Skip to main content
Log in

Livable housing: representation of life in urban neighborhoods housing, Karaj Metropolis, Iran

  • Published:
Environment, Development and Sustainability Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In residential areas, livability entails high-quality life standards for citizens in all environment-related activities. As the smallest unit in an urban system, housing is a key variable of livability and a basic effective element in citizens' environment. Indeed, viewed as a basis for urban sustainability, livable housing relates to social, economic, physical and environmental aspects of life in an urban area. This study aims to evaluate housing livability at the level of neighborhoods and analyze the factors involved in it. The research population consists of 138 neighborhoods in the city of Karaj, Iran. The data analysis has been performed with a multi-criteria evaluation model and the geographic information system software along with weights and indices extracted from the classified maps of livable housing in the neighborhoods of the city. As the results of the study show, the neighborhoods in the city have different rates of livability and are thus heterogeneously aligned in this regard. Of all the neighborhoods, 51% are in good and very good conditions, 26% in average conditions and 22% in poor and very poor conditions, which shows the imbalanced distribution of livability factors through those neighborhoods. One of the applications of this study is to pay attention to the regeneration of neighborhoods with low levels of housing livability and to improve the physical and economic livability of housing in them, empowering neighborhoods with the aim of improving infrastructure facilities and services, benefiting from high per capita services and improving accesses to the center of neighborhoods.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

(Source: The authors)

Fig. 7
Fig. 8

(Source: The authors)

Fig. 9
Fig. 10

(Source: The authors)

Similar content being viewed by others

Data availability

The data used in this article are available. In the text of the article, the data related to the images (1.2.3.5.7.9) and Table (2.4.5.6) have been adjusted and analyzed with the raw data set in the repository to the link (mega.nz/file/YdhxWQ7C#oW5boDBRPXFV1E0HRnXnSedxAM-8 CPsSUagikRxgqM).

References

  • AIA. (2010). Promoting livable communities. (American Institute of Architects) Retrieved from www.aia.org.

  • Ahmed, N. O., El-Halafawy, A. M., & Amin, A. M. (2019). A critical review of urban livability. European Journal of Sustainable Development, 8(1), 165–182. https://doi.org/10.14207/ejsd.2019.v8n1p165

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Allen, N., & O’Donnell, G. (2020). Creating improved housing outcomes: Medium-density housing liveability and wellbeing literature review. BRANZ Study Report SR431. Judge Ford, New Zealand: BRANZ Ltd. ISSN: 1179–6197.

  • Amerio, A., Brambilla, A., Morganti, A., Agugli, A., Bianchi, D., Santi, F., Costantini, L., Odone, A., Costanza, A., Signorelli, C., Serafini, G., Amore, M., & Capolongo, S. (2020). COVID-19 lockdown: Housing built environment’s ects on mental health. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 17(5973), 1–10. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph17165973

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Antognelli, S., & Vizzari, M. (2016). LISAM: An open source GIS-based model for liveability spatial assessment. Peer-Reviewed Scientific Mega Journal. https://doi.org/10.7287/peerj.preprints.2133v2

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Aribigbola, A. (2008). Housing policy formulation in developing countries: Evidences of programme implementation from Akure, Ondo State Nigeria. Journal of Human Ecology, 23(2), 125–134.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Balsas, C. J. L. (2004). Measuring the livability of an urban centre: An exploratory study of key performance indicators. Planning Practice and Research, 19(1), 101–110. https://doi.org/10.1080/0269745042000246603

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bennett, J. (2010). New Zealand apartment living: Developing a liveability evaluation index. Master diss. Victoria University of Wellington, Wellington, New Zealand.

