Abstract
Carbon emissions have caused serious environmental pollution, carbon emission reduction (CER) is attracting widespread attention. Many enterprises have not been very effective in CER because of the high cost of CER. Government subsidies and the cooperation of enterprises play an important role in promoting CER. To identify the optimal cooperative emission reduction strategy under cap-and-trade (C&T) and government subsidies, this paper constructs three models to study the behavioural choice of suppliers and manufacturers. First, a static evolutionary game model is constructed between suppliers and manufacturers, and evolutionary stable strategies (ESSs) are discussed. Then, two dynamic mechanisms, dynamic subsidies and dynamic cooperation mechanisms, are constructed and the ESSs of these two models are discussed. Finally, a numerical simulation of the model is conducted to analyse the impact of government subsidies, shared CER cost, CER costs and carbon pricing on the behaviour of suppliers and manufacturers under the three mechanisms. The results show that higher government subsidies can encourage manufacturers to participate in CER activities. Carbon pricing has an incentive effect on the manufacturer’s emission reduction behaviour, while has a negative effect on suppliers to cooperate in the three mechanisms. A relatively small cost-sharing ratio is a way to promote upstream and downstream cooperation to reduce emissions. The dynamic cooperation mechanism can be more powerful to promote manufacturers to CER than the dynamic subsidy mechanism. The results provide a theoretical basis for the implementation of CER, governments can formulate reasonable subsidies and C&T policies to enterprises and promote cooperation among supply chain members. Suppliers and manufacturers can implement reasonable decisions to CER and achieve a win–win situation.
Similar content being viewed by others
Data availability
The datasets generated during and/or analysed during the current study are available from the corresponding author on reasonable request.
References
Anser, M. K., et al. (2020). Identifying the carbon emissions damage to international tourism: Turn a blind eye. Sustainability, 12(5), 1937. https://doi.org/10.3390/su12051937
Awan, U. (2019). Impact of social supply chain practices on social sustainability performance in manufacturing firms. International Journal of Innovation and Sustainable Development, 13(2), 198–219. https://doi.org/10.1504/IJISD.2019.098996
Barari, S., Agarwal, G., W. C., et al. (2012). A Decision Framework for the Analysis of Green supply chain contracts: An evolutionary game approach. Expert Systems with Applications, 39(3), 2965–2976. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eswa.2011.08.158
Bernini, C., & Pellegrini, G. (2011). How are growth and productivity in private firms affected by public subsidy? Evidence from a regional policy. Regional Science and Urban Economics, 41(3), 253–265.
Cao, K., He, P., & Liu, Z. (2020). Production and pricing decisions in a dual-channel supply chain under remanufacturing subsidy policy and carbon tax policy. Journal of the Operational Research Society, 71(8), 1199–1215. https://doi.org/10.1080/01605682.2019.1605471
Cao, K., Xu, X., Wu, Q., et al. (2017). Optimal production and carbon emission reduction level under cap-and-trade and low carbon subsidy policies. Journal of Cleaner Production, 167, 505–513. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.07.251
Chai, Q., Xiao, Z., Lai, K., et al. (2018). Can carbon cap and trade mechanism be beneficial for remanufacturing? International Journal of Production Economics, 203, 311–321.
Chang, X., Xia, H., Zhu, H., et al. (2015). Production decisions in a hybrid manufacturing–remanufacturing system with carbon cap and trade mechanism. International Journal of Production Economics, 162, 160–173. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2015.01.020
Chen, J. Y., Dimitrov, S., & Pun, H. (2019). The impact of government subsidy on supply Chains’ sustainability innovation. Omega, 86, 42–58. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.omega.2018.06.012
Chen, T., Gozgor, G., Koo, C. K., et al. (2020). Does international cooperation affect CO2 emissions? Evidence from OECD countries. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 27(8), 8548–8556.
Chen, W., & Hu, Z. H. (2018). Using evolutionary game theory to study governments and manufacturers’ behavioral strategies under various carbon taxes and subsidies. Journal of Cleaner Production, 201, 123–141. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.08.007
Chen, X., & Hao, G. (2015). Sustainable pricing and production policies for two competing firms with carbon emissions tax. International Journal of Production Research, 53(21), 6408–6420. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2014.932928
Chen, Z., & Nie, P. (2016). Effects of carbon tax on social welfare: A case study of China. Applied Energy, 183, 1607–1615. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2016.09.111
Dai, X., & Cheng, L. (2015). The effect of public subsidies on corporate R&D investment: An application of the generalized propensity score. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 90, 410–419. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.techfore.2014.04.014
Fan, R., & Dong, L. (2018). The dynamic analysis and simulation of government subsidy strategies in low-carbon diffusion considering the behavior of heterogeneous agents. Energy Policy, 117, 252–262. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2017.12.003
Friedman, D. (1991). Evolutionary games in economics. Econometrica Journal of the Econometric Society, 59, 637–666.
