Skip to main content
Log in

Effect of Wind on Smoldering Combustion Limits of Moist Pine Needle Beds

  • Published:
Fire Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

We studied moist pine needle beds burning under the effect of wind, in order to determine the upper moisture limit for which there is fire propagation for different wind velocities. For this purpose we built a wind tunnel that allowed us to burn a 600 mm by 150 mm by 40 mm bed under wind velocities between 0.5 m/s and 5.0 m/s and controlled air temperature. Results show an increase in moisture limit from 54% to approximately 140%, for the velocity range indicated. Combustion at limiting conditions proceeds mainly by smoldering with some periods of flaming combustion. It was observed that, for conditions close to extinction, the smoldering front is not quenched at the surface. Additionally, it was also observed that a strong flow of hot gases exit from the fuel bed at the free surface. These two observations lead to the conclusion that the main heat sink is moisture evaporation and that heat losses to the surroundings is reduced by the blowing effect of the hot gases coming off the bed. A dimensional analysis suggests a correlation between moisture limit and wind velocity of the form M = A − B/\( {v} \) 2 w , where M is moisture limit for fire propagation, A and B are constants, and \( {v} \) w is wind speed. Two dimensionless numbers helped to plot the smoldering temperature and fire propagation velocity in a more meaningful way. They are \( \Uppi_{1} = {{T_{sml} c_{p,g} } \mathord{\left/ {\vphantom {{T_{sml} c_{p,g} } {v_{w}^{2} }}} \right. \kern-0pt} {v_{w}^{2} }} \) and \( \Uppi_{2} = {{Mh_{fg} } \mathord{\left/ {\vphantom {{Mh_{fg} } {v_{w}^{2} }}} \right. \kern-0pt} {v_{w}^{2} }} \), where T sml is smoldering temperature, c p,g is the gas specific heat, M is fuel moisture content and h fg is the latent heat of water evaporation. A relatively high moisture limit at 5 m/s wind velocity is possible due to the relatively high air flow into the smoldering front and the efficient heat feedback produced in forward smoldering.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Figure 1
Figure 2
Figure 3
Figure 4
Figure 5
Figure 6
Figure 7
Figure 8
Figure 9
Figure 10
Figure 11
Figure 12
Figure 13
Figure 14
Figure 15

Similar content being viewed by others

Abbreviations

c b :

Bed specific heat (J/kg K)

c pg :

Gas specific heat (J/kg K)

H c,eff :

Effective heat of combustion (J/kg)

h fg :

Enthalpy of evaporation (J/kg)

M :

Moisture content (kg water/kg dry fuel)

R :

Fire propagation velocity (m/s)

T :

Temperature (K)

U c :

Global heat loss coefficient (W/m2/K)

\( {v} \) w :

Wind velocity (m/s)

ρ b :

Bed density (kg/m3)

ρ g :

Gas density (kg/m3)

References

  1. Porterie B, Morvan D, Loraud JC, Larini M (2000) Firespread through fuel beds: modeling of wind-aided fires and induced hydrodynamics. Phys Fluids 12:1762–1782. doi:10.1063/1.870426

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Manzello SL, Cleary TG, Shields JR, Yang JC (2006) On the ignition of fuel beds by firebrands. Fire Mater 30:77–87. doi:10.1002/fam.901

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Marcelli T, Santoni PA, Simeoni A, Leoni E, Porterie B (2004) Fire spread across pine needle fuel beds: characterization of temperature and velocity distribution within the fire plume. Int J Wildl Fire 13:37–48. doi:10.1071/WF02065

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Catchpole WR, Catchpole EA, Butler BW, Rothermel RC, Morris GA, Latham DJ (1998) Rate of spread of free-burning fires in woody fuels in a wind tunnel. Combust Sci Technol 131:1–37

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Frandsen WH (1997) Ignition probability of organic soils. Can J For Res 27:1471–1477

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Frandsen WH (1987) The influence of moisture and mineral soil on the combustion limits of smoldering forest duff. Can J For Res 17:1540–1544

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Hartford RA (1989) Smoldering combustion limits in peat as influenced by moisture, mineral content, and organic bulk density. In: MacIver DC, Auld H, Whitewood R (eds) Proceedings of the 10th conference on fire and forest meteorology, April 1989. Forestry Canada, Petawawa National Forestry Institute, Chalk River, Ottawa, pp 282–286

    Google Scholar 

  8. Garlough EC, Keyes CR (2011) Influences of moisture content, mineral content and bulk density on smouldering combustion of ponderosa pine duff mounds. Int J Wildl Fire 20:589–596

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Vergara JT, Rivera JD (2009) Measurement of combustion limits of moist pine needle beds. In: Sixth mediterranean combustion symposium. Porticcio–Ajaccio, Corsica, France, June 7–11

