Abstract
Undefended or weakly defended prey species can evolve to resemble better-defended prey (models) in a potentially parasitic relationship called Batesian mimicry. However, some highly defended prey have lethal defenses that might prevent predators from learning to avoid them, which raises questions as to how and why warning signals evolve in these species. One solution is that the warning signals of lethal species have evolved to resemble those of less defended species, where avoidance learning is possible. To examine the general feasibility of this hypothesis, we modeled associative learning by predators foraging on prey species that were either weakly or highly defended. The highly defended prey had a fixed probability of killing an attacking predator. We found that the weakly defended species was more likely to be a parasitic Batesian mimic when its defenses were weaker. Weakly defended prey were more parasitic when the weakly defended prey was relatively common, and when highly defended prey were less likely to be lethal. Generally, mimicry was more mutualistic (i.e. Müllerian) as the highly defended prey increased in lethality. However, for a relatively lethal mimetic mutant that resembled a weakly defended species to invade a non-mimetic population of highly defended prey, lethality needed to be high, as benefits of mimicry did not accrue at low frequency. Moreover, when we created predators that had innate aversions to dangerous prey, weakly defended mimics were parasitic upon highly defended prey. Innate aversions also evolved in an individual based-simulation. When our analyses of prey lethality and innate aversions are taken together, it is likely that highly defended prey are most often models in Batesian mimicry systems.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data availability
Not applicable.
Code availability
All code is available as an online supplement.
References
Anderson B, De Jager M (2019) Natural selection in mimicry. Biolo Rev. https://doi.org/10.1111/brv.12564
Aubier TG, Joron M, Sherratt TN (2017) Mimicry among unequally defended prey should be mutualistic when predators sample optimally. Am Nat 189:267–282. https://doi.org/10.1086/690121
Bates HW (1862) XXXII. Contributions to an insect fauna of the Amazon Valley. Lepidoptera: Heliconidæ. Trans LinnSoc Lond 23:495–566. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1096-3642.1860.tb00146.x
Beckers GJL, Leenders TAAM, Strijbosch H (1996) Coral snake mimicry: live snakes not avoided by a mammalian predator. Oecologia 106:461–463. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00329702
Brattstrom BH (1955) The coral snake “mimic” problem and protective coloration. Evolution 9:217–219. https://doi.org/10.2307/2405591
Brodie EDI (1993) Differential avoidance of coral snake banded patterns by free-ranging predators in Costa Rica. Evolution 47:227–235
Bronstein JL (2015) The study of mutualism. In: Bronstein JL (ed) Mutualism. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Caldwell GS, Rubinoff RW (1983) Avoidance of venomous sea snakes by naive herons and egrets. Auk 100:195–198
Cook M, Mineka S (1989) Observational conditioning of fear to fear-relevant versus fear-irrelevant stimuli in rhesus monkeys. J Abnorm Psychol 98:448–459. https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-843x.98.4.448
Coppinger RP (1970) The effect of experience and novelty on avian feeding behavior with reference to the evolution of warning coloration in butterflies. II. Reactions of naive birds to novel insects. Am Nat 104:323–335. https://doi.org/10.1086/282666
Darst CR, Cummings ME (2006) Predator learning favours mimicry of a less-toxic model in poison frogs. Nature 440:208–211. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature04297
Davis Rabosky AR, Cox CL, Rabosky DL et al (2016) Coral snakes predict the evolution of mimicry across new world snakes. Nat Commun 7:11484. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms11484
Dunn ER (1954) The coral snake “mimic” problem in Panama. Evolution 8:97–102
Edmunds M (2006) Do Malaysian Myrmarachne associate with particular species of ant? Biol J Lin Soc 88:645–653. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1095-8312.2006.00649.x
