Abstract
High temperature stress is a severe problem that limits the productivity of pea and most crops. Investigating the genetic basis of agronomic and morphological traits related to heat stress tolerance could expedite the development of stress-adaptive pea cultivars, thereby increasing productivity for food security. This study aimed to explore genetic variation in Southeast Asia pea accessions and identify marker-trait associations (MTAs) related to heat stress. Phenotypic data were assessed for genetic variation in 11 traits including phenological, morphological, and agronomic, under high temperature conditions in Malaysia and Indonesia. A collection of 94 pea accessions of 92 landraces from Indonesia and two commercial cultivars from Taiwan was used for genome-wide association study. A total of 1,974 high-quality single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) were used to determine marker-trait associations. Population structure, principal coordinate analysis, and kinship analysis revealed that the accessions could be divided into three groups. The BLINK model identified twenty-six significant (P ≤ 0.001) MTAs for the observed characters across all locations and consistent in multiple individual locations. Two SNPs on Chr2 and Chr6 that were associated with more than one trait predicted to co-localize with a gene involved in mediating environmental stress responses and may provide a novel mechanism of heat tolerance in pea. Nineteen candidate genes were identified within 15 kb distance of 26 significant SNPs associated with days to flowering, number of nodes, peduncle length, days to harvesting green pod, days to physiological maturity, and seed volume. The SNP markers and candidate genes identified in this study have potential for marker-assisted selection toward rapid development of pea cultivars with improved heat tolerance.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data availability
The datasets generated during and/or analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
References
Ahmad S, Kaur S, Lamb-palmer ND, Lefsrud M, Singh J (2015) Genetic diversity and population structure of Pisum sativum accessions for marker-trait association of lipid content. Crop J 3:238–245. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cj.2015.03.005
Ahmed HG, Iqbal MA, Iqbal Y, Zeng A, Ullah et al (2021) Genome wide association mapping through 90K SNP array against leaf rust pathogen in bread wheat genotypes under field conditions. J King Saud Univ Sci 33:101628. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jksus.2021.101628
Annum N, Ahmed M, Tester M, Mukhtar Z, Saeed NA (2023) Physiological responses induced by phospholipase C isoform 5 upon heat stress in Arabidopsis thaliana. Front Plant Sci 14:1076331. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2023.1076331
Ayeneh A, Van Ginkel M, Reynolds MP, Ammar K (2002) Comparison of leaf, spike, peduncle and canopy temperature depression in wheat under heat stress. Field Crop Res 79:173–184
Bird KA, An H, Gazave E, Gore MA, Pires JC et al (2017) Population structure and phylogenetic relationships in a diverse panel of Brassica rapa L. Front Plant Sci 8:321. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2017.00321
Bradbury PJ, Zhang Z, Kroon DE, Casstevens TM, Ramdoss Y et al (2007) TASSEL: software for association mapping of complex traits in diverse samples. Bioinformatics 23(19):2633–2635. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/btm308
Chen F, Li Q, Sun L, He Z (2006) The rice 14-3-3 gene family and its involvement in responses to biotic and abiotic stress. DNA Res 13:53–63. https://doi.org/10.1093/dnares/dsl001
Devi J, Sagar V, Mishra GP, Jha PK, Gupta N et al (2023) Heat stress tolerance in peas (Pisum sativum L.): current status and way forward. Front Plant Sci 13:1108276. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2022.1108276
Doyle J (1991) DNA protocols for plants. In: Hewitt GM, Johnston AWB, Young JPW (eds) Molecular techniques in taxonomy. Springer, Berlin