  10. Davies GM, Gray A, Hamilton A, Legg C (2008) The future of fire management in the British uplands. Int J Biodiv Sci Manag 4:127–147. doi:10.3843/Biodiv.4.3

    Google Scholar 

  11. Davies GM, Smith AA, MacDonald AJ, Bakker JD, Legg C (2010) (2010) Fire intensity, fire severity and ecosystem response in heathlands: factors affecting the regeneration of Calluna vulgaris. J Appl Ecol 47:356–365

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Davies GM, Legg C (2011) Fuel moisture thresholds in the flammability of Calluna vulgaris. Fire Technol 47:421–436

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Jervis FX, Rein G, Simeoni A, Torero JL (2010) The role of moisture in the burning of live and dead pine needles. In: Interflam, 5–7 July 2010, Nottingham, UK

  14. Weise DR, Zhou X, Sun L, Mahalingam S (2005) Fire spread in chaparral: ‘go or no-go’. Int J Wildl Fire 14:99–106

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. McAllister S, Finney M, Cohen J (2010) Critical mass flux for flaming ignition of dead, dry wood as a function of external radiant heat flux and oxidizer flow velocity. In: DX Viegas (ed) VI international conference on forest fire research, November, Coimbra, Portugal

  16. McAllister S, Finney M, Cohen J (2011) Critical mass flux for flaming ignition of wood as a function of external radiant heat flux and moisture content. In: 7th US national technical meeting of the Combustion Institute, Georgia Institue of Technology, Atlanta, GA, 20–23 March, 2011

  17. McAllister S, Genfell I, Hadlow A, Jolly WM, Finney M, Cohen J (2012) Piloted ignition of live forest fuels. Fire Saf J 51:133–142

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Jolly MW, Parsons RA, Hadlow AM, Cohn GM, McAllister SS, Popp JB, Hubbard RM, Negron JF (2012) Relationships between moisture, chemistry, and ignition of Pinus contorta needles during the early stages of mountain pine beetle attack. For Ecol Manag 269:52–59

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Cordova JL, Walther DC, Torero JL, Fernandez-Pello AC (2001) Oxidizer flow effects on the flammability of solid combustibles. Combus Sci Technol 164:253–278

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Dimitrakopoulos AP, Papaioannou KK (2001) Flammability assessment of mediterranean forest fuels. Fire Technol 37:143–152

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Rein G (2009) Smouldering combustion phenomena in science and technology. Int Rev Chem Eng 1(1):3–18

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  22. Bar-Ilan A, Rein G, Fernandez-Pello AC, Torero JL, Urban DL (2004) Forced forward smoldering experiments in microgravity. Exp Therm Fluid Sci 28:743–751

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Rein G, Bar-Ilan A, Fernandez-Pello AC, Ellzey JL, Torero JL, Urban DL (2005) Modeling of one-dimensional smoldering of polyurethane in microgravity conditions. Proc Combus Inst 30:2327–2334

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Ohlemiller TJ (2002) Smoldering combustion. In: The SFPE handbook of fire protection engineering, 3rd edn, pp 200–210

  25. White FM (1986) Fluid mechanics. McGraw-Hill, New York

    Google Scholar 

  26. Hepp MT (2009) Diseño y Construcción de Túnel de Viento de Ensayo para Medir Ignición y Propagación del Fuego en Lechos de Agujas de Pino Radiata. Graduation Project, School of Engineering, Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile

  27. Rivera JD, Davies GM, Jahn W (2012) Flammability and the heat of combustion of natural fuels: a review. Combus Sci Technol 184(2):224–242

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Kays WM, Craford ME (1980) Convective heat and mass transfer. McGraw-Hill, 2nd edn, pp 220–223

  29. Fernandes P, Luz A, Loureiro C, Godinho-Ferreira P, Botelho H (2006) Fuel modelling and fire hazard assessment based on data from the Portuguese national forest inventory. In: Viegas DX (ed) V International conference on forest fire research. Elsevier, Figueira da Foz, p S229

    Google Scholar 

  30. Rein G, Garcia J, Simeoni A, Tihay V, Ferrat L (2008) Smouldering natural fires: comparison of burning dynamics in boreal peat and Mediterranean humus. WIT Trans Ecol Environ 119:183–192. doi:10.2495/FIVA080191

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

We want to acknowledge the cooperation of Corporación Nacional Forestal (CONAF) of the Chilean Government that permitted us to take pine needle samples.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Juan de Dios Rivera.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Valdivieso, J.P., Rivera, J.d. Effect of Wind on Smoldering Combustion Limits of Moist Pine Needle Beds. Fire Technol 50, 1589–1605 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10694-013-0357-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10694-013-0357-2

Keywords

Navigation