Skip to main content
Log in

Analysis of Thermal Radiation Emitted from Partially Premixed Methane–Air Jet Flames

  • Published:
Fire Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

According to accident databases, severe accidents, usually leading to catastrophic events, have originated from 50% of registered jet fires. This “domino effect” is usually caused by the high heat fluxes emitted from jet flames, and the flame impingement. This study analyses the thermal radiation emitted from partially premixed methane–air jet flames, obtained with volumetric fuel flows of 7 L/min, 8 L/min, and 9 L/min. The main geometrical features of the flames (lift-off distance, radiant flame length, and flame area) were obtained by analysing over 500 images, then used to calculate the parameters involved in the solid flame radiation model to determine the heat flux emitted. The view factor was calculated for finite areas, while emissivity was obtained by correlating the average flame diameter of each flame with a soot particle constant. The results obtained from the experiments clearly identify three general regions for the flame temperature and heat flux profiles, as a function of the flame’s axial position. The maximum flame temperature and heat flux are reached in the second region, at approximately 73% of the flame’s axial position. The geometric considerations used throughout the present work allowed for more accurate thermal radiation values in regard to other known techniques.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 5
Figure 6
Figure 7
Figure 8
Figure 9
Figure 10
Figure 11
Figure 12
Figure 13
Figure 14
Figure 15
Figure 16
Figure 17
Figure 18

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

A :

Body A, relation between variables or area (m2)

A 1 :

Jet flame area (m2)

A 2 :

Target or receiving area (m2)

B :

Relation between variables

d :

Nozzle diameter (mm)

D :

Flame diameter (m)

E″:

Surface emissive power (kW/m2)

F :

View factor

G :

Analytical integration function

h :

Height (m)

H :

Radiant flame length (m)

H f :

Total flame length (m)

H r :

Relative humidity (%)

k :

Number of rectangles

K :

Effective emission/absorption coefficient (m1)

L :

Mean equivalent beam length of the flame (m)

L f :

Lift-off (m)

m :

Mass flow rate (kg/s)

n :

Area factor

q air :

Volumetric air flow rate (L/min)

q f :

Volumetric fuel flow rate (L/min)

q″:

Radiant heat flux (kW/m2)

r :

Radius (m)

R 2 :

Coefficient of determination

s :

Standard deviation

T :

Temperature (K)

v :

Height at different position along the flame (m)

v/H f :

Axial position of the flame

x :

Position in the coordinate axis (see Figure 1c) (m)

y :

Position in the coordinate axis (see Figure 1c) or distance (see Figures 6, 8, and 9) (m)

z :

Distance between the flame and the target (m)

ε :

Flame emissivity

η :

Position in the coordinate axis (see Figure 1c) (m)

\(\theta\) :

Angle between the flame and the target (°)

\(\xi\) :

Position in the coordinate axis (see Figure 1c) (m)

σ :

Stefan–Boltzmann constant (5.67 × 108 W/m2 K4)

\(\tau\) :

Atmospheric transmissivity

0:

Ambient

1:

Initial state

2:

Final state

f :

Flame

i,j,k,l :

Any number (1,2,…) within the range of integration, see Equation (3)

References

  1. Wang B, Dinglin L, Wu C (2020) Characteristics of hazardous chemical accidents during hot season in China from 1989 to 2019: a statistical investigation. Saf Sci 129:104788. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssci.2020.104788

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Casal J (2018) Evaluation of the effects and consequences of major accidents in industrial plants, 2nd edn. Elsevier, Amsterdam

    Google Scholar 

  3. Wood MH, Fabbri L (2019) Challenges and opportunities for assessing global progress in reducing chemical accidents risks. Prog Disaster Sci 4:100044. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pdisas.2019.100044

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Huang K, Chen G, Khan F, Yang Y (2021) Dynamic analysis for fire-induced domino effects in chemical process industries. Process Saf Environ Prot 148:686–697. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.psep.2021.01.042

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Gómez-Mares M, Zárate L, Casal J (2008) Jet fires and the domino effect. Fire Saf J 43:583–588. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.firesaf.2008.01.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Landucci G, Argenti F, Spadoni G, Cozzani V (2016) Domino effect frequency assessment: the role of safety barriers. J Loss Prev Process Ind 44:706–717. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jlp.2016.03.006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Landucci G, Cozzani V, Birk M (2013) Heat radiation effects. In: Reniers G, Cozzani V (eds) Domino effects in the process industries. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp 70–115

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  8. Zhou K, Jiang J (2015) Thermal radiation from vertical turbulent jet flame: line source model. J Heat Transf 138:042701. https://doi.org/10.1115/1.4032151

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Raj PK, Fires LNG (2007) A review of experimental results, models and hazards prediction challenges. J Hazard Mater 140:444–464. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2006.10.029

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Hankinson G, Lowesmith B (2012) A consideration of methods of determining the radiative characteristics of jet fires. Combust Flame 159:1165–1177. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.combustflame.2011.09.004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Sen S, Puri IK (2008) Thermal radiation modelling in flames and fires. In: Faghri M, Sundén B (eds) WIT transaction on state of the art in science and engineering. WIT Press, Southampton, pp 301–325