Dwivedi SL, Ceccarelli S, Blair MW, Upadhyaya HD, Are AK et al (2016) Landrace germplasm for improving yield and abiotic stress adaptation. Trends Plant Sci 21(1):31–42. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tplants.2015.10.012
Earl DA, vonHoldt BM (2012) STRUCTURE HARVESTER: a website and program for visualizing STRUCTURE output and implementing the Evanno method. Conserv Genet Resour 4:359–361. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12686-011-9548-7
Elshire RJ, Glaubitz JC, Sun Q, Poland JA, Kawamoto K et al (2011) A robust, simple genotyping-by-sequencing (GBS) approach for high diversity species. PLoS ONE 6(5):e19379. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0019379
Enyew M, Feyissa T, Carlsson AS, Tesfaye K, Hammenhag C et al (2022) Genome-wide analyses using multi-locus models revealed marker-trait associations for major agronomic traits in Sorghum bicolor. Front Plant Sci 13:999692. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2022.999692
Evanno G, Regnaut S, Goudet J (2005) Detecting the number of clusters of individuals using the software STRUCTURE: a simulation study. Mol Ecol 14:2611–2620. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1365-294X.2005.02553.x
FAOSTAT (2023) Data temperature land on change and production. https://www.fao.org/faostat/en/#data/ET. Accessed 7 Dec 2023
Ferrari B, Romani M, Aubert G, Boucherot K, Burstin J et al (2016) Association of SNP markers with agronomic and quality traits of field pea in Italy. Czech J Genet Plant Breed 52(3):83–93. https://doi.org/10.17221/22/2016-CJGPB
Foucher F, Morin J, Courtiade J, Cadioux S, Ellis N et al (2003) Determinate and late flowering are two terminal Flower1/Centroradialis homologs that control two distinct phases of flowering initiation and development in pea. Plant Cell 15:2742–2754. https://doi.org/10.1105/tpc.015701
Gali KK, Sackville A, Tafesse EG, Lachagari VBR, McPhee K et al (2019) Genome-wide association mapping for agronomic and seed quality traits of field pea (Pisum sativum L.). Front. Plant Sci 10:1538. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2019.01538
Gao K, Liu Y, Li B, Zhou R, Sun D et al (2014) Arabidopsis thaliana phosphoinositide-specific phospholipase C isoform 3 (AtPLC3) and AtPLC9 have an additive effect on thermotolerance. Plant Cell Physiol 55(11):1873–1883. https://doi.org/10.1093/pcp/pcu116
Gixhari B, Pavelková M, Ismaili H, Vrapi H, Jaupi A et al (2014) Genetic diversity of Albanian pea (Pisum sativum L.) landraces assessed by morphological traits and molecular markers. Czech J Genet Plant Breed 50(2):177–184. https://doi.org/10.17221/227/2013-cjgpb
Glaszmann JC, Kilian B, Upadhyaya HD, Varshney RK (2010) Accessing genetic diversity for crop improvement. Curr Opin Plant Biol 13:167–173. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pbi.2010.01.004
Griffiths S, Dunford RP, Coupland G, Laurie DA (2003) The evolution of CONSTANS-like gene families in barley, rice, and Arabidopsis. Plant Physiol 131:1855–1867. https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.102.016188
Guilioni L, Wery J, Tardieu F (1997) Heat stress-induced abortion of buds and flowers in pea: is sensitivity linked to organ age or to relations between reproductive organs? Ann Bot 80:159–168. https://doi.org/10.1006/anbo.1997.0425
Guilioni L, Wéry J, Lecoeur J (2003) High temperature and water deficit may reduce seed number in field pea purely by decreasing plant growth rate. Funct Plant Biol 30:1151–1164. https://doi.org/10.1071/FP03105
Hanci F (2019) Genetic variability in peas (Pisum sativum L.) from Turkey asssessed with molecular and morphological markers. Folia Hortic 31(1):101–116. https://doi.org/10.2478/fhort-2019-0007
Huang S, Gali KK, Tar’an B, Warkentin TD, Bueckert RA (2017) Pea phenology: crop potential in a warming environment. Crop Sci 57(3):1540–1551. https://doi.org/10.2135/cropsci2016.12.0974
Huang M, Liu X, Zhou Y, Summers RM, Zhang Z (2018) BLINK: a package for the next level of genome-wide association studies with both individuals and markers in the millions. Gigascience 8:1–12. https://doi.org/10.1093/gigascience/giy154