Friedman, D. (1998). On economic applications of evolutionary game theory. Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 8(1), 15–43. https://doi.org/10.1007/s001910050054
Galinato, G. I., & Yoder, J. K. (2010). An integrated tax-subsidy policy for carbon emission reduction. Resource and Energy Economics, 32(3), 310–326. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.reseneeco.2009.10.001
Ghosh, D., & Shah, J. (2015). Supply chain analysis under green sensitive consumer demand and cost sharing contract. International Journal of Production Economics, 164, 319–329.
Giri, R. N., Mondal, S. K., & Maiti, M. (2019). Government intervention on a competing supply chain with two green manufacturers and a retailer. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 128, 104–121. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2018.12.030
Gui, H., Xue, J., Li, Y., & Chen, L. (2022). Research on carbon emissions reduction strategy considering government subsidy and free riding behavior. Environmental Engineering Science, 39(4), 329–341. https://doi.org/10.1089/ees.2021.0192
Hájek, M., Zimmermannová, J., Helman, K., et al. (2019). Analysis of carbon tax efficiency in energy industries of selected EU countries. Energy Policy, 134, 110955. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2019.110955
Han, X., Yang, Q., Shang, J., et al. (2017). Optimal strategies for trade-old-for-remanufactured programs: Receptivity, durability, and subsidy. International Journal of Production Economics, 193, 602–616. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2017.07.025
He, P., He, Y., & Xu, H. (2019). Channel structure and pricing in a dual-channel closed-loop supply chain with government subsidy. International Journal of Production Economics, 213, 108–123. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2019.03.013
Ji, J., Zhang, Z., & Yang, L. (2017). Carbon emission reduction decisions in the retail-/dual-channel supply chain with consumers’ preference. Journal of Cleaner Production, 141, 852–867. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.09.135
Ji, T., Xu, X., Yan, X., & Yu, Y. (2020). The production decisions and cap setting with wholesale price and revenue sharing contracts under cap-and-trade regulation. International Journal of Production Research, 58(1), 128–147. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2019.1641239
Kang, K., Zhao, Y., Zhang, J., et al. (2019). Evolutionary game theoretic analysis on low-carbon strategy for supply chain enterprises. Journal of Cleaner Production, 230, 981–994.
Keivanpour, S., Ait-Kadi, D., & Mascle, C. (2017). Automobile manufacturers’ strategic choice in applying green practices: Joint application of evolutionary game theory and fuzzy rule-based approach. International Journal of Production Research, 55(5), 1312–1335. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2016.1203077
Li, Y., Tong, Y., Ye, F., et al. (2020). The choice of the government green subsidy scheme: innovation subsidy vs product subsidy. International Journal of Production Research, 58(16), 4932–4946.
Li, Z., Pan, Y., Yang, W., et al. (2021b). Effects of government subsidies on green technology investment and green marketing coordination of supply chain under the cap-and-trade mechanism. Energy Economics, 101, 105426. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2021.105426
Li, Z., Pan, Y., Yang, W., Ma, J., & Zhou, M. (2021). Effects of government subsidies on green technology investment and green marketing coordination of supply chain under the cap-and-trade mechanism. Energy Economics. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.eneco.2021.105426
Liu, C., Huang, W., & Yang, C. (2017). The evolutionary dynamics of China’s electric vehicle industry–Taxes vs. subsidies. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 113, 103–122.
