Abstract
Quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.) is an ancestral species from the Andean region, which is considered as a staple food for its populations. In Colombia, the crop has been gaining economic importance despite little information related to the varietal purity of cultivated materials. The department of Boyacá has a diversity of quinoas with potential for use, which can be an alternative for more productive crops. Thus, the objective of this research was to evaluate the yield and phenological aspects of 30 quinoa genetic materials in Boyacá and establish a selection index to differentiate them according to their yield. It was determined that the phenological cycle of the 30 genetic materials ranged between 144 and 189 days, the estimation of the yield components showed that the variables that contributed the most to the observed phenotypic variation were the panicle length, yield, seed diameter, and weight of 1000 seeds. Through the selection index, it was determined that the materials Quinua Primavera, Amarilla de Maranganí and Quinua Peruana, have the potential to increase productivity, since they present high yield, semi-late phenological cycle, large grain size and weight of 1000 seeds between 0.3 and 0.4 g. This research showed that phenotypic variables can be useful for the design of selection tools, oriented to the characteristics of agronomic importance and determined their usefulness to increase the efficiency of quinoa improvement programs.
Similar content being viewed by others
Availability of data and material
All the data used for the elaboration of this manuscript are available for your request.
References
Apaza Vidal, Cáceres G, Estrada R, Pinedo R (2013) Catálogo de variedades comerciales de quinua en el Perú. Organización de las Naciones Unidas para la Alimentación y la Agricultura.
Afiah S, Wafaa H, Al Kady A (2018) Assessment of six quinoa (Chenopodium Quinoa Willd.) genotypes for seed yield and its attributes under Toshka Conditions. Zagazig J Agric Res 45(6):2281–94.
Al-Naggar A, El-Salam R, Badran A, El-Moghazi M (2017) Heritability and interrelationships for agronomic, physiological and yield traits of quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.) under elevated water stress. Arch Curr Res Int 10(3):1–15. https://doi.org/10.9734/acri/2017/37215
Bazile D, Jacobsen SE, Verniau A (2016) The global expansion of quinoa: trends and limits. Front Plant Sci 7:1–6. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpls.2016.00622
Bertero HD (2003) Response of developmental processes to temperature and photoperiod in quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.). Food Rev Int 19(1–2):87–97. https://doi.org/10.1081/FRI-120018870
Bertero HD, De La Vega AJ, Correa G, Jacobsen S.E, Mujica A (2004) Genotype and genotype-by-environment interaction effects for grain yield and grain size of quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.) as revealed by pattern analysis of international multi-environment trials. Field Crops Res 89(2–3):299–318. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.fcr.2004.02.006
Bioversity International, Organización de las Naciones Unidas para la Agricultura y la Alimentación (FAO), Fundación PROINPA, Instituto Nacional de Innovación Agropecuaria y Forestal (INIAF), F. I. de D. A. (FIDA) (2013) Descriptores para quinua y sus parientes silvestres. Bioversity International p 52.
Bonifacio A (2019) Improvement of quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa willd.) and qañawa (Chenopodium pallidicaule Aellen) in the context of climate change in the high andes. Cien Inv Agr 46(2): 113–124. https://doi.org/10.7764/rcia.v46i2.2146
Chura E, Mujica Á, Haussmann B, Smith K, Flores S, Flores A (2019) Agronomic characterization of quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa willd.) progeny from close and distant self-fertilized s5 simple crosses. Cien Inv Agr 46(2):154–165. https://doi.org/10.7764/rcia.v46i2.2142
Cortés X, Rubiano A (2007) Caracterización de tres ecotipos de Quinua “Chenopodium quinoa Willd“ mediante técnicas agroecológicas, en dos zonas agroclimatologicamente diferentes del Departamento de Cundinamarca. Rev Inventum 2(2):89–101
De Santis G, D’Ambrosio T, Rinaldi M, Rascio A (2016) Heritabilities of morphological and quality traits and interrelationships with yield in quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.) genotypes in the Mediterranean environment. J Cereal Sci 70:177–185. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcs.2016.06.003
Delgado A, Palacios J, Betancourt C (2009) Evaluación de 16 genotipos de quinua dulce (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.) en el municipio de Iles, Nariño (Colombia). Agron Colomb 27(2): 159–167.
