Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Functional and phylogenetic diversity of plant communities differently affect the structure of flower-visitor interactions and reveal convergences in floral traits

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
Evolutionary Ecology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Community ecology has moved from descriptive studies to more mechanistic approaches asking questions about causes and consequences of community composition and interactions between species. Many ecological processes are shaped by the presence or absence of functional groups, not necessarily species. Thus, the diversity of functional traits, i.e. their interspecific variation, is a key feature of plant communities with consequences on other trophic levels. In a simulation study based on a quantitative flower-visitor network and quantitative measurements of flower traits, we tested how the functional FDiv and phylogenetic diversity PDiv of plant communities affect animal species richness and diversity as well as network properties. Within the limitations of the assumption that plants maintain the qualitative and quantitative interactions with animals in subsampled communities, we found that functionally diverse plant communities support a large number of animal species (not necessarily animal diversity). Additionally, the network structure was more complementarily specialized (higher \(H_{2}^{\prime }\)-values) and comprised a larger number of unrealized links (low connectance) and thus a higher partitioning of resources among consumers in functionally diverse plant communities than in communities with a lower FDiv. For the phylogenetic diversity PDiv of plant communities we found contrasting effects, which may be explained by divergences or convergences of functional traits. Our results support the notion that functionally diverse plant communities offer a large number of niches that can be occupied by a larger number of flower visiting species specialized to a specific set of flower traits. Thus, functional flower traits serve as barriers that exclude some flower visitors but also as attractive features that facilitate interactions with other animal species. Our study fosters a trait-based definition of niches and functional groups and may stimulate field studies testing the predictions of this simulation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Ackerly DD, Reich PB (1999) Convergence and correlations among leaf size and function in seed plants: a comparative test using independent contrasts. Am J Bot 86:1272–1281

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Aizen MA, Vazquez DP (2006) Flowering phenologies of hummingbird plants from the temperate forest of southern South America: is there evidence of competitive displacement? Ecography 29:357–366

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Alarcon R, Waser NM, Ollerton J (2008) Year-to-year variation in the topology of a plant-pollinator interaction network. Oikos 117:1796–1807

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Anderson B, Johnson SD (2009) Geographical covariation and local convergence of flower depth in a guild of fly-pollinated plants. New Phytol 182:533–540

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Arnold SEJ, Faruq S, Savolainen V, McOwan PW, Chittka L (2010) FReD: the floral reflectance database—a web portal for analyses of flower colour. PLoS One 5(12):e14287

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Begon M, Harper J, Townsend C (1998) Ökologie. Spektrum Akademischer Verlag GmbH, Heidelberg

    Google Scholar 

  • Benson DA, Karsch-Mizrachi I, Lipman DJ, Ostell J, Sayers EW (2010) GenBank. Nucleic Acids Res 38:D46–D51

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bernhardt P (2000) Convergent evolution and adaptive radiation of beetle-pollinated angiosperms. Plant Syst Evol 222:293–320

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Biesmeijer JC, Roberts SPM, Reemer M, Ohlemuller R, Edwards M, Peeters T, Schaffers AP, Potts SG, Kleukers R, Thomas CD, Settele J, Kunin WE (2006) Parallel declines in pollinators and insect-pollinated plants in Britain and the Netherlands. Science 313:351–354

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Blüthgen N, Menzel F, Blüthgen N (2006) Measuring specialization in species interaction networks. BMC Ecol 6:9

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Bradshaw HD, Schemske DW (2003) Allele substitution at a flower colour locus produces a pollinator shift in monkeyflowers. Nature 426:176–178

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Cadotte M, Albert CH, Walker SC (2013) The ecology of differences: assessing community assembly with trait and evolutionary distances. Ecol Lett 16:1234–1244

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Callaway RM, Walker LR (1997) Competition and facilitation: a synthetic approach to interactions in plant communities. Ecology 78:1958–1965

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Charleston MA, Robertson DL (2002) Preferential host switching by primate lentiviruses can account for phylogenetic similarity with the primate phylogeny. Syst Biol 51:528–535

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Devictor V, Mouillot D, Meynard C, Jiguet F, Thuiller W, Mouquet N (2010) Spatial mismatch and congruence between taxonomic, phylogenetic and functional diversity: the need for integrative conservation strategies in a changing world. Ecol Lett 13:1030–1040

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Faegri K, Pijl Lvd (1979) The principles of pollination ecology, 3rd edn. Pergamon Press, Toronto

    Google Scholar 

  • Fründ J, Linsenmair KE, Blüthgen N (2010) Pollinator diversity and specialization in relation to flower diversity. Oikos 119:1581–1590

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Galen C, Kaczorowski R, Todd SL, Geib J, Raguso RA (2011) Dosage-dependent impacts of a floral volatile compound on pollinators, larcenists, and the potential for floral evolution in the Alpine Skypilot Polemonium viscosum. Am Nat 177:258–272

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Gascuel O (1997) BIONJ: an improved version of the NJ algorithm based on a simple model of sequence data. Mol Biol Evolut 14:685–695

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Graham CH, Ron SR, Santos JC, Schneider CJ, Moritz C (2004) Integrating phylogenetics and environmental niche models to explore speciation mechanisms in dendrobatid frogs. Evolution 58:1781–1793