Liu, Y., Wang, D., & Xu, Q. (2020). A supply chain coordination mechanism with suppliers’ effort performance level and fairness concern. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 53, 0969–6989. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jretconser.2019.101950
Liu, Z. L., Anderson, T. D., & Cruz, J. M. (2012). Consumer environmental awareness and competition in two-stage supply chains. European Journal of Operational Research, 218(3), 602–613. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2011.11.027
Ma, J., Hou, Y., Wang, Z., et al. (2021). Pricing strategy and coordination of automobile manufacturers based on government intervention and carbon emission reduction. Energy Policy, 148, 111919. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2020.111919
Meng, Q., et al. (2021). Pricing policies of dual-channel green supply chain: Considering government subsidies and consumers’ dual preferences.”. Sustainable Production and Consumption, 26, 1021–1030. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.spc.2021.01.012
Mitra, S., & Webster, S. (2008). Competition in remanufacturing and the effects of government subsidies. International Journal of Production Economics, 111(2), 287–298. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2007.02.042
Pan, Y., Yang, W., Ma, N., et al. (2019). Game analysis of carbon emission verification: A case study from Shenzhen’s cap-and-trade system in China. Energy Policy, 130, 418–428. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2019.04.024
Perera, R. S. (2018). An evolutionary game theory strategy for carbon emission reduction in the electricity market. International Game Theory Review, 20(04), 1850008. https://doi.org/10.1142/S0219198918500081
Qiao, H., & Su, Q. (2021). Impact of government subsidy on the remanufacturing industry. Waste Management, 120, 433–447. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.wasman.2020.10.005
Ren, L., Zhou, S., Peng, T., et al. (2021). A review of CO2 emissions reduction technologies and low-carbon development in the iron and steel industry focusing on China. Renewable and Sustainable Energy Reviews. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.rser.2021.110846
Rezaee, A., Dehghanian, F., Fahimnia, B., et al. (2017). Green supply chain network design with stochastic demand and carbon price. Annals of operations research, 250(2), 463–485. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-015-1936-z
Shi, Y., Han, B., & Zeng, Y. (2020). Simulating policy interventions in the interfirm diffusion of low-carbon technologies: An agent-based evolutionary game model. Journal of Cleaner Production, 250, 119449. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.119449
Song, M., Wang, S., & Zhang, H. (2020). Could environmental regulation and R&D tax incentives affect green product innovation? Journal of Cleaner Production, 258, 120849. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2020.120849
Sun, H., Wan, Y., Zhang, L., et al. (2019). Evolutionary game of the green investment in a two-echelon supply chain under a government subsidy mechanism. Journal of Cleaner Production, 235, 1315–1326. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2019.06.329
Sun, H., & Yang, J. (2021). Optimal decisions for competitive manufacturers under carbon tax and cap-and-trade policies. Computers & Industrial Engineering. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.cie.2021.07244
Toptal, A., Özlü, H., & Konur, D. (2014). Joint decisions on inventory replenishment and emission reduction investment under different emission regulations. International Journal of Production Research, 52(1), 243–269. https://doi.org/10.1080/00207543.2013.836615
Usman, B., Zaman, K., Nassani, A. A., et al. (2022). The impact of carbon pricing, climate financing, and financial literacy on COVID-19 cases: Go-for-green healthcare policies. Environmental Science and Pollution Research, 29(24), 35884–35896. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11356-022-18689-y
Wang, C., Nie, P. Y., Peng, D. H., et al. (2016). Green insurance subsidy for promoting clean production innovation. Journal of Cleaner Production., 148, 111–117. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2017.01.145
Wang, J., Ma, R., Lu, X., et al. (2022). Emission reduction cooperation in a dynamic supply chain with competitive retailers. Environment, Development and Sustainability. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-021-02031-6
Wang, L., & Zheng, J. (2019). Research on low-carbon diffusion considering the game among enterprises in the complex network context. Journal of Cleaner Production, 210, 1–11. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.10.297
Wang, M., Wu, J., Kafa, N., et al. (2020). Carbon emission-compliance green location-inventory problem with demand and carbon price uncertainties. Transportation Research Part e: Logistics and Transportation Review, 142, 102038. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tre.2020.102038
Wang, M., Zhao, L., & Herty, M. (2019). Joint replenishment and carbon trading in fresh food supply chains. European Journal of Operational Research, 277(2), 561–573. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ejor.2019.03.004
Wang, Y., Chang, X., Chen, Z., et al. (2014). Impact of subsidy policies on recycling and remanufacturing using system dynamics methodology: A case of auto parts in China. Journal of Cleaner Production, 74, 161–171. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2014.03.023