IPCC (2014) Climate change 2014: synthesis report. Geneva, Switzerland
Jiang Y, Lahlali R, Karunakaran C, Kumar S, Davis AR et al (2015) Seed set, pollen morphology and pollen surface composition response to heat stress in field pea. Plant Cell Environ 38:2387–2397. https://doi.org/10.1111/pce.12589
Jiang Y, Lindsay DL, Davis AR, Wang Z, MacLean DE et al (2019) Impact of heat stress on pod-based yield components in field pea (Pisumsativum L). J Agron Crop Sci 00:1–14. https://doi.org/10.1111/jac.12365
Keneni G, Jarso M, Wolabu T, Dino G (2005) Extent and pattern of genetic diversity for morpho-agronomic traits in Ethiopian highland pulse landraces: I. Field pea (Pisum sativum L). Genet Resour Crop Evol 52(5):539–549. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10722-003-6016-6
Keneni G, Jarso M, Wolabu T (2007) Eco-geographic distribution and microcenters of genetic diversity in faba bean (Vicia Faba L.) and field pea (Pisum Sativum L.) germplasm collections from Ethiopia. East Afr J Sci 1(1):10–24
Kim S, Plagnol V, Hu TT, Toomajian C, Clark RM et al (2007) Recombination and linkage disequilibrium in Arabidopsis thaliana. Nat Genet 39(9):1151–1155. https://doi.org/10.1038/ng2115
Korte A, Farlow A (2013) The advantages and limitations of trait analysis with GWAS: a review. Plant Methods 9:29. https://doi.org/10.1186/1746-4811-9-29
Kostaki K-I, Coupel-Ledru A, Bonnell VC, Gustavsson M, Sun P et al (2020) Guard cells integrate light and temperature signals to control stomatal aperture. Plant Physiol 182:1404–1419. https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.19.01528
Kreplak J, Madoui M, Cápal P, Novák P, Labadie K et al (2019) A reference genome for pea provides insight into legume genome evolution. Nat Genet 51:1411–1422. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41588-019-0480-1
Kuznetsov I, Davletov F, Anokhina N, Akhmadullina I, Safin F (2020) Influence of weather condtion on the field peas (Pisumsativum L. ssp. sativum) vegetation period and yield. Agron Res 18(2):472–482. https://doi.org/10.15159/AR.20.154
Li W, Wang P, Zhao H, Sun X, Yang T et al (2021) QTL for main stem node number and its response to plant densities in 144 soybean FW-RILs. Front Plant Sci 12:666796. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2021.666796
Liang Y, Ma F, Zhang R, Li W, Dang J et al (2023) Genome-wide identification and characterization of tomato 14-3-3 (SlTFT) genes and functional analysis of SlTFT6 under heat stress. Physiol Plant 175(2):e13888. https://doi.org/10.1111/ppl.13888
Lipka AE, Tian F, Wang Q, Peiffer J, Li M et al (2012) GAPIT: genome association and prediction integrated tool. Bioinformatics 28(18):2397–2399. https://doi.org/10.1093/bioinformatics/bts444
Lo S, Muñoz-amatriaín M, Boukar O, He I, Cisse N et al (2018) Identification of QTL controlling domestication-related traits in cowpea (Vigna unguiculata L. Walp). Sci Rep 8:6261. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-018-24349-4
Mahfouz MM (2010) RNA-directed DNA methylation: mechanisms and functions. Plant Signal Behav 5(7):806–816. https://doi.org/10.4161/psb.5.7.11695
Martin-Sanz A, Caminero C, Jing R, Flavell AJ, Perez de la M (2011) Genetic diversity among Spanish pea (Pisum sativum L.) landraces, pea cultivars and the World Pisum sp. core collection assessed by retrotransposon-based insertion polymorphisms (RBIPs). Span J Agric Res 9(1):166–178. https://doi.org/10.5424/sjar/20110901-214-10
Mather KA, Caicedo AL, Polato NR, Olsen KM, Mccouch S et al (2007) The extent of linkage disequilibrium in rice (Oryza sativa L). Genetics 177:2223–2232. https://doi.org/10.1534/genetics.107.079616
Mohapatra C, Chand R, Tiwari JK, Singh AK (2020) Effect of heat stress during flowering and pod formation in pea (Pisum sativum L.). Physiol. Mol Biol Plants 26(6):1119–1125. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12298-020-00803-4
National Library of Medicine (US) (2004) National Center for Biotechnology Information. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/gene/127120441/ Accessed 5 Dec 2023.