Di Rienzo JA, Casanoves F, Balzarini MG, Gonzalez L, Tablada M, Robledo CW (2020) InfoStat versión 2020. Centro de Transferencia InfoStat, FCA, Universidad Nacional de Córdoba, Argentina
Egli D (2017) Seed biology and the yield of grain crops. CABI, Wallingford
Escribano J, Cabanes J, Jiménez M, Ibañez M, Gómez LR, García F, Gandía F (2017) Characterization of betalains, saponins and antioxidant power in differently colored quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa) varieties. Food Chem 234:285–294. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.foodchem.2017.04.187
Fuentes F, Jellen E, Maughan P (2009) Diversidad genética y recursos genéticos para el mejoramiento de la quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd). Revista Geográfica de Valparaíso 42:20–33
García M, Roa D, Stechauner R, Molano F, Bazile D, Plazas N (2020a) Effect of temperature on the growth and development of quinoa plants (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.): a review on a global scale. Sylwan 165(5): 23. http://repositorio.unan.edu.ni/2986/1/5624.pdf
García M, Zurita A, Stechauner R, Roa D (2020b) Quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.) and its relationship with agroclimatic characteristics: A Colombian perspective. Chil J Agric Res 80(2):290–302. https://doi.org/10.4067/S0718-58392020000200290
García M, García J, Quito C (2019a) Efecto de la salinidad por NaCl en el crecimiento y desarrollo de plantas de Chenopodium quinoa Willd. Ciencia En Desarrollo, 10(1):19–29. https://doi.org/10.19053/01217488.v10.n1.2019.8341
García M, García J, Deaquiz Y (2019b) Physiological Performance of Quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.) under Agricultural Climatic Conditions in Boyaca, Colombia. Agron Colomb 37(2): 160–68.
García M, Leguizamón N (2018). La quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.) en los sistemas de producción agraria. Produccion y Limpia 13(1): 112–119. https://doi.org/10.22507/pml.v13n1a6
García M, García J, Melo D, Deaquiz Y (2017) Respuesta agronómica de la quinua (Chenopodium quinoa Willd) variedad dulce de Soracá a la fertilización en Ventaquemada-Boyacá. Cultura Científica 15:66–77
Josse J, Husson F (2016) missMDA: a package for handling missing values in multivariate data analysis. J Stat Softw 70(1):1–31
Kassambara A, Mundt F (2020) factoextra: Extract and Visualize the Results of Multivariate Data Analyses. (R package version 1.0.7).
Katwal T, Bazile D (2020) First adaptation of quinoa in the Bhutanese mountain agriculture systems. PLoS ONE 15(1):1–18. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0219804
Le S, Josse J, Husson F (2008) FactoMineR: an R package for multivariate analysis. J Stat Softw 25(1):1–18
MADR (2018). En los últimos 4 años, la quinua ha tenido un crecimiento de más del 150% en áreas de producción. Ministerio de Agricultira y Desarrollo Rural (MADR) de Colombia, Bogotá, Colombia. Available at https://www.minagricultura.gov.co/noticias/Paginas/En-los-últimos-4-años,-la-quinua-ha-tenidoun-crecimiento-de-más-del-150-en-áreas-de-producción-.aspx (accessed 7 Noviembre 2020).