    Google Scholar 

  12. Wang X, Fan Y, Zhou K, Yu Y (2018) Multi-layer cylindrical flame model for predicting radiant heat flux from pool fire. Procedia Eng 211:768–777. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2017.12.074

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Mudan K (1987) Geometric view factors for thermal radiation hazard assessment. Fire Saf J 12:89–96. https://doi.org/10.1016/0379-7112(87)90024-5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Palacios A, Muñoz M, Dabra RM, Casal J (2012) Thermal radiation from vertical jet fires. Fire Saf J 51:93–101. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.firesaf.2012.03.006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Zalosh R (2003) Appendix A: flame radiation review. In: Zalosh R (ed) Industrial fire protection. Wiley, Hoboken

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  16. Davis BC, Bagster DF (1989) The computation of view factors of fire models. J Loss Prev Process Ind 2:224–234. https://doi.org/10.1016/0950-4230(89)80037-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Howell JR, Siegel R, Mengüc MP (1982) A catalog of radiation heat transfer configuration factors. http://www.thermalradiation.net/indexCat.html. Accessed 14 Dec 2022

  18. American Institute of Chemical Engineers, Inc (2010) Appendix A: view factor for selected configurations. In: Centre for Chemical Process Safety (eds) Guidelines for vapor cloud explosion, pressure vessel burst, BLEVE, and flash fire hazards. Wiley, Hoboken, p 428

  19. Thyageswaran S (2017) Radiation view factor for co-axial and unequal rectangles in parallel planes. Heat Transf Eng 38:1522–1529. https://doi.org/10.1080/01457632.2016.1255093

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Gross U, Spindler K, Hanhne E (1981) Shape factor equations for radiation heat transfer between plane rectangular surfaces. Lett Heat Mass Transf 8:219–227

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Hurley M, Gottuk D, Hall J Jr, Harada K, Kuligowski E, Puchovsky M, Wieczorek C (2016) SFPE handbook of fire protection engineering, 5th edn. Springer-Verlag, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  22. Yuen WW, Tien CL (1977) A simple calculation scheme for the luminous-flame emissivity. Symp Combust Proc 16:1481–1487. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0082-0784(77)80430-X

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Drysdale D (2011) An introduction to fire dynamics, 3rd edn. Wiley, Chichester

    Book  Google Scholar 

  24. Chan AKF (1984) Plasma-combustor hybrid for the control of flame emissivity and turn-down ratio. Combustion and Fuel Research Inc. https://www.sbir.gov/sbirsearch/detail/129277

  25. Tien CL, Lee KY, Stretton AJ (2002) Radiation heat transfer. In: Di Nenno PJ et al (eds) SFPE of fire protection engineering, 3rd edn. Society of Fire Protection Engineer, Boston, p 1.73-1.89

    Google Scholar 

  26. Gore J, Faeth G, Evans D, Pfenning D (1986) Structure and radiation properties of large-scale natural gas/air diffusion flames. Fire Mater 10:161–169

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Costa M, Parente C, Santos A (2004) Nitrogen oxides emissions from buoyancy and momentum controlled turbulent methane jet diffusion flames. Exp Therm Fluid Sci 28:729–734. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.expthermflusci.2003.12.010

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Huang Y, Li Y, Dong B (2018) The temperature profile of rectangular fuel source jet fire with different aspect ratio. Procedia Eng 211:280–287. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.proeng.2017.12.014

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Gómez-Mares M, Muñoz M, Casal J (2009) Axial temperature distribution in vertical jet fires. J Hazard Mater 172:54–60. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2009.06.136

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Brzustowski TA, Sommer EC (1973) Predicting radiant heating from flares. In: Proceeding of the division of refining API, vol 53. API, Washington, D.C., pp 865–893

  31. Fenghui J (1995) Prediction of flame radiation and temperature in polymer combustion. In: AOFST symposiums. pp 298–306. https://www.iafss.org/publications/aofst/2/298/view/aofst_2-298.pdf

  32. Satrio P, Adityo R, Agung R, Nugroho Y (2018) Experimental study of thermal radiation from jet flame. IOP Conf Ser Earth Environ Sci 105:012085. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/105/1/012085

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Yuen WW (2006) The multiple absorption coefficient zonal method (MACZM), an efficient computational approach for the analysis of radiative heat transfer in multidimensional inhomogeneous nongray media. Numer Heat Transf B 49(2):89–103. https://doi.org/10.1080/10407780500334664

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Bordbar MH, Hyppanen T (2015) The correlation based zonal method and its application to the back-pass channel of oxy/air-fired CFB boiler. Appl Therm Eng 78:351–363. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.applthermaleng.2014.12.046

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

Authors want to thank Dr. Mário Costa (deceased) for providing the experimental data for validation.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding authors

Correspondence to A. Palacios or L. Zarate-López.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Palacios, A., Zarate-López, L., Alvarez-Guapillo, M.J. et al. Analysis of Thermal Radiation Emitted from Partially Premixed Methane–Air Jet Flames. Fire Technol 59, 1805–1832 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10694-023-01407-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10694-023-01407-6

Keywords

Navigation