NOAA (2023) Monthly global climate report for annual 2022. National Centers for Environmental Information. https://www.ncei.noaa.gov/access/monitoring/monthly-report/global/202213. Accessed 2 June 2023
Pokotylo I, Pejchar P, Potocky M, Kocourková D, Krcková Z et al (2013) Progress in lipid research the plant non-specific phospholipase C gene family. Novel competitors in lipid signalling. Prog Lipid Res 52:62–79. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plipres.2012.09.001
Powers S, Boatwright JL, Thavarajah D (2021) Genome-wide association studies of mineral and phytic acid concentrations in pea (Pisum sativum L.) to evaluate biofortification potential. G3 genes, genomes. Genet 11(9):jkab227. https://doi.org/10.1093/g3journal/jkab227
Pritchard JK, Stephens M, Donnelly P (2000) Inference of population structure using multilocus genotype data. Genetics 155:945–959
Qin W, Yu Y, Jin Y, Wang X, Liu J et al (2018) Genome-wide analysis elucidates the role of CONSTANS-like genes in stress responses of cotton. Int J Mol Sci 19:2658. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms19092658
Remington DL, Thornsberry JM, Matsuoka Y, Wilson LM, Whitt SR et al (2001) Structure of linkage disequilibrium and phenotypic associations in the maize genome. PNAS 98(20):11479–11484
Rispail N, Wohor OZ, Osuna-Caballero S, Barilli E, Rubiales D (2023) Genetic diversity and population structure of a wide Pisum spp. core collection. Int J Mol Sci 24:2470. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijms24032470
Rostoks N, Ramsay L, Mackenzie K, Cardle L, Bhat PR et al (2006) Recent history of artificial outcrossing facilitates whole-genome association mapping in elite inbred crop varieties. PNAS 103(49):18656–18661. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0606133103
RStudio Team (2022) R: A language and environment for statistical computing. https://www.r-project.org/
Singh VK, Jain M, Garg R (2015) Genome-wide analysis and expression profiling suggest diverse roles of GH3 genes during development and abiotic stress responses in legumes. Front Plant Sci 5:789. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2014.00789
Stansell Z, Hyma K, Fresnedo-ramírez J, Björkman T, Hua J (2018) Genotyping-by-sequencing of Brassica oleracea vegetables reveals unique phylogenetic patterns, population structure and domestication footprints. Hortic Res 5:38. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41438-018-0040-3
Stone JM, Walker JC (1995) Plant protein kinase families and signal transduction. Plant Physiol 108:451–457. https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.108.2.451
Su J, Zhang F, Chong X, Song A, Guan Z et al (2019) Genome-wide association study identifies favorable SNP alleles and candidate genes for waterlogging tolerance in chrysanthemums. Hortic Res 6:21. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41438-018-0101-7
Tafesse EG, Warkentin TD, Bueckert RA (2019) Canopy architecture and leaf type as traits of heat resistance in pea. Field Crop Res 241:107561. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2019.107561
Teshome A, Bryngelsson T, Dagne K, Geleta M (2015) Assessment of genetic diversity in Ethiopian field pea (Pisum sativum L.) accessions with newly developed EST-SSR markers. BMC Genet 16:102. https://doi.org/10.1186/s12863-015-0261-5
Thirumalai K, DInezio PN, Okumura Y, Deser C (2017) Extreme temperatures in Southeast Asia caused by El Ninõ and worsened by global warming. Nat Commun 8:15531. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms15531
Uffelmann E, Huang QQ, Munung NS, de Vries J, Okada Y et al (2021) Genome-wide association studies. Nat Rev Methods Prim 1:59. https://doi.org/10.1038/s43586-021-00056-9
