Skip to main content

Advertisement

SpringerLink
Log in

Influence of Permeability on the Rate of Fire Spread over Natural and Artificial Pinus radiata Forest Litter

  • Published:
Fire Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The rate of fire spread is of paramount interest in order to prevent and control wildland fires. It has been extensively studied under laboratory conditions, but little research has been made regarding the differences between artificially constructed and natural litter. By using a specially designed sampling method, in this study differences in the rate of spread between natural and constructed pine needle litter samples are assessed using a combustion tunnel with controlled wind speed. A total of 68 experiments were conducted with four levels of wind speed and six levels of permeability (five for constructed samples and one for the natural sample). It was found that permeability has a strong influence on the rate of spread when wind speeds are high (2.1–3.6 \({\hbox {m}} \cdot {\hbox {s}}^{-1}\)). It was also found that while wind speed and permeability have a strong influence on the rate of spread, their combined effect is not significant. Thus, both variables may be treated independently from one another. Lastly, it was found that constructed samples with permeability of \(1 \times 10^{-7}\) m\(^2\) behave similarly to natural samples in terms of the rate of spread. This suggests that it is possible to use constructed samples in the laboratory by matching their permeability, and, thus, obtain realistic values for the rate of fire spread. This could be of use for medium and large scale laboratory tests, where it is not possible to use undisturbed litter samples.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 5
Figure 6
Figure 7

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. Retrieved from http://effis.jrc.ec.europa.eu/ in August 2017.

  2. Or CONAF by its Spanish name, Corporación Nacional Forestal.

  3. The RoS obtained from the thermocouple readings was later discarded due to the high uncertainties associated to the flame front, as explained in Sect. 2.4.

  4. https://www.ibm.com/analytics/spss-statistics-software.

References

  1. Keeley W, Bond WJ, Bradstock R (2012) Fire in mediterranean ecosystems: ecology, evolution and management. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  2. Ubeda X, Sarricolea P (2016) Wildfires in Chile: a review. Glob Planet Change 146:152–161. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gloplacha.2016.10.004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Fateh T, Richard F, Batiot B, Rogaume T, Luche J, Zaida J (2016) Characterization of the burning behavior and gaseous emissions of pine needles in a cone calorimeter—FTIR apparatus. Fire Saf J 82:91–100. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.firesaf.2016.03.008

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Tihay V, Morandini F, Santoni PA, Perez-Ramirez Y, Barboni T (2015) Combustion of forest litters under slope conditions: burning rate, heat release rate, convective and radiant fractions for different loads. Combust Flame 161(12):3237–3248. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.combustflame.2014.06.003

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Santoni PA, Bartoli P, Simeoni A, Torero JL (2014) Bulk and particle properties of pine needle fuel beds-influence on combustion. Int J Wildland Fire 23(8):1076–1086. https://doi.org/10.1071/WF13079

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Rothermel RC (1972) A mathematical model for predicting fire spread in wildland fuels. USDA Forest Service Research Paper INT USA (INT-115), p. 40

  7. Varner JM, Kane JM, Kreye JK, Engber E (2015) The flammability of forest and woodland litter: a synthesis. Curr For Rep 1(2):91–99. https://doi.org/10.1007/s40725-015-0012-x

    Google Scholar 

  8. El Houssami M, Thomas JC, Lamorlette A, Morvan D, Chaos M, Hadden R, Simeoni A (2016) Experimental and numerical studies characterizing the burning dynamics of wildland fuels. Combust Flame 168:113–126. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.combustflame.2016.04.004

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Thomas JANC, Simeoni A, Gallagher M (2014) An experimental study evaluating the burning dynamics of pitch pine needle beds using the FPA. In: Proceedings of the 11th international symposium on fire safety science, pp. 1406–1419. https://doi.org/10.3801/IAFSS.FSS.11-1406

  10. Simeoni A, Thomas JC, Bartoli P, Borowieck P, Reszka P, Colella F, Santoni PA, Torero JL (2012) Flammability studies for wildland and wildland-urban interface fires applied to pine needles and solid polymers. Fire Saf J 54:203–217. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.firesaf.2012.08.005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Jervis F, Rein G (2015) Experimental study on the burning behaviour of Pinus halepensis needles using small-scale fire calorimetry of live, aged and dead samples. Fire Mater 40:385–395

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Chiaramonti N, Romagnoli E, Santoni PA, Barboni T (2017) Comparison of the combustion of pine species with two sizes of calorimeter: 10g vs. 100g. Fire Technol 53(2):741–770. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10694-016-0595-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Fuentes A, Consalvi JL (2014) Experimental study of the burning rate of small-scale forest fuel layers. Int J Therm Sci 74(C):119–125. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijthermalsci.2013.06.002

    Google Scholar 

  14. Schemel CF, Simeoni A, Biteau H, Rivera JD, Torero JL (2008) A calorimetric study of wildland fuels. Exper Therm Fluid Sci 32(7):1381–1389. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.expthermflusci.2007.11.011