  • Berenger, V., & Verdier Chouchane, A. (2007). Multidimensional measures of well-being: Standard of living and quality of life across countries. World Development, 35(7), 1259–1276. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.worlddev.2006.10.011

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bo, F., Danlinb, Y., & Yaojunb, Z. (2019). The livable urban landscape: GIS and remote sensing extracted land use assessment for urban livability in Changchun Proper, China. Land Use Policy, 87(2019), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landusepol.2019.104048

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Carlsson, I., Frederiksen, S. O., & Gottfries, C. G. (2002). Quality of life and standard of living in a randomly selected group of psychiatrically disabled people in Sweden 2 years after a psychiatry reform. European Psychiatry, 17(4), 87–179.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Centre for Health Promotion. (2009). The quality of life model. Promotion. 2009. The Quality of Life Model, www.utoronto.ca/ch.

  • Chen, Z., Song, Y., He, Q., & Shen, F. (2018). Spatially explicit assessment on urban vitality: Case studies in Chicago and Wuhan. Sustainable Cities and Society. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2018.04.021

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Chiang, C., & Liang, J. (2013). An evaluation approach for livable urban environments. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 20, 5229–5242. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-013-1511-6

    Article  ADS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Christy, F., Raissa, G., Sihotang, S., & Wijaya, K. (2021). Critical analysis of urban livability measures based on the perspective of placemaking, the fifth international conference on indonesian architecture and planning IOP Conf. Series: Earth and Environmental Science. 764: 12–16. https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/764/1/012016.

  • Diener, E., & Suh, E. (1997). Measuring quality of life: Economic, social and subjective indicators. Social Indicators Research, 40, 189–216. https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1006859511756

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Drexhage, J., & Murphy, D. (2012). Sustainable development: From Brundtland to Rio 2012, 2010. United Nations.

    Google Scholar 

  • EIU, Economist Intelligence Unit. (2012). A summary of the livbility ranking and over view, Malaysian Journal of Environmental Management 8: 87–107.

  • EIU, Economist Intelligence Unit. (2014). A summary of the livability ranking and over View, EIU Malaysian Journal of Environmental Management, 8: 87–107.

  • Epley, D. R., & Menon, M. (2008). A method of assembling cross-sectional indicators into a community quality of life. Social Indicator Research, 88, 281–296. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-007-9190-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ezennia, I. S., & Hoskara, S. O. (2019). Exploring the severity of factors influencing sustainable affordable housing choice: Evidence from Abuja, Nigeria. Sustainability, 11(5792), 1–25. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11205792

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fan, Z., Wang, Y., & Feng, Y. (2021). Ecological livability assessment of urban agglomerations in Guangdong-Hong Kong-Macao Greater Bay Area. International Journal Environmental Research and Public Health, 18(13349), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijerph182413349

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fansuri, S., & Zainah, N. (2020). Enviromental housing planning with rainwater harvesting system as clean water resources using 3D in Sumenep regency. Journal of Physics: Conference Series, 1538(012029), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1088/1742-6596/1538/1/012029

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Federal Highway Administration. United States Department of Transportation. (2011). Smart growth and the FHWA. Retrieved from http://www.fhwa.dot.gov.

  • Galal, A. M., Elariane, S. A., & Abd-Elsattar, M. (2020). The effect of Syrians’ commercial activities on the livability of urban neighborhood centers-case study 6th of October City. Egypt. HBRC Journal, 16(1), 179–205. https://doi.org/10.1080/16874048.2020.1794214

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ghasemi, K., Hamzenejad, M., & Meshkini, A. (2018). The spatial analysis of the livability of 22 districts of Tehran Metropolis using multi-criteria decision-making approaches. Sustainable Cities and Society, 38, 382–404. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scs.2018.01.018

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gorener, A., Toker, K., & Uluçay, K. (2012). Application of combined SWOT and AHP: A case study for a manufacturing firm. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 58, 1525–1534. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2012.09.1139

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hovey, B. (2008). Review essay: In search of urban livability: CARL ABBOTT, Greater Portland: urban life and landscape in the Pacific Northwest. Journal of Urban History, 3(34), 552–561.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Howley, P., Scott, M., & Redmond, D. (2009). Sustainability versus Liveability: An investigation of neighbourhood satisfaction. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 52(6), 847–864.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Huang, L., Yana, L., & Wu, J. (2016). Assessing urban sustainability of Chinese megacities: 35 years after the economic reform and open-door policy. Landscape and Urban Planning, 145, 57–70. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.landurbplan.2015.09.005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ilesanmi, A. O. (2012). Housing, neighborhood quality and quality of life in public housing in Lagos, Nigeria. International Journal for Housing Science, 36(4), 231–240. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2016.05.198