Wang, Y., & Wang, F. (2021). Production and emissions reduction decisions considering the differentiated carbon tax regulation across new and remanufactured products and consumer preference. Urban Climate, 40, 100992. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.uclim.2021.100992
Wu, B., Liu, P., & Xu, X. (2017). An evolutionary analysis of low-carbon strategies based on the government–enterprise game in the complex network context. Journal of Cleaner Production., 141, 168–179. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.09.053
Wu, X. Y., Fan, Z. P., & Cao, B. B. (2020). Cost-sharing strategy for carbon emission reduction and sales effort: A nash game with government subsidy. Journal of Industrial & Management Optimization, 16(4), 1999–2027. https://doi.org/10.3934/jimo.2019040
Xu, L., Wang, C., Miao, Z., et al. (2019). Governmental subsidy policies and supply chain decisions with carbon emission limit and consumer’s environmental awareness. RAIRO-Operations Research, 53(5), 1675–1689. https://doi.org/10.1051/ro/2018094
Xu, X., Zhang, W., He, P., & Xu, X. (2017). Production and pricing problems in make-to-order supply chain with cap-and-trade regulation. Omega, 66, 248–257. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.omega.2015.08.006
Yang, H., & Chen, W. (2018). Retailer-driven carbon emission abatement with consumer environmental awareness and carbon tax: Revenue-sharing versus Cost-sharing. Omega-International Journal of Management Science, 78, 179–191. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.omega.2017.06.012
Yang, X., He, L., Xia, Y., et al. (2019). Effect of government subsidies on renewable energy investments: The threshold effect. Energy Policy, 132, 156–166. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.enpol.2019.05.039
Yi, Y., & Li, J. (2018). The effect of governmental policies of carbon taxes and energy-saving subsidies on enterprise decisions in a two-echelon supply chain. Journal of Cleaner Production, 18, 675–691. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.01.188
Yin, Y., Aikawa, K., & Mizokami, S. (2016). Effect of housing relocation subsidy policy on energy consumption: A simulation case study. Applied Energy, 168, 291–302. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.apenergy.2016.01.068
Zhang, B., & Xu, L. (2013). Multi-item production planning with carbon cap and trade mechanism. International Journal of Production Economics, 144(1), 118–127. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2013.01.024
Zhang, S., Wang, C., & Yu, C. (2019). The evolutionary game analysis and simulation with system dynamics of manufacturer’s emissions abatement behavior under cap-and-trade regulation. Applied Mathematics and Computation, 355, 343–355. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.amc.2019.02.080
Zhao, J., Wei, J., & Li, Y. (2014). Pricing decisions for substitutable products in a two-echelon supply chain with firms׳ different channel powers. International Journal of Production Economics, 153, 243–252. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ijpe.2014.03.005
Zhao, L., & Zhang, J. (2014). Analysis of a duopoly game with heterogeneous players participating in carbon emission trading. Nonlinear Analysis: Modelling and Control, 19(1), 118–131.
Zhao, R., Zhou, X., Jin, Q., Wang, Y., & Liu, C. (2017). Enterprises’ compliance with government carbon reduction labelling policy using a system dynamics approach. Journal of Cleaner Production, 163, 303–319. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2016.04.096
Zhao, T., & Liu, Z. (2019). A novel analysis of carbon capture and storage (CCS) technology adoption: An evolutionary game model between stakeholders. Energy, 189, 116352. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.energy.116352
Zhi, B., Liu, X., Chen, J., et al. (2019). Collaborative carbon emission reduction in supply chains: An evolutionary game-theoretic study. Management Decision, 57(4), 1087–1107. https://doi.org/10.1108/MD-09-2018-1061
Zhou, Y., Hu, F., & Zhou, Z. (2018). Pricing decisions and social welfare in a supply chain with multiple competing retailers and carbon tax policy. Journal of Cleaner Production, 190, 752–777. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jclepro.2018.04.162
Acknowledgements
We sincerely thank the associate editor and two anonymous reviewers for their kind and helpful comments on this paper.
Funding
This work was supported by National Natural Science Foundation of China (71871002).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Contributions
Conceptualization, funding acquisition, methodology, project administration and supervision were performed by HS. The first draft of the manuscript was written by KW, and all authors commented on previous versions of the manuscript. Investigation and validation were performed by XD. All authors read and approved the final manuscript.
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Competing interests
The authors have no competing interests to declare that are relevant to the content of this article.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Appendix
Appendix
Proof of Proposition 4
The stability analysis is shown in follows: See Tables 10 and
Proof of Proposition 6
See Tables
12 and
Proof of Corollary 1.
