Abstract
Community ecology has moved from descriptive studies to more mechanistic approaches asking questions about causes and consequences of community composition and interactions between species. Many ecological processes are shaped by the presence or absence of functional groups, not necessarily species. Thus, the diversity of functional traits, i.e. their interspecific variation, is a key feature of plant communities with consequences on other trophic levels. In a simulation study based on a quantitative flower-visitor network and quantitative measurements of flower traits, we tested how the functional FDiv and phylogenetic diversity PDiv of plant communities affect animal species richness and diversity as well as network properties. Within the limitations of the assumption that plants maintain the qualitative and quantitative interactions with animals in subsampled communities, we found that functionally diverse plant communities support a large number of animal species (not necessarily animal diversity). Additionally, the network structure was more complementarily specialized (higher \(H_{2}^{\prime }\)-values) and comprised a larger number of unrealized links (low connectance) and thus a higher partitioning of resources among consumers in functionally diverse plant communities than in communities with a lower FDiv. For the phylogenetic diversity PDiv of plant communities we found contrasting effects, which may be explained by divergences or convergences of functional traits. Our results support the notion that functionally diverse plant communities offer a large number of niches that can be occupied by a larger number of flower visiting species specialized to a specific set of flower traits. Thus, functional flower traits serve as barriers that exclude some flower visitors but also as attractive features that facilitate interactions with other animal species. Our study fosters a trait-based definition of niches and functional groups and may stimulate field studies testing the predictions of this simulation.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Ackerly DD, Reich PB (1999) Convergence and correlations among leaf size and function in seed plants: a comparative test using independent contrasts. Am J Bot 86:1272–1281
Aizen MA, Vazquez DP (2006) Flowering phenologies of hummingbird plants from the temperate forest of southern South America: is there evidence of competitive displacement? Ecography 29:357–366
Alarcon R, Waser NM, Ollerton J (2008) Year-to-year variation in the topology of a plant-pollinator interaction network. Oikos 117:1796–1807
Anderson B, Johnson SD (2009) Geographical covariation and local convergence of flower depth in a guild of fly-pollinated plants. New Phytol 182:533–540
Arnold SEJ, Faruq S, Savolainen V, McOwan PW, Chittka L (2010) FReD: the floral reflectance database—a web portal for analyses of flower colour. PLoS One 5(12):e14287
Begon M, Harper J, Townsend C (1998) Ökologie. Spektrum Akademischer Verlag GmbH, Heidelberg
Benson DA, Karsch-Mizrachi I, Lipman DJ, Ostell J, Sayers EW (2010) GenBank. Nucleic Acids Res 38:D46–D51
Bernhardt P (2000) Convergent evolution and adaptive radiation of beetle-pollinated angiosperms. Plant Syst Evol 222:293–320
Biesmeijer JC, Roberts SPM, Reemer M, Ohlemuller R, Edwards M, Peeters T, Schaffers AP, Potts SG, Kleukers R, Thomas CD, Settele J, Kunin WE (2006) Parallel declines in pollinators and insect-pollinated plants in Britain and the Netherlands. Science 313:351–354
Blüthgen N, Menzel F, Blüthgen N (2006) Measuring specialization in species interaction networks. BMC Ecol 6:9
Bradshaw HD, Schemske DW (2003) Allele substitution at a flower colour locus produces a pollinator shift in monkeyflowers. Nature 426:176–178
Cadotte M, Albert CH, Walker SC (2013) The ecology of differences: assessing community assembly with trait and evolutionary distances. Ecol Lett 16:1234–1244
Callaway RM, Walker LR (1997) Competition and facilitation: a synthetic approach to interactions in plant communities. Ecology 78:1958–1965
Charleston MA, Robertson DL (2002) Preferential host switching by primate lentiviruses can account for phylogenetic similarity with the primate phylogeny. Syst Biol 51:528–535
Devictor V, Mouillot D, Meynard C, Jiguet F, Thuiller W, Mouquet N (2010) Spatial mismatch and congruence between taxonomic, phylogenetic and functional diversity: the need for integrative conservation strategies in a changing world. Ecol Lett 13:1030–1040
Faegri K, Pijl Lvd (1979) The principles of pollination ecology, 3rd edn. Pergamon Press, Toronto
Fründ J, Linsenmair KE, Blüthgen N (2010) Pollinator diversity and specialization in relation to flower diversity. Oikos 119:1581–1590
Galen C, Kaczorowski R, Todd SL, Geib J, Raguso RA (2011) Dosage-dependent impacts of a floral volatile compound on pollinators, larcenists, and the potential for floral evolution in the Alpine Skypilot Polemonium viscosum. Am Nat 177:258–272
Gascuel O (1997) BIONJ: an improved version of the NJ algorithm based on a simple model of sequence data. Mol Biol Evolut 14:685–695