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Janahi, H., Raman, S., & Zapata-Lancaster, G. (2018). Understanding the impact of the residential built environment design on inhabitants’ wellbeing. Paper presented at the ARCC-EAAE 2018 International Conference, Philadelphia, PA.

  • Jia, Y., Shen, J., Wang, H., Dong, G., & Sun, F. (2018). Evaluation of the spatiotemporal variation of sustainable utilization of water resources: Case study from Henan Province (China). Water Research, 10(5), 554. https://doi.org/10.3390/w10050554

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jomehpour, M. (2015). Assessing the livability of the new and old parts of Tehran, Municipality Districts 22 and 10 of Tehran. International Journal of Sustainable Development, 8(9), 87–96.

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones, C., & Newsome, D. (2015). Perth (Australia) as one of the world’s most liveable cities: A perspective on society, sustainability and environment. International Journal of Tourism Cities, 1(1), 18–35. https://doi.org/10.1108/IJTC-08-2014-0001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jun, L., & Yi, R. (2016). A case study in Xianning to evaluate the livability of small and medium-sized cities. International Conference on Industrial Informatics—Computing Technology, Intelligent Technology, Industrial Information Integration, 32, 332–336. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICIICII.2016.32

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kacprzyk, K., & Jain, L. C. (2015). Data preprocessing in data mining. Intelling System Reference Springer. http://www.springer.com/series/8578. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-10247-4

  • Kazana, V., & Kazaklis, A. (2009). Exploring quality of life concerns in the context of sustainable rural development at the local level: A Greek case study. Regional Environmental Change, 9(3), 209–219. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10113-008-0056-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kovacs-Gyori, A., Cabrera- Barona, P., Resch, B., Meha, M., & Blaschke, T. (2019). Assessing and representing livability through the analysis of residential preference. Sustainability. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11184934

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Larice, M. A. (2005).Great neighborhood: The livability and morphology of high density neighborhoods in North America.: PhD diss, University of California, Berekele.

  • Li, T., Dodson, J., & Sipe, N. (2017). Examining household relocation pressures from rising transport and housing costs an Australian case study. Transport Policy, 65, 106–113. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tranpol.2017.03.016

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li, F., Hu, D., Liu, X., Wang, R., Yang, W., & Paulussen, J. (2008). Comprehensive urban planning and management at multiple scales based on ecological principles: A case study in Beijing, China. The International Journal of Sustainable Development & World Ecology, 15(6), 524–533.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Li, W., & Yao, C. (2013). Trends of livability in the capital region of Taiwan. Asian Architecture and Building Engineering, 12(2), 293–300. https://doi.org/10.3130/jaabe.12.293

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Liang, X., Liu, Y., & Qiu, T. (2020). Livability assessment of urban communities considering the preferences of different age groups. Hindawi Complexity, 2020, 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1155/2020/8269274

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Lihu, P., Li, X., Qin, S., Zhang, Y., & Yan, H. (2020). A multi-agent model of changes in urban safety livability. Simulation: Transactions of the Society for Modeling and Simulation International. https://doi.org/10.1177/0037549719898762

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ling, O. G., & Yuen, B. (2010). World cities: Achieving liveability and vibrancy.

