frac{{6a_{{\left( {peak} \right)}} m_{{b\left( {peak} \right)}} (s_{{\left( {peak} \right)}} + m_{{b\left( {peak} \right)}} \sigma_{3n}^{^{\prime}} )^{{a_{{\left( {peak} \right)}} - 1}} }}{{2\left( {1 + a_{{\left( {peak} \right)}} } \right)\left( {2 + a_{{\left( {peak} \right)}} } \right) + 6a_{{\left( {peak} \right)}} m_{{b\left( {peak} \right)}} (s_{{\left( {peak} \right)}} + m_{{b\left( {peak} \right)}} \sigma_{3n}^{^{\prime}} )^{{a_{{\left( {peak} \right)}} - 1}} }}} \right]\)
-
11.
\(\psi_{{\left( {peak} \right)}} = \frac{{5 GSI^{peak} - 125}}{1000}\varphi_{{\left( {peak} \right)}} , for 25 < GSI^{peak} < 75\)
-
12.
\(K_{{\Psi \left( {peak} \right)}} = K_{{\Psi \left( {i = 1} \right)}} = \frac{{1 + sin\Psi_{{\left( {peak} \right)}} }}{{1 - sin\Psi_{{\left( {peak} \right)}} }}\)
-
13.
\(\sigma_{{r\left( {i = 1} \right)}} = \sigma_{{r\left( {R_{P} } \right)}}\)
-
14.
\(\sigma_{{\theta \left( {i = 1} \right)}} = 2\sigma_{0} - \sigma_{{r\left( {R_{P} } \right)}}\)
-
15.
\(\varepsilon_{{\theta \left( {i = 1} \right)}}^{ } = \varepsilon_{\theta \left( r \right)}^{e} = \frac{{1 + v_{e} }}{{E_{e} }}\left( {\sigma_{0} - \sigma_{{r\left( {i = 1} \right)}} } \right) , \varepsilon_{{\theta \left( {i = 1} \right)}}^{P} = 0\)
-
16.
\(\varepsilon_{{r\left( {i = 1} \right)}}^{ } = \varepsilon_{{r\left( {i = 1} \right)}}^{e} = - \frac{{1 + v_{e} }}{{E_{e} }}\left( {\sigma_{0} - \sigma_{{r\left( {i = 1} \right)}} } \right) , \varepsilon_{{r\left( {i = 1} \right)}}^{P} = 0\)
-
17.
\(\eta_{{\left( {i = 1} \right)}}^{P} = 0\)
-
18.
\(\rho_{{\left( {i = 1} \right)}} = 1\)
-
19.
\(M_{{\left( {i = 1} \right)}} = \left\{ {\begin{array}{*{20}c} {\begin{array}{*{20}c} { - E_{e} \left[ {0.0046e^{{0.0768 \times GSI^{peak} }} } \right]\left( {\frac{{\sigma_{{r\left( {i = 1} \right)}}^{ } }}{{\sigma_{ci} \sqrt {s^{peak} } }}} \right)^{ - 1} } & {if \frac{{\sigma_{{r\left( {i = 1} \right)}}^{ } }}{{\sigma_{ci} \sqrt {s^{peak} } }} \ge 0.1} \\ { - E_{e} \left[ {0.0046e^{{0.0768 \times GSI^{peak} }} } \right]\left( {\frac{{\sigma_{{r\left( {i = 1} \right)}}^{ } }}{{2\sigma_{ci} \sqrt {s^{peak} } }} + 0.05} \right)^{ - 1} } & {if \frac{{\sigma_{{r\left( {i = 1} \right)}}^{ } }}{{\sigma_{ci} \sqrt {s^{peak} } }} \le 0.1} \\ \end{array} } \\ \\ \end{array} } \right.\)
-
20.
\(\eta_{{\left( {i = 1} \right)}}^{P*} = \left( {1 + \frac{{K_{{\Psi \left( {\eta_{{\left( {i = 1} \right)}}^{P} } \right)}} }}{2}} \right)\left[ {\sigma_{1}^{peak} \left( {\sigma_{{r\left( {i = 1} \right)}}^{ } } \right) - \sigma_{1}^{res} \left( {\sigma_{{r\left( {i = 1} \right)}}^{ } } \right)} \right]\left[ {\frac{1}{{E_{e} }} - \frac{1}{{M_{{\left( {i = 1} \right)}} }}} \right]\)
-
21.