Emsley MG (1966) The mimetic significance of Erythrolamprus aesculapii ocellatus Peters from Tobago. Evolution 20:663. https://doi.org/10.2307/2406599
Exnerová A, Štys P, Fučíková E et al (2007) Avoidance of aposematic prey in European tits (Paridae): learned or innate? Behav Ecol 18:148–156. https://doi.org/10.1093/beheco/arl061
Fedy BC, Stutchbury BJM (2004) Territory switching and floating in the white-bellied antbird (Myrmeciza longipes), a resident tropical passerine in Panama. Auk 121:11
Franks DW, Ruxton GD, Sherratt TN (2009) Warning signals evolve to disengage Batesian mimics. Evolution 63:256–267. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1558-5646.2008.00509.x
Gavrilets S, Hastings A (1998) Coevolutionary chase in two-species systems with applications to mimicry. J Theor Biol 191:415–427. https://doi.org/10.1006/jtbi.1997.0615
Greene HW, McDiarmid RW (1981) Coral snake mimicry: does it occur? Science 213:1207–1212
Hecht MK, Marien D (1956) The coral snake mimic problem: a reinterpretation. J Morphol 98:335–365. https://doi.org/10.1002/jmor.1050980207
Hinman KE, Throop HL, Adams KL et al (1997) Predation by free-ranging birds on partial coral snake mimics: the importance of ring width and color. Evolution 51:1011–1014
Hossie TJ, Hassall C, Knee W, Sherratt TN (2013) Species with a chemical defence, but not chemical offence, live longer. J Evol Biol 26:1598–1602. https://doi.org/10.1111/jeb.12143
Kikuchi DW, Sherratt TN (2015) Costs of learning and the evolution of mimetic signals. Am Nat 186:321–332. https://doi.org/10.1086/682371
Kuchta SR (2005) Experimental support for aposematic coloration in the salamander Ensatina eschscholtzii xanthoptica: implications for mimicry of Pacific newts. Copeia 2005:265–271. https://doi.org/10.1643/CH-04-173R
Lindström L, Alatalo RV, Mappes J et al (1999) Can aposematic signals evolve by gradual change? Nature 397:249–251. https://doi.org/10.1038/16692
Mertens R (1956) Das problem der mimikry bei korallenschlangen. Fischer, Waldachtal
Mobley JA, Stidham TA (2000) Great Horned Owl feath from predation of a toxic California newt. Wilson Bull 112:563–564. https://doi.org/10.1676/0043-5643(2000)112[0563:GHODFP]2.0.CO;2
Müller F (1879) Ituna and Thyridia: a remarkable case of mimicry in butterflies. Trans Entomol Soc Lond 770:20–29
Nelson XJ, Jackson RR (2006) Vision-based innate aversion to ants and ant mimics. Behav Ecol 17:676–681. https://doi.org/10.1093/beheco/ark017
Nelson XJ, Jackson RR, Li D et al (2006) Innate aversion to ants (Hymenoptera: Formicidae) and ant mimics: experimental findings from mantises (Mantodea). Biol J Lin Soc 88:23–32. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1095-8312.2006.00598.x
Pekár S (2014) Is inaccurate mimicry ancestral to accurate in myrmecomorphic spiders (Araneae)? Biol J Linn Soc Lond 113:97–111. https://doi.org/10.1111/bij.12287
Pekár S, Petráková L, Bulbert MW et al (2017) The golden mimicry complex uses a wide spectrum of defence to deter a community of predators. eLife 6:e22089. https://doi.org/10.7554/eLife.22089
Pfennig DW, Harcombe WR, Pfennig KS (2001) Frequency-dependent Batesian mimicry. Nature 410:323–323. https://doi.org/10.1038/35066628
Pfennig DW, Harper GR, Brumo AF et al (2007) Population differences in predation on Batesian mimics in allopatry with their model: selection against mimics is strongest when they are common. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 61:505–511. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00265-006-0278-x
Rescorla RA, Wagner AR (1972) A theory of Pavlovian conditioning: variations in the effectiveness of reinforcement and nonreinforcement. In: Black AH, Prokasy WF (eds) Classical conditioning II. Appleton-Century-Crofts, Norwalk, pp 64–99
Rojas B (2017) Behavioural, ecological, and evolutionary aspects of diversity in frog colour patterns. Biol Rev 92:1059–1080. https://doi.org/10.1111/brv.12269
Rowland HM, Ihalainen E, Lindström L et al (2007) Co-mimics have a mutualistic relationship despite unequal defences. Nature 448:64–67. https://doi.org/10.1038/nature05899
Rowland HM, Mappes J, Ruxton GD, Speed MP (2010) Mimicry between unequally defended prey can be parasitic: evidence for quasi-Batesian mimicry. Ecol Lett 13:1494–1502. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1461-0248.2010.01539.x