Graham CH, Ron SR, Santos JC, Schneider CJ, Moritz C (2004) Integrating phylogenetics and environmental niche models to explore speciation mechanisms in dendrobatid frogs. Evolution 58:1781–1793
Grant PR, Grant BR (2006) Evolution of character displacement in Darwin’s finches. Science 313:224–226
Heemsbergen DA, Berg MP, Loreau M, van Haj JR, Faber JH, Verhoef HA (2004) Biodiversity effects on soil processes explained by interspecific functional dissimilarity. Science 306:1019–1020
Hutchinson GE (1957) Concluding remarks. Cold Spring Harb Symp Quant Biol 22:415–427
Irwin RE, Adler LS, Brody AK (2004) The dual role of floral traits: pollinator attraction and plant defense. Ecology 85:1503–1511
Junker RR, Blüthgen N (2010) Floral scents repel facultative flower visitors, but attract obligate ones. Ann Bot 105:777–782
Junker RR, Höcherl N, Blüthgen N (2010) Responses to olfactory signals reflect network structure of flower-visitor interactions. J Anim Ecol 79:818–823
Junker RR, Daehler CC, Dötterl S, Keller A, Blüthgen N (2011) Hawaiian ant-flower networks: nectar-thieving ants prefer undefended native over introduced plants with floral defenses. Ecol Monogr 81:295–311
Junker RR, Blüthgen N, Brehm T, Binkenstein J, Paulus J, Schaefer HM, Stang M (2013) Specialization on traits as basis for the niche-breadth of flower visitors and as structuring mechanism of ecological networks. Funct Ecol 27:329–341
Larkin MA, Blackshields G, Brown NP, Chenna R, McGettigan PA, McWilliam H, Valentin F, Wallace IM, Wilm A, Lopez R, Thompson JD, Gibson TJ, Higgins DG (2007) Clustal W and clustal X version 2.0. Bioinformatics 23:2947–2948
Maron JL, Crone E (2006) Herbivory: effects on plant abundance, distribution and population growth. Proc R Soc B Biol Sci 273:2575–2584
Olesen JM, Bascompte J, Elberling H, Jordano P (2008) Temporal dynamics in a pollination network. Ecology 89:1573–1582
Pearman PB, Guisan A, Broennimann O, Randin CF (2008) Niche dynamics in space and time. Trends Ecol Evol 23:149–158
Petanidou T, Kallimanis AS, Tzanopoulos AS, Sgardelis SP, Pantis JD (2008) Long-term observation of a pollination network: fluctuation in species and interactions, relative invariance of network structure and implications for estimates of specialization. Ecol Lett 11:564–575
Potts SG, Vulliamy B, Roberts S, O’Toole C, Dafni A, Ne’eman G, Willmer PG (2004) Nectar resource diversity organises flower-visitor community structure. Entomol Exp Appl 113:103–107
Prinzing A, Durka W, Klotz S, Brandl R (2001) The niche of higher plants: evidence for phylogenetic conservatism. Proc R Soc B Biol Sci 268:2383–2389
Reich PB, Walters MB, Ellsworth DS (1997) From tropics to tundra: global convergence in plant functioning. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA 94:13730–13734
Schemske DW (1981) Floral convergence and pollinator sharing in 2 bee-pollinated tropical herbs. Ecology 62:946–954
Stone GN, Willmer P, Rowe JA (1998) Partitioning of pollinators during flowering in an African Acacia community. Ecology 79:2808–2827
Webb CO, Ackerly DD, McPeek MA, Donoghue MJ (2002) Phylogenies and community ecology. Annu Rev Ecol Syst 33:475–505
Wolf M, Ruderisch B, Dandekar T, Schultz J, Muller T (2008) ProfDistS: (profile-) distance based phylogeny on sequence—structure alignments. Bioinformatics 24:2401–2402
Acknowledgments
We thank Anne-Amélie C. Larue and Gita Benadi for helpful discussions and Tanja Brehm, Julia Binkenstein, Justina Paulus, H. Martin Schäfer and Martina Stang for help in collecting data used in this study. The study was supported by the Deutsche Forschungsgemeinschaft (DFG).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Electronic supplementary material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
10682_2014_9747_MOESM1_ESM.docx
Mean and 95 % confidence intervals of r-values of correlations between each of two predictor variables (FDiv or Pdiv) and each of the four predicted variables: animal species richness, animal diversity (Shannon indes), network connectance and complementary specialization (H 2 ′) (DOCX 110 kb)
10682_2014_9747_MOESM2_ESM.docx
Qualitative and quantitative persistence of interactions across six temporally and eight spatially separated networks (DOCX 139 kb)
10682_2014_9747_MOESM3_ESM.docx
Correlation between PDist ij and FDist ij based on each of the eight traits alone and all traits combined (Mantel statistic based on Pearson’s product-moment correlation) (DOCX 111 kb)
10682_2014_9747_MOESM4_ESM.docx
Tanglegrams linking trees based on phylogenetic relationships and functional distances (based on quantitative measurements of phenology, floral reflectance, display size, flowers per inflorescence, flower height, nectar-tube depth, sugar provided per flower, pollen-mass per flower) (DOCX 254 kb)
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Junker, R.R., Blüthgen, N. & Keller, A. Functional and phylogenetic diversity of plant communities differently affect the structure of flower-visitor interactions and reveal convergences in floral traits. Evol Ecol 29, 437–450 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10682-014-9747-2
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10682-014-9747-2