\(\Delta \sigma_{{r\left( {i = 1} \right)}} = \Delta \sigma_{{\theta \left( {i = 1} \right)}} = \Delta \varepsilon_{{r\left( {i = 1} \right)}}^{e} = \Delta \varepsilon_{{\theta \left( {i = 1} \right)}}^{e} = \Delta \rho_{{\left( {i = 1} \right)}} = \overline{\rho }_{{\left( {i = 1} \right)}} = \Delta \varepsilon_{{\theta \left( {i = 1} \right)}}^{P} = \Delta \varepsilon_{{r\left( {i = 1} \right)}}^{P} = \Delta \varepsilon_{{\theta \left( {i = 1} \right)}} = \Delta \varepsilon_{{r\left( {i = 1} \right)}} = 0\)
Sequence of calculation for each ring (\(i \ge 2\)):
-
1.
\(\Delta \sigma_{r\left( i \right)} = \frac{{P_{i} - \sigma_{{r\left( {R_{P} } \right)}} }}{n}\)
-
2.
\(\sigma_{r\left( i \right)} = \sigma_{{r\left( {i - 1} \right)}} + \Delta \sigma_{r\left( i \right)}\)
-
3.
\(\sigma_{\theta \left( i \right)} = \sigma_{r\left( i \right)} + \sigma_{ci} \left( {\frac{{m_{{b\left( {\eta_{{\left( {i - 1} \right)}}^{P} } \right)}} \sigma_{r\left( i \right)} }}{{\sigma_{ci} }} + s_{{\left( {\eta_{{\left( {i - 1} \right)}}^{P} } \right)}} } \right)^{{a_{{\left( {\eta_{{\left( {i - 1} \right)}}^{P} } \right)}} }}\)
-
4.
\(\Delta \sigma_{\theta \left( i \right)} = \sigma_{\theta \left( i \right)} - \sigma_{{\theta \left( {i - 1} \right)}}\)
-
5.
\(\Delta \varepsilon_{r\left( i \right)}^{e} = \frac{{1 + v_{{\left( {\eta_{{\left( {i - 1} \right)}}^{P} } \right)}} }}{{E_{{\left( {\eta_{{\left( {i - 1} \right)}}^{P} } \right)}} }}\left[ {\Delta \sigma_{r\left( i \right)} \left( {1 - v_{{\left( {\eta_{{\left( {i - 1} \right)}}^{P} } \right)}} } \right) - \Delta \sigma_{\theta \left( i \right)} v_{{\left( {\eta_{{\left( {i - 1} \right)}}^{P} } \right)}} } \right]\)
-
6.
\(\Delta \varepsilon_{\theta \left( i \right)}^{e} = \frac{{1 + v_{{\left( {\eta_{{\left( {i - 1} \right)}}^{P} } \right)}} }}{{E_{{\left( {\eta_{{\left( {i - 1} \right)}}^{P} } \right)}} }}\left[ {\Delta \sigma_{\theta \left( i \right)} \left( {1 - v_{{\left( {\eta_{{\left( {i - 1} \right)}}^{P} } \right)}} } \right) - \Delta \sigma_{r\left( i \right)} v_{{\left( {\eta_{{\left( {i - 1} \right)}}^{P} } \right)}} } \right]\)
-
7.
\(H\left( {\overline{\sigma }_{r\left( i \right)} ,\eta_{{\left( {i - 1} \right)}}^{P} } \right) = \sigma_{ci} \left( {\frac{{m_{{b_{{\left( {\eta_{{\left( {i - 1} \right)}}^{P} } \right)}} }} \left[ {\frac{{\sigma_{r\left( i \right)} + \sigma_{{r\left( {i - 1} \right)}} }}{2}} \right]}}{{\sigma_{ci} }} + s_{{\left( {\eta_{{\left( {i - 1} \right)}}^{P} } \right)}} } \right)^{{a_{{\left( {\eta_{{\left( {i - 1} \right)}}^{P} } \right)}} }}\)
-
8.
\(C_{4} = \sqrt {\left[ {\Delta \sigma_{r\left( i \right)} - 2F_{r} R_{P} \rho_{i - 1} + 2H\left( {\overline{\sigma }_{r\left( i \right)} ,\eta_{{\left( {i - 1} \right)}}^{P} } \right)} \right]^{2} - 8\Delta \sigma_{r\left( i \right)} H\left( {\overline{\sigma }_{r\left( i \right)} ,\eta_{{\left( {i - 1} \right)}}^{P} } \right)}\)
-
9.