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Grant PR, Grant BR (2006) Evolution of character displacement in Darwin’s finches. Science 313:224–226

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Heemsbergen DA, Berg MP, Loreau M, van Haj JR, Faber JH, Verhoef HA (2004) Biodiversity effects on soil processes explained by interspecific functional dissimilarity. Science 306:1019–1020

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Hutchinson GE (1957) Concluding remarks. Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol 22:415–427

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Irwin RE, Adler LS, Brody AK (2004) The dual role of floral traits: pollinator attraction and plant defense. Ecology 85:1503–1511

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Junker RR, Blüthgen N (2010) Floral scents repel facultative flower visitors, but attract obligate ones. Ann Bot 105:777–782

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Junker RR, Höcherl N, Blüthgen N (2010) Responses to olfactory signals reflect network structure of flower-visitor interactions. J Anim Ecol 79:818–823

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Junker RR, Daehler CC, Dötterl S, Keller A, Blüthgen N (2011) Hawaiian ant-flower networks: nectar-thieving ants prefer undefended native over introduced plants with floral defenses. Ecol Monogr 81:295–311

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Junker RR, Blüthgen N, Brehm T, Binkenstein J, Paulus J, Schaefer HM, Stang M (2013) Specialization on traits as basis for the niche-breadth of flower visitors and as structuring mechanism of ecological networks. Funct Ecol 27:329–341

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Larkin MA, Blackshields G, Brown NP, Chenna R, McGettigan PA, McWilliam H, Valentin F, Wallace IM, Wilm A, Lopez R, Thompson JD, Gibson TJ, Higgins DG (2007) Clustal W and clustal X version 2.0. Bioinformatics 23:2947–2948

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Maron JL, Crone E (2006) Herbivory: effects on plant abundance, distribution and population growth. Proc R Soc B Biol Sci 273:2575–2584

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Olesen JM, Bascompte J, Elberling H, Jordano P (2008) Temporal dynamics in a pollination network. Ecology 89:1573–1582

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Pearman PB, Guisan A, Broennimann O, Randin CF (2008) Niche dynamics in space and time. Trends Ecol Evol 23:149–158

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Petanidou T, Kallimanis AS, Tzanopoulos AS, Sgardelis SP, Pantis JD (2008) Long-term observation of a pollination network: fluctuation in species and interactions, relative invariance of network structure and implications for estimates of specialization. Ecol Lett 11:564–575

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Potts SG, Vulliamy B, Roberts S, O’Toole C, Dafni A, Ne’eman G, Willmer PG (2004) Nectar resource diversity organises flower-visitor community structure. Entomol Exp Appl 113:103–107

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Prinzing A, Durka W, Klotz S, Brandl R (2001) The niche of higher plants: evidence for phylogenetic conservatism. Proc R Soc B Biol Sci 268:2383–2389

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Reich PB, Walters MB, Ellsworth DS (1997) From tropics to tundra: global convergence in plant functioning. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 94:13730–13734

    Article  PubMed Central  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Schemske DW (1981) Floral convergence and pollinator sharing in 2 bee-pollinated tropical herbs. Ecology 62:946–954

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stone GN, Willmer P, Rowe JA (1998) Partitioning of pollinators during flowering in an African Acacia community. Ecology 79:2808–2827

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Webb CO, Ackerly DD, McPeek MA, Donoghue MJ (2002) Phylogenies and community ecology. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 33:475–505

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wolf M, Ruderisch B, Dandekar T, Schultz J, Muller T (2008) ProfDistS: (profile-) distance based phylogeny on sequence—structure alignments. Bioinformatics 24:2401–2402

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We thank Anne-Amélie C. Larue and Gita Benadi for helpful discussions and Tanja Brehm, Julia Binkenstein, Justina Paulus, H. Martin Schäfer and Martina Stang for help in collecting data used in this study. The study was supported by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Robert R. Junker.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

10682_2014_9747_MOESM1_ESM.docx

Mean and 95 % confidence intervals of r-values of correlations between each of two predictor variables (FDiv or Pdiv) and each of the four predicted variables: animal species richness, animal diversity (Shannon indes), network connectance and complementary specialization (H 2 ) (DOCX 110 kb)

10682_2014_9747_MOESM2_ESM.docx

Qualitative and quantitative persistence of interactions across six temporally and eight spatially separated networks (DOCX 139 kb)

10682_2014_9747_MOESM3_ESM.docx

Correlation between PDist ij and FDist ij based on each of the eight traits alone and all traits combined (Mantel statistic based on Pearson’s product-moment correlation) (DOCX 111 kb)

10682_2014_9747_MOESM4_ESM.docx

Tanglegrams linking trees based on phylogenetic relationships and functional distances (based on quantitative measurements of phenology, floral reflectance, display size, flowers per inflorescence, flower height, nectar-tube depth, sugar provided per flower, pollen-mass per flower) (DOCX 254 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Junker, R.R., Blüthgen, N. & Keller, A. Functional and phylogenetic diversity of plant communities differently affect the structure of flower-visitor interactions and reveal convergences in floral traits. Evol Ecol 29, 437–450 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10682-014-9747-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10682-014-9747-2

Keywords

Navigation