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Thomas JC, Mueller EV, Santamaria S, Gallagher M, El Houssami M, Filkov A, Clark K, Skowronski N, Hadden RM, Mell W, Simeoni A: Investigation of firebrand generation from an experimental fire: development of a reliable data collection methodology. Fire Saf J 91:1–8 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.firesaf.2017.04.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Valdivieso JP, Rivera JDD (2014) Effect of wind on smoldering combustion limits of moist pine needle beds. Fire Technol 50(6):1589–1605. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10694-013-0357-2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Kasymov D, Filkov A, Baydarov D, Sharypov O (2016) Interaction of smoldering branches and pine bark firebrands with fuel bed at different ambient conditions. Proc. SPIE 10035 (16):100,356H. https://doi.org/10.1117/12.2249083

    Google Scholar 

  18. Fernandez-Pello AC, Lautenberger C, Rich D, Zak C, Urban J, Hadden R, Scott S, Fereres S (2015) Spot fire ignition of natural fuel beds by hot metal particles, embers, and sparks. Combust Sci Technol 187(1–2):269–295. https://doi.org/10.1080/00102202.2014.973953

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Wang H, Van Eyk PJ, Medwell PR, Birzer CH, Tian ZF, Possell M (2016) Identification and quantitative analysis of smoldering and flaming combustion of radiata pine. Energy Fuels 30(9):7666–7677. https://doi.org/10.1021/acs.energyfuels.6b00314

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Fehrmann S, Jahn W, de Dios Rivera J (2017) Permeability comparison of natural and artificial Pinus radiata forest litters. Fire Technol 53(3):1291–1308. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10694-016-0631-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Ganteaume A, Jappiot M, Curt T, Lampin C, Borgniet L (2014) Flammability of litter sampled according to two different methods: comparison of results in laboratory experiments. Int J Wildland Fire 23(8):1061–1075. https://doi.org/10.1071/WF13045

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Forrest W, Ovington J (1970) Organic matter changes in an age series of Pinus radiata plantations. Br Ecol Soc 7(1):177–186

    Google Scholar 

  23. Boboulos M, Purvis M (2012) Fire behavior of Mediterranean pine forest litter assessed in a specifically designed experimental rig. Exp Tech 36(4):57–66. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1747-1567.2011.00718.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Mendes-Lopes JMC, Ventura JMP, Amaral JMP (2003) Flame characteristics, temperature–time curves, and rate of spread in fires propagating in a bed of Pinus pinaster needles. Int J Wildland Fire 12(1):67–84. https://doi.org/10.1071/WF02063

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Catchpole WR, Catchpole EA, Butler BW, Rothermel RC, Morris GA, Latham DJ (1998) Rate of spread of free-burning fires in woody fuels in a wind tunnel. Combust Sci Technol 131:1–37. https://doi.org/10.1080/00102209808935753

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Prat-Guitart N, Rein G, Hadden RM, Belcher CM, Yearsley JM (2016) Propagation probability and spread rates of self-sustained smouldering fires under controlled moisture content and bulk density conditions. Int J Wildland Fire 25(4):456–465. https://doi.org/10.1071/WF15103

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Pastor E, Àgueda A, Andrade-Cetto J, Muñoz M, Pérez Y, Planas E (2006) Computing the rate of spread of linear flame fronts by thermal image processing. Fire Saf J 41(8):569–579. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.firesaf.2006.05.009

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Morgan J (2014) Classification and regression tree analysis. Report No 1. Boston University School of Public Health

  29. Howell D (2007) Statistical methods for psychology, 6th edn. Thomson Wadsworth, Belmont, CA

    Google Scholar 

  30. Bartoli P, Simeoni A, Biteau H, Torero JL, Santoni PA (2011) Determination of the main parameters influencing forest fuel combustion dynamics. Fire Saf J 46(1–2):27–33. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.firesaf.2010.05.002

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Boboulos M, Purvis M (2009) Wind and slope effects on ROS during the fire propagation in East-Mediterranean pine forest litter. Fire Saf J 44(5):764–769. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.firesaf.2009.03.006

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The support for Wolfram Jahn from the Chilean Commission for Scientific and Technological Research (CONICYT) through the “Anillos de Investigación en Ciencias y Tecnología” program (Grant No 172095—Understanding Wildfire Hazards Posed by Ignition in Continuous and Discontinuous Configurations) is gratefully acknowledged.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Mechanical and Metallurgical Engineering, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile, Santiago, Chile

    Sofia Figueroa, Juan de Dios Rivera & Wolfram Jahn

Authors
  1. Sofia Figueroa
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Juan de Dios Rivera
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Wolfram Jahn
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Wolfram Jahn.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Figueroa, S., Rivera, J.d.D. & Jahn, W. Influence of Permeability on the Rate of Fire Spread over Natural and Artificial Pinus radiata Forest Litter. Fire Technol 55, 1085–1103 (2019). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10694-019-00824-w

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10694-019-00824-w

Keywords

Search

Navigation