  • Lingjun, L., Yan, H., & Zong, H. (2009). The method of livable environmental evaluation based on remote sensing technology. International Forum on Information Technology and Applications, IEEE: Computer Society. https://doi.org/10.1109/IFITA.2009.571

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Litman, T. (2011). Sustainability and Livability: Summary of Definitions, Goals, Objectives, and Performance Indicators. Victoria Transport Policy Institute

  • Liu, J., Nijkamp, P., Huang, X., & Lin, D. (2017). Urban livability and tourism development in China: Analysis of sustainable development by means of spatial panel data. The Journal of Habitat International, 68, 1–9. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.habitatint.2017.02.005

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Liu, B. Z., & Wang, D. W. (2012). Research on the complexity of livable city standards and the construction of livable city. In: 2012 24th Chinese Control and Decision Conference (CCDC) (pp. 1788-1792). IEEE.

  • Lowe, M., Whitzman, C., Badland, H., Davern, M., Aye, L., Hes, D., Butterworth, I., & Giles-Corti, B. (2015). Planning healthy, liveable and sustainable cities: How can indicators inform policy? Urban Policy and Research, 33(2), 131–144. https://doi.org/10.1080/08111146.2014.1002606

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Luo, Q., Shu, H., Zhao, Z., Qi, R., & Huang, Y. (2022). Evaluation of community livability using gridded basic urban geographical data: A case study of Wuhan. International Journal of Geographical Information Science, 11(1), 38. https://doi.org/10.3390/ijgi11010038

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Marans, R. W. (2003). Understanding environmental quality through quality of life studies: The 2001 DAS and its use of subjective and objective indicators. Landscape and Urban Planning, 65, 73–83. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0169-2046(02)00239-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Marsal-Llacuna, M. L., Colomer-Llinàs, J., & Meléndez-Frigola, J. (2015). Lessons in urban monitoring taken from sustainable and livable cities to better address the smart cities initiative. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 90, 611–622. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2014.01.012

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mercer. Mercer quality of living survey. Available online: www.mercer.com/newsroom/2014-quality-of-living-survey.html (accessed on 4 April 2013).

  • Merriam-Webster. (2017). Livability. Available online: http://www.merriam-webster.com.

  • Mohit, M. A., & Sule, A. I. (2015). Liveability and low-income housing in Nigeria. Social and Behavioral Sciences, 222, 863–871. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2016.05.198

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Monocle. (2019). Quality of life survey: Top 25 cities, 2019 Retrieved from monocle.com/film/affairs/quality-of-life-survey-top-25-cities-2019.

  • Moreland City Council. (2018). The medium density housing movement. http://www.defign.co.nz/blog/the-medium-density-housing-movement-#.XJml0CIza73.

  • Mouratidis, K. (2018). Built environment and social well-being: How does urban form affect social life and personal relationships? Cities, 74, 7–20. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2017.10.020

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mouratidis, K. (2020). Commute satisfaction, neighborhood satisfaction, and housing satisfaction as predictors of subjective well-being and indicators of urban livability. Travel Behavior and Society, 21, 265–278. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tbs.2020.07.006

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nelson, A., & Schneider, F. (2018). Housing for de growth: Principles, models, challenges and opportunities. London, Routledge. Sciences (CML) at Leiden University, Netherlands

  • Newton, P. W. (2012). Liveable and sustainable? Socio-technical challenges for twenty-first-century cities. Journal of Urban Technology, 19(1), 81–102. https://doi.org/10.1080/10630732.2012.626703

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nirfalini Auli, D. (2016). A framework for exploring livable community in residential environment. case study: Public housing in Medan, Indonesia. Procedia Social and Behavioral Sciences, 234, 336–343. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.sbspro.2016.10.250

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Norouzian-Maleki, S., Bell, S., Hosseini, S. B., & Faizi, M. (2015). Developing and testing a framework for the assessment of neighbourhood liveability in two contrasting countries: Iran and Estonia. Ecological Indicators, 48, 263–271. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecolind.2014.07.033

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Okulicz-Kozaryn, A. (2011). City life: Rankings (livability) versus perceptions (satisfaction). Social Indicators Research, 110, 433–451. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-011-9939-x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Onnom, W., Tripathi, N., Nitivattananon, V., & Ninsawat, S. (2018). Development of a liveable city index (LCI) Using multi criteria geospatial modelling for medium class cities in developing countries. Sustainability. https://doi.org/10.3390/su10020520

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Owens, C. (2009). Challenges in evaluating livability in Vancouver, Canada.