Since \(- \beta_{2} \Pi_{m} - H > 0\), \(\left( { - \beta_{2} \Pi_{m} + y_{1}^{*} V_{m} - H} \right) > 0\), \(\left[ {\left( {1 + \beta_{1} - \beta_{2} } \right)\Pi_{m} - \Pi_{m1} + \lambda C_{0} } \right] > 0\),
Hence \(\frac{{\partial x_{D} }}{\partial \lambda }{ = }\frac{{\left( {\beta_{2} \Pi_{m} + H} \right)C_{0} }}{{\left[ {\Pi_{m1} - \left( {1 + \beta_{1} - \beta_{2} } \right)\Pi_{m} - \lambda C_{0} } \right]^{2} }} < 0\), \(\frac{{\partial x_{D} }}{\partial V} = - \frac{1}{{\Pi_{m1} - \left( {1 + \beta_{1} - \beta_{2} } \right)\Pi_{m} - \lambda C_{0} }} < 0\),
\(\frac{{\partial x_{1}^{*} }}{\partial V} = \frac{y - 1}{{\left( {1 + \beta_{1} - \beta_{2} } \right)\Pi_{m} - \Pi_{m1} + \lambda C_{0} }} < 0\), \(\frac{{\partial x_{1}^{*} }}{{\partial P_{C} }} = \frac{{E_{1} - E_{0} }}{{\left( {1 + \beta_{1} - \beta_{2} } \right)\Pi_{m} - \Pi_{m1} + \lambda C_{0} }} < 0\), \(\frac{{\partial y_{1}^{*} }}{\partial \lambda } = \frac{{ - \alpha_{2} \Pi_{s} C_{0} }}{{\left[ {\left( {1 + \beta_{1} - \beta_{2} } \right)\Pi_{m} - \Pi_{m1} + \lambda C_{0} } \right]^{2} }} < 0\).
\(\frac{{\partial y_{1}^{*} }}{{\partial C_{0} }}{ = }\frac{{ - \alpha_{2} \lambda \Pi_{s} }}{{\left[ {\left( {1 + \beta_{1} - \beta_{2} } \right)\Pi_{m} - \Pi_{m1} + \lambda C_{0} } \right]^{2} }} < 0\),
\(\frac{{\partial x_{2}^{*} }}{\partial V}{ = } - \sqrt {\left[ {\left( {1 + \beta_{1} - \beta_{2} } \right)\Pi_{m} - \Pi_{m1} } \right]^{2} - 4\lambda C_{0} \left( {\beta_{2} \Pi_{m} + H} \right)} < 0\),
\(\frac{{\partial x_{2}^{*} }}{{\partial P_{C} }} = \left( {E_{0} - E_{1} } \right)\sqrt {\left[ {\left( {1 + \beta_{1} - \beta_{2} } \right)\Pi_{m} - \Pi_{m1} } \right]^{2} - 4\lambda C_{0} \left( {\beta_{2} \Pi_{m} + H} \right)} < 0\),
\(\frac{{\partial y_{2}^{*} }}{\partial \lambda } = \frac{{\alpha_{2} \Pi_{s} \left[ {\left( {1 + \beta_{1} - \beta_{2} } \right)\Pi_{m} - \Pi_{m1} - \sqrt {\left[ {\left( {1 + \beta_{1} - \beta_{2} } \right)\Pi_{m} - \prod_{m1} } \right]^{2} - 4\lambda C_{0} \left( {\beta_{2} \Pi_{m} + H} \right)} } \right]}}{{2\lambda \left[ {\left( {1 + \alpha_{1} - \alpha_{2} } \right)\Pi_{s} - \Pi_{s1} - x_{D} \lambda C_{0} } \right]}} < 0\),
\(\frac{{\partial y_{2}^{*} }}{{\partial C_{0} }} = \frac{{\alpha_{2} \Pi_{s} \left[ {\left( {1 + \beta_{1} - \beta_{2} } \right)\Pi_{m} - \Pi_{m1} - \sqrt {\left[ {\left( {1 + \beta_{1} - \beta_{2} } \right)\Pi_{m} - \Pi_{m1} } \right]^{2} - 4\lambda C_{0} \left( {\beta_{2} \Pi_{m} + H} \right)} } \right]}}{{2C_{0} \left[ {\left( {1 + \alpha_{1} - \alpha_{2} } \right)\Pi_{s} - \Pi_{s1} - x_{D} \lambda C_{0} } \right]}} < 0\).
Rights and permissions
Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.
About this article
Cite this article
Sun, H., Wang, K. & Du, X. Cooperative emission reduction behaviour of supply chain enterprises under cap-and-trade and government subsidies. Environ Dev Sustain (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-023-03980-w
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10668-023-03980-w