\(\rho_{i} = \left\{ {\begin{array}{*{20}c} {\frac{{ - \Delta \sigma_{r\left( i \right)} + 2H\left( {\overline{\sigma }_{r\left( i \right)} ,\eta_{{\left( {i - 1} \right)}}^{P} } \right) - C_{4} }}{{2F_{r} R_{P} }}} & {if F_{r} \ne 0} \\ {\rho_{i - 1} \left[ {\frac{{\Delta \sigma_{r\left( i \right)} + 2H\left( {\overline{\sigma }_{r\left( i \right)} ,\eta_{{\left( {i - 1} \right)}}^{P} } \right)}}{{ - \Delta \sigma_{r\left( i \right)} + 2H\left( {\overline{\sigma }_{r\left( i \right)} ,\eta_{{\left( {i - 1} \right)}}^{P} } \right)}}} \right]} & {if F_{r} = 0} \\ \end{array} } \right.\)
-
10.
\(\Delta \rho_{\left( i \right)} = \rho_{\left( i \right)} - \rho_{{\left( {i - 1} \right)}}\)
-
11.
\(\overline{\rho }_{\left( i \right)} = \frac{{\rho_{\left( i \right)} + \rho_{{\left( {i - 1} \right)}} }}{2}\)
-
12.
\(\Delta \varepsilon_{\theta \left( i \right)}^{P} = \frac{{ - \frac{{\Delta \varepsilon_{\theta \left( i \right)}^{e} }}{{\Delta \rho_{\left( i \right)} }} - \frac{{1 + v_{{\left( {\eta_{{\left( {i - 1} \right)}}^{P} } \right)}} }}{{E_{{\left( {\eta_{{\left( {i - 1} \right)}}^{P} } \right)}} }} \frac{{H\left( {\overline{\sigma }_{r\left( i \right)} ,\eta_{{\left( {i - 1} \right)}}^{P} } \right)}}{{\overline{\rho }_{\left( i \right)} }} - \frac{{\varepsilon_{{\theta \left( {i - 1} \right)}}^{P} - \varepsilon_{{r\left( {i - 1} \right)}}^{P} }}{{\overline{\rho }_{\left( i \right)} }}}}{{\frac{1}{{\Delta \rho_{\left( i \right)} }} + \frac{{1 + K_{{\Psi (\eta_{{\left( {i - 1} \right)}}^{P} )}} }}{{\overline{\rho }_{\left( i \right)} }}}}\)
-
13.
\(\Delta \varepsilon_{r\left( i \right)}^{P} = - K_{{\Psi (\eta_{{\left( {i - 1} \right)}}^{P} )}} \Delta \varepsilon_{\theta \left( i \right)}^{P}\)
-
14.
\(\varepsilon_{\theta \left( i \right)}^{P} = \Delta \varepsilon_{\theta \left( i \right)}^{P} + \varepsilon_{{\theta \left( {i - 1} \right)}}^{P}\)
-
15.
\(\varepsilon_{r\left( i \right)}^{P} = \Delta \varepsilon_{r\left( i \right)}^{P} + \varepsilon_{{r\left( {i - 1} \right)}}^{P}\)
-
16.
\(\eta_{\left( i \right)}^{P} = \eta_{{\left( {i - 1} \right)}}^{P} + \Delta \varepsilon_{\theta \left( i \right)}^{P} - \Delta \varepsilon_{r\left( i \right)}^{P}\)
-
17.
\(\Delta \varepsilon_{\theta \left( i \right)} = \Delta \varepsilon_{\theta \left( i \right)}^{e} + \Delta \varepsilon_{\theta \left( i \right)}^{P}\)
-
18.
\(\Delta \varepsilon_{r\left( i \right)} = \Delta \varepsilon_{r\left( i \right)}^{e} + \Delta \varepsilon_{r\left( i \right)}^{P}\)
-
19.
\(\varepsilon_{r\left( i \right)} = \varepsilon_{{r\left( {i - 1} \right)}} + \Delta \varepsilon_{r\left( i \right)}\)
-
20.
\(\varepsilon_{\theta \left( i \right)} = \varepsilon_{{\theta \left( {i - 1} \right)}} + \Delta \varepsilon_{\theta \left( i \right)}\)
-
21.