  • Pacione, M. (2005). Urban geography: A global perspective. Routledge.

    Google Scholar 

  • Palagi, S., & Javernick-Will, A. (2020). Pathways to livable relocation settlements following disaster. Sustainability. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12083474

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pampanga, D. G., Rafee, M. M., & Johar, F. (2015). Appropriate urban livability indicators for metropolitan Johor, Malaysia via expert-stakeholder approach: A Delphi technique. International Journal of Built Environment and Sustainability, 2(4), 301–316. https://doi.org/10.11113/ijbes.v2.n4.98

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pandey, R. U., Garg, Y. K., & Bharat, A. (2013). Understanding qualitative conceptions of livability: An Indian perspective. International Journal of Research in Engineering and Technology, 2(12), 374–380.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Park, S., & Vlek, P. L. (2002). Environmental correlation of three-dimensional soil spatial variability: A comparison of three adaptive techniques. Geoderma, 109(1–2), 117–140. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0016-7061(02)00146-5

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  • Parker, J., & Simpson, G. D. (2018). Public green infrastructure contributes to city livability: A systematic quantitative review. Land, 7, 161–174. https://doi.org/10.3390/land7040161

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Patterson, M. (2020). Revitalization, transformation and the ‘Bilbao effect’: Testing the local area impact of iconic architectural developments in North America, 2000–2009. European Planning Studies. https://doi.org/10.1080/09654313.2020.1863341

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Paul, A., & Sen, J. (2018). Livability assessment within a metropolis based on the impact of integrated urban geographic factors (IUGFs) on clustering urban centers of Kolkat. Cities, 74, 142–150. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2017.11.015

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Portney, K. (2013). Taking sustainable cities seriously: Economic development, the environment, and quality of life in American Cities. MIT Press.

    Google Scholar 

  • Prochorskaite, A. (2015). An investigation of the ‘soft’ features of sustainable and healthy housing design: Exploring stakeholder preferences and their provision in new housing developments. PHD diss., Liverpool John Moores University.

  • Rafee Majid, M., Pampanga, D. G., Zaman, M., Ruslik, N., Medugu, I. N., & Amer, M. S. (2020). Urban livability indicators for secondary cities in Asean region. Planning Malaysia: Journal of the Malaysian Institute of Planners, 18(2), 261–272. https://doi.org/10.21837/pm.v18i13.791

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ruth, M., & Franklin, R. S. (2014). Livability for all? Conceptual limits and practical implications. Applied Geography, 49, 18–23. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apgeog.2013.09.018

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  • Safavi Sohi, M., Razavian, M. T., & Kohestani Faruj, G. (2014). What kinds of cities are livable? Case study: Tehran, neighborhood Darake. Advances in Environmental Biology, 8(11), 572–588.

    Google Scholar 

  • Saitluanga, B. L. (2013). Spatial pattern of urban livability in himalayan region: A case of Aizawl City. Social Indicators Research. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-013-0362-3

    Book  Google Scholar 

  • Seiedbaigi, S., Sarvar, R., & Faraji Rad, A. (2018). The role of urban management in the development of city culture and urbanization (case study: Ilam City). Journal of New Attitudes in Human Geography, 10(3), 304–287.

    Google Scholar 

  • Simpson, G. D., & Parker, J. (2018). Data on peer-reviewed papers about green infrastructure, urban nature, and city liveability. Data, 3(51), 1–11. https://doi.org/10.3390/data3040051

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Sirgy, J., & Cornwell, T. (2002). How neighbourhood features affect quality of life. Social Indicators Research, 59, 79–114.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Skalickya, V., & Cerpesb, I. (2019). Comprehensive assessment methodology for liveable residential environment. Cities, 94, 44–54. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2019.05.020

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Statistics New Zealand. (2015). Measuring housing quality: Potential ways to improve data collection on housing quality in New Zealand .Available from www.stats.govt.nz. ISBN 978–0–478–42945–9.