Morillo A, Manjarres E, Morillo Y. (2020). Evaluación morfoagronómica de 19 materiales de Chenopodium quinoa en el Departamento de Boyacá. Biotecnología en el Sector Agropecuario y Agroindustrial 18(1): 84–96. https://doi.org/10.18684/bsaa.v18n1.1416
Reguera M, Conesa C, Gil A, Haros C, Pérez M, Briones V, Bolaños L, Bonilla I, Álvarez R, Pinto K, Mujica Á, Bascuñán L (2018) The impact of different agroecological conditions on the nutritional composition of quinoa seeds. PeerJ 18(3):1–20. https://doi.org/10.7717/peerj.4442
Salazar PA (2016) Rendimiento de quinua variedad “Salcedo INIA” (Chenopodium quinoa Willd) con cinco densidades de siembra bajo condiciones del valle de Huaral –Lima-2015. Universidad San Pedro.
Sellami M, Pulvento C, Lavini A (2021) Agronomic practices and performances of quinoa under field conditions: a systematic review. Plants 10(1):1–20. https://doi.org/10.3390/plants10010072
Sosa V, Brito V, Fuentes F, Steinfort U (2017) Phenological growth stages of quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa) based on the BBCH scale. Ann Appl Biol 171(1):117–124. https://doi.org/10.1111/aab.12358
Taiyun W, Simko V (2017) R package “corrplot”: Visualization of a Correlation Matrix (Version 0.84).
Tapia M, Canahua A, Ignacio S (2014) Razas de quinuas del Perú. ANPE-Perú, CONCYTEC, Lima, Perú., p 173
Team R (2020) R: A language and environment for statistical computing. R Foundation for Statistical Computing, Vienna, Austria
Torres J, Vargas H, Corredor G, Reyes L (2000) Caracterización morfoagronómica de diecinueve cultivares de quinua (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.) en la Sabana de Bogotá. Agronomia Colombiana 17(1–3): 60–68. https://revistas.unal.edu.co/index.php/agrocol/article/view/21547
Veloza C, Romero G, Gómez J (2016) Respuesta morfoagronómica y calidad en proteína de tres accesiones de quinua (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.) en la sabana norte de Bogotá. Revista UDCA Actualidad & Divulgación Científica 19(2): 325–332. https://doi.org/10.31910/rudca.v19.n2.2016.86
Vilcacundo R, Hernández B (2017) Nutritional and biological value of quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.). Curr Opin Food Sci 14:1–6. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cofs.2016.11.007
Zurita A, Fuentes F, Zamora P, Jacobsen S, Schwember A (2014) Breeding quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.): Potential and perspectives. Mol Breed 34(1):13–30. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11032-014-0023-5
Acknowledgments
To the “Patrimonio Autónomo Fondo Nacional de Financiamiento para la Ciencia, la Tecnología y la Innovación Francisco José de Caldas- MinCiencias. Cód. 63924”, to the CIDE group “Competitividad, Innovación y Desarrollo Empresarial” the Faculty of Agricultural Sciences of the UPTC, to the Bioplasma group of the Faculty of Sciences of the UPTC and to the International Language Institute of the UPTC.
Funding
To the “Patrimonio Autónomo Fondo Nacional de Financiamiento para la Ciencia, la Tecnología y la Innovación Francisco José de Caldas- MinCiencias. Cód. 63924”.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
All authors EHMH, ACMC, ZZOP, ACC and DMAM conceived and designed research. EHMH and ACMC contributed reagents, materials, and analysis tools. EHMH and DMAM conducted and analyzed the experiments and data. EHMH, ACMC, ZZOP, ACC and DMAM contributed to data interpretation and manuscript preparation. All authors read and approved the manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflicts of interest
There is no conflict of interest between the authors of this manuscript (Letter attached).
Ethical approval
Not applicable.
Consent to participate
All the authors of this manuscript declare that we participated in the design and preparation of this manuscript (Letter attached).
Consent for publication
All authors authorize the publication of this manuscript (Letter attached).
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Manjarres-Hernández, E.H., Morillo-Coronado, A.C., Ojeda-Pérez, Z.Z. et al. Characterization of the yield components and selection of materials for breeding programs of quinoa (Chenopodium quinoa Willd.). Euphytica 217, 101 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10681-021-02837-5
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10681-021-02837-5