\(M_{\left( i \right)} = \left\{ {\begin{array}{*{20}c} {\begin{array}{*{20}c} { - E_{e} \left[ {0.0046e^{{0.0768 \times GSI^{peak} }} } \right]\left( {\frac{{\sigma_{r\left( i \right)}^{ } }}{{\sigma_{ci} \sqrt {s^{peak} } }}} \right)^{ - 1} } & {if\; \frac{{\sigma_{r\left( i \right)}^{ } }}{{\sigma_{ci} \sqrt {s^{peak} } }} \ge 0.1} \\ { - E_{e} \left[ {0.0046e^{{0.0768 \times GSI^{peak} }} } \right]\left( {\frac{{\sigma_{r\left( i \right)}^{ } }}{{2\sigma_{ci} \sqrt {s^{peak} } }} + 0.05} \right)^{ - 1} } & {if\; \frac{{\sigma_{r\left( i \right)}^{ } }}{{\sigma_{ci} \sqrt {s^{peak} } }} \le 0.1} \\ \end{array} } \\ \\ \end{array} } \right.\)
-
22.
\(\eta_{\left( i \right)}^{P*} = \left( {1 + \frac{{K_{{\Psi \left( {\eta_{{\left( {i - 1} \right)}}^{P} } \right)}} }}{2}} \right)\left[ {\sigma_{1}^{peak} \left( {\sigma_{r\left( i \right)}^{ } } \right) - \sigma_{1}^{res} \left( {\sigma_{r\left( i \right)}^{ } } \right)} \right]\left[ {\frac{1}{{E_{e} }} - \frac{1}{{M_{\left( i \right)} }}} \right]\)
-
23.
\(K_{{\Psi (\eta_{\left( i \right)}^{P} )}} = \left\{ {\begin{array}{*{20}c} {\begin{array}{*{20}c} {1 + \left( {K_{{\psi \left( {peak} \right)}} - 1} \right) \times e^{{\frac{{ - \eta_{\left( i \right)}^{P} }}{{\eta_{\left( i \right)}^{P*} }}}} } & {if\; 0 < \eta_{\left( i \right)}^{P} \le \eta_{\left( i \right)}^{P*} } \\ {1 + \left( {K_{{\psi \left( {peak} \right)}} - 1} \right) \times e^{ - 1} } & {if\; \eta_{\left( i \right)}^{P} > \eta_{\left( i \right)}^{P*} } \\ \end{array} } \\ \\ \end{array} } \right.\)
-
24.
\(\omega_{{\left( {\eta_{\left( i \right)}^{P} } \right)}} = \left\{ {\begin{array}{*{20}c} {\begin{array}{*{20}c} {\left( {\omega_{P} - \omega_{r} } \right)\left[ {\alpha \left( {\frac{{\eta_{\left( i \right)}^{P} }}{{\eta_{\left( i \right)}^{P*} }}} \right)^{2} - \left( {1 + \alpha } \right)\frac{{\eta_{\left( i \right)}^{P} }}{{\eta_{\left( i \right)}^{P*} }}} \right] + \omega_{P} } & {if 0 < \eta_{\left( i \right)}^{P} \le \eta_{\left( i \right)}^{P*} } \\ {\omega_{r} } & {if \eta_{\left( i \right)}^{P} > \eta_{\left( i \right)}^{P*} } \\ \end{array} } \\ \\ \end{array} } \right.\)
-
25.
If \(\sigma_{r\left( i \right)} > P_{i}\), let i = i + 1 and repeat the above calculations for next ring
-
26.
If \(\sigma_{r\left( i \right)} = P_{i}\), consider the below note. Then, perform below steps
-
27.
\(R_{P} = \frac{{r_{o} }}{{\rho_{i} }}\)
-
28.
\(u_{r\left( i \right)} = r_{o} \varepsilon_{\theta \left( i \right)}\)
Note: It should be noted that when \(F_{r}\) is not zero, the calculations depend on \(R_{P}\) value. Due to the fact that this parameter is not initially determined, the calculation must be performed alternately to achieve an appropriate convergence. Thus, at the first step, an initial value for \(R_{P}\) is assumed and calculations are performed. After the calculations, a new \(R_{P}\) will be obtained and this value is used for calculations of subsequent stages. When the difference between the new value of this parameter and the last one becomes negligible, the computations will be stopped. An important point is that when the internal support pressure becomes smaller than some value, the magnitude of \(R_{P}\) does not converge. This means that instability of the tunnel occurs.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Zaheri, M., Ranjbarnia, M. A New Procedure for Calculation of Ground Response Curve of a Circular Tunnel Considering the Influence of Young’s Modulus Variation and the Plastic Weight Loading. Geotech Geol Eng 39, 1079–1099 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10706-020-01546-5
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10706-020-01546-5