Villa TCC, Maxted N, Scholten M, Ford-Lloyd B (2005) Defining and identifying crop landraces. Plant Genet Resour 3(3):373–384. https://doi.org/10.1079/pgr200591
Wahid A, Gelani S, Ashraf M, Foolad MR (2007) Heat tolerance in plants: an overview. Environ Exp Bot 61:199–223. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.envexpbot.2007.05.011
Waluyo B, Saptadi D, Zanetta CU (2019) Diversity and genetic potential of Indonesia pea (Pisumsativum L.) landrace based on morphological traits in lowlands. Trans Persat Genet Malays 10:13–19
Wang Q, Yan C, Fu Y, Wang Y, Jiang P et al (2023) Genome-wide identification of 14-3-3 gene family reveals their diverse responses to abiotic stress by interacting with StABI5 in potato (Solanum tuberosum L.). Front. Plant Sci 13:1090571. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2022.1090571
Wang X, Yao X, Zhao A, Yang M, Zhao W et al (2021) Phosphoinositide–specific phospholipase C gene involved in heat and drought tolerance in wheat (Triticum aestivum L). Genes Genom 43(10):1167–1177. https://doi.org/10.1007/s13258-021-01123-x
Weller JL, Reid JB, Taylor SA, Murfet IC (1997) The genetic control of flowering in pea. Trends Plant Sci 2(11):412–418. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1360-1385(97)01127-8
Wright S (1965) The interpretation of population structure by F-statistics with special regard to systems of mating. Evol (N Y) 19:395–420
Xu Y, Li P, Yang Z, Xu C (2017) Genetic mapping of quantitative trait loci in crops. Crop J 5:175–184. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cj.2016.06.003
Yu J, Buckler ES (2006) Genetic association mapping and genome organization of maize. Curr Opin Biotechnol 17:155–160. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.copbio.2006.02.003
Zanetta CU, Rafii MY, Jaafar JN, Warkentin TD, Waluyo B et al (2023) Variability and assessment of interrelationships among yield and yield-related characters of pea accessions under the influence of high temperature. New Zeal J Crop Hortic Sci. https://doi.org/10.1080/01140671.2023.2180760
Zong X-X, Guan J-P, Wang S-M, Liu Q-C (2008) Genetic diversity among Chinese pea (Pisum sativum L.) landraces as revealed by SSR markers. Acta Agron Sin 34(8):1330–1338. https://doi.org/10.1016/S1875-2780(08)60045-0
Acknowledgements
We thank Carmen Breitkreutz, Pulse Crop Breeding staff of the Crop Development Centre, University of Saskatchewan, for her technical assistance during the laboratory work.
Funding
This work was sponsored by DAAD (The German Academic Exchange Service) under In-Country/In-Region scholarship program at SEAMEO SEARCA, 2019 (Grant Number 57454966). This work was also supported by Canadian Bureau for International Education under Canada-ASEAN Scholarships and Educational Exchanges for Development.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
All authors contributed to the study conception and design. Phenotyping, data analysis, and initial draft writing of the manuscript were done by C.U.Z. Plant material was provided by B.W. Genotyping was managed by K.K.G. and T.D.W. T.D.W., K.K.G., S.I.R., and B.W. reviewed and edited the manuscript. All authors approved the final version of this manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors declare no competing interests.
Additional information
Publisher’s Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Zanetta, C.U., Gali, K.K., Rafii, M.Y. et al. Dissecting genetic variation and association mapping for agro-morphological traits under high temperature stress in pea (Pisum sativum L.). Euphytica 220, 23 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10681-023-03279-x
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10681-023-03279-x