Ruxton GD, Sherratt TN, Speed MP (2004) Avoiding attack. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Ruxton GD, Allen WL, Sherratt TN, Speed MP (2018) Avoiding attack, 2nd edn. Oxford University Press, Oxford
Schuler W, Hesse E (1985) On the function of warning coloration: a black and yellow pattern inhibits prey-attack by naive domestic chicks. Behav Ecol Sociobiol 16:249–255. https://doi.org/10.1007/BF00310988
Sergio F, Blas J, Hiraldo F (2009) Predictors of floater status in a long-lived bird: a cross-sectional and longitudinal test of hypotheses. J Anim Ecol 78:109–118. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-2656.2008.01484.x
Sherbrooke WC, Westphal MF (2006) Responses of greater roadrunners during attacks on sympatric venomous and nonvenomous snakes. Southwest Nat 51:41–47. https://doi.org/10.1894/0038-4909(2006)51[41:ROGRDA]2.0.CO;2
Sherratt TN (2002) The evolution of imperfect mimicry. Behav Ecol 13:821–826
Sherratt TN (2008) The evolution of Müllerian mimicry. Naturwissenschaften 95:681–695. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00114-008-0403-y
Sherratt TN (2011) The optimal sampling strategy for unfamiliar prey. Evolution 65:2014–2025. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1558-5646.2011.01274.x
Sherratt TN (2016) State-dependent optimization: a comment on Skelhorn et al. Behav Ecol 27:965–965. https://doi.org/10.1093/beheco/arw024
Smith SM (1975) Innate recognition of coral snake pattern by a possible avian predator. Science 187:759–760. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.187.4178.759
Smith SM (1977) Coral-snake pattern recognition and stimulus generalisation by naive great kiskadees. Nature 265:536–536
Speed MP (1993) Mullerian mimicry and the psychology of predation. Anim Behav 45:571–580
Speed MP, Turner JRG (1999) Learning and memory in mimicry: II. Do we understand the mimicry spectrum? Biol J Lin Soc 67:281–312. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1095-8312.1999.tb01935.x
Symula R, Schulte R, Summers K (2001) Molecular phylogenetic evidence for a mimetic radiation in Peruvian poison frogs supports a Müllerian mimicry hypothesis. Proc R Soc Lond B 268:2415–2421. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2001.1812
Thorogood R, Kokko H, Mappes J (2018) Social transmission of avoidance among predators facilitates the spread of novel prey. Nat Ecol Evol 2:254–261. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41559-017-0418-x
Trimmer PC, McNamara JM, Houston AI, Marshall JAR (2012) Does natural selection favour the Rescorla-Wagner rule? J Theor Biol 302:39–52. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jtbi.2012.02.014
Wickler W (1968) Mimicry in plants and animals. George Weidenfeld and Nicholson Ltd., London
Winters AE, Wilson NG, van den Berg CP et al (2018) Toxicity and taste: unequal chemical defences in a mimicry ring. Proc R Soc b Biol Sci 285:20180457. https://doi.org/10.1098/rspb.2018.0457
Winters AE, Chan W, White AM et al (2022) Weapons or deterrents? Nudibranch molluscs use distinct ecological modes of chemical defence against predators. J Anim Ecol 91:831–844. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2656.13643
Acknowledgements
We acknowledge support for the publication costs by the Open Access Publication Fund of Bielefeld University.
Funding
DWK was funded by the German Research Foundation (DFG) as part of the SFB TRR 212 (NC3) – Project number 316099922.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
OTH and SMRJ-S coded the model and drafted the manuscript. DWK contributed to code and visualization. TNS and DWK designed the study and contributed to the manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Conflicts of interest
We have no conflicts of interest.
Ethics approval
Not applicable.
Consent to participate
Not applicable.
Consent for publication
Not applicable.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Supplementary Information
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Heerwig, O.T., Jain-Schlaepfer, S.M.R., Sherratt, T.N. et al. Effects of predator associative learning and innate aversion on mimicry complexes. Evol Ecol 37, 709–720 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10682-023-10238-4
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10682-023-10238-4