  • Stevens, Q. (2009). Broken public spaces in theory and in practice. TPR, 80(4–5), 371–391. https://doi.org/10.3828/tpr.2009.3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Subramanian, N., & Ramanathan, R. (2012). A review of applications of analytic hierarchy process in operations management. International Journal of Production Economics, 138, 215–241. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2012.03.036

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Szibbo, N. A. (2016). Assessing neighborhood livability: Evidence from LEED® for neighborhood development and new urbanist communities. Articulo Journal of Urban Research, 14, 1–24. https://doi.org/10.4000/articulo.3120

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tan, K. G., Chuah, H. Y., & Luu, N. T. D. (2018). A case study on malaysia and singapore: nexus amongst competitiveness cost of living, wages, purchasing power, and liveability. Competitiveness Review: An International Business Journal, 2018, 1–27. https://doi.org/10.1108/CR-09-2017-0062

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tan, K. G., & Kaur, S. (2016). Measuring Abu Dhabi’s liveability using the global liveable city index (GLCI). World Journal of Science, Technology and Sustainable Development, 13(3), 205–223. https://doi.org/10.1108/WJSTSD-11-2015-0054

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  • Tan, K. G., Tongxin Nie, T., & Baek, S. (2016). Empirical assessment on the liveability of cities in the Greater China Region. Competitiveness Review, 26(1), 2–24.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Tan, K. G., Woo, W. T., & Tan, B. S. (2014). A new instrument to promote knowledge-led growth: The global liveable cities index. International Journal Business Competition and Growth, 3(3), 174–188.

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Thapalia, R. (2006). Assessing building vulnerability for earthquake using field survey data and development control data, Master diss in ITC

  • United Nations Human Settlements Programme (UN-Habitat). (2012). Sustainable housing for sustainable cities: A policy framework for developing countries. First published in Nairobi in 2012 by UN-Habitat. Copyright © United Nations Human Settlements Programme 2012.

  • Van Kamp, I., Leidelmeijer, K., Marsman, G., & de Hollander, A. (2003). Urban environmental quality and human well-being. Landscape and Urban Planning, 65(1–2), 5–18. https://doi.org/10.1016/s0169-2046(02)00232-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Wang, J., Su, M., Chen, B., Chen, S., & Liang, C. (2011). A comparative study of Beijing and three global cities: A perspective on urban livability. Frontiers in Earth Science, 5(3), 323–329. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11707-011-0182-1

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Williams, C., & Millington, A. (2004). The diverse and costested meanings of sustainable development. The Geographical Journal, 170(2), 99–104. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.0016-7398.2004.00111.x

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Winston, N., & Eastaway, M. P. (2007). Sustainable housing in the urban context: International sustainable development indicator sets and housing. Social Indicators Research, 87(2), 211–221. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11205-007-9165-8

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • World Health Organization (WHO). (2018). Housing and health guidelines. ISBN 978–92–4–155037–6. Creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-sa/3.0/igo).

  • Zhan, D., Kwan, M. P., Zhang, W., Fan, J., Yu, J., & Dang, Y. (2018). Assessment and determinants of satisfaction with urban livability in China. Cities, 79, 92–101. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cities.2018.02.025

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Zhu, L., Guo, Y., Zhang, C., Jijun, M., Lei, J., Zhang, Y., & Tang, W. (2020). Assessing community-level livability using combined remote sensing and internet-based big geospatial data. Remote Sensing. https://doi.org/10.3390/rs1224402

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

This work is based upon research funded by Iran National Science Foundation (http://INSF.org) under Postdoctoral Research Project No. 99028877.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Abolfazl Meshkini.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Supplementary Information

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (DOCX 33 KB)

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Alipour, S., Meshkini, A. Livable housing: representation of life in urban neighborhoods housing, Karaj Metropolis, Iran. Environ Dev Sustain (2024). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-024-04552-2

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-024-04552-2

